不同性别比和童年经济状况对未婚男性性态度的影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.01.07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于进化心理学的生命史理论，通过两个实验探讨性别比和童年经济状况同男性性态度间的关系。实验1和实验2分别采用图片和文字材料启动被试的性别比感知，结果发现感知性别比和童年经济状况对未婚男性的"随意性行为"态度表现出显著的交互效应：童年家庭经济状况差的未婚男性在感知到周围女性数量相对充裕的情境下，其性开放态度会较感知到周围男性数量充裕时明显上升；童年家庭富裕的男性的性开放态度在不同感知性别比下保持相对稳定。

关键词: 性开放态度, 感知性别比, 童年经济状况, 生命史理论

Abstract: On the basis of life history theory, this research aims to explore how sex ratios influence unmarried male's unrestricted sociosexual attitudes. Two experiments are carried out to testify the hypothesis that young male's childhood economic background plays a moderating role between the perceived sex ratio in the environment and their unrestricted sociosexual attitudes. Experiment 1 adopted series of facial photo pictures, which was consist of 6 male and 2 female facial photo pictures or 2 male and 6 female ones, as the priming material of different sex ratio.Results indicated that perceived sex ratio and childhood economic status showed a significant interactive effect on male's unrestricted sociosexual attitudes:men with lower level of childhood economic status displayed a higher level of acceptance to casual sexual behaviors when primed with low sex ratio than that primed with high sex ratio; male with higher level of childhood economic background exhibited a stable level of sexual attitudes under different priming conditions. In addition, childhood economic background produced a significant main effect on male's attitude to casual sexual behaviors. The perceived sex ratio did not have a significant main effect on men's unrestricted sociosexual attitudes. Experiment 2 adopted pseudo news reports, which depicted the situation of unbalanced sex ratio (more female or more male) in current China, as the priming materials. The result was similar with that in Experiment 1:Sex ratio and childhood economic status influenced male's unrestricted sociosexual attitudes interactively:Men with poorer childhood economic status showed higher level of acceptance to casual sexual behaviors when primed with low sex ratio in comparison with that of high sex ratio; men with a relatively richer childhood status showed a stable level of acceptance to casual sexual behaviors under both of the perceived unbalanced sex ratio in the background. In addition, childhood economic condition as well as the perceived sex ratio did not have a significant main effect on male's attitude to casual sexual behaviors. Conclusion:Overall,both of the two experiments support that sex ratio and childhood economic status produce an interactive influence on male's unrestricted sociosexual attitudes:the unmarried male participants with poor childhood economic status increase the level of their acceptance to casual sexual behaviors under the condition of more females in comparison of that under the condition of more males, while the unmarried men with rich childhood economic status show a relatively stable level of acceptance to casual sexual behaviors under different priming conditions of sex ratio.

Key words: unrestricted sociosexual attitude, perceived sex ratio, childhood economic background, life history theory

中图分类号:

B844

王燕, 王素芳, 张伊娜, 王凯. 不同性别比和童年经济状况对未婚男性性态度的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 54-59.

WANG Yan, WANG Sufang, ZHANG Yina, WANG Kai. The Influence of Different Operational Sex Ratios and Childhood Economic Status on Unmarried Males' Unrestricted Sociosexual Attitudes[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(1): 54-59.

参考文献

Belsky, J. (2010). Childhood experience and the development of reproductive strategies.Psicothema, 22, 28-34.
Belsky, J., Houts, R. M., & Fearon, R. M. (2010). Infant attachment security and the timing of puberty.Psychological Science, 21, 1195-1201.
Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy:An evolutionaray theory of socialization.Child Development, 62, 647-670.
Browning, C. R., Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2005). Sexual initiation in early adolescence:The nexus of parental and community control.American Sociological Review, 70, 758-778.
Buss D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory:An evolutionary perspective on human mating.Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
Chang, L., Lu, H. J., Lansford, J. E., Skinner, A. T., Bornstein, M. H., Steinberg, L.…Tapanya, S. (2019). Environmental harshness and unpredictability, life history, and social and academic behavior of adolescents in nine countries.Developmental Psychology, 55(4), 890-903.
Charnov, E. L. (1993). Life History Invariants.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
Chen, B. B., & Chang, L. (2016). Procrastination as a fast life history strategy.Evolutionary Psychology, 14, 1-5.
Daan, S., & Tinbergen, J. (1997).Adaptation of life histories. In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (Eds.), Behavioural Ecology:An evolutionary approach. (4th ed., pp. 311-333). Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
Daan, S., & Tinbergen, J. (1997). Adaptation of life histories. In J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies (Eds.), Behavioural Ecology:An evolutionary approach. (4th ed., pp. 311-333). Oxford, UK:Blackwell.
Draper, P., & Harpending, H. (1982). Father absence and reproductive strategy:an evolutionary perspective.Journal of Anthropological Research, 38, 255-273.
Ellis, B., Boyce, W. T., Belsky, J., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & Van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (2011).Differential susceptibility to the environment:An evolutionary-neurodevelopmental theory. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 7-28.
Griskevicius, V., Ackerman, J. M., Cantú, S. M., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E., Simpson, J. A.,…Tybur, J. M. (2013). When the economy falters, do people spend or save? Responses to resource scarcity depend on childhood environments.Psychological Science, 24, 197-205.
Griskevicius, V., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E., & Tybur, J. M. (2011). Environmental contingency in life history strategies:The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on reproductive timing.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 100, 241-54.
Griskevicius, V., Simpson, J. A., Durante, K. M., Kim, J. S., & Cantu, S. M. (2012).Evolution, Social Influence, and Sex Ratio. In D. T. Kenrick (Ed), Six Degrees of Social Influence (pp.78-88). Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:A regression-based approach. New York, NY, US:Guilford Press.
Hendrick, C.,Hendrick, S. S., & Reich, D. A. (2006). The brief sexual attitudes scale. Journal of Sex Research, 43(1), 76-86.
Johnson, J. J., & Kirkpatric, L. A. (2007).Adolescent sexual onset:An intergenerational analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 939-949.
Kaplan, H. S., & Gangestad, S. W. (2005). Life history theory and evolutionary psychology. In D. M. Buss (Ed),The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 68-95). Hoboken, NJ:Wiley.
Low, B. S., Hazel, A., Parker, N., & Welch, K. B. (2008). Influences on women's reproductive lives:Unexpected ecological underpinnings.Cross-Cultural Research:The Journal of Comparative Social Science, 42, 201-219.
Lu, H.J., & Chang, L. (2019). Aggression and risk taking as adaptive implementations of fast life history strategy.Developmental Science. DOI:10.1111/desc.12827.
Lu, H.J., Wong, K., & Chang, L. (2017). The association between life history strategy and mate preference in men.Personality and Individual Differences, 116, 157-163.
Moss, J. H., & Maner, J. K. (2016). Biased sex ratios influence fundamental aspects of human mating. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(1), 72-80.
Pedersen, F. A. (1991). Secular trends in human sex ratios:Their influence on individual and family behavior. Human Nature, 2, 271-291.
Roff, D. A. (2002). Life history evolution. Sunderland, MA:Sinauer.
Schacht, R., & Mulder, M. B. (2015). Sex ratio effects on reproductive strategies in humans. Royal Society Open Science, 2:140402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.140402
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from argentina to zimbabwe:A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating.Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 28, 247-311.
Tinbergen, J. M., & Both, C. (1999). Is clutch size individually optimized? Behavioral Ecology, 10, 504-509.
Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1997). Life expectancy, economic inequality, homicide, and reproductive timing in chicago neighbourhoods.Bmj Clinical Research, 314, 1271-1274.
Worthman, C. M., & Kuzara, J. (2005). Life history and the early origins of health differentials.American Journal of Human Biology, 17(17), 95-112.
石雅茗, 刘爽. (2015). 中国出生性别比的新变化及其思考. 人口研究, 39(4), 35-48.
王燕, 侯博文, 李歆瑶, 李晓煦, 焦璐. (2017). 不同性别比和资源获取能力对未婚男性择偶标准的影响. 心理学报,49(9), 1195-1205.
王雨晴, 姚鹏飞, 周国梅. (2015). 面孔吸引力、人格标签对于男女择偶偏好的影响. 心理学报, 47, 108-118.
魏彤儒, 张刚. (2010). 中国现代社会"城市剩女"问题的思考. 中国青年研究, 2010(5), 22-24.
中国家庭发展报告. (2015). 国家卫生计生委.2015-05-13取自http://www.rmzxb.com.cn/c/2015-05-13/499347.shtml

相关文章 15

[1]	关文军, 胡梦娟, 刘晨. 自闭症儿童父母歧视知觉对群际关系的影响:一个有调节的中介作用模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 854-863.
[2]	李维佳, 胡清芬. 空间再定向任务中心理表征的多样性——来自虚拟现实实验的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 385-394.
[3]	向玲, 范淑娴, 陈家利, 王宝玺. 学习困难青少年认知控制特点研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 410-416.
[4]	侯芬, 伍新春, 邹盛奇, 刘畅, 黄彬彬. 父母教养投入对青少年亲社会行为的影响:亲子依恋的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 417-425.
[5]	阚佳琦, 刘斯漫, 时嘉惠, 闫琦, 郭俊斌, 王争艳. 祖辈共同看护背景下母亲和祖辈将心比心、母子依恋与婴幼儿认知的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 395-402.
[6]	田云龙, 喻承甫, 林霜, 叶诗敏, 张晓琳, 刘毅, 路红, 张卫. 父母体罚、学校参与与青少年网络游戏成瘾:亲子关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 461-471.
[7]	李若璇, 朱文龙, 刘红瑞, 姚梅林. 家长教育期望对学业倦怠的影响:家长投入的中介及家庭功能的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 489-496.
[8]	彭源, 朱蕾, 王振宏. 父母情绪表达与青少年问题行为:亲子依恋、孤独感的多重中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 504-512.
[9]	江永强, 邵云天, 蔺秀云, 何先友. 初中生班级团体依恋、自悯与学习倦怠的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 472-480.
[10]	范航, 朱转, 苗灵童, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突对青少年抑郁情绪的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 481-488.
[11]	叶宝娟, 朱黎君, 方小婷, 刘明矾, 王凯凯, 杨强. 压力知觉对大学生抑郁的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 497-503.
[12]	陈庆秋, 徐华, 吴南. 助人情境中幼儿知恩图报意识的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 403-409.
[13]	徐璐璐, 吴佩佩, 贺雯. 贫困大学生元刻板印象威胁对群际关系的影响:群际焦虑的中介和自尊的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 426-433.
[14]	丁子恩, 王笑涵, 刘勤学. 大学生自尊与网络过激行为的关系:社交焦虑和双自我意识的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 171-180.
[15]	刘雪萍, 陈子卓, 黄文, 彭华茂. 成功老化内涵及影响因素分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 249-256.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed