行为自主决策、亲子亲合与个体主观幸福感的关系:留守与非留守青少年的比较

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.03.13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以374名农村青少年为被试，基于留守青少年和非留守青少年的比较，探讨了个体行为自主决策、亲子亲合与主观幸福感之间的关系，并检验了亲子亲合与性别的调节作用。结果表明：（1）行为自主决策能够显著正向预测农村留守和非留守青少年的生活满意度；父子亲合和母子亲合能显著正向预测两类青少年的积极情绪和生活满意度，负向预测其消极情绪。（2）对于非留守青少年，行为自主决策与母子亲合对主观幸福感的预测作用存在性别差异：行为自主决策仅能够显著正向预测非留守男生的积极情绪和生活满意度，母子亲合则显著负向预测非留守女生的消极情绪；但是，这种性别差异不存在于留守青少年之中。（3）对于非留守青少年，母子亲合在其行为自主决策与生活满意度之间关系中的调节作用显著：低母子亲合水平下，行为自主决策能够显著正向预测其生活满意度；高母子亲合水平下，行为自主决策与其生活满意度之间不存在关联。

关键词: 留守青少年, 行为自主决策, 亲子亲合, 主观幸福感

Abstract: A total of 374 rural adolescents were recruited from a rural area in Shandong province of China, including 161 adolescents from two-parent-migrant families and 213 adolescents from nonmigrant families. These adolescents completed a self-report assessment on investigating relations between decision-making autonomy, parent-adolescent cohesion, and adolescents' subjective well-being. Parent-adolescent cohesion and gender were examined as moderators. The results indicated that decision-making autonomy was positively associated with adolescents' life satisfaction. Father-adolescent cohesion and mother-adolescent cohesion predicted higher levels of adolescents' subjective well-being. Moreover, decision-making autonomy predicted positive emotion and life satisfaction only among boys from nonmigrant families and mother-adolescent cohesion predicted negative emotion only among girls from nonmigrant families. In addition, mother-adolescent cohesion moderated the association between decision-making autonomy and life satisfaction among adolescents from nonmigrant families. Specifically, decision-making autonomy was positively associated with adolescents' life satisfaction at lower levels of mother-adolescent cohesion, but such association was not significant at higher levels of mother-adolescent cohesion.

Key words: left-behind adolescents, decision-making autonomy, parent-adolescent cohesion, subjective well-being

中图分类号:

B844

赵景欣, 王秋金, 杨萍, 刘霞. 行为自主决策、亲子亲合与个体主观幸福感的关系:留守与非留守青少年的比较[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(3): 352-360.

ZHAO Jingxin, WANG Qiujin, YANG Ping, LIU Xia. The Relationship among Decision-making Autonomy, Parent-Adolescent Cohesion, and Subjective Well-being: A Comparative Study Between Left-behind Adolescents and Non-left-behind Adolescents[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2017, 33(3): 352-360.

参考文献

Antaramian, S. P., Huebner, E. S., Hills, K. J., & Valois, R. F. (2010). A dual-factor model of mental health:toward a more comprehensive understanding of youth functioning.American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 80(4), 462-472.

Bao, X. H., & Lam, S. F. (2008). Who makes the choice? Rethinking the role of autonomy and relatedness in Chinese children's motivation. Child Development, 79, 269-283.

Barber, B. K., & Schluterman, J. M. (2008). Connectedness in the lives of children and adolescents:A call for greater conceptual clarity.Journal of Adolescent Health, 43(3), 209-216.

Bean, R. A., Barber, B. K., & Crane, D. R. (2006). Parental support, behavioral control, and psychological control among African American youth:The relationships to academic grades, delinquency, and depression.Journal of Family Issues, 27(10), 1335-1355.

Bergman, M. M., & Scott, J. (2001). Young adolescents' well-being and health-risk behaviors:Gender and socio-economic differences. Journal of Adolescence, 24(2), 184-97.

Blos, P. (1979).The adolescent passage. New York:International Universities Press.

Chao, R. K. (1994). Beyond parental control and authoritarian parenting style:Understanding chinese parenting through the cultural notion of training. Child Development, 65(4), 1111-9.

Carla Crespo, Magdalena, Kielpikowski, Jan Pryor, & Paul E. Jose. (2011)Family Rituals in New Zealand Families:Links to Family Cohesion and Adolescents' Well-Being. Journal of Family Psychology, 25(2), 184-193.

Cheng, J., & Sun, Y. H. (2015). Depression and anxiety among left-behind children in China:A systematic review. Child:Care, Health & Development, 41(4), 515-523.

Cohen,J., Cohen,P., West,S.G.,& Aiken,L.S.(2003)Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis For The Behavioral Sciences, Third Edition.Mahwah:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., & Flanagan, C., et al. (1993). Development during adolescence. The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and in families.American Psychologist, 48(2), 90-101.

Erikson, E. (1968).Identity:Youth and crisis. New York:Norton.

Fuligni, A. J. (1998). Authority, autonomy, and parent-adolescent conflict and cohesion:A study of adolescents from Mexican, Chinese, Filipino, and European backgrounds.Developmental Psychology, 34(4), 782-792.

Hascher, T. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative research approaches to assess student well-being.International Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 84-96.

Huebner, E. S. (1991). Correlates of life satisfaction in children.School Psychology Quarterly, 6(2), 103-111.

Jia, Z. B., & Tian, W. H. (2010). Loneliness of left-behind children:A cross-sectional survey in a sample of rural China. Child:care, health and development, 36(6), 812-817.

Laible, D. J., Carlo, G., & Raffaelli, M. (2000). The differential relations of parent and peer attachment to adolescent adjustment.Journal of Youth & Adolescence, volume,29(29), 45-59.

Lu, Y. (2012). Education of children left behind in rural China.Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(2), 328-341.

Noller, P., & Callan, V. J. (1986). Adolescent and parent perceptions of family cohesion and adaptability.Journal of Adolescence, 9(1), 97-106.

Palomar-Lever, J., & Victorio-Estrada, A. (2014). Determinants of subjective well-being in adolescent children of recipients of the oportunidades human development program in mexico.Social Indicators Research, 118(1), 103-124.

Podsakoff,MacKenzie, Lee & Podsakoff. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research:A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Jour nal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.

Qin, L., Pomerantz, E. M., & Wang, Q., (2009). Are Gains in Decision-Making Autonomy During Early Adolescence Beneficial for Emotional Functioning? The Case of the United States and China.Child Development, 80(6), 1705-1721.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.

Seligman, M. E. P. (2008). Positive health.Applied Psychology, 57(Supplement s1), 3-18.

Smetana, J. G., Campione-Barr, N., & Daddis, C. (2004). Longitudinal development of family decision making:defining healthy behavioral autonomy for middle-class african american adolescents.Child Development, 75(5), 1418-34.

Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent Development,Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 83-110.

Stroud, L.R., Salovey, P., & Epel, E. S. (2002) Sex dlifferences in stress responses:social rejection versus achievement stress. Biological Psychiatry, 52(4),318-327.

Su, S., Li, X., Lin, D., Xu, X., & Zhu, M. (2013).Psychological adjustment amony left-behimd children in rural China:The role of parental migration and parent-child communication. Child:Care, Health and Development.39(2), 162-170.

Takahashi, K., Antonucci, T. C., & Akiyama, H. (2002). Commonalities and differences in close relationships among the Americans and Japanese:A comparison by the individualism/collectivism concept.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(5), 453-465.

Zhang, W. X., & Fuligni, A. J. (2006). Authority, autonomy, and family relationships among adolescents in urban and rural China.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16(4), 527-537.

Zhao, J., Liu, X. & Wang, M. (2015). Parent-child cohesion, friend companionship and left-behind children's emotional adaptation in rural China. Child Abuse & Neglect, 48, 190-199.

申继亮, 胡心怡, 刘霞. (2009). 留守儿童歧视知觉特点及与主观幸福感的关系.河南大学学报(社会科学版), 49(6), 117-121.

王美萍, 张文新. (2007). 青少年期亲子冲突与亲子亲合的发展特征. 心理科学, 30(5), 1196-1198.

赵景欣, 刘霞, 申继亮. (2008). 留守青少年的社会支持网络与其抑郁、孤独之间的关系——基于变量中心和个体中心的视角. 心理发展与教育, 24(1), 36-42.

赵景欣, 刘霞, 张文新. (2013). 同伴拒绝、同伴接纳与农村留守儿童的心理适应:亲子亲合与逆境信念的作用. 心理学报,45(7), 797-810.

邹泓, 李晓巍, 张文娟. (2010). 青少年家庭人际关系的特点及其对社会适应的作用机制. 心理科学,(5), 1136-1141

相关文章 15

[1]	唐莹莹, 蔺秀云, 殷锦绣, 何婷, 周少嘉, 曹志涛. 亲子依恋和祖孙依恋的一致与不一致和儿童主观幸福感的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 859-868.
[2]	彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[3]	曾子豪, 彭丽仪, 詹林, 刘双金, 欧阳晓优, 丁道群, 黎志华, 胡义秋, 方晓义. 儿童期受虐对大学生抑郁症状的影响:主观幸福感的中介和基因的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 276-285.
[4]	田玮宜, 徐健捷, 吕广林, 王轶楠. 父母自尊与青少年主观幸福感间的关系:亲子信任与青少年自尊的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 331-338.
[5]	张艺涵, 张婷, 赵景欣. 歧视知觉与农村留守青少年的孤独感:亲子分离年龄和分离时长的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 90-99.
[6]	陈必忠, 郑雪, 孙晓军. 社交媒体自我控制失败影响硕士生主观幸福感的心理机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 882-888.
[7]	袁柯曼, 李白璐, 梁丽婵, 边玉芳. 累积情境风险与流动儿童主观幸福感的关系:个体保护因子的补偿效应和保护效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 546-557.
[8]	牛凯宁, 李梅, 张向葵. 青少年友谊质量和主观幸福感的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 407-418.
[9]	陈子循, 王晖, 冯映雪, 刘霞. 同伴侵害对留守青少年主观幸福感的影响:自尊和社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 605-614.
[10]	池文韬, 桑青松, 舒首立. 大学生专业内部动机与主观幸福感的关系:专业投入与主观专业成就的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 477-485.
[11]	衡书鹏, 赵换方, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 朋友圈点赞与主观幸福感的关系:一个有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 341-349.
[12]	郭瑾瑾, 牛璐, 谢笑春, 王鹏程, 雷雳. 线上“秀恩爱”与旁观者主观幸福感的关系:自尊的中介作用和依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 359-366.
[13]	吴玉婷, 苑鑫, 王雨晴, 朱慧, 毛叶琳, 金灿灿. 广场舞组织氛围和老年人主观幸福感的关系:组织认同和自尊的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 624-631.
[14]	张兴旭, 郭海英, 林丹华. 亲子、同伴、师生关系与青少年主观幸福感关系的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 458-466.
[15]	牛玉柏, 郝泽生, 王任振, 洪芳. 老年人乐观、领悟社会支持与主观幸福感的关系—控制策略的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(2): 227-235.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed