心理理论与社会互动方式对初中生社会善念发展的影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.04.04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探讨初中生社会善念的发展特点及相关影响因素,实验1采用卡通插图范式和SoMi范式,以628名7~9年级初中生为被试,考察不同心理理论类型初中生的社会善念的发展;实验2使用社会互动情境和SoMi范式,以360名7~9年级初中生为被试,考察社会互动方式与反馈类型对不同年级初中生社会善念的影响。结果发现:(1)初中生的社会善念不存在年级和性别差异,但7年级中高情感心理理论初中生的社会善念显著多于高认知心理理论初中生;(2)7年级初中生在积极反馈条件下的社会善念较多,而8年级初中生在消极反馈条件下较多,9年级初中生在这两种条件下则不存在显著差异;(3)在合作情境中,初中生在积极反馈下的社会善念更多,而在竞争情境中,初中生在消极反馈下的社会善念更多。研究说明初中生的社会善念具有跨年龄和跨性别的稳定性,并且会受到心理理论、社会互动方式及反馈类型的影响。

关键词: 初中生, 社会善念, 心理理论, 社会互动方式, 反馈类型

Abstract: The present study examined the developmental characteristics and the relative factors that influenced social mindfulness in junior high school students. In Experiment 1, we investigated the development of social mindfulness in 628 junior high school students (7~9 grades) with different levels of theory of mind (ToM) by employing cartoon vignette and social mindfulness (SoMi) paradigms. In Experiment 2, we recruited 360 junior high school students (7~9 grades) and investigated the effects of the pattern of social interactions and feedback types on social mindfulness of students in different grades by adopting study paradigms of social interaction scenarios and SoMi. The results were as follows:(1) There were no age or gender differences in social mindfulness among the junior high school students, but the students with high level of emotional ToM showed more social mindfulness than those with high level of cognitive ToM in 7th grade; (2) The 7th grade students had more social mindfulness under the positive feedback condition, while the 8th grade students had more social mindfulness under the negative feedback condition. There was no significant difference between the two conditions for the 9th grade students; (3) In the cooperative situation, the junior high school students had more social mindfulness under the positive feedback, while in the competitive situation, they had more social mindfulness under the negative feedback. The present study implies that social mindfulness is stable across age and gender in junior high school students, but it is affected by theory of mind, the pattern of social interactions, and feedback types.

Key words: junior high school students, social mindfulness, theory of mind, pattern of social interactions, feedback type

中图分类号:

B844

严益霞, 刘颜蓥, 丁芳. 心理理论与社会互动方式对初中生社会善念发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 485-494.

YAN Yixia, LIU Yanying, DING Fang. The Effects of Theory of Mind and the Pattern of Social Interactions on the Development of Social Mindfulness in Junior High School Students[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(4): 485-494.

