公正世界信念与大学生社会责任感的关系:人际信任的解释作用及其性别差异

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2019.03.04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 社会责任感是大学生学业成就和幸福生活等积极心理与行为的有效预测指标，考察社会责任感的影响因素及其作用机制有助于大学生社会责任感的培养与提升。为此，本研究以6所高校852名大学生为被试，考察了公正世界信念与大学生社会责任感之间的关系，以及人际信任对二者关系的中介作用及其性别差异。结果发现：（1）公正世界信念可以显著正向预测大学生的社会责任感；（2）人际信任在公正世界信念与大学生社会责任感之间发挥着部分中介作用，但是主要表现在男大学生群体中，而女大学生中未发现该效应。这说明，公正世界信念可以显著预测大学生社会责任感，并且在男大学生中人际信任是二者关系的中介桥梁。

关键词: 公正世界信念, 人际信任, 社会责任感, 性别差异, 大学生

Abstract: Social responsibility is a relatively stable quality referring to assuming social responsibility or helping others. For undergraduate students, social responsibility was considered to be the effective indicator of a series of positive psychology and behaviors. In this study, 852 college students from 6 universities in China were investigated to examine the mediating effect of interpersonal trust and the moderating role of gender between belief in a just world and social responsibility. The results showed:(1) The belief in a just world was significantly positively related to the sense of social responsibility; (2) The relationship between belief in a just world and social responsibility was mediated by interpersonal trust. However, the mediating effect of interpersonal trust is mainly found among male undergraduate students, but not among female undergraduate students. This meant that the belief in a just world belief could predict male undergraduate students' sense of social responsibility, and interpersonal trust was the intermediary bridge between the relationship.

Key words: belief in a just world, interpersonal trust, social responsibility, gender difference, undergraduate student

中图分类号:

B844

易梅, 田园, 明桦, 黄四林, 辛自强. 公正世界信念与大学生社会责任感的关系:人际信任的解释作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 282-287.

YI Mei, TIAN Yuan, MING Hua, HUANG Silin, XIN Ziqiang. Relationship between Belief in a Just World and Social Responsibility among Undergraduate Students: The Mediating Role of Interpersonal Trust and the Gender Difference[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2019, 35(3): 282-287.

参考文献

AhnDoehee. (2016). Relations of Adolescents' Peer Attachment, Social Responsibility, and Interpersonal Problems. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16, 411-430.
Alonso-Almeida, M., Perramon, J., & Bagur-Femenias, L. (2017). Leadership styles and corporate social responsibility management:Analysis from a gender perspective. Business Ethics:A European Review, 26, 147-161.
Bègue, L., Charmoillaux, M., Cochet, J., Cury, C., & Suremain, F. D. (2008). Altruistic behavior and the bidimensional just world belief. American Journal of Psychology, 121, 47-56.
Correia, I., & Dalbert, C., (2008), School bullying:Belief in a personal just world of bullies, victims and defenders. European Psychologist, 13, 248-254.
Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally:about the personal belief in a just world scale's validity. Social Justice Research, 12, 79-98.
Edlund, J. E., Sagarin, B. J., & Johnson, B. S. (2007). Reciprocity and the belief in a just world. Personality & Individual Differences, 43, 589-596.
Flanagan, C. A. (2013). Teenage Citizens:The Political Theories of the Young. Harvard University Press.
Gilligan, C. (1983). In a different voice:Psychological theory and women's development. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 28, 39-40.
Hafer, C. L., & Correy, B. L. (1999). Mediators of the relation between beliefs in a just world and emotional responses to negative outcomes. Social Justice Research, 12, 189-204.
Kelley, S. M., & Kelley, C. G. (2009). Subjective Social Mobility:data from thirty nations. In The International Social Survey Programme 1984-2009. Routledge.
Sosik, J. J., Koul, R., & Cameron, J. C. (2017). Gender and contextual differences in social responsibility in Thai schools:a multi-study person versus situation analysis. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 38(1), 45-62.
Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process:Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030-1051.
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1989). The social psychology of procedural justice. Critical Issues in Social Justice, 57, 830-838.
Isen, A. M. (2009). A role for neuropsychology in understanding the facilitating influence of positive affect on social behavior and cognitive processes. In C. R. Snyder & S. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology. New York:Oxford.
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122-1131.
Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651-665.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Introduction to special topic forum:Not so different after all:A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-404.
Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior:the effect of one badapple on the barrel. Psychological Science, 20, 393-398.
Singg, S., & Ader, J. A. (2001). Development of the student personal responsibility scale-10. Social Behavior & Personality:An International Journal, 29, 331-335.
Such, E., & Walker, R. (2004). Being responsible and responsible beings:Children's understanding of responsibility. Children & Society, 18, 231-242.
Wray-Lake, L., Syvertsen, A. K., & Flanagan, C. A. (2016). Developmental change in social responsibility during adolescence:An ecological perspective. Developmental Psychology, 52(1), 130-142.
Tan, Y. L. (2013). Does organizational injustice lead to unethical behavior in workplace? The moderating effect of guanxi. In The 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (1209-1216). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
UNESCO. (1998). World Declaration on Higher Education for The Twenty-First Century:Vision and Action. Available at http://www.unesco.org/education/educprog/wche/declaration_eng.htm (retrieved 25 July 2009).
Waugh, C. E., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2006), Nice to know you:Positive emotions, self-other overlap, and complex understanding in the formation of a new relationship. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 93-106.
Wray-Lake, L., & Syvertsen, A. K. (2011). The developmental roots of social responsibility in childhood and adolescence. New Directions for Child & Adolescent Development, 34, 11-25.
阿孜古丽·吐尔逊, 王贞贞, 窦亚兰, 戴江红. (2015). 新疆某医科院校中外临床专业医学生人际信任调查. 新疆医科大学学报, 38, 1438-1440.
常志彬, 谭千保. (2017). 大学生的公正世界信念及其对自尊的作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 25, 537-539.
丁园园, 吕伟, 姚本先. (2009). 大学生人际交往价值观的性别差异研究. 中国成人教育, 18, 90-91.
何晓丽, 王振宏, 王克静. (2011). 积极情绪对人际信任影响的线索效应. 心理学报, 43, 1408-1417.
侯杰泰. (2004). 结构方程模型及其应用. 北京:教育科学出版社.
胡伟, 陈世盛, 吕勇. (2014). 高中生人际信任、疏离感和公民责任意识的关系研究. 心理与行为研究, 12, 795-799.
黄四林, 韩明跃, 孙铃,尚若星. (2016). 大学生公正感对其社会责任感的影响——社会流动信念的中介作用. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 61, 68-74.
刘春晖, 辛自强, 林崇德. (2013). 主题情境和信任特质对大学生信任圈的影响. 心理发展与教育, 29, 255-261.
刘广增, 胡天强, 张大均. (2016). 中学生人际关系及其与自尊、人际信任的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24, 349-351.
刘海涛, 郑雪. (2010). 大学生社会责任感与人格关系的研究. 长春工业大学学报(高教研究版), 31, 89-92.
聂兵霞. (2015). 大学生公正世界信念与宽恕的关系:自尊、感恩的中介作用 (硕士学位论文). 哈尔滨师范大学.
卢光莉, 陈超然. (2004). 大学生人际信任状况的研究. 行政科学论坛, 18, 117-119.
毛婷婷, 梁昌莲. (2013). 山西省大学生公正世界信念现状调查及分析. 长治学院学报, 30, 02-104.
明朗. (2013). 制度信任和社会流动信念的特征及其与学业投入的关系(硕士学位论文). 中央财经大学,北京.
滕国鹏, 金盛华, 刘宏伟. (2016). 大学生社会公平期望对人际信任的影响——积极信念的中介作用. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 37, 22-25.
王希平. (2011). 大学生自我和谐、人际信任与主观幸福感的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 河北大学,保定.
王鑫. (2012). 教师差别行为与中学生学业情绪、学业成绩的关系 (硕士学位论文). 陕西师范大学,西安.
夏勉, 张玉, 谢宝国. (2015). 大学生助人行为两难现象的影响因素及应对策略. 学习与实践, 32, 135-140.
杨中芳, 彭泗清. (1999). 中国人人际信任的概念化:一个人际关系的观点. 社会学研究, 14, 3-23.
周春燕, 郭永玉. (2013). 公正世界信念——重建公正的双刃剑. 心理科学进展, 21, 144-154.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12, 942-950.

