心理发展与教育 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 409-417.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2016.04.04

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

教育价值观和逆境信念在家庭经济压力与初中生学业成就之间的作用

赵力燕1, 李董平2, 徐小燕3, 王艳辉4, 孙文强5   

  1. 1. 成都文理学院教育学院, 成都 610401;
    2. 华中师范大学心理学院, 武汉 430079;
    3. 四川师范大学教育科学学院, 成都 610101;
    4. 嘉应学院教育科学学院, 梅州 514015;
    5. 安徽师范大学教育科学学院, 芜湖 241000
  • 出版日期:2016-07-15 发布日期:2016-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 赵力燕,E-mail:zeenaly@126.com E-mail:zeenaly@126.com

The Roles of Educational Values and Chinese Cultural Beliefs about Adversity in the Relationship between Family Financial Strain and Academic Achievement among Middle School Students

ZHAO Liyan1, LI Dongping2, XU Xiaoyan3, WANG Yanhui4, SUN Wenqiang5   

  1. 1. School of Education, Chengdu College of Arts and Sciences, Chengdu 610401;
    2. School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079;
    3. Institute of Education, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101;
    4. School of Educational Science, Jiaying University, Meizhou 514015;
    5. College of Educational Science, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241000
  • Online:2016-07-15 Published:2016-07-15

摘要: 大量研究表明,家庭经济压力对青少年学业成就具有显著的不利影响。但是,目前学界对家庭经济压力“怎样”(中介机制)以及“何时”(调节机制)影响青少年学业成就仍知之甚少。本研究在整合贫困文化模型及心理韧性理论的基础上构建一个有调节的中介模型,考察青少年教育价值观(读书是否有用)在家庭经济压力与学业成就之间的中介作用,同时检验中国文化逆境信念对该中介路径的调节作用。采用随机整群抽样,选取四川省9所普通中学1613名初中生(平均年龄13.42岁,SD = 1.22)作为研究对象。被试匿名填写家庭经济压力问卷、教育价值观问卷、中国文化逆境信念量表以及学业成就问卷。结果表明:(1)在控制了性别、年龄等人口学变量后,家庭经济压力显著负向预测学业成就。(2)教育价值观在家庭经济压力与学业成就之间具有部分中介作用。(3)积极逆境信念能缓冲家庭经济压力对教育价值观的消极作用,进而减少对学业成就的不利影响。本研究证实了“读书无用论”是经济困难与学业成就的重要联系机制,并肯定了中国文化逆境信念对经济困难青少年的保护作用。这一内在保护机制的揭示对教育实践有一定的启示。

关键词: 家庭经济压力, 学业成就, 教育价值观, 逆境信念, 初中生

Abstract: A large body of research has documented the negative impact of family financial strain on adolescent academic achievement, yet little is known about the mediating mechanism (i.e., how family financial strain impact adolescents' academic achievement?) and moderating mechanism (i.e., when the impact is most or least potent?) underlying this relation. The present study constructed a moderated mediation model based on the integration of cultural model of poverty and resilience theory to examine the mediating role of educational values and the moderating role of Chinese cultural beliefs about adversity in the direct and indirect relationship between family financial strain and academic achievement. A total of 1,613 Chinese middle school students (mean age = 13.42 years, SD = 1.22) from Sichuan Province participated in this study. They anonymously completed questionnaires regarding family financial strain, values of education, Chinese cultural beliefs about adversity, and academic achievement. The results indicated that: (a) after controlling for gender and age, family financial strain was significantly negatively associated with academic achievement; (b) educational values partially mediated the relationship between family financial strain and academic achievement; and (c) Chinese cultural beliefs about adversity buffered the indirect impact of family financial strain on academic achievement through educational values. This study demonstrated the important mediating role of “useless education” in the relationship between family financial strain and academic achievement, and confirmed the protective role of Chinese cultural beliefs about adversity in the indirect relationship between economic strain and academic achievement. Our findings have some important implications for educational practice.

Key words: family financial strain, academic achievement, educational values, Chinese cultural beliefs about adversity, middle school students

中图分类号: 

  • B844

Chen, E., & Miller, G. E. (2012). Shift and persist strategies: Why low socioeconomic status isn't always bad for health. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(2), 135-158.

Crockett, L. J., Schulenberg, J. E., & Petersen, A. C. (1987). Congruence between objective and self-report data in a sample of young adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 2(4), 383-392.

Crook, S. R., & Evans, G. W. (2014). The role of planning skills in the income-achievement gap. Child Development, 85(2), 405-411.

Dornbusch, S. M., Ritter, P. L., Leiderman, P. H., Roberts, D. F., & Fraleigh, M. J. (1987). The relation of parenting style to adolescent school performance. Child Development, 58(5), 1244-1257.

Duncan, G. J., Magnuson, K., & Votruba-Drzal, E. (2015). Children and socioeconomic status. In R. M. Lerner, M. H. Bornstein, & T. Leventhal (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, Vol. 4: Ecological Settings and Processes (7th ed., pp. 534-573). New York: Wiley.

Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1-12.

Erceg-Hurn, D. M., & Mirosevich, V. M. (2008). Modern robust statistical methods: An easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. American Psychologist, 63(7), 591-601.

Evans, G. W., & Fuller-Rowell, T. E. (2013). Childhood poverty, chronic stress, and young adult working memory: The protective role of self-regulatory capacity. Developmental Science, 16(5), 688-696.

Evans, G. W., & Kim, P. (2013). Childhood poverty, chronic stress, self-regulation, and coping. Child Development Perspectives, 7(1), 43-48.

Fuligni, A. J. (1997). The academic achievement of adolescents from immigrant families: The role of family background, attitudes, and behavior. Child Development, 68(2), 351-363.

Fuligni, A. J. (1998). The adjustment of children from immigrant families. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7(4), 99-103.

Fuligni, A. J., & Tseng, V. (1999). Family obligation and the academic motivation of adolescents from immigrant and American-born families. In T. Urdan (Ed.), Advances in motivation and achievement: The role of context (Vol. 11, pp. 159-183). Stamford, CT: JAI Press.

Fuligni, A. J., & Zhang, W. X. (2004). Attitudes toward family obligation among adolescents in contemporary urban and rural China. Child Development, 74(1), 180-192.

Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2009). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsorth.

Heberle, A. E., & Carter, A. S. (2015). Cognitive aspects of young children's experience of economic disadvantage. Psychological Bulletin, 141(4), 723-746.

Howell, D. C. (2013). Statistical methods for psychology (8th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Lamont, M., & Small, M. L. (2008). How culture matters for the understanding of poverty: Enriching our understanding. In A. C. Linn & D. R. Harris (Eds.), The colors of poverty: Why racial and ethnic disparities exist (pp. 76-102). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Lewis, O. (1975). Five families: Mexican case studies in the culture of poverty. New York: Basic Books.

Luthar, S. S., Crossman, E. J., & Small, P. J. (2015). Resilience and adversity. In R. M. Lerner & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, Vol. 3: Socioemotional Processes (7th ed., pp. 247-286). New York: Wiley.

Mani, A., Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E., & Zhao, J. (2013). Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science, 341, 976-980.

McLoyd, V. C., Kaplan, R., Purtell, K. M., Bagley, E., Hardaway, C. R., & Smalls, C. (2009). Poverty and socioeconomic disadvantage in adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology, Vol. 2: Contextual influences on adolescent development (3rd ed., pp. 444-491). New York: Wiley.

McLoyd, V., Mistry, R. S., & Hardaway, C. R. (2014). Poverty and children's development. In E. T. Gershoff, R. S. Mistry, & D. A. Crosby (Eds.), Societal contexts of child development: Pathways of influence and implications for practice and policy (pp. 109-124). New York: Oxford University Press.

Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 852-863.

Pan, J., Wong, D. F. K., Chan, K. S., & Chan, C. L. W. (2008). Development and validation of the Chinese making sense of adversity scale: Acculturative stressors as an example. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(5), 479-486.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.

Reardon, S. F. (2011). The widening academic achievement gap between the rich and the poor: New evidence and possible explanations. Whither Opportunity, 91-116.

Shek, D. T. (2004). Chinese cultural beliefs about adversity: Its relationship to psychological well-being, school adjustment and problem behavior in Chinese adolescents with and without economic disadvantage. Childhood, 11(1), 63-80.

Shek, D. T. (2005). A longitudinal study of Chinese cultural beliefs about adversity, psychological well-being, delinquency and substance abuse in Chinese adolescents with economic disadvantage. Social Indicators Research, 71(1-3), 385-409.

Shek, D. T., Tang, V., Lam, C. M., Lam, M. C., Tsoi, K. W., & Tsang, K. M. (2003). The relationship between Chinese cultural beliefs about adversity and psychological adjustment in Chinese families with economic disadvantage. American Journal of Family Therapy, 31(5), 427-443.

Sun, W., Li, D., Zhang, W., Bao, Z., & Wang, Y. (2015). Family material hardship and Chinese adolescents' problem behaviors: A moderated mediation analysis. PLoS ONE, 10(5), e0128024.

Tseng, V. (2004). Family interdependence and academic adjustment in college: Youth from immigrant and U.S.-born families. Child Development, 75(3), 966-983.

White, R., Liu, Y., Nair, R. L., & Tein, J. Y. (2015). Longitudinal and integrative tests of family stress model effects on Mexican origin adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 51(5), 649-662.

Yoshikawa, H., Aber, J. L., & Beardslee, W. R. (2012). The effects of poverty on the mental, emotional, and behavioral health of children and youth: implications for prevention. American Psychologist, 67(4), 272-284.

鲍振宙, 李董平, 张卫, 王艳辉, 孙文强, 赵力燕. (2014). 累积生态风险与青少年的学业和社交能力: 子女责任感的风险补偿与调节效应. 心理发展与教育, 30(5), 482-495.

鲍振宙, 张卫, 李董平, 李丹黎, 王艳辉. (2013). 校园氛围与青少年学业成就的关系: 一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 29(1), 54-60.

曹新美. (2013). 中学生学习价值观的现状与特点研究. 中国特殊教育, (8), 77-84.

陈国华. (2013). “读书无用论”现象的农村社会调查与反思. 天府新论, (2), 111-115.

丁霞. (2006).农村初中“学困生”的产生原因及对策研究. 硕士学位论文. 东北师范大学.

国务院第六次全国人口普查办公室, 国家统计局人口和就业统计司. (2011). 2010年第六次全国人口普查主要数据. 北京: 中国统计出版社.

李董平. (2012). 多重生态学风险因素与青少年社会适应: 风险建模与作用机制研究. 博士学位论文. 华南师范大学.

李董平, 许路, 鲍振宙, 陈武, 苏小慧, 张微. (2015). 家庭经济压力与青少年抑郁: 歧视知觉和亲子依恋的作用. 心理发展与教育, 31(3), 342-349.

刘精明, 杨江华. (2007). 关注贫困儿童的教育公平问题. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 6(2), 120-128.

吕小康, 汪新建, 付晓婷. (2014). 为什么贫困会削弱决策能力?三种心理学解释. 心理科学进展, 22(11), 1823-1828.

欧贤才, 王凯. (2007). 自愿性辍学: 新时期农村初中教育的一个新问题. 中国青年研究, (5), 60-63.

石雷山, 陈英敏, 侯秀, 高峰强. (2013). 家庭社会经济地位与学习投入的关系: 学业自我效能的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 29(1), 71-78.

王建平, 李董平, 张卫. (2010). 家庭经济困难与青少年社会适应的关系. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (4), 22-23.

文超, 张卫, 李董平, 喻承甫, 代维祝. (2010). 初中生感恩与学业成就的关系: 学习投入的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 26(6), 598-605.

温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 有调节的中介模型检验方法: 竞争还是替补? 心理学报, 46(5), 714-726.

徐夫真, 张文新, 张玲玲. (2009). 家庭功能对青少年疏离感的影响: 有调节的中介效应. 心理学报, 41(12), 1165-1174.

张卫, 李董平, 谢志杰. (2007). 低社会经济地位与儿童发展. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), (6), 104-112, 118.

赵景欣, 刘霞, 张文新. (2013). 同伴拒绝、同伴接纳与农村留守儿童的心理适应: 亲子亲合与逆境信念的作用. 心理学报, 45(7), 797-810.
[1] 秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响:同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[2] 吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[3] 陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[4] 周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[5] 辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[6] 冯全升, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 张艳红, 连帅磊. 负性生活事件与初中生内化问题:反刍思维的中介作用与同伴依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 419-428.
[7] 刘志国, 齐冰, 李亚平, 王润洲, 崔佳, 宋耀武. 成就目标定向在学业自我概念与学业成绩关系中的调节作用:基于内/外参照模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 68-76.
[8] 李明, 尚新华, 方晓义, 姬文广. 从父母教育卷入到学业成就:自主支持与自主学习力的链式中介[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 839-847.
[9] 肖雪, 郭磊, 赵永萍, 陈富国. 累积生态风险与初中生受欺凌的关系模式:心理弹性的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 648-657.
[10] 严益霞, 刘颜蓥, 丁芳. 心理理论与社会互动方式对初中生社会善念发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 485-494.
[11] 李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[12] 王国霞, 赵扬. 教师自主支持与学生学业成就关系的元分析:心理需要满足、动机及投入的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 380-390.
[13] 周宗奎, 曹敏, 田媛, 黄淳, 杨秀娟, 宋友志. 初中生亲子关系与抑郁:自尊和情绪弹性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 864-872.
[14] 任萍, 魏一, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 王璇. 受欺负对抑郁情绪的影响:悲伤、愤怒反刍的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 873-881.
[15] 吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!