家庭社会经济地位对青少年问题行为的影响:父母情感温暖和公正世界信念的链式中介作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.02.13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨家庭社会经济地位对青少年问题行为的影响及其作用机制，基于生物生态学理论，采用家庭社会经济地位评估、简式父母教养方式问卷、公正世界信念量表和长处与困难问卷对全国三大片区13所中学的1337名青少年（7~12年级）进行调查。结果表明：（1）家庭社会经济地位、父母情感温暖、公正世界信念和问题行为之间两两显著相关，且家庭社会经济地位能显著负向预测问题行为；（2）父母情感温暖和公正世界信念在家庭社会经济地位与问题行为之间起显著的中介作用。具体为三条中介路径：一是父母情感温暖的单独中介作用；二是公正世界信念的单独中介作用；三是父母情感温暖和公正世界信念的链式中介作用。本研究丰富了问题行为领域的研究成果，为预防和干预青少年问题行为提供了理论基础。

关键词: 家庭社会经济地位, 父母情感温暖, 公正世界信念, 问题行为, 青少年

Abstract: This study aimed to explore the effect of family socioeconomic status on adolescent problem behaviors and its underlying mechanism. Based on the bioecological theory, we used the family socioeconomic status assessment, the short-Egma Minnen av Bardndosnauppforstran, the belief in a just world scale and the strengths and difficulties questionnaire survey 1337 adolescents (grades 7-12) in 13 middle schools in the country's three major regions. The results indicated that:(1) There were significant correlations among family socioeconomic status, parental emotional warmth, belief in a just word and problem behaviors, and family socioeconomic status could significantly negatively predict problem behaviors; (2) Parental emotional warmth and belief in a just word played significant mediating roles between family socioeconomic status and problem behaviors. Specifically, there were three paths that family socioeconomic status to influence problem behaviors:one was the mediating role of parental emotional warmth; the second was the mediating role of belief in a just word; the third was the chain-mediated role of both parental emotional warmth and belief in a just word. This study enriches the research results in the field of problem behaviors and provides a theoretical basis for the prevention and intervention of adolescent problem behaviors.

Key words: family socioeconomic status, parental emotional warmth, belief in a just world, problem behaviors, adolescents

中图分类号:

B844

刘广增, 张大均, 朱政光, 李佳佳, 陈旭. 家庭社会经济地位对青少年问题行为的影响:父母情感温暖和公正世界信念的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 240-248.

LIU Guangzeng, ZHANG Dajun, ZHU Zhengguang, LI Jiajia, CHEN Xu. The Effect of Family Socioeconomic Status on Adolescents' Problem Behaviors: The Chain Mediating Role of Parental Emotional Warmth and Belief in a Just World[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(2): 240-248.

参考文献

Abubakar, A., Van de Vijver, F. J., Suryani, A. O., Handayani, P., & Pandia, W. S. (2015). Perceptions of parenting styles and their associations with mental health and life satisfaction among urban Indonesian adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(9), 2680-2692.
Baumrind, D. (1991). The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 11(1), 56-95.
Bøe, T., Sivertsen, B., Heiervang, E., Goodman, R., Lundervold, A. J., & Hysing, M. (2014). Socioeconomic status and child mental health:The role of parental emotional well-being and parenting practices. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42(5), 705-715.
Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 371-399.
Braza, P., Carreras, R., Muñoz, J. M., Braza, F., Azurmendi, A., Pascual-Sagastizábal, E., et al. (2015). Negative maternal and paternal parenting styles as predictors of children's behavioral problems:Moderating effects of the child's sex. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(4), 847-856.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development:Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development:Research perspectives. Developmental psychology, 22(6), 723-742.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. R.m.lerner Handbook of Child Psychology, 1, 993-1028.
Conger, R. D., Conger, K. J., & Martin, M. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status, family processes, and individual development. Journal of Marriage & Family, 72(3), 685-704.
Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally:About the personal belief in a just world scale's validity. Social Justice Research, 12(2), 79-98.
Dalbert, C., & Radant, M. (2004). Parenting and young adolescents' belief in a just world. The justice motive in adolescence and young adulthood:Origins and consequences, 11-25.
Dalbert, C., & Stoeber, J. (2006). The personal belief in a just world and domain-specific beliefs about justice at school and in the family:A longitudinal study with adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(3), 200-207.
DiClemente, R. J., Hansen, W. B., & Ponton, L. E. (1996). Adolescents at risk. In Handbook of adolescent health risk behavior (pp. 1-4). Springer, Boston, MA.
Faccenda, L., & Pantaléon, N. (2011). Analysis of the relationships between sensitivity to injustice, principles of justice and belief in a just world. Journal of Moral Education, 40(4), 491-511.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1:Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(11), 1337-1345.
Goodman, A., Lamping, D. L., & Ploubidis, G. B. (2010). When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (sdq):data from british parents, teachers and children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(8), 1179-1191.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:a regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling:A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Korous, K. M., Causadias, J. M., Bradley, R. H., & Luthar, S. S. (2018). Unpacking the link between socioeconomic status and behavior problems:A second-order meta-analysis. Development and Psychopathology, 30(5), 1889-1906.
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world:A fundamental delusion. New York:Plenum Press.
Lipkusa, I. M., Dalbert, C., & Siegler, I. C. (1996). The importance of distinguishing the belief in a just world for self versus for others:Implications for psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(7), 666-677.
Liu, G., Zhang, D., Pan, Y., Ma, Y., & Lu, X. (2017). The effect of psychological suzhi on problem behaviors in Chinese adolescents:the mediating role of subjective social status and self-esteem. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1490.
McLaughlin, K. A., & King, K. (2015). Developmental trajectories of anxiety and depression in early adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(2), 311-323.
OECD. (2012). PISA 2009 Technical Report. Paris:OECD.
Pinquart, M. (2016). Associations of parenting styles and dimensions with academic achievement in children and adolescents:A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 475-493.
Rosa, E. M., & Tudge, J. (2013). Urie Bronfenbrenner's theory of human development:Its evolution from ecology to bioecology. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5(4), 243-258.
Spera, C. (2005). A review of the relationship among parenting practices, parenting styles, and adolescent school achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 125-146.
Umemura, T., & erek, J. (2016). Different developmental pathways from parental warmth to adolescents' trust in peers and politicians:mediating roles of adolescent-parent attachment and belief in a just world. Social Justice Research, 29(2), 186-205.
Wu, L., Zhang, D., Cheng, G., Hu, T., & Rost, D. H. (2015). Parental emotional warmth and psychological suzhi as mediators between socioeconomic status and problem behaviours in Chinese children. Children and Youth Services Review, 59, 132-138.
Yeung, R., & Leadbeater, B. (2010). Adults make a difference:the protective effects of parent and teacher emotional support on emotional and behavioral problems of peer-victimized adolescents. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(1), 80-98.
Zhu, J., Yu, C., Zhang, W., Bao, Z., Jiang, Y., Chen, Y., et al. (2016). Peer victimization, deviant peer affiliation and impulsivity:predicting adolescent problem behaviors. Child Abuse & Neglect, 58, 39-50.
陈艳红, 程刚, 关雨生, 张大均. (2014). 大学生客观社会经济地位与自尊:主观社会地位的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 30(6), 594-600.
戴晓阳. (2010). 常用心理评估量表手册. 北京:人民军医出版社.
蒋奖, 鲁峥嵘, 蒋苾菁, 许燕. (2010). 简式父母教养方式问卷中文版的初步修订. 心理发展与教育,26(1), 94-99.
寇建华, 杜亚松, 夏黎明. (2007). 长处和困难问卷 (学生版) 上海常模的制订. 中国健康心理学杂志,15(1), 3-5.
刘广增, 张大均, 罗世兰, 房立艳. (2018). 8~12岁儿童孤独感及其与父母情感温暖、问题行为的关系.中国临床心理学杂志, 26(3), 586-589.
陆学艺. (2002). 当代中国社会十大阶层分析. 学习与实践, 3, 55-63.
聂瑞虹, 周楠, 张宇驰, 方晓义. (2017). 人际关系与高中生内外化问题的关系:自尊的中介及性别的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(6), 708-718.
彭源, 朱蕾, 王振宏. (2018). 父母情绪表达与青少年问题行为:亲子依恋、孤独感的多重中介效应.心理发展与教育, 34(4), 504-512.
邵海英. (2014). 父母教养方式对中学生问题行为的影响. 中国健康心理学杂志, 22(3), 439-441.
宋友志, 田媛, 周宗奎, 连帅磊, 牛更枫. (2018). 青少年公正世界信念对抑郁的影响:感恩和自尊的序列中介作用. 心理科学, 41(4), 828-834.
苏志强, 张大均, 王鑫强. (2012). 公正世界信念量表的修订及在大学生应用的信效度研究. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 21(6), 561-563.
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 中介效应分析:方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 731-745.
杨继平, 王兴超. (2012). 道德推脱对青少年攻击行为的影响:有调节的中介效应. 心理学报, 44(8), 1075-1085.
叶婷, 吴慧婷. (2012). 低家庭社会经济地位与青少年社会适应的关系:感恩的补偿和调节效应. 心理学探新, 32(1), 61-66.
占盛丽. (2009). 从个人和学校视角看家庭社会经济地位对学生学业成绩的影响——国际学生评估项目(pisa)的启示. 上海教育科研, 12, 10-13.
张茜洋, 冷露, 陈红君, 方晓义, 舒曾, 蔺秀云. (2017). 家庭社会经济地位对流动儿童认知能力的影响:父母教养方式的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(2), 153-162.
张羽, 李玮玮, 罗玉晗, 华销嫣, 王耘. (2017). 家庭社会经济地位与父母教养方式对儿童青少年公正世界信念的影响. 心理发展与教育, 33(5), 513-523.
赵改, 孔繁昌, 刘诏君, 冯雅萌, 黄声普, 王亚丹等. (2018). 父母情感温暖对青少年感恩的影响:责任心与公正世界信念的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 34(3), 257-263.
周春燕, 郭永玉. (2013a). 公正世界信念——重建公正的双刃剑. 心理科学进展, 21(1), 144-154.
周春燕, 郭永玉. (2013b). 家庭社会阶层对大学生心理健康的影响:公正世界信念的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(4), 636-640.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	陆信哲, 王智, 李勇, 王玢莹. 父母暴力暴露对中学生问题行为的纵向影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 231-239.
[2]	王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[3]	王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系：意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[4]	肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[5]	冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[6]	魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系：压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[7]	邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[8]	彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[9]	刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[10]	刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[11]	沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分？学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[12]	张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[13]	洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[14]	王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
[15]	牛湘, 冉光明. 同伴关系与幼儿问题行为关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 473-487.