心理发展与教育 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 402-408.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2016.04.03

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

群体偏好与年级对小学生利他惩罚行为的影响

郭庆科, 徐萍, 吴睿, 胡姗姗   

  1. 山东师范大学心理学院, 济南 250014
  • 出版日期:2016-07-15 发布日期:2016-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 郭庆科,E-mail:guoqingke@163.com E-mail:guoqingke@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家社会科学基金项目“慈善捐助的心理诱发机制研究”(15BSH083);教育部人文社科规划基金项目“利他行为的启动机制和内隐测量研究”(13YJA190006)和山东省“人类认知与行为发展”重点实验室建设项目资助。

Effects of In-group Favoritism and Grade on the Altruistic Punishment Behavior of Primary School students

GUO Qingke, XU Ping, WU Rui, HU Shanshan   

  1. School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014
  • Online:2016-07-15 Published:2016-07-15

摘要: 采用独裁者博弈(DG)探讨了群体偏好对不同年级小学生利他惩罚行为的影响。研究1对450名小学生利他惩罚行为的年级发展特点进行了测查。研究2以168名小学生为被试,考察了在独裁者博弈中与独裁者的关系、性别与年级对小学生(第三方)利他惩罚行为的影响。研究3以180名小学生为被试,考察了在独裁者博弈中与接受者的关系、性别与年级对小学生(第三方)利他惩罚行为的影响。结果发现:(1)利他惩罚行为在1至3年级之间有显著增长,3至5年级之间不仅没有增加反而有所下降。(2)3年级小学生开始表现出明显的群体偏好。(3)利他惩罚行为的性别差异不明显,与女生比男生更利他的预期相左。结论:小学生至少在6岁就已经出现了利他惩罚行为且逐渐表现出群体偏好;小学生道德行为发展中可能存在“3年级现象”;女生可能更愿意通过非惩罚的方式达成公平。

关键词: 独裁者博弈, 利他惩罚, 内群体偏好, 3年级现象

Abstract: The present research explored the developmental characteristics of primary school students' altruistic punishment behavior and the influence of in-group favoritism. There were three mutually related studies. In study 1, video typed dictator game tasks were used to examine the developmental characteristics of altruistic punishment, and the effects of gender and grade in 450 primary school students (grade 1, 3 and 5). In study 2, we further explored the effects of gender and the group relationship between participants and dictators on altruistic punishment behavior in 168 primary school students from different grades. In study 3, the effects of gender and group relationship between the participants and the recipients in the dictator game was also explored. The results are as follows: (1) School children show willingness to perform altruistic punishment which develops evidently from grade 1 to grade 3, but doesn't increase significantly from grade 3 to grade 5 (a certain degree of decline is even observed). (2) From grade 3, altruistic punishment behavior begins to show significant in-group favoritism. (3) Inconsistent with the prediction that girls are more altruistic than boys, we find no gender difference in altruistic punishment behavior. The results indicate that: (1) Although only 6-year-old, Chinese children develop a willingness to perform the altruistic punishment behavior. (2) Maybe a “3 grade phenomenon” does exist in Chinese children's moral development. (3) Probably the girls prefer Non - punitive ways to maintain fairness in interpersonal relationships.

Key words: dictator game, altruistic punishment, in-group favoritism, three grade phenomenon

中图分类号: 

  • B844

Abrams, D., Rutland, A., Cameron, L., & Marques, J. (2003). The development of subjective group dynamics: When in - group bias gets specific. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21(2), 155-176.

Apfelbaum, E. P., Pauker, K., Ambady, N., Sommers, S. R., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Learning (not) to talk about race: when older children underperform in social categorization. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1513-1518.

Blake, P. R., & McAuliffe, K. (2011). “I had so much it didn't seem fair”: Eight-year-olds reject two forms of inequity. Cognition, 120(2), 215-224.

Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2004). The evolution of strong reciprocity: cooperation in heterogeneous populations. Theoretical Population Biology, 65(1), 17-28.

Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S., & Richerson, P. J. (2003). The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(6), 3531-3535.

Buckholtz, J. W., Asplund, C. L., Dux, P. E., Zald, D. H., Gore, J. C., Jones, O. D., et al. (2008). The neural correlates of third-party punishment. Neuron, 60(5), 930-940.

Chavez, A. K., & Bicchieri, C. (2013). Third-party sanctioning and compensation behavior: Findings from the ultimatum game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 268-277.

Cushman, F., Dreber, A., Wang, Y., & Costa, J. (2009). Accidental Outcomes Guide Punishment in a “Trembling Hand” Game. PLOS ONE, 4(8) , e6699-e6699.

Dos Santos, M., Braithwaite, V. A., & Wedekind, C. (2014). Exposure to superfluous information reduces cooperation and increases antisocial punishment in reputation-based interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2, 41.

Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, 454(7208), 1079-1083.

Fehr, E., Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (2002). Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms. Human Nature, 13(1), 1-25.

Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). The nature of human altruism. Nature, 425(6960), 785-791.

Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(2), 63-87.

Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 817-868.

Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (2010). On inequity aversion: A reply to Binmore and Shaked. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 73(1), 101-108.

Frederickson, N. L., & Simmonds, E. A. (2008). Special Needs, Relationship Type and Distributive Justice Norms in Early and Later Years of Middle Childhood. Social Development, 17(4), 1056-1073.

Gächter, S., Renner, E., & Sefton, M. (2008). The long-run benefits of punishment. Science, 322(5907), 1510-1510.

Giardini, F., Paolucci, M., Villatoro, D., & Conte, R. (2014). Punishment and gossip: sustaining cooperation in a public goods game. Advances in Social Simulation (pp. 107-118). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Gummerum, M., & Chu, M. T. (2014). Outcomes and intentions in children's, adolescents', and adults' second-and third-party punishment behavior. Cognition, 133(1), 97-103.

Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., Bloom, P., & Mahajan, N. (2011). How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(50), 19931-19936.

Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K., & Liday, S. J. (2003). Bargaining by children. University of Oregon Economics Working Paper, (2002-4).

House, B., Henrich, J., Sarnecka, B., & Silk, J. B. (2013). The development of contingent reciprocity in children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 34(2), 86-93.

Janssen, M. A., & Bushman, C. (2008). Evolution of cooperation and altruistic punishment when retaliation is possible. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 254(3), 541-545.

Kenward, B., & Osth, T. (2012). Enactment of third-party punishment by 4-year-olds. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 373.

Leliveld, M. C., Dijk, E., & Beest, I. (2012). Punishing and compensating others at your own expense: The role of empathic concern on reactions to distributive injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(2), 135-140.

Mackie, D. M., & Smith, E. R. (1998). Intergroup relations: insights from a theoretically integrative approach. Psychological Review, 105(3), 499.

McAuliffe, K., Jordan, J. J., & Warneken, F. (2015). Costly third-party punishment in young children. Cognition, 134, 1-10.

Nelissen, R. M., & Zeelenberg, M. (2009). Moral emotions as determinants of third-party punishment: Anger, guilt, and the functions of altruistic sanctions. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(7), 543-553.

Raihani, N. J., & McAuliffe, K. (2012). Human punishment is motivated by inequity aversion, not a desire for reciprocity. Biology Letters, 8(5), 802-804.

Raihani, N. J., Thornton, A., & Bshary, R. (2012). Punishment and cooperation in nature. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27(5), 288-295.

Riedl, K., Jensen, K., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2012). No third-party punishment in chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(37), 14824-14829.

Schiller, B., Baumgartner, T., & Knoch, D. (2014). Intergroup bias in third-party punishment stems from both ingroup favoritism and outgroup discrimination. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(3), 169-175.

Schmidt, M. F., Rakoczy, H., & Tomasello, M. (2012). Young children enforce social norms selectively depending on the violator's group affiliation. Cognition, 124(3), 325-333.

Smith, C. E., Blake, P. R., & Harris, P. L. (2013). I should but I won't: why young children endorse norms of fair sharing but do not follow them. PLOS ONE, 8(3), e59510.

Warneken, F., Lohse, K., Melis, A. P., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Young children share the spoils after collaboration. Psychological Science, 22(2), 267-273.

Wilder, D., & Simon, A. F. (2001). Affect as a cause of intergroup bias. Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes, 153-172.

陈会昌, 耿希峰, 秦丽丽, 林思南. (2004). 7~11岁儿童分享行为的发展. 心理科学, 27(3), 571-574.

傅根跃, 陈昌凯, 胡优君. (2005). 小学儿童集体主义意识研究. 心理科学, 25(5), 612-613.

管贝贝, 杜时忠. (2012). “3年级现象” 透视——中高年级小学生道德素质的实证研究. 基础教育, (2), 109-113.

于静, 朱莉琪. (2010). 儿童公平行为的发展——来自博弈实验的证据. 心理科学进展, 18(7), 1182-1188.

朱莉琪. (2013). 儿童公平行为发展. 心理学与创新能力提升——第十六届全国心理学学术会议论文集.
[1] 曹钰舒, 徐璐璐, 贺雯, 罗俊龙, 李海江. 不同人际情境影响工作记忆的初探[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(2): 139-144.
[2] 丁毅, 纪婷婷, 陈旭. 利他惩罚的发生机制及其神经基础[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(6): 658-664.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!