前瞻记忆意向后效应的加工机制:来自眼动的证据

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.02.02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于重复前瞻记忆目标范式和视觉搜索范式，采用多种类型刺激呈现的眼动测量方式考察前瞻记忆意向后效应的加工机制。研究采用2（条件）×5（刺激类型）的混合实验设计，显著条件下前瞻记忆目标为红色，非显著条件下前瞻记忆目标和其他字母的颜色均为白色，背景为黑色。结果显示，显著和非显著条件下前瞻记忆完成阶段中对原前瞻记忆目标的反应时慢于控制条件，而且前瞻记忆目标在进行中任务目标之后的反应时慢于进行中任务目标之前的刺激类型。另外，非显著条件下，前瞻记忆目标在进行中任务目标之前和之后的眼动数据没有差异；显著条件下的注视点数量多于控制条件，前瞻记忆目标在进行中任务目标之后的注视点数量多于进行中任务目标之前的刺激类型。结果说明，前瞻记忆任务完成以后，在随后的阶段中遇到原前瞻记忆目标时被试会投入认知资源对其进行抑制，支持抑制加工。

关键词: 前瞻记忆意向后效应, 自动化加工, 控制加工, 抑制加工, 眼动

Abstract: Prospective memory (PM) is the ability of remembering to perform an intended action in the future. The aftereffects of prospective memory is defined as the phenomenon that the completed intention has an influence on the performance of the ongoing task. Based on the repeated prospective memory target paradigm and visual search paradigm, the current study embedded a prospective memory task in a visual search task in which multi-targets would be presented in the display. A 2(condition)×5(trial type) mixed factorial design was adopted. In the salient condition, the PM target appeared in red font against a black background screen. In the non-salient condition, PM targets were presented in a white font against background. The results show that the reaction time of original PM target in the salient and non-salient conditions was slower than the control condition during the finished-PM phase, and the PM target being in front of the OT target was slower than the PM target being behind the OT target. In addition, the percentage of commission errors was low in all conditions. The eye movement data showed that there was no significant difference between the PM target being in front of the OT target and the PM target being behind the OT target in the non-salient condition; The quantity of fixations in the salient condition were more than the control condition, and the quantity of fixations in the PM target being in front of OT target were more than the PM target being behind the OT target. In addition, both the first and total fixation durations were no significant difference across different conditions and trail types. In sum, the results suggest participants would allocate cognitive resources to suppress the original PM target during the finished-PM phase, supporting the inhibition processing.

Key words: the aftereffects of prospective memory, spontaneous retrieval processing, strategic monitoring processing, inhibition processing, eye tracking

中图分类号:

B844

辛聪, 张曼曼, 郭盈秀, 郭云飞, 陈幼贞. 前瞻记忆意向后效应的加工机制:来自眼动的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 138-145.

XIN Cong, ZHANG Manman, GUO Yingxiu, GUO Yunfei, CHEN Youzhen. The Underlying Processing Mechanism of the Aftereffects on Prospective Memory: Evidence from Eye Movements[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(2): 138-145.

参考文献

Anderson, F. T., & Einstein, G. O. (2016). The fate of completed intentions. Memory, 25(4),467-480.
Boywitt, C. D., Rummel, J., & Meiser, T. (2015). Commission errors of active intentions:The roles of aging, cognitive load, and practice. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition, 22(5),560-576.
Bugg, J. M., & Scullin, M. K. (2013). Controlling intentions:The surprising ease of stopping after going relative to stopping after never having gone. Psychological science, 24(12), 2463-2471.
Bugg, J. M., Scullin, M. K., & McDaniel, M. A. (2013). Strengthening encoding via implementation intention formation increases prospective memory commission errors. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20(3),522-527.
Bugg, J. M., Scullin, M. K., & Rauvola, R. S. (2016). Forgetting no-longer-relevant prospective memory intentions is (sometimes) harder with age but easier with forgetting practice. Psychology and Aging, 31(4),358-369.
Dasse, M. N. (2016). Investigating prospective memory commission errors(Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Baylor University, Texas.
Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 16(4), 717-726.
Kimmel, S. E., Chen, Z., Price, M., Parker, C. S., Metlay, J. P., & Christie, J. D. (2007). The influence of patient adherence on anticoagulation control with warfarin:Results from the international normalized ratio adherence and genetics (in-range) study. Archives of Internal Medicine, 167(3), 229-235.
Meiser, T. & Rummel, J. (2012). False prospective memory responses as indications of automatic processes in the initiation of delayed intentions. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(3), 1509-1516.
Pink, J. E., & Dodson, C. S. (2013). Negative prospective memory:Remembering not to perform an action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 20(1), 184-190.
Rose, F. D., Attree, E. A., Brooks, B. M., Parslow, D. M., Penn, P. R., & Ambihaipahan, N. (2000). Training in virtual environments:Transfer to real world tasks and equivalence to real task training. Ergonomics, 43(4), 494-511.
Schaper, P., & Grundgeiger, T. (2016). Commission errors in delay-execute prospective memory tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(8), 1423-1438.
Scott, I. A. (2016). The role of context and memory strategies in prospective memory commission errors(Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Tennessee University, Chattanooga.
Scullin, M. K., & Bugg, J. M. (2013). Failing to forget:Prospective memory commission errors can result from spontaneous retrieval and impaired executive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 39(3), 965-977.
Scullin, M. K., Bugg, J. M., & McDaniel, M. A. (2012). Whoops, I did it again:Commission errors in prospective memory. Psychology and Aging, 27(1),46-53.
Scullin, M. K., Bugg, J. M., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2011). Prospective memory and aging:Preserved spontaneous retrieval, but impaired deactivation, in older adults. Memory and Cognition, 39(7),1232-1240.
Scullin, M. K., Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2009). Evidence for spontaneous retrieval of suspended but not finished prospective memories. Memory and Cognition, 37(4), 425-433.
Van Benthem, K. D., Herdman, C. M., Tolton, R. G., & Lefevre, J. A. (2015). Prospective memory failures in aviation:Effects of cue salience, workload, and individual differences. Aerospace Medicine and Human Performance, 84(4), 366-373.
Walser, M., Fischer, R., & Goschke, T. (2012). The failure of deactivating intentions:Aftereffects of completed intentions in the repeated prospective memory cue paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(4),1030-1044.
Walser, M., Goschke, T., & Fischer, R. (2014). The difficulty of letting go:Moderators of the deactivation of completed intentions. Psychological Research, 78(4), 574-583.
Walser, M., Goschke, T., Möschl, M., & Fischer, R. (2016). Intention deactivation:Effects of prospective memory task similarity on aftereffects of completed intentions. Psychological Research, 81(5), 961-981.
West, R., Mcnerney, M. W., & Travers, S. (2007). Gone but not forgotten:The effects of cancelled intentions on the neural correlates of prospective memory. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 64(3), 215-225.
Willis, M. (2016). Intention Interference, Intention Superiority and Commission Errors in Prospective Memory Tasks after Suspended or Finished Instructions(Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Baylor University, Texas.
陈丽君, 郑雪. (2014). 大学生问题发现过程的眼动研究. 心理学报, 46(3),367-384.
陈思佚, 周仁来. (2010). 前瞻记忆需要经过策略加工:来自眼动的证据. 心理学报, 42(12),1128-1136.
郭云飞, 辛聪, 干加裙, 陈幼贞. (2017). 任务规律性对前瞻记忆的影响. 心理科学, 40(6), 1309-1315.

相关文章 15

[1]	王敬欣, 赵赛男, 徐倩倩. 字间空格与词频对青年人和老年人阅读的影响:眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 781-787.
[2]	高子惠, 焦雨, 王曦, 刘肖岑. 电子绘本文字的动静态呈现方式对幼儿阅读体验和学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 817-824.
[3]	于晓, 张涵, 陈英和, 戚玥, 刘爱芳, 刘丽丽. 类比推理的眼动研究:揭示个体类比推理策略发展的有效手段[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 897-903.
[4]	施芳婷, 郑晨烨, 颜秀琳, 陆露, 王静梅, 邸波, 卢英俊. 5~6岁幼儿对不同文化背景卡通面孔再认的眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 323-334.
[5]	马安然, 王燕青, 王福兴, 周治金. 教学微视频的播放速度对学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 391-399.
[6]	刘志方, 仝文, 张骏. 中文阅读中词汇加工的年老化:眼动证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 665-677.
[7]	王薇, 徐知宇, 李永鑫, 程奕芸. 情绪主题绘本阅读对自闭症谱系障碍儿童情绪理解障碍的干预效果[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 566-572.
[8]	张骏, 仝文, 刘志方. 不同词长中文句子阅读知觉广度的年老化:眼动证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 312-319.
[9]	陈朝阳, 刘志方, 苏永强, 程亚华. 高低阅读技能聋生词汇加工的语境预测性效应特点:眼动证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 692-699.
[10]	童钰, 王福兴. 威胁性刺激蛇一定会被更快觉察吗?蛇与蜥蜴的对比[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 524-534.
[11]	苏永强, 付福音, 刘志方, 陈朝阳. 阅读中词汇视觉编码年老化的原因:基于消失文本实验的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(4): 433-440.
[12]	李文静, 童钰, 王福兴, 康素杰, 刘华山, 杨超. 动画教学代理对多媒体学习的影响:学习者经验与偏好的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(4): 453-462.
[13]	钱莹莹, 王福兴, 段朝辉, 周宗奎. 动画速度和学习者经验对多媒体学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 191-197.
[14]	张玉晶, 买合甫来提·坎吉, 阻木然提古丽·然木吐拉. 不同水平五年级维吾尔族学生母语阅读知觉广度[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(6): 703-709.
[15]	白学军, 郭志英, 王永胜, 高晓雷, 闫国利. 老年人与青年人阅读空格文本的注视位置效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(2): 171-179.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed