心理发展与教育 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 323-334.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.03.03

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

5~6岁幼儿对不同文化背景卡通面孔再认的眼动研究

施芳婷1,2, 郑晨烨1,5, 颜秀琳1, 陆露1, 王静梅1,3, 邸波4, 卢英俊1,3   

  1. 1. 浙江师范大学儿童研究院, 杭州 310012;
    2. 华东师范大学国际与比较教育研究所, 上海 200062;
    3. 浙江师范大学发展认知神经科学实验室, 杭州 310012;
    4. 浙江师范大学杭州幼儿师范学院动画系, 杭州 310012;
    5. 浙江省级机关北山幼儿园, 杭州 310000
  • 发布日期:2021-05-18
  • 通讯作者: 卢英俊 E-mail:luyingjun@zjnu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省社科规划一般课题“儿童对卡通面孔与真人面孔认知的神经机制研究”(15JDET02YB)。

An Eye-movement Research on 5~6-year-old Children's Recognition of Cartoon Faces in Different Culture Backgrounds

SHI Fangting1,2, ZHENG Chenye1,5, YAN Xiulin1, LU Lu1, WANG Jingmei1,3, DI Bo4, LU Yingjun1,3   

  1. 1. Institute of Child Study, Zhejiang Normal University, Hangzhou 310012;
    2. Institute of International and Comparative Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062;
    3. Lab of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Hangzhou College for Preschool Education, Zhejiang Normal University, Hangzhou 310012;
    4. Department of Animation, Hangzhou College for Preschool Education, Zhejiang Normal University, Hangzhou 310012;
    5. Zhejiang Beishan Kindergarten, Hangzhou 310000
  • Published:2021-05-18

摘要: 采用不同文化背景卡通面孔为刺激材料,探究中国幼儿对中国风、日本风与欧美风女性卡通面孔再认的差异及其眼动机制。结果显示:(1)卡通面孔再认正确率差异显著,日本风面孔具有记忆优势;女童对三种面孔再认正确率均显著高于男童;(2)卡通面孔特质中的夸张性对卡通面孔再认正确率的预测显著;(3)文化背景与性别因素显著影响平均注视时间、注视点个数、眼跳次数和幅度及瞳孔大小等总体眼动指标;(4)兴趣区数据显示:对日本风面孔的总注视时间和注视点个数最高;卡通面孔再认主要依赖于眼部、其次为鼻子;文化背景与兴趣区存在交互作用,在注视时间、注视点个数与首注视点指标上,提示幼儿更关注日本风的眼睛区域与欧美风的鼻子区域。综上,幼儿对不同文化背景卡通面孔的记忆和眼动加工存在差异,日本风卡通面孔的记忆优势可能基于其夸张性高的面孔特质,尤其在眼睛部位;行为学与眼动指标均提示女童对卡通面孔的再认具有优势。

关键词: 幼儿, 面孔再认, 面孔记忆, 卡通面孔, 眼动

Abstract: Cartoon faces in different cultural backgrounds were used to explore the recognition difference and its eye movement mechanism when Chinese children were memorizing Chinese, Japanese and European-American style female cartoon faces. The results showed that:(1) the accuracy among different cartoon faces was significantly different, Japanese style faces had an advantage in memorizing. Girls' face recognition accuracy in three styles was significantly higher than boys; (2) the exaggeration of facial features of cartoon faces could significantly predicate the recognition accuracy; (3) cultural background and gender factors significantly affected overall eye movement indicators, such as the average fixation time, fixation counts, saccades counts, saccades amplitude, and pupil size; (4) interest area data showed that the total fixation time and fixation counts for Japanese style faces were the highest; the eyes were the most concerned in cartoon recognition, followed by the nose; There was an interaction between cultural background and interest area in fixation time, fixation counts and first fixation area, which indicates that children focus more on the eyes of Japanese style and the nose of European-American style. In conclusion, there are differences in children's memory and eye movement processing of cartoon faces from different cultural backgrounds. The memory advantage of Japanese style faces may be due to its exaggeration of facial features, especially for the eye areas. Girls show more advantages in recognizing cartoon faces both in behavioral and eye movement indicators.

Key words: children, face recognition, face memory, cartoon face, eye movement

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Anastasi, J. S., & Rhodes, M. G. (2005). An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12(6), 1043-1047.
Anzures, G., Kelly, D. J., Pascalis, O., Quinn, P. C., Slater, A. M., de Viviés, X., & Lee, K. (2014). Own- and other-race face identity recognition in children:The effects of pose and feature composition. Developmental Psychology, 50(2), 469-481.
Bar-Haim, Y., Ziv, T., Lamy, D., & Hodes, R. M. (2006). Nature and nurture in own-race face processing. Psychological Science, 17(2), 159-163.
Beham, M. P., & Roomi, S. M. (2013). A review of face recognition methods. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 27(4), 101-135.
Blais, C., Jack, R. E., Scheepers, C., Fiset, D., & Caldare, R. (2008). Culture shapes how we look at faces. PLoS ONE, 3(8), Article e3022.http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003022
Brandon, M. (2014). The effect of facial attractiveness on recognition memory. Honors Projects Overview. 98.https://digitalcommons.ric.edu/honors_projects/98
Bronstad, P. M., & Russell, R. (2007). Beauty is in the "we" of the beholder:Greater agreement on facial attractiveness among close relations. Perception, 36(11), 1674-1681.
Bruce, V., Burton, M., & Anddench, N. (1994). What's distinctive about a distinctive face? Experimental Psychology, 47(1), 119-141.
Chen, H., Russell, R., Nakayama, K., & Livingstone, M. (2010). Crossing the "uncanny valley":Adaptation to cartoon faces can influence perception of human faces. Perception, 39(3), 378-386.
Crookes, K., & Robbins, R. A. (2014). No childhood development of viewpoint-invariant face recognition:Evidence from 8-year-olds and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 103-111.
Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2006). The Cambridge face memory test:Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosia participants. Neuropsychologia, 44(4), 576-585.
Feinman, S., & Entwisle, D. R. (1976). Children's ability to recognize other children's faces. Child Development, 47(2), 506-510.
Ferguson, K. T., Kulkofsky, S., Cashon, C. H., & Casasola, M. (2009). The development of specialized processing of own-race faces in infancy. Infancy, 14(3), 263-284.
Gross, T. F. (2014). Face recognition and own-ethnicity bias in black, east/southeast Asian, Hispanic, and white children. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 5(3), 181-189.
Henderson, P. W., Giese, J. L., & Cote, J. A. (2004). Impression management using typeface design. Journal of Marketing, 68(4), 60-72.
Henderson, J., Falk, R.,Minut, S., Dyer, F. C., & Mahadevan, S. (2001). Gaze control for face learning and recognition by humans and machines. In T. F. Shipley & P. J. Kellman (Eds.). From fragments to objects:Segmentation and grouping in vision (pp. 463-481). Amsterdam:Elsevier Science.
Hills, P. J. (2012). A developmental study of the own-age face recognition bias in children. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 499-508.
Lewin C, & Herlitz A. (2002). Sex differences in face recognition-women's faces make the difference. Brain & Cognition, 50(1), 121-128.
John, M. H., Carrick, C. W., & Richard, J. F. (2005). Eye movements are functional during face learning. Memory Cognition, 33(1), 98-110.
Liu, S., Quinn, P. C., Wheeler, A., Xiao, N., Ge, L., & Lee, K. (2011). Similarity and difference in the processing of same- and other-race faces as revealed by eye tracking in 4- to 9-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(1), 180-189.
Lovén, J., Herlitz, A., & Rehnman, J. (2011). Women's own-gender bias in face recognition memory. Experimental Psychology, 58(4), 333-340.
Lu, Y. J., Wang, J. M., Wang, L., Wang, J. L., & Qin, J. L. (2014). Neural responses to cartoon facial attractiveness:An event-related potential study. Neuroscience Bulletin, 30(3), 441-450.
Palmer, M. A., Brewer, N., & Horry, R. (2013).Understanding gender bias in face recognition:Effects of divided attention at encoding. Acta Psychologica, 142(3), 362-369.
Mallet, P., & Lallemand, N. (2003). Preadolescents' recognition of faces of unfamiliar peers:The effect of attractiveness of faces. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 164(4), 453-471.
Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7(1), 3-35.
Maner, J. K., Kenrick, D. T., Becker, D. V., Delton, A. W., Hofer, B., Wilbur, C., & Neuberg, S. (2003). Sexually selective cognition:Beauty captures the mind of the beholder. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1107-1120.
Mauro, R., & Kubovy, M. (1992). Caricature and face recognition. Memory & Cognition, 20(4), 433-440.
Quinn, P. C., Uttley, L., Lee, K., Gibson, A., Smith, M., & Slater, A. M. (2008). Infant preference for female faces occurs for same-but not other-race faces. Journal of Neuropsychology, 2(1), 15-26.
Quinn, P. C., Yahr, J., Kuhn, A., Slater, A. M., & Pascalis, O. (2002). Representation of the gender of human faces by infants:A preference for female. Perception, 31(9), 1109-1121.
Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movement in reading and information processing:20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372-422.
Rehnman, J., & Herlitz, A. (2006). Higher face recognition ability in girls:Magnified by own-sex and own-ethnicity bias. Memory, 14(3), 289-296.
Rhodes, G., & Tremewan, T. (1996). Averageness, exaggeration, and facial attractiveness. Psychological Science, 7(2), 105-110.
Rhodes, G., Harwood, K., Yoshikawa, S., Nishitani, M., & McLean, I. (2002). The attractiveness of average faces:Cross-cultural evidence and possible biological basis. In G. Rhodes & L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Facial attractiveness:Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (pp. 35-58). Ablex Publishing.
Rubenstein, A. J., Kalakanis, L., & Langlois, J. H. (1999). Infant preferences for attractive faces:A cognitive explanation. Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 848-855.
Sangrigoli, S., & de Schonen, S. (2004). Recognition of own-race and other-race faces by three-month-old infants. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(7), 1219-1227.
Weirich, S., Hoffmann, F., Meissner, L., Heinz, A., & Bengner, T. (2011). Sex influence on face recognition memory moderated by presentation duration and reencoding. Neuropsychology, 25(6), 806-813.
Wright, D. B., & Stroud, J. N. (2002). Age differences in lineup identification accuracy:People are better with their own age. Law and Human Behavior. 26(6), 641-654.
Wright, D., B. & Sladden, B. (2003). An own gender bias and the importance of hair in face recognition. Acta Psychologica, 114(1), 101-114.
Xiao, W. S., Xiao, N. G., Quinn, P. C., Anzures, G., & Lee, K. (2013). Development of face scanning for own- and other-race faces in infancy. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37(2), 100-105.
程蕾, 黄希庭. (2016). 5岁儿童自我面孔的认知特点. 心理与行为研究, 14(4), 465-470.
谷莉, 白学军. (2014). 成人与幼儿面部表情注意偏好的眼动研究. 心理科学, 37(1), 101-105.
李鸥, 陈红. (2010). 面孔吸引力的回顾与前瞻. 心理科学进展, 18(3), 472-479.
刘希平, 唐乐, 唐卫海. (2012). 面孔再认及学习程度判断中的同龄效应. 心理发展与教育,28(3),271-275.
吕勇, 刘亚平, 罗跃嘉. (2011). 记忆面孔, 男女有别:关于面孔再认性别差异的行为与ERP研究. 科学通报, 256(14), 1112-1123.
彭聃龄, 张必隐. (2004). 认知心理学. 杭州:浙江教育出版社.
史新广. (2007). 女性容貌吸引力及其与人格和心理健康的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 苏州大学.
隋雪, 任延涛. (2007). 面部表情识别的即时加工过程. 心理学报, 36(1), 64-70.
唐玉梅, 葛列众. (2004). 陌生面孔特征信息的拼图实验研究. 人类工效学, 10(4), 37-38.
唐卫海, 唐乐, 张晓佩, 刘希平. (2017). 面孔再认中同龄效应的发展. 天津师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 48-53.
田磊.(2008). 中外影视动画民族艺术风格比较研究(硕士学位论文). 山东师范大学, 济南.
王军利, 王静梅, 任静婷, 卢英俊. (2013). 卡通面孔分类与知觉加工的ERP比较研究. 心理科学, 36(2), 320-327.
王静梅, 卢英俊. (2011). 绘图方式与脸型对卡通面孔吸引力的影响. 幼儿教育,(6), 6-11.
王玲, 王静梅, 王军利, 卢英俊. (2012). 卡通面孔与真实面孔识别的ERP比较研究. 心理研究, 5(5), 19-28.
王乾东, 胡超, 傅根跃. (2013). 幼儿面孔加工异族效应的眼动研究. 心理学报, 45(2), 169-178.
王哲, 葛列众, 袁中庆. (2010). 5岁儿童对熟悉面孔的特征信息识别. 心理科学, 33(1), 122-125.
吴振东. (2002). 儿童电视美术片在幼儿园教育中的应用研究(硕士学位论文). 福建师范大学, 福州.
闫国利, 白学军. (2012). 眼动研究心理学导论:揭开心灵之窗奥秘的神奇学科. 北京:科学出版社.
赵倩, 王静梅, 徐侃鸿, 卢英俊. (2013). 不同任务情境中5~6岁儿童卡通面孔加工的眼动研究. 心理发展与教育, 29(5), 457-465.
张丽丽, 魏斌, 张妍. (2016). 微笑影响面孔吸引力判断的眼动研究. 心理学探新, 36(1), 1113-1117.
张妍, 孔繁昌, 陈红, 向燕辉, 高笑, 陈敏燕. (2010). 男性对女性面孔吸引力的认知偏好:来自ERP的证据. 心理学报, 42(11), 1060-1072.
郑晨烨, 王静梅, 胡佳, 王一逸, 郑娴, 张莹, 卢英俊. (2015). 面部空间特征关系对真人与卡通面孔吸引力影响的ERP发展性研究. 心理学进展, 5(12), 816-827.
郑晨烨. (2018). 幼儿对真人与卡通面孔记忆及其眼动机制研究(硕士学位论文). 浙江师范大学, 杭州.
郑娴, 张筱群, 郑潇雅, 王静梅, 卢英俊. (2014). 6岁幼儿对卡通与真人面孔表情认知差异的研究. 幼儿教育, (12), 35-39.
朱孟亭. (2011). 面孔认知性别差异的眼动研究(硕士学位论文). 华东师范大学, 上海.
[1] 王敬欣, 赵赛男, 徐倩倩. 字间空格与词频对青年人和老年人阅读的影响:眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 781-787.
[2] 高子惠, 焦雨, 王曦, 刘肖岑. 电子绘本文字的动静态呈现方式对幼儿阅读体验和学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 817-824.
[3] 王英杰, 栾金鑫, 李燕. 母亲养育压力与幼儿焦虑的关系:亲子冲突的中介作用和母亲正念的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 702-709.
[4] 张文洁, 范增, 黎蕾, 刘毅, 钟毅平. 接受对象的常规行为与资源需求对5~6岁幼儿分享行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 465-472.
[5] 牛湘, 冉光明. 同伴关系与幼儿问题行为关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 473-487.
[6] 刘双, 李梅, 冯晓杭, 张向葵. 幼儿掌控动机与能力关系的纵向研究:任务类型与气质的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 161-172.
[7] 王英杰, 张刈, 张美霞, 李燕. 母亲正念与幼儿问题行为的关系:正念养育和亲子关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 184-191.
[8] 刘晓洁, 李燕. 母亲感知的共同教养对幼儿行为问题的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 626-634.
[9] 张和颐, 洪秀敏. 家庭认知环境与0~3岁婴幼儿发展的关系:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 178-185.
[10] 王薇, 贡德英, 程春, 陈科, 李永鑫, 闫晶晶. 5~7岁自闭症谱系障碍幼儿数感的特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 818-825.
[11] 于晓, 张涵, 陈英和, 戚玥, 刘爱芳, 刘丽丽. 类比推理的眼动研究:揭示个体类比推理策略发展的有效手段[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 897-903.
[12] 刘田田, 李燕, 李有嘉, 姜新苗. 父母协同教养与学前儿童社会行为的关系:亲子关系和同胞关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 638-647.
[13] 周思妤, 王艺卓, 李晓巍. 幼儿园新教师学历与离职意向的关系:入职适应、工作满意度的多重中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 675-682.
[14] 贺晓玲, 陈俊, 刘灵, 张甜. 3~5岁幼儿职业声望垂直空间、大小双重隐喻发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 457-464.
[15] 李占星, 朱莉琪. “它”是所有者吗?幼儿对所有权主体的理解[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 465-471.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!