动画速度和学习者经验对多媒体学习的影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2016.02.08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以往研究显示,动画教学的效果很可能受到学习者先前知识经验与动画速度的影响。研究选取高经验和低经验的学习者,操纵动画播放速度为快、中和慢三个水平,利用眼动仪记录学习过程中的注意,探讨学习者经验和动画速度对学习效果和注意分配的影响。结果发现,在即时测验上,学习者经验和动画速度没有交互作用;在延迟测验上,低经验者在快速下成绩优于中速;高经验者对图片注视时间长于低经验者。研究认为,在即时测验上,学习者的经验水平不会影响动画速度的教学效果;在延迟测验上,低经验者在快速呈现动画时学习效果更好,学习者经验和动画速度对学习效果的影响更可能随着时间推移体现出来;基于整体型学习材料,高经验者比低经验者更关注图片。

关键词: 先验知识, 动画速度, 多媒体学习, 眼动

Abstract: Previous studies showed that multimedia learning effect were likely to be influenced by learner's prior knowledge and animation's speed. This study presented fast, normal, and slow animated learning materials to learners with high prior knowledge (HPK) and low prior knowledge (LPK) while recording their eye movements with an eye tracker. The results showed that there were no interaction on immediate tests, while the LPK perform better under fast than normal condition on delayed test. Eye-movement data indicated that the HPK fixated longer than the LPK on the picture AOI (Area of Interest). It suggests that learner's prior knowledge wouldn't affect the instructional effect of animation's speed on immediate test. The LPK performed better under fast condition on delayed test, which shows the multimedia learning effect affected by learner's prior knowledge and animation's speed can be tested over time. The HPK pay more attention to picture than the LPK in the overall learning material.

Key words: prior knowledge, presentation speed, multimedia learning, eye movement

中图分类号:

B844

钱莹莹, 王福兴, 段朝辉, 周宗奎. 动画速度和学习者经验对多媒体学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 191-197.

QIAN Yingying, WANG Fuxing, DUAN Zhaohui, ZHOU Zongkui. The Effect of Animation's Presentation Speed and Learner's Prior Knowledge on Multimedia Learning[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2016, 32(2): 191-197.

参考文献

Amadieu,F., Van Gog, T., Paas, F., Tricot, A., & Mariné, C. (2009). Effects of prior knowledge and concept-map structure on disorientation, cognitive load, and learning. Learning and Instruction, 19(5), 376-386.
De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2010). Learning by generating vs. receiving instructional explanations:Two approaches to enhance attention cueing in animations. Computers & Education, 55(2), 681-691.
De Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2011). Attention cueing in an instructional animation:The role of presentation speed. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 41-45.
Eitel, A., Scheiter, K., Schüler, A., Nyström, M., & Holmqvist, K. (2013). How a picture facilitates the process of learning from text:Evidence for scaffolding. Learning and Instruction, 28(4), 48-63.
Fischer, S., Lowe, R. K., & Schwan, S. (2008). Effects of presentation speed of a dynamic visualization on the understanding of a mechanical system. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22(8), 1126-1141.
Fischer, S., & Schwan, S. (2010). Comprehending animations:Effects of spatial cueing versus temporal scaling. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 465-475.
Gegenfurtner, A., Lehtinen, E., & Säljö, R. (2011). Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizations:A meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 523-552.
Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation:Inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(5), 1084-1102.
Höffler, T. N., & Leutner, D. (2007). Instructional animation versus static pictures:A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 722-738.
Holsanova, J., Holmberg, N., & Holmqvist, K. (2009). Reading information graphics:The role of spatial contiguity and dual attentional guidance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(9), 1215-1226.
Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2003). The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 23-31.
Kalyuga, S. (2007). Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 19(4), 509-539.
Kalyuga, S., & Renkl, A. (2010). Expertise reversal effect and its instructional implications:Introduction to the special issue. Instructional Science, 38(3), 209-215.
Kalyuga, S., Rikers, R., & Paas, F. (2012). Educational implications of expertise reversal effects in learning and performance of complex cognitive and sensorimotor skills. Educational Psychology Review,24(2),313-337.
Kissane, M., Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2008). The consequences of fading instructional guidance on delayed performance:The case of financial services training. Educational Psychology, 28(7), 809-822.
Manor, B. R., & Gordon, E. (2003). Defining the temporal threshold for ocular fixation in free-viewing visuocognitive tasks. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 128(1), 85-93.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning:Evidence for dual processing systems in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312-320.
Meyer, K., Rasch, T., & Schnotz, W. (2010). Effects of animation's speed of presentation on perceptual processing and learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 136-145.
Nievelstein, F., Van Gog, T., Van Dijck, G., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2013). The worked example and expertise reversal effect in less structured tasks:Learning to reason about legal cases. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(2), 118-125.
Ozcelik, E., Arslan-Ari, I., & Cagiltay, K. (2010). Why does signaling enhance multimedia learning? Evidence from eye movements. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 110-117.
Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics:A cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429-434.
Post, L. S., Van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Zwaan, R. A. (2013). Effects of simultaneously observing and making gestures while studying grammar animations on cognitive load and learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1450-1455.
Rey, G. D., & Buchwald, F. (2011). The expertise reversal effect:Cognitive load and motivational explanations. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied, 17(1), 33-48.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving:Effects on learning. Cognitive Science,12(2),257-285.
段朝辉, 颜志强, 王福兴, 周宗奎. (2013). 动画呈现速度对多媒体学习效果影响的眼动研究. 心理发展与教育, 29(1), 46-53.
王福兴, 段朝辉, 周宗奎, 陈珺. (2015). 邻近效应对多媒体学习中图文整合的影响:线索的作用. 心理学报, 47(2), 224-233.
王福兴, 芦咏莉, 段朝辉, 周宗奎. (2013). 不同经验教师对学生课堂行为加工的眼动研究. 心理发展与教育, 29(4), 391-399.
闫国利, 熊建萍, 臧传丽, 余莉莉, 崔磊, 白学军. (2013). 阅读研究中的主要眼动指标评述. 心理科学进展, 21(4), 589-605.

相关文章 15

[1]	王敬欣, 赵赛男, 徐倩倩. 字间空格与词频对青年人和老年人阅读的影响:眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 781-787.
[2]	高子惠, 焦雨, 王曦, 刘肖岑. 电子绘本文字的动静态呈现方式对幼儿阅读体验和学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 817-824.
[3]	于晓, 张涵, 陈英和, 戚玥, 刘爱芳, 刘丽丽. 类比推理的眼动研究:揭示个体类比推理策略发展的有效手段[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 897-903.
[4]	施芳婷, 郑晨烨, 颜秀琳, 陆露, 王静梅, 邸波, 卢英俊. 5~6岁幼儿对不同文化背景卡通面孔再认的眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 323-334.
[5]	马安然, 王燕青, 王福兴, 周治金. 教学微视频的播放速度对学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 391-399.
[6]	辛聪, 张曼曼, 郭盈秀, 郭云飞, 陈幼贞. 前瞻记忆意向后效应的加工机制:来自眼动的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 138-145.
[7]	刘志方, 仝文, 张骏. 中文阅读中词汇加工的年老化:眼动证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 665-677.
[8]	周丽, 王福兴, 谢和平, 陈佳雪, 辛亮, 赵庆柏. 积极的情绪能否促进多媒体学习?基于元分析的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 697-709.
[9]	王薇, 徐知宇, 李永鑫, 程奕芸. 情绪主题绘本阅读对自闭症谱系障碍儿童情绪理解障碍的干预效果[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 566-572.
[10]	张骏, 仝文, 刘志方. 不同词长中文句子阅读知觉广度的年老化:眼动证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 312-319.
[11]	陈朝阳, 刘志方, 苏永强, 程亚华. 高低阅读技能聋生词汇加工的语境预测性效应特点:眼动证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 692-699.
[12]	童钰, 王福兴. 威胁性刺激蛇一定会被更快觉察吗?蛇与蜥蜴的对比[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 524-534.
[13]	苏永强, 付福音, 刘志方, 陈朝阳. 阅读中词汇视觉编码年老化的原因:基于消失文本实验的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(4): 433-440.
[14]	王玉鑫, 谢和平, 王福兴, 安婧, 郝艳斌. 多媒体学习的图文整合:空间邻近效应的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(5): 565-578.
[15]	李文静, 童钰, 王福兴, 康素杰, 刘华山, 杨超. 动画教学代理对多媒体学习的影响:学习者经验与偏好的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(4): 453-462.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed