公正世界信念与大学生社会责任感的关系:人际信任的解释作用及其性别差异

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2019.03.04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 社会责任感是大学生学业成就和幸福生活等积极心理与行为的有效预测指标，考察社会责任感的影响因素及其作用机制有助于大学生社会责任感的培养与提升。为此，本研究以6所高校852名大学生为被试，考察了公正世界信念与大学生社会责任感之间的关系，以及人际信任对二者关系的中介作用及其性别差异。结果发现：（1）公正世界信念可以显著正向预测大学生的社会责任感；（2）人际信任在公正世界信念与大学生社会责任感之间发挥着部分中介作用，但是主要表现在男大学生群体中，而女大学生中未发现该效应。这说明，公正世界信念可以显著预测大学生社会责任感，并且在男大学生中人际信任是二者关系的中介桥梁。

关键词: 公正世界信念, 人际信任, 社会责任感, 性别差异, 大学生

Abstract: Social responsibility is a relatively stable quality referring to assuming social responsibility or helping others. For undergraduate students, social responsibility was considered to be the effective indicator of a series of positive psychology and behaviors. In this study, 852 college students from 6 universities in China were investigated to examine the mediating effect of interpersonal trust and the moderating role of gender between belief in a just world and social responsibility. The results showed:(1) The belief in a just world was significantly positively related to the sense of social responsibility; (2) The relationship between belief in a just world and social responsibility was mediated by interpersonal trust. However, the mediating effect of interpersonal trust is mainly found among male undergraduate students, but not among female undergraduate students. This meant that the belief in a just world belief could predict male undergraduate students' sense of social responsibility, and interpersonal trust was the intermediary bridge between the relationship.

Key words: belief in a just world, interpersonal trust, social responsibility, gender difference, undergraduate student

中图分类号:

B844

易梅, 田园, 明桦, 黄四林, 辛自强. 公正世界信念与大学生社会责任感的关系:人际信任的解释作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 282-287.

YI Mei, TIAN Yuan, MING Hua, HUANG Silin, XIN Ziqiang. Relationship between Belief in a Just World and Social Responsibility among Undergraduate Students: The Mediating Role of Interpersonal Trust and the Gender Difference[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2019, 35(3): 282-287.

参考文献

AhnDoehee. (2016). Relations of Adolescents' Peer Attachment, Social Responsibility, and Interpersonal Problems. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16, 411-430.
Alonso-Almeida, M., Perramon, J., & Bagur-Femenias, L. (2017). Leadership styles and corporate social responsibility management:Analysis from a gender perspective. Business Ethics:A European Review, 26, 147-161.
Bègue, L., Charmoillaux, M., Cochet, J., Cury, C., & Suremain, F. D. (2008). Altruistic behavior and the bidimensional just world belief. American Journal of Psychology, 121, 47-56.
Correia, I., & Dalbert, C., (2008), School bullying:Belief in a personal just world of bullies, victims and defenders. European Psychologist, 13, 248-254.
Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally:about the personal belief in a just world scale's validity. Social Justice Research, 12, 79-98.
Edlund, J. E., Sagarin, B. J., & Johnson, B. S. (2007). Reciprocity and the belief in a just world. Personality & Individual Differences, 43, 589-596.
Flanagan, C. A. (2013). Teenage Citizens:The Political Theories of the Young. Harvard University Press.
Gilligan, C. (1983). In a different voice:Psychological theory and women's development. Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 28, 39-40.
Hafer, C. L., & Correy, B. L. (1999). Mediators of the relation between beliefs in a just world and emotional responses to negative outcomes. Social Justice Research, 12, 189-204.
Kelley, S. M., & Kelley, C. G. (2009). Subjective Social Mobility:data from thirty nations. In The International Social Survey Programme 1984-2009. Routledge.
Sosik, J. J., Koul, R., & Cameron, J. C. (2017). Gender and contextual differences in social responsibility in Thai schools:a multi-study person versus situation analysis. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 38(1), 45-62.
Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process:Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030-1051.
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1989). The social psychology of procedural justice. Critical Issues in Social Justice, 57, 830-838.
Isen, A. M. (2009). A role for neuropsychology in understanding the facilitating influence of positive affect on social behavior and cognitive processes. In C. R. Snyder & S. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology. New York:Oxford.
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122-1131.
Rotter, J. B. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35, 651-665.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Introduction to special topic forum:Not so different after all:A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393-404.
Gino, F., Ayal, S., & Ariely, D. (2009). Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior:the effect of one badapple on the barrel. Psychological Science, 20, 393-398.
Singg, S., & Ader, J. A. (2001). Development of the student personal responsibility scale-10. Social Behavior & Personality:An International Journal, 29, 331-335.
Such, E., & Walker, R. (2004). Being responsible and responsible beings:Children's understanding of responsibility. Children & Society, 18, 231-242.
Wray-Lake, L., Syvertsen, A. K., & Flanagan, C. A. (2016). Developmental change in social responsibility during adolescence:An ecological perspective. Developmental Psychology, 52(1), 130-142.
Tan, Y. L. (2013). Does organizational injustice lead to unethical behavior in workplace? The moderating effect of guanxi. In The 19th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (1209-1216). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
UNESCO. (1998). World Declaration on Higher Education for The Twenty-First Century:Vision and Action. Available at http://www.unesco.org/education/educprog/wche/declaration_eng.htm (retrieved 25 July 2009).
Waugh, C. E., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2006), Nice to know you:Positive emotions, self-other overlap, and complex understanding in the formation of a new relationship. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 93-106.
Wray-Lake, L., & Syvertsen, A. K. (2011). The developmental roots of social responsibility in childhood and adolescence. New Directions for Child & Adolescent Development, 34, 11-25.
阿孜古丽·吐尔逊, 王贞贞, 窦亚兰, 戴江红. (2015). 新疆某医科院校中外临床专业医学生人际信任调查. 新疆医科大学学报, 38, 1438-1440.
常志彬, 谭千保. (2017). 大学生的公正世界信念及其对自尊的作用. 中国健康心理学杂志, 25, 537-539.
丁园园, 吕伟, 姚本先. (2009). 大学生人际交往价值观的性别差异研究. 中国成人教育, 18, 90-91.
何晓丽, 王振宏, 王克静. (2011). 积极情绪对人际信任影响的线索效应. 心理学报, 43, 1408-1417.
侯杰泰. (2004). 结构方程模型及其应用. 北京:教育科学出版社.
胡伟, 陈世盛, 吕勇. (2014). 高中生人际信任、疏离感和公民责任意识的关系研究. 心理与行为研究, 12, 795-799.
黄四林, 韩明跃, 孙铃,尚若星. (2016). 大学生公正感对其社会责任感的影响——社会流动信念的中介作用. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 61, 68-74.
刘春晖, 辛自强, 林崇德. (2013). 主题情境和信任特质对大学生信任圈的影响. 心理发展与教育, 29, 255-261.
刘广增, 胡天强, 张大均. (2016). 中学生人际关系及其与自尊、人际信任的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24, 349-351.
刘海涛, 郑雪. (2010). 大学生社会责任感与人格关系的研究. 长春工业大学学报(高教研究版), 31, 89-92.
聂兵霞. (2015). 大学生公正世界信念与宽恕的关系:自尊、感恩的中介作用 (硕士学位论文). 哈尔滨师范大学.
卢光莉, 陈超然. (2004). 大学生人际信任状况的研究. 行政科学论坛, 18, 117-119.
毛婷婷, 梁昌莲. (2013). 山西省大学生公正世界信念现状调查及分析. 长治学院学报, 30, 02-104.
明朗. (2013). 制度信任和社会流动信念的特征及其与学业投入的关系(硕士学位论文). 中央财经大学,北京.
滕国鹏, 金盛华, 刘宏伟. (2016). 大学生社会公平期望对人际信任的影响——积极信念的中介作用. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 37, 22-25.
王希平. (2011). 大学生自我和谐、人际信任与主观幸福感的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 河北大学,保定.
王鑫. (2012). 教师差别行为与中学生学业情绪、学业成绩的关系 (硕士学位论文). 陕西师范大学,西安.
夏勉, 张玉, 谢宝国. (2015). 大学生助人行为两难现象的影响因素及应对策略. 学习与实践, 32, 135-140.
杨中芳, 彭泗清. (1999). 中国人人际信任的概念化:一个人际关系的观点. 社会学研究, 14, 3-23.
周春燕, 郭永玉. (2013). 公正世界信念——重建公正的双刃剑. 心理科学进展, 21, 144-154.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12, 942-950.

相关文章 15

[1]	郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系：双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2]	王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[3]	樊香麟, 崔英锦. 客体化身体意识与女大学生限制性饮食行为的关系：外貌负面评价恐惧和社会文化压力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 122-131.
[4]	张慧如, 张伟达, 傅王倩, 邓敏, 彭苏浩, 李玉. 孤独感对创造性倾向的影响：无聊倾向和焦虑情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 132-141.
[5]	邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[6]	何安明, 张钰睿, 惠秋平. 大学生感恩与社会幸福感的关系:手机冷落行为的中介作用和负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 505-512.
[7]	赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[8]	杜秀芳, 武玉玺, 徐政, 袁晓倩, 陈功香. 金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 342-349.
[9]	喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[10]	曾子豪, 彭丽仪, 詹林, 刘双金, 欧阳晓优, 丁道群, 黎志华, 胡义秋, 方晓义. 儿童期受虐对大学生抑郁症状的影响:主观幸福感的中介和基因的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 276-285.
[11]	曹瑞琳, 梅松丽, 梁磊磊, 李传恩, 张莹. 感恩与大学生网络成瘾的关系:核心自我评价和生命意义感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 286-294.
[12]	陈子循, 李金文, 王雨萌, 刘霞. 累积环境风险与大学生自伤的关系:情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 109-120.
[13]	张陆, 黄雪芳, 游志麒, 叶娜. 儿童期虐待对大学生公正世界信念的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 804-812.
[14]	郑爽, 刘红瑞, 李静, 席雨, 姚梅林. 主动性人格与大学生创业准备行为的关系:创业意向的中介效应与创业社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 813-821.
[15]	王浩, 俞国良. 大学生依恋焦虑与抑郁的关系:恋爱中关系攻击和关系质量的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 879-885.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed