个人取向勇气对中学生学业成就的影响:问题解决和求助应对方式的中介作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.01.08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用整群抽样法选取山西、云南、重庆地区的1100名中学生作为研究对象，通过心理量表和学科测验获取其个人取向勇气、应对方式、学业成就的数据，探讨个人取向勇气对中学生学业成就的影响及其中介机制。结构方程建模结果表明：中学生的个人取向勇气与学业成就之间显著正相关，问题解决应对方式、求助应对方式在个人取向勇气影响中学生学业成就的过程中起中介作用。研究结果揭示了勇气水平较高的中学生更倾向采用问题解决和求助两种应对方式，从而取得较大的学业成就，这对中学教育工作者开展勇气品格培养和学业成就提升的教育实践有重要启示。

关键词: 中学生, 个人取向勇气, 学业成就, 应对方式

Abstract: A total of 1100 middle school students from Shanxi, Yunnan and Chongqing were selected as participants with cluster sampling. Psychological scales and subject tests were used to obtain the data of their individually-oriented courage, coping style and academic achievement in order to explore the influence of individually-oriented courage on the participants' academic achievement and its mediating effect. The results of structural equation model showed that:(1) there was a significant positive correlation between middle school students' individually-oriented courage and academic achievement; (2) problem-solving and help-seeking coping styles played an mediating role in the process of individually-oriented courage' influence on their academic achievement. This research revealed that middle school students with higher courage tended to achieve greater academic achievement by problem-solving and help-seeking coping styles, which had important implications for educators in developing middle school students' courage and improving their academic achievement.

Key words: middle school students, individually-oriented courage, academic achievement, coping style

中图分类号:

G442

程翠萍, 黄希庭. 个人取向勇气对中学生学业成就的影响:问题解决和求助应对方式的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 60-67.

CHENG Cuiping, HUANG Xiting. The Influence of Individually-oriented Courage on Middle School Students' Academic Achievement: The Mediating Roles of Problem-solving and Help-seeking Coping Styles[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(1): 60-67.

