中文阅读中词汇加工的年老化:眼动证据

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2019.06.04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究探讨年老化影响中文阅读中词汇加工过程的特点，包含两项实验。实验一探讨老年与青年读者在词频效应上的差异，实验二探讨老年与青年读者在语境预测性效应上的差异。结果发现：（1）相对于青年读者，老年读者注视目标词汇的时间较长、再注视回视较多、跳读较少；（2）在首次注视时间、凝视时间和眼跳参数上，年龄组别与词频之间交互作用不显著，但对目标词汇的总注视时间上，年龄组别与词频之间交互作用显著；（3）在所有注视时间指标和回视概率上，均发现年龄组别与语境预测性影响之间交互作用显著。结论：中文老年读者阅读时的词汇加工效率低于青年人；中文阅读中眼跳策略与词汇加工的年老化模式有语言特殊性特点。

关键词: 中文阅读, 词汇加工, 年老化, 眼动

Abstract: Evidences have shown that aging enlarger the frequency effects in alphabetic languages reading, however, aging effects on predictability effects were not consistent between English and German. Present studies explored the aging effects on word processing in Chinese reading by tracing the eye movements of young and older adults when they reading. With two experiments we explored the age differences in word frequency and predictability effects respectively. The results have shown that (1) comparing to young adults, older adults fixated words for longer time, re-fixated and regressed more often, skipped less often, (2) the interaction between age groups and word frequency were not reliable on first fixation duration, and gaze duration on the target words, however, (3) interaction between age groups and word predictability were significant on all the fixation time and regression probability, the word predictability effect of older adults were lager than that of young adults. Thus these results indicated that aging lead to a decline in the efficiency of word processing, and the aging effects on eye movement control and word processing in Chinese reading were different from those in alphabetic languages reading.

Key words: Chinese reading, word processing, aging, eye movements

中图分类号:

B844

刘志方, 仝文, 张骏. 中文阅读中词汇加工的年老化:眼动证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 665-677.

LIU Zhifang, TONG Wen, ZHANG Jun. Aging Effects on Word Processing in Chinese Reading: Evidences from Eye Movements[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2019, 35(6): 665-677.

参考文献

Ashby, J., Rayner, K., & Clifton, C. (2005). Eye movements of highly skilled and average readers:Differential effects of frequency and predictability. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(6), 1065-1086.
Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17(3), 364-390.
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing:Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255-278.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1-48.
Blythe, H. I., Liversedge, S. P., Joseph, H. S. S. L., White, S. J., & Rayner, K. (2009). Visual information capture during fixations in reading for children and adults. Vision Research, 49(2), 1593-1591.
Dambacher, M.,Kliegl,R.,Hofmann,M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2006). Frequency and predictability effects on event related potentials during reading. Brain Research, 1084(1), 89-103.
Ehrlich, S. F., & Rayner, K. (1981). Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(6), 641-655.
Engbert, R., Longtin, A., & Kliegl, R. (2002). A dynamical model of saccade generation in reading based on spatially distributed lexical processing. Vision Research, 42(5), 621-636.
Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT:A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112(4), 777-813.
Hand, C.J., Miellet, S., O'Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2010). The frequency-predictability interaction in reading:It depends on where you're coming from. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 36(5), 1294-1313.
Jr, C. C., Ferreira, F., Henderson, J. M., Inhoff, A. W., Liversedge, S. P., Reichle, E. D., et al. (2016).Eye movements in reading and information processing:Keith Rayner's 40 year legacy. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 1-19.
Kemper,. S., & McDowd, J. (2006). Eye movements of young and older adults while reading with distraction. Psychology and Aging, 21(1), 32-39.
Kemper, S., & Liu, C. J. (2007). Eye movements of young and older adults during reading. Psychology and Aging, 22(1), 84-94.
Kemper, S., Crow, A., & Kemtes, K. (2004). Eye-fixation patterns of high and low-span young and older adults:down the garden path and back. Psychology and Aging 19(1), 157-170.
Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M., & Engbert, R. (2004). Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1/2), 262-284.
Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading:The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 135(1), 12-35.
Laubrock, J., Kliegl, R., & Engbert, R. (2006). SWIFT explorations of age differences in eye movements during reading. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(6), 872-884.
Li, X., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. P. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58(4), 525-552.
Liu, Y., Huang, R., Gao, D., & Reichle, E. D. (2017). Further tests of a dynamic-adjustment account of saccade targeting during the reading of chinese. Cognitive Science, 41(S6), 1264-1287.
Liu, Y., Huang, R., Li, Y., & Gao, D. (2017). The Word Frequency Effect on Saccade Targeting during Chinese Reading:Evidence from a Survival Analysis of Saccade Length. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 116-116.
Liu, Y., Reichle, E. D., & Li, X. (2015). Parafoveal processing affects outgoing saccade length during the reading of Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(4), 1229.
Liu, Y., Reichle, E. D., & Li, X. (2016). The effect of word frequency and parafoveal preview on saccade length during the reading of Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 42(7), 1008-1025.
Liu, Z., Pan, Y., Tong, W., & Liu, N. (2017). Effects of adults aging on word encoding in reading Chinese:evidence from disappearing text. PeerJ, 5:e2897 DOI 10.7717/peerj.2897.
Ma, G., Li, X., & Rayner, K. (2015). Readers extract character frequency information from nonfixated-target word at long pretarget fixations during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 41(5),1409-1419.
Owsley, C. (2011). Aging and vision. Vision Research, 51(13),1610-1622.
Paterson, K. B., McGowan, V. A., & Jordan, T. R. (2013). Effects of adult aging on reading filtered text:evidence from eye movements. PeerJ, 1:e63; DOI 10.7717/peerj.63
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing:20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.
Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 62(8), 1457-1506.
Rayner, K., Binder, K. S., Ashby, J., & Pollatsek, A. (2001). Eye movement control in reading:Word predictability has little influence on initial landing positions in words. Vision Research, 41(7), 943-954.
Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading:Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14(3), 191-201.
Rayner, K., Li, X., Juhasz, B. J., & Yan, G. (2005). The effect of word predictability on the eye movements of Chinese readers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 1089-1093
Rayner, K., Reichle, E. D., Stroud, M. J., Williams, C. C., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). The effects of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on the eye movements of young and elderly readers. Psychology and Aging, 21(3), 448-465.
Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (1996). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading:A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(4), 504-509.
Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D., & Rayner, K. (1998).Toward a model of eye-movements control in reading. Psychological Review, 105(1),125-157.
Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2006). E-Z Reader:A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement behavior during reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 4-22.
Richter, E. M., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2006). Current advances in SWIFT. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 23-33.
Reilly, R.,& Radach, R. (2006). Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive System Research, 7(1), 34-55.
Reilly, R., & Radach, R. (2012). The dynamics of reading in non-Roman writing systems:a Reading and Writing Special Issue. Reading & Writing, 25(5), 935-950.
Salthouse, T. A. (1992). Influence of processing speed on adult age differences in working memory. Acta Psychologica, 79(2), 155-170.
Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103(3), 403-428.
Schad, D. J., & Engbert, R. (2012). The zoom lens of attention:Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model. Visual Cognition, 20(4-5), 391-421.
Schotter, E. R., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2014). Rethinking parafoveal processing in reading:Serial attention models can explain semantic preview benefit and N+2 preview effects. Visual Cognition, 22(3-4), 309-333.
Slattery, T. J., Staub, A., & Rayner, K. (2012). Saccade launch site as a predictor of fixation durations in reading:Comments on Hand, Miellet.
O'Donnell, and Sereno (2010). Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 38(1), 251-261.
Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Miller, L. M. S., & Herzog, C. (2006). Aging and self-regulated language processing. Psychological Bulletin, 132(4), 582-606.
Wang, J., Li, L., Li, S., Xie, F., Chang, M., Paterson, K. B., et al. (2018). Adult age differences in eye movements during reading:The evidence from Chinese. Journals of Gerontology:Psychological Sciences, 73(4),584-593.
Yang, S. N., & McConkie, G. W. (2004). Saccade generation during reading:are words necessary? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1), 226-261.
Zang, C., Zhang, M., Bai, X., Yan, G., Paterson, K. B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2016). Effects of word frequency and visual complexity on eye movements of young and older Chinese readers. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(7), 1409-1425.
李德明, 刘昌, 陈天勇, 李贵芸. (2003). 加工速度和工作记忆在认知年老化过程中的作用. 心理学报,35(4), 471-475.
李兴珊, 刘萍萍, 马国杰. (2011). 中文阅读中词切分的认知机理述评. 心理科学进展, 19(4), 459-470.
卢张龙, 白学军, 闫国利. (2008). 汉语词汇识别中词频和可预测性交互作用的眼动研究. 心理研究,1(4), 29-33.
刘志方, 翁世华, 张锋. (2014). 中文阅读中词汇视觉编码的年龄特征:来自眼动方面的证据. 心理发展与教育, 30(4), 411-419.
申继亮, 王大华, 彭华茂, 唐丹. (2003). 基本心理能力老化的中介变量, 心理学报, 35(6), 802-809.
苏衡, 刘志方, 曹立人. (2016). 中文阅读预视加工中的词频和预测性效应及其对词切分的启示:基于眼动的证据. 心理学报, 48(6), 625-636.
苏永强, 付福音, 刘志方, 陈朝阳. (2017). 阅读中词汇视觉编码年老化的原因:基于消失文本实验的证据. 心理发展与教育, 33(4), 433-440.
王永胜, 白学军, 臧传丽, 高晓雷, 郭志英, 闫国利. (2016). 副中央凹中字N+2的预视对汉语阅读眼跳目标选择影响的眼动研究. 心理学报, 48(1), 1-11.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	王敬欣, 赵赛男, 徐倩倩. 字间空格与词频对青年人和老年人阅读的影响:眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 781-787.
[2]	高子惠, 焦雨, 王曦, 刘肖岑. 电子绘本文字的动静态呈现方式对幼儿阅读体验和学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 817-824.
[3]	于晓, 张涵, 陈英和, 戚玥, 刘爱芳, 刘丽丽. 类比推理的眼动研究:揭示个体类比推理策略发展的有效手段[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 897-903.
[4]	施芳婷, 郑晨烨, 颜秀琳, 陆露, 王静梅, 邸波, 卢英俊. 5~6岁幼儿对不同文化背景卡通面孔再认的眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 323-334.
[5]	马安然, 王燕青, 王福兴, 周治金. 教学微视频的播放速度对学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 391-399.
[6]	辛聪, 张曼曼, 郭盈秀, 郭云飞, 陈幼贞. 前瞻记忆意向后效应的加工机制:来自眼动的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 138-145.
[7]	王薇, 徐知宇, 李永鑫, 程奕芸. 情绪主题绘本阅读对自闭症谱系障碍儿童情绪理解障碍的干预效果[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 566-572.
[8]	张骏, 仝文, 刘志方. 不同词长中文句子阅读知觉广度的年老化:眼动证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 312-319.
[9]	陈朝阳, 刘志方, 苏永强, 程亚华. 高低阅读技能聋生词汇加工的语境预测性效应特点:眼动证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 692-699.
[10]	童钰, 王福兴. 威胁性刺激蛇一定会被更快觉察吗?蛇与蜥蜴的对比[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 524-534.
[11]	苏永强, 付福音, 刘志方, 陈朝阳. 阅读中词汇视觉编码年老化的原因:基于消失文本实验的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(4): 433-440.
[12]	李文静, 童钰, 王福兴, 康素杰, 刘华山, 杨超. 动画教学代理对多媒体学习的影响:学习者经验与偏好的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(4): 453-462.
[13]	钱莹莹, 王福兴, 段朝辉, 周宗奎. 动画速度和学习者经验对多媒体学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 191-197.
[14]	张玉晶, 买合甫来提·坎吉, 阻木然提古丽·然木吐拉. 不同水平五年级维吾尔族学生母语阅读知觉广度[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(6): 703-709.
[15]	白学军, 郭志英, 王永胜, 高晓雷, 闫国利. 老年人与青年人阅读空格文本的注视位置效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(2): 171-179.