参考文献

Balliet, D., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2013). Trust, conflict, and cooperation:A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139(5), 1090-1112.
Batson, C. D. (1991).The altruism question:Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
Belschak, F. D., & Hartog, D. N. D. (2009). Consequences of positive and negative feedback:The impact on emotions and extra-role behaviors. Applied Psychology, 58(2), 274-303.
Boxer, P., Tisak, M. S., & Goldstein, S. E. (2004). Is it bad to be good?An exploration of aggressive and prosocial behavior subtypes in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33(2), 91-100.
Caprara, G. V., Kanacri, B. P. L., Zuffianò, A., Gerbino, M., & Pastorelli, C. (2015). Why and how to promote adolescents' prosocial behaviors:Direct, mediated and moderated effects of the CEPIDEA school-based program. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(12), 2211-2229.
Carlo, G., Crockett, L. J., Randall, B. A., & Roesch, S. C. (2007). A latent growth curve analysis of prosocial behavior among rural adolescents.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(2), 301-324.
Carlo, G., Hausmann, A., Christiansen, S., & Randall, B. A. (2003). Sociocognitive and behavioral correlates of a measure of prosocial tendencies for adolescents.Journal of Early Adolescence, 23(1), 107-134.
Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. (2002).Psychological testing and assessment:An introduction to tests and measurement (5th ed.). New York:McGraw-Hill.
Damon, W., & Hart, D. (1992). Self-understanding and its role in social and moral development. In M. H. Bornstein & M. E. Lamb (Eds.),Developmental psychology:An advanced textbook (3rd ed., pp. 421-464). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
Eisenberg, N., Murphy, B., & Shepard, S. (1997). The development of empathic accuracy. In W. Ickes (Ed.),Empathic accuracy (pp. 73-116). New York:Guilford Press.
Happé, F. G., Winner, E., & Brownell, H. (1998). The getting of wisdom:Theory of mind in old age. Developmental Psychology, 34 (2), 358-362.
Hein, G., Silani, G., Preuschoff, K., Batson, C. D., & Singer, T. (2010). Neuralresponses to ingroup and outgroup members' suffering predict individual differences in costly helping. Neuron, 68(1), 149-160.
Jacobs, J. E., Vernon, M. K., & Eccles, J. S. (2004). Relations between social self-perceptions, time use, and prosocial or problem behaviors during adolescence.Journal of Adolescent Research, 19(1), 45-62.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1975). Learning together and alone:Cooperation, competition and individualization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
Kanacri, B. P. L., Pastorelli, C., Eisenberg, N., Zuffianò, A., & Caprara, G. V. (2013). The development of prosociality from adolescence to early adulthood:The role of effortful control. Journal of Personality, 81(3), 302-312.
Karniol, R. (1995). Developmental and individual differences in predicting others' thoughts and feelings:Applying the transformation rule model. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology:Vol. 15.Social development (pp. 27-48). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
Laninga-Wijnen, L., Harakeh, Z., Dijkstra, J. K., Veenstra, R., & Vollebergh, W. (2018). Aggressive and prosocial peer norms:Change, stability, and associations with adolescent aggressive and prosocial behavior development.The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(2),178-203.
Magnusson, D. (1990). Personality development from an interactional perspective. In L. Pervin (Ed.),Handbook of personality (pp. 193-222). New York:Guilford Press.
Mischkowski, D., Thielmann, I., & Glöckner, A. (2018). Think it through before making a choice?Processing mode does not influence social mindfulness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 74, 85-97.
Nantel-Vivier, A., Kokko, K., Caprara, G. V., Pastorelli, C., Gerbino, M. G., Paciello, M., … Tremblay, R. E. (2009). Prosocial development from childhood to adolescence:A multi-informant perspective with Canadian and Italian longitudinal studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(5), 590-598.
O' Brien, E. d., Konrath, S. H., Grühn, D., & Hagen, A. L. (2013). Empathic concern and perspective taking:Linear and quadratic effects of age across the adult life span. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(2), 168-175.
Paal, T, & Bereczkei, T. (2007). Adult theory of mind, cooperation, Machiavellianism:The effect of mindreading on social relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(3), 541-551.
Pearl, R. (1985). Children's understanding of others' need for help:Effects of problem explicitness and type. Child Development, 56(3), 735-745.
Rusbult, C. E., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2003). Interdependence, interaction, and relationships. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 351-375.
Russell, A., Hart, C. H., Robinson, C. C., & Olsen, S. F. (2003). Children's sociable and aggressive behaviour with peers:A comparison of the United States and Australia, and contributions of temperament and parenting style. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(1), 74-86.
Sebastian, C. L., Fontaine, N. M. G., Bird, G., Blakemore, S. J., de Brito, S. A., McCrory, E. J. P., & Viding, E. (2012). Neural processing associated with cognitive and affective theory of mind in adolescents and adults. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(1), 53-63.
Shamay-Tsoory, S.G., Harari, H., Aharon-Peretz, J., & Levkovitz, Y. (2010).The role of the orbitofrontal cortex in affective theory of mind deficits in criminal offenders with psychopathic tendencies.Cortex, 46(5), 668-677.
Vallerand, R. J., & Reid, G. (1988). On the relative effects of positive and negative verbal feedback on males' and females' intrinsic motivation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 20(3), 239-250.
van der Graaff, J., Carlo, G., Crocetti, E., Koot, H. M., & Branje, S. (2018). Prosocial behavior in adolescence:Gender differences in development and links with empathy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(5), 1086-1099.
van Doesum, N. J., van Lange, D. A. W., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2013). Social mindfulness:Skill and will to navigate the social world.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(1), 86-103.
van Doesum, N. J., van Prooijen, J. W., Verburgh, L., & van Lange, P. A. M. (2016). Social hostility in soccer and beyond. PLoS ONE, 11(4), e0153577.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153577
van Lange, P. A., Balliet, D., Parks, C. D., & Vugt, M. V. (2014).Social dilemmas:The psychology of human cooperation. New York:Oxford University Press.
van Lange, P. A. M., & van Doesum, N. J. (2015). Social mindfulness and social hostility. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 18-24.
陈武英, 卢家楣, 刘连启, 林文毅. (2014). 共情的性别差异. 心理科学进展, 22(9), 1423-1434.
丁芳, 郭勇. (2010). 儿童心理理论、移情与亲社会行为的关系. 心理科学, 33(3), 660-662.
窦凯, 刘耀中, 王玉洁, 聂衍刚. (2018). "乐"于合作:感知社会善念诱导合作行为的情绪机制. 心理学报, 50(1), 101-114.
窦凯, 聂衍刚, 王玉洁, 刘耀中. (2018). 信任还是设防?互动博弈中社会善念对合作行为的促进效应. 心理科学, 41(2), 390-396.
窦凯, 聂衍刚, 王玉洁, 张庆鹏. (2017). 人际互动中的社会善念:概念、测评及影响机制. 心理学进展, 7(9), 1101-1112.
方晓义, 王耘, 白学军. (1992). 儿童合作与竞争行为发展研究综述. 心理发展与教育, 8(1), 38-42.
何先友. (2016). 青少年发展与教育心理学(第2版). 北京:高等教育出版社.
李寒梅, 于海东. (2006). 试论青少年的自我与自我认同. 山东教育学院学报, 21(5), 7-9.
李洪, 赛李阳, 傅根跃, 马伟娜. (2018). 竞争/合作情境下大学生自我提升的特点及其适应价值. 杭州师范大学学报(自然科学版), 17(2), 128-135.
林崇德. (2018). 发展心理学 (第三版). 北京:人民教育出版社.
刘世奎. (1992). 课堂情境中学生竞争对其成就归因和成就行为的影响. 心理学报, 24(2), 182-189.
托马斯, R. M. (2009). 儿童发展理论:比较的视角(第六版) (郭本禹, 王云强等译). 上海:上海教育出版社.
沃建中, 林崇德, 马红中, 李峰. (2001). 中学生人际关系发展特点的研究. 心理发展与教育, 17(3), 9-15.
吴燕, 徐建平. (2007). 初中生诚实性测验中社会赞许反应研究. 心理发展与教育, 23(3), 107-111.
张梦圆, 杨莹, 寇彧. (2015). 青少年的亲社会行为及其发展. 青年研究, (4), 10-18.
周国韬, 贺岭峰. (1996). 11~15岁学生自我概念的发展. 心理发展与教育, 12(3), 37-42.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	刘艳春, 邓玉婷, 张曦. 智力障碍儿童对不同对象的分享行为：心理理论的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 160-168.
[2]	秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响：同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[3]	吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[4]	陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[5]	周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[6]	冯全升, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 张艳红, 连帅磊. 负性生活事件与初中生内化问题:反刍思维的中介作用与同伴依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 419-428.
[7]	刘志国, 齐冰, 李亚平, 王润洲, 崔佳, 宋耀武. 成就目标定向在学业自我概念与学业成绩关系中的调节作用:基于内/外参照模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 68-76.
[8]	肖雪, 郭磊, 赵永萍, 陈富国. 累积生态风险与初中生受欺凌的关系模式：心理弹性的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 648-657.
[9]	李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[10]	葛国宏. 成人依恋与心理理论的关系:认知融合与经验性回避的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 223-235.
[11]	周宗奎, 曹敏, 田媛, 黄淳, 杨秀娟, 宋友志. 初中生亲子关系与抑郁:自尊和情绪弹性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 864-872.
[12]	任萍, 魏一, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 王璇. 受欺负对抑郁情绪的影响:悲伤、愤怒反刍的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 873-881.
[13]	吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.
[14]	赖燕群, 连榕, 杨琪, 牛更枫. 家庭功能与初中生欺负行为:有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 727-734.
[15]	肖雪, 刘璐, 刘丽莎, 徐良苑, 张旭然, 李燕芳. 内群体偏爱与儿童基于贡献的分配公平性:心理理论的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 498-507.