参考文献

Akgun, S., & Ciarrochi, J. (2003). Learned resourcefulness moderates the relationship between academic stress and academic performance.Educational Psychology, 23(3), 287-294.
Alumran, J. I., & Punamäki, R. L. (2008). Relationship between gender, age, academic achievement, emotional intelligence, and coping styles in Bahraini adolescents.Individual Differences Research, 6(2), 104-119.
Armstrong, K., Best, S., & Domenici, P. (2006). Courage after fire:Coping strategies for troops returning from Iraq and Afghanistan and their families. Berkley, CA:Ulysses Press.
Arsenio, W. F., & Loria, S. (2014). Coping with negative emotions:Connections with adolescents' academic performance and stress.The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 175(1), 76-90.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Biswas-Diener, R. (2012). The courage quotient:How science can make you braver. San Francisco:John Wiley.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2003). Personality predicts academic performance:Evidence from two longitudinal university samples.Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 319-338.
Coolbrandt, A., & Grypdonck, M. H. (2010). Keeping courage during stem cell transplantation:A qualitative research.European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 14(3), 218-223.
Crockett, L. J., Schulenberg, J. E., & Petersen, A. C. (1987). Congruence between objective and self-report data in a sample of young adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2(4), 383-392.
De laFuente, J., Fernández-Cabezas, M., Cambil, M., Vera, M. M., González-Torres, M. C., & Artuch-Garde, R. (2017). Linear relationship between resilience, learning approaches, and coping strategies to predict achievement in undergraduate students. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1039.
Gustems-Carnicer, J., & Calderón, C. (2016). Virtues and character strengths related to approach coping strategies of college students.Social Psychology of Education, 19(1), 77-95.
Kern, M. L., & Bowling, D. S. (2015). Character strengths and academic performance in law students.Journal of Research in Personality, 55, 25-29.
Konter, E., & Toros, T. (2013). Courage and performance in soccer.International Journal of Academic Research, 5(4), 276-282.
Lounsbury, J. W., Fisher, L. A., Levy, J. J., & Welsh, D. P. (2009). An investigation of character strengths in relation to the academic success of college students. Individual Differences Research, 7(1), 52-69.
MacCann, C., Fogarty, G. J., Zeidner, M., & Roberts, R. D. (2011). Coping mediates the relationship between emotional intelligence (EI) and academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 60-70.
Maddi, S. R. (2006). Hardiness:The courage to grow from stresses.The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(3), 160-168.
Magnano, P., Paolillo, A., Platania, S., & Santisi, G. (2017). Courage as a potential mediator between personality and coping.Personality and Individual Differences, 111, 13-18.
Malhotra, N. K., Kim, S. S., & Patil, A. (2006). Common method variance in IS research:A comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research.Management Science, 52(12), 1865-1883.
Martin, A. J. (2011). Courage in the Classroom:Exploring a New Framework Predicting Academic Performance and Engagement.School Psychology Quarterly, 26(2), 145-160.
Matsunaga, M. (2008). Item parceling in structural equation modeling:A primer.Communication Methods and Measures, 2(4), 260-293.
Newman, R. S. (2002). How self-regulated learners cope with academic difficulty:The role of adaptive help seeking.Theory into Practice, 41(2), 132-138.
Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2008). Positive psychology and character strengths:Application to strengths-based school counseling.Professional School Counseling, 12(2), 85-92.
Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance.Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322-338.
Pury, C. L., Kowalski, R. M., & Spearman, J. (2007). Distinctions between general and personal courage.The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2(2), 99-114.
Rate, C. R., Clarke, J. A., Lindsay, D. R., & Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Implicit theories of courage.The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2(2), 80-98.
Roesch, S. C., Duangado, K. M., Vaughn, A. A., Aldridge, A. A., & Villodas, F. (2010). Dispositionalhope and the propensity to cope:A daily diary assessment of minority adolescents. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 16(2), 191-198.
Saklofske, D. H., Austin, E. J., Mastoras, S. M., Beaton, L., & Osborne, S. E. (2012). Relationships of personality, affect, emotional intelligence and coping with student stress andacademic success:Different patterns of association for stress and success. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 251-257.
Thomas, C. L., Cassady, J. C., & Heller, M. L. (2017). The influence of emotional intelligence, cognitive test anxiety, and coping strategies on undergraduate academic performance.Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 40-48.
Toner, E., Haslam, N., Robinson, J., & Williams, P. (2012). Character strengths and wellbeing in adolescence:Structure and correlates of the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths for Children.Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 637-642.
Weber, M., & Ruch, W. (2012). The role of a good character in 12-year-old school children:Do character strengths matter in the classroom? Child Indicators Research, 5(2), 317-334.
Yao, Y. S., Chang, W. W., Jin, Y. L., Chen, Y., He, L. P., & Zhang, L. (2014). Life satisfaction, coping, self-esteem and suicide ideation in Chinese adolescents:A school-based study. Child:Care, Health and Development, 40(5), 747-752.
陈立胜. (2008). 《论语》中的勇:历史建构与现代启示. 中山大学学报(社会科学版), 48(4), 112-123.
陈树林, 郑全全, 潘健男, 郑胜圣. (2000). 中学生应对方式量表的初步编制. 中国临床心理学杂志, 8(4), 211-214.
陈赟. (2006). 为什么是智仁勇之德, 才开启了中庸的可能性? 现代哲学, 6, 92-98.
程翠萍, 黄希庭. (2014). 勇气:理论, 测量及影响因素. 心理科学进展, 22(7), 1170-1177.
程翠萍, 黄希庭. (2016). 中国人勇气量表的建构. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 42(1), 5-11.
程翠萍. (2016). 中国人勇气的结构与测量(博士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.
董妍, 俞国良. (2010). 青少年学业情绪对学业成就的影响. 心理科学, 33(4), 934-937.
窦温暖, 王敬群, 邵淑娟. (2007). 高中生学业成绩、归因方式、应对方式与自尊的关系. 江西教育科研, 6, 57-59.
郭成, 阴山燕, 赵慧. (2005). 高中生的压力应对方式及其与学业成绩关系的研究. 西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 31(6), 61-64.
黄希庭, 余华, 郑涌, 杨家忠, 王卫红. (2000). 中学生应对方式的初步研究. 心理科学, 23(1), 1-5.
黄希庭. (2014). 探究人格奥秘. 北京:商务印书馆.
李彩娜, 孙翠翠, 徐恩镇, 顾娇娇, 张庆垚. (2017). 初中生应对方式, 压力对社会适应的影响:纵向中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 33(2), 172-182.
刘志军, 白学军, 陈会昌. (2008). 初中生人格型乐观, 应对策略与学业成绩的关系. 心理学探新, 28(2), 49-52.
刘志军. (2007). 初中生乐观主义与其学业成绩的关系及中介效应分析. 心理发展与教育, 23(3), 73-78.
孙配贞, 郑雪, 余祖伟. (2010). 初中生感戴状况与学校生活满意度的关系:应对方式的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 26(1), 67-72.
文超, 张卫, 李董平, 喻承甫, 代维祝. (2010). 初中生感恩与学业成就的关系:学习投入的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 26(6), 598-605.
吴明隆. (2009). 结构方程模型——AMOS的操作与应用. 重庆:重庆大学出版社.
张虹, 陈树林, 郑全全. (1999). 高中学生心理应激及其中介变量的研究. 心理科学, 22(6), 508-511.
郑日昌, 蔡永红, 周益群. (1999). 心理测量学. 北京:人民教育出版社.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	陆信哲, 王智, 李勇, 王玢莹. 父母暴力暴露对中学生问题行为的纵向影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 231-239.
[2]	苑媛, 梁周健, 张丽. 结构性校园氛围与中学生抑郁:社会支持的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 869-876.
[3]	彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[4]	辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[5]	喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[6]	苏志强, 马郑豫. 童年期友谊质量与孤独感的纵向发展关系:应对方式的共变作用分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 31-39.
[7]	李明, 尚新华, 方晓义, 姬文广. 从父母教育卷入到学业成就:自主支持与自主学习力的链式中介[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 839-847.
[8]	王小凤, 燕良轼, 丁道群. 童年期不良经历对中学生良心的影响：特质自我控制和自我损耗的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 566-575.
[9]	王国霞, 赵扬. 教师自主支持与学生学业成就关系的元分析:心理需要满足、动机及投入的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 380-390.
[10]	何安明, 万娇娇, 惠秋平. 手机依赖与青少年心理健康的关系:学业倦怠的中介作用和应对方式的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 391-398.
[11]	王旭, 刘衍玲, 林杰, 刘传星, 魏灵真, 邱涵宇. 亲子关系对中学生心理健康的影响:社会支持和心理素质的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 263-271.
[12]	程可心, 游雅媛, 叶宝娟, 陈志忠. 家庭功能与中学生自杀态度的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 272-278.
[13]	苏志强, 马郑豫, 张大均, 马健云. 童年期儿童应对方式发展的成因:特质论还是情境论？[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 335-343.
[14]	薛璐璐, 姜媛, 方平. 述情障碍与中学生人际关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 92-100.
[15]	彭自芳, 傅纳, 张新杰. 父母冲突与中学生应对方式的关系:教养方式和情绪安全感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 668-676.