家庭社会经济地位对青少年问题行为的影响:父母情感温暖和公正世界信念的链式中介作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.02.13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨家庭社会经济地位对青少年问题行为的影响及其作用机制，基于生物生态学理论，采用家庭社会经济地位评估、简式父母教养方式问卷、公正世界信念量表和长处与困难问卷对全国三大片区13所中学的1337名青少年（7~12年级）进行调查。结果表明：（1）家庭社会经济地位、父母情感温暖、公正世界信念和问题行为之间两两显著相关，且家庭社会经济地位能显著负向预测问题行为；（2）父母情感温暖和公正世界信念在家庭社会经济地位与问题行为之间起显著的中介作用。具体为三条中介路径：一是父母情感温暖的单独中介作用；二是公正世界信念的单独中介作用；三是父母情感温暖和公正世界信念的链式中介作用。本研究丰富了问题行为领域的研究成果，为预防和干预青少年问题行为提供了理论基础。

关键词: 家庭社会经济地位, 父母情感温暖, 公正世界信念, 问题行为, 青少年

Abstract: This study aimed to explore the effect of family socioeconomic status on adolescent problem behaviors and its underlying mechanism. Based on the bioecological theory, we used the family socioeconomic status assessment, the short-Egma Minnen av Bardndosnauppforstran, the belief in a just world scale and the strengths and difficulties questionnaire survey 1337 adolescents (grades 7-12) in 13 middle schools in the country's three major regions. The results indicated that:(1) There were significant correlations among family socioeconomic status, parental emotional warmth, belief in a just word and problem behaviors, and family socioeconomic status could significantly negatively predict problem behaviors; (2) Parental emotional warmth and belief in a just word played significant mediating roles between family socioeconomic status and problem behaviors. Specifically, there were three paths that family socioeconomic status to influence problem behaviors:one was the mediating role of parental emotional warmth; the second was the mediating role of belief in a just word; the third was the chain-mediated role of both parental emotional warmth and belief in a just word. This study enriches the research results in the field of problem behaviors and provides a theoretical basis for the prevention and intervention of adolescent problem behaviors.

Key words: family socioeconomic status, parental emotional warmth, belief in a just world, problem behaviors, adolescents

中图分类号:

B844

刘广增, 张大均, 朱政光, 李佳佳, 陈旭. 家庭社会经济地位对青少年问题行为的影响:父母情感温暖和公正世界信念的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 240-248.

LIU Guangzeng, ZHANG Dajun, ZHU Zhengguang, LI Jiajia, CHEN Xu. The Effect of Family Socioeconomic Status on Adolescents' Problem Behaviors: The Chain Mediating Role of Parental Emotional Warmth and Belief in a Just World[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(2): 240-248.

参考文献

Abubakar, A., Van de Vijver, F. J., Suryani, A. O., Handayani, P., & Pandia, W. S. (2015). Perceptions of parenting styles and their associations with mental health and life satisfaction among urban Indonesian adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(9), 2680-2692.
Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(1), 56-95.
Bøe, T., Sivertsen, B., Heiervang, E., Goodman, R., Lundervold, A. J., & Hysing, M. (2014). Socioeconomic status and child mental health:The role of parental emotional well-being and parenting practices. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42(5), 705-715.
Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 371-399.
Braza, P., Carreras, R., Muñoz, J. M., Braza, F., Azurmendi, A., Pascual-Sagastizábal, E., et al. (2015). Negative maternal and paternal parenting styles as predictors of children's behavioral problems:Moderating effects of the child's sex. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(4), 847-856.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development:Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development:Research perspectives. Developmental psychology, 22(6), 723-742.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. R.m.lerner Handbook of Child Psychology, 1, 993-1028.
Conger, R. D., Conger, K. J., & Martin, M. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status, family processes, and individual development. Journal of Marriage & Family, 72(3), 685-704.
Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally:About the personal belief in a just world scale's validity. Social Justice Research, 12(2), 79-98.
Dalbert, C., & Radant, M. (2004). Parenting and young adolescents' belief in a just world. The justice motive in adolescence and young adulthood:Origins and consequences, 11-25.
Dalbert, C., & Stoeber, J. (2006). The personal belief in a just world and domain-specific beliefs about justice at school and in the family:A longitudinal study with adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(3), 200-207.
DiClemente, R. J., Hansen, W. B., & Ponton, L. E. (1996). Adolescents at risk. In Handbook of adolescent health risk behavior (pp. 1-4). Springer, Boston, MA.
Faccenda, L., & Pantaléon, N. (2011). Analysis of the relationships between sensitivity to injustice, principles of justice and belief in a just world. Journal of Moral Education, 40(4), 491-511.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1:Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(11), 1337-1345.
Goodman, A., Lamping, D. L., & Ploubidis, G. B. (2010). When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (sdq):data from british parents, teachers and children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(8), 1179-1191.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:a regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Korous, K. M., Causadias, J. M., Bradley, R. H., & Luthar, S. S. (2018). Unpacking the link between socioeconomic status and behavior problems:A second-order meta-analysis. Development and Psychopathology, 30(5), 1889-1906.
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world:A fundamental delusion. New York:Plenum Press.
Lipkusa, I. M., Dalbert, C., & Siegler, I. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus for others:Implications for psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(7), 666-677.
Liu, G., Zhang, D., Pan, Y., Ma, Y., & Lu, X. (2017). The effect of psychological suzhi on problem behaviors in Chinese adolescents:the mediating role of subjective social status and self-esteem. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1490.
McLaughlin, K. A., & King, K. (2015). Developmental trajectories of anxiety and depression in early adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(2), 311-323.
OECD. (2012). PISA 2009 Technical Report. Paris:OECD.
Pinquart, M. (2016). Associations of parenting styles and dimensions with academic achievement in children and adolescents:A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 475-493.
Rosa, E. M., & Tudge, J. (2013). Urie Bronfenbrenner's theory of human development:Its evolution from ecology to bioecology. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5(4), 243-258.
Spera, C. (2005). A review of the relationship among parenting practices, parenting styles, and adolescent school achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 125-146.
Umemura, T., & erek, J. (2016). Different developmental pathways from parental warmth to adolescents' trust in peers and politicians:mediating roles of adolescent-parent attachment and belief in a just world. Social Justice Research, 29(2), 186-205.
Wu, L., Zhang, D., Cheng, G., Hu, T., & Rost, D. H. (2015). Parental emotional warmth and psychological suzhi as mediators between socioeconomic status and problem behaviours in Chinese children. Children and Youth Services Review, 59, 132-138.
Yeung, R., & Leadbeater, B. (2010). Adults make a difference:the protective effects of parent and teacher emotional support on emotional and behavioral problems of peer-victimized adolescents. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(1), 80-98.
Zhu, J., Yu, C., Zhang, W., Bao, Z., Jiang, Y., Chen, Y., et al. (2016). Peer victimization, deviant peer affiliation and impulsivity:predicting adolescent problem behaviors. Child Abuse & Neglect, 58, 39-50.
陈艳红, 程刚, 关雨生, 张大均. (2014). 大学生客观社会经济地位与自尊:主观社会地位的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 30(6), 594-600.
戴晓阳. (2010). 常用心理评估量表手册. 北京:人民军医出版社.
蒋奖, 鲁峥嵘, 蒋苾菁, 许燕. (2010). 简式父母教养方式问卷中文版的初步修订. 心理发展与教育,26(1), 94-99.
寇建华, 杜亚松, 夏黎明. (2007). 长处和困难问卷 (学生版) 上海常模的制订. 中国健康心理学杂志,15(1), 3-5.
刘广增, 张大均, 罗世兰, 房立艳. (2018). 8~12岁儿童孤独感及其与父母情感温暖、问题行为的关系.中国临床心理学杂志, 26(3), 586-589.
陆学艺. (2002). 当代中国社会十大阶层分析. 学习与实践, 3, 55-63.
聂瑞虹, 周楠, 张宇驰, 方晓义. (2017). 人际关系与高中生内外化问题的关系:自尊的中介及性别的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(6), 708-718.
彭源, 朱蕾, 王振宏. (2018). 父母情绪表达与青少年问题行为:亲子依恋、孤独感的多重中介效应.心理发展与教育, 34(4), 504-512.
邵海英. (2014). 父母教养方式对中学生问题行为的影响. 中国健康心理学杂志, 22(3), 439-441.
宋友志, 田媛, 周宗奎, 连帅磊, 牛更枫. (2018). 青少年公正世界信念对抑郁的影响:感恩和自尊的序列中介作用. 心理科学, 41(4), 828-834.
苏志强, 张大均, 王鑫强. (2012). 公正世界信念量表的修订及在大学生应用的信效度研究. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 21(6), 561-563.
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 中介效应分析:方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 731-745.
杨继平, 王兴超. (2012). 道德推脱对青少年攻击行为的影响:有调节的中介效应. 心理学报, 44(8), 1075-1085.
叶婷, 吴慧婷. (2012). 低家庭社会经济地位与青少年社会适应的关系:感恩的补偿和调节效应. 心理学探新, 32(1), 61-66.
占盛丽. (2009). 从个人和学校视角看家庭社会经济地位对学生学业成绩的影响——国际学生评估项目(pisa)的启示. 上海教育科研, 12, 10-13.
张茜洋, 冷露, 陈红君, 方晓义, 舒曾, 蔺秀云. (2017). 家庭社会经济地位对流动儿童认知能力的影响:父母教养方式的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(2), 153-162.
张羽, 李玮玮, 罗玉晗, 华销嫣, 王耘. (2017). 家庭社会经济地位与父母教养方式对儿童青少年公正世界信念的影响. 心理发展与教育, 33(5), 513-523.
赵改, 孔繁昌, 刘诏君, 冯雅萌, 黄声普, 王亚丹等. (2018). 父母情感温暖对青少年感恩的影响:责任心与公正世界信念的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 34(3), 257-263.
周春燕, 郭永玉. (2013a). 公正世界信念——重建公正的双刃剑. 心理科学进展, 21(1), 144-154.
周春燕, 郭永玉. (2013b). 家庭社会阶层对大学生心理健康的影响:公正世界信念的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(4), 636-640.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	邬钟灵, 陈亮. 父亲、母亲教养行为对幼儿社会适应的影响:同胞关系的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 478-489.
[2]	郭筱琳, 李珮瑜, 张艺凡, 罗良. 成就预测思维:青少年学业表现与成长型思维的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 536-543.
[3]	李璇, 马淑风. 合作推理对青少年同伴关系发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 315-325.
[4]	赵泰格, 盛靓, 高君杰, 辛素飞. 父母情感温暖与青少年亲社会行为倾向的纵向关系:上行社会比较的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 437-446.
[5]	刘洋, 闫哲, 常淑敏. 家庭社会经济地位对青少年早期社会能力发展的影响:一般自我概念的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 447-456.
[6]	王曼璐, 王智, 邵景进. 童年期忽视对青少年中期经历关系侵害的影响：自尊的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 274-284.
[7]	李丹, 陈佳宇, 刘思格, 吴德华, 尹华站. 青少年特质感恩与主观幸福感:生命意义的纵向解释作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 28-38.
[8]	向燕辉, 马丽平, 胡芸绮, 李晓军. 青少年心理适应与内外攻击的关联:基于追踪和周记法的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 85-97.
[9]	边昊天, 庄瑞雪, 王嘉宝, 边玉芳, 梁丽婵. 养育倦怠与青少年网络游戏成瘾:基本心理需要满足、意志控制及性别的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 110-120.
[10]	杨淑芸, 李紫涵, 任萍. 欺凌受害对早期青少年自伤的影响:孤独感与情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 121-130.
[11]	鲍振宙, 杨凌青, 储怡佳, 于明申, 徐梓唯. 青少年亲欺凌旁观行为的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 131-141.
[12]	王玉龙, 王丹云, 蔺秀云. 早期青少年自伤与自杀意念的关系:亲子沟通的纵向调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 142-152.
[13]	陈子循, 白荣, 李金文, 徐程睿. 父母冲突与青少年手机成瘾的纵向关系:冲动性和朋友支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 892-902.
[14]	汤佳怡, 付成妤, 徐慰. 青少年家庭功能对抑郁和社交焦虑的影响:公正世界信念的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 701-709.
[15]	张凤, 黄四林, 梅刻寒, 张嘉恬, 邓祎祎. 脱贫地区乡村青少年社会流动信念与其学业坚持性:学业应对策略的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 510-517.