相关文章 15

[1]	刘颖, 刘儒德, 毛晨莹, 林静敏, 刘佳彬. 在线视频学习中教师反馈时间和反馈复杂性对大学生学习投入的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 408-417.
[2]	万欢兰, 牛宇洁, 王博晨, 金灿灿. 大学生人生目标、自我控制和学业倦怠间的关系:一项纵向研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 418-426.
[3]	张梅, 黄扬, 于嘉雯, 黄四林. 媒体多任务对大学生阅读绩效的影响：任务难度和类型的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 222-233.
[4]	赵笑梅, 赵昕睿, 王珂珂. 大学生图文信息知识整合的加工:来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 18-27.
[5]	丁越, 刘力嘉, 寇彧. 互联网时代的大学生人际关系满意度:线上积极反馈与感知社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 39-49.
[6]	王祯, 史保莹, 赵好莉, 郭云飞, 王恩国. 情感教学代理的情绪表达和角色对视频学习的影响:学习者经验的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 60-69.
[7]	魏军, 羿聪, 周溪亭. 大学生基于学业表现的自我价值感与学业内卷行为的关联:基于潜变量增长模型分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 692-700.
[8]	汤佳怡, 付成妤, 徐慰. 青少年家庭功能对抑郁和社交焦虑的影响:公正世界信念的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 701-709.
[9]	焦姣, 牡丹, 史璐. 亲密关系满意度对大学生主观幸福感的影响:一项日记追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 720-729.
[10]	胡心怡, 陈英和. 大学生新目标投入能力、自我损耗与幸福感的关系:生命意义感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 348-356.
[11]	谢莉, 金辉, 王志英, 胡宇飞, 杨喜兰, 席娟. 脱贫内生动力对贫困大学生学习投入的影响:自我控制的中介作用和社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 386-397.
[12]	谭德琴, 丁菀, 宋省成, 吴伟, 蔺秀云. 代际间的暴力传递——父母虐待对儿童欺负行为的影响:基于潜变量增长模型的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 410-419.
[13]	赵笑梅, 程释, 刘子涵, 刘红. 不同语言条件和执行功能对大学生记忆整合的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 153-162.
[14]	廖晨曦, 王大华. 大学生依恋对自尊和人际适应的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 196-205.
[15]	郭滢, 陈晓丹, 刘文志, 刘雨彤, 朱皕. 青少年语义错误记忆发展:学习测验因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 12-21.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed