受助者结果类型对亲社会表现的影响:成人与儿童的对比研究

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2019.03.03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 亲社会表现是指人们在社会交往中表现出来的谦让、帮助、合作、分享等行为，其影响机制受到广泛关注。本文通过两个研究（分别以大学生和二、四、六年级小学生为研究对象）探讨了受助者结果类型（受助者获得积极结果vs.受助者避免消极结果）对亲社会表现的影响。结果显示：（1）受助者避免消极结果条件比受助者获得积极结果条件诱发成人更高的亲社会意愿和行为；（2）六年级儿童帮助他人避免消极结果的亲社会意愿更强、情绪更积极；（3）相对于帮助他人避免消极结果，二年级儿童更倾向于帮助他人获得积极结果。这些结果说明受助者结果类型影响个体的亲社会表现（包括亲社会行为、亲社会意愿、亲社会情绪），并且这种影响因成人和儿童有所不同：成人和年长儿童表现出亲社会损失规避现象，年幼儿童则表现出相反效应。

关键词: 亲社会表现, 受助者结果类型, 成人, 儿童, 亲社会损失规避

Abstract: Prosocial performance refers to a broad category of actions that benefit other people or the society. The mechanisms underlying prosocial performance is a hot topic. Compared with other factors that affect prosocial performance, prosocial outcomes relatively received less attention. This research explored the effects of the recipient's outcomes (prosocial gains vs. prosocial non-losses) and age on prosocial performance. The results revealed that, (1) for adults, prosocial non-losses induced more prosocial performance than prosocial gains; (2) for Grade six children, the prosocial willingness to help others avoid negative outcomes was stronger; (3) Grade two children were more willing to help others gain positive outcomes. These results suggest that the recipient's outcomes produced an effect on prosocial performance, and only adults and old children exhibit prosocial loss aversion.

Key words: prosocial performance, recipient's outcomes, adults, children, prosocial loss aversion

中图分类号:

B844

肖凤秋, 郑志伟, 陈英和. 受助者结果类型对亲社会表现的影响:成人与儿童的对比研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 274-281.

XIAO Fengqiu, ZHENG Zhiwei, CHEN Yinghe. The Contrast Effect of the Recipient's Outcomes on Prosocial Performance between Adults and Children[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2019, 35(3): 274-281.

参考文献

Batson, C. D., Dyck, J. L., Brandt, J. R., Batson, J. G., Powell, A. L., McMaster, M. R., & Griffitt, C. (1988). Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 52-77.
Côté, S., Tremblay, R. E., Nagin, D., Zoccolillo, M., & Vitaro, F. (2002). The development of impulsivity, fearfulness, and helpfulness during childhood:Patterns of consistency and change in the trajectories of boys and girls. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(5), 609-618.
Dunfield, K. A. (2014). A construct divided:prosocial behavior as helping, sharing, and comforting subtypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(3), 958.
Gneezy, A., Imas, A., Brown, A., Nelson, L. D., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Paying to be nice:Consistency and costly prosocial behavior. Management Science, 58(1), 179-187.
Grant, A., & Dutton, J. (2012). Beneficiary or benefactor, are people more prosocial when they reflect on receiving or giving? Psychological Science, 23(9), 1033-1039.
Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K., & Vesterlund, L. (2002). Risk attitudes of children and adults:Choices over small and large probability gains and losses. Experimental Economics, 5(1), 53-84.
Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention:Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30(2), 1-46.
Idson, L. C., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Imagining how you'd feel:The role of motivational experiences from regulatory fit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(7), 926-937.
Imuta, K., Henry, J. D., Slaughter, V., Selcuk, B., & Ruffman, T. (2016). Theory of mind and prosocial behavior in childhood:A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 52(8), 1192-1205.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory:An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica:Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(2), 263-292.
Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory:Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93(2), 136-153.
Levin, I. P., & Hart, S. S. (2003). Risk preferences in young children:Early evidence of individual differences in reaction to potential gains and losses. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16(5), 397-413.
Li, Y. J., Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., & Neuberg, S. L. (2012). Economic decision biases and fundamental motivations:How mating and self-protection alter loss aversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 550-561.
Liberman, N., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). Predicting the intensity of losses vs. non-gains and non-losses vs. gains in judging fairness and value:A test of the loss aversion explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(5), 527-534.
McGraw, A. P., Larsen, J. T., Kahneman, D., & Schkade, D. (2010). Comparing gains and losses. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1438-1445.
Novemsky, N., & Kahneman, D. (2005). The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 119-128.
Paulus, M. (2018). The multidimensional nature of early prosocial behavior:Theoretical perspectives. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20(2), 111-116.
Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior:Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 365-392.
Polman, E. (2010). Information distortion in self-other decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 432-435.
Polman, E. (2012a). Effects of self-other decision making on regulatory focus and choice overload. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 980-993.
Polman, E. (2012b). Self-other decision making and loss aversion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(2), 141-150.
Robbins, E. E. (2013). Inequity aversion and fairness in development(Doctral Dissertation). Emory University, Atlanta.
Steelandt, S., Broihanne, M. H., Romain, A., Thierry, B., & Dufour, V. (2013). Decision-making under risk of loss in children. PLoS One, 8(1), e52316.
Stocks, E. L., Lishner, D. A., & Decker, S. K. (2009). Altruism or psychological escape:Why does empathy promote prosocial behavior? European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(5), 649-665.
丁凤琴, 陆朝晖. (2016). 共情与亲社会行为关系的元分析. 心理科学进展, 24(8), 1159-1174.
寇彧, 唐玲玲. (2004). 心境对亲社会行为的影响. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),(5), 44-49.
肖凤秋, 郑志伟, 陈英和. (2014). 亲社会行为产生机制的理论演进. 心理科学,37(5), 1263-1270.

相关文章 15

[1]	储月, 刘希平, 徐慧, 唐卫海. 儿童社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 153-159.
[2]	刘艳春, 邓玉婷, 张曦. 智力障碍儿童对不同对象的分享行为：心理理论的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 160-168.
[3]	梁丹丹, 闫晓民, 葛志林. 4~8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童基于语言线索的情绪识别能力发展研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 169-175.
[4]	史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[5]	冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[6]	赵京伟, 陈晓旭, 任立文, 耿喆, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与小学儿童焦虑：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[7]	朱娜平, 刘雁伶, 熊红梅, 赵攀. “公无远近”有早晚:不同资源分配情境中儿童公平规范执行行为发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 772-780.
[8]	颜志强, 周可, 曾晓, 徐惠, 朱晓倩, 张娟. 学前期儿童执行功能与攻击性行为的关系:认知共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[9]	任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
[10]	李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[11]	银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[12]	赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[13]	张玉平, 董琼, 宋爽, 舒华. 小学低年级儿童的阅读发展轨迹:早期语言认知技能的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 210-218.
[14]	李君, 王悦, 陈夏妮, 李莹. 二语学习对汉语学龄儿童认知控制与词汇通达的作用——年龄和二语熟练程度的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 219-227.
[15]	鲁明辉, 王融, 张丽敏. 父母心理弹性与自闭症谱系障碍儿童情绪行为问题的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 247-254.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed