心理发展与教育 ›› 2011, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 255-259.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

小学高年级儿童的内隐智力理论及其与表扬的关系

邢淑芬1,3, 俞国良2, 林崇德3   

  1. 1. 首都师范大学心理系北京市"学习与认知"重点实验室, 北京 100048;
    2. 中国人民大学心理研究所, 北京 100082;
    3. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京 100875
  • 出版日期:2011-05-15 发布日期:2011-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 林崇德,E-mail:linchongde@263.net E-mail:linchongde@263.net
  • 基金资助:
    北京市属高等学校人才强教深化计划“学术创新团队建设计划”项目(PHR201007109);教育部人文社科一般项目“公办学校中流动儿童的情绪发展与心理适应—基于社会融合的视角”(10YJCXLX039)

The Characteristics of Implicit Theory of Intelligence of Children in Higher Grader of Primary School and the Effects of Praise On it

XING Shu-fen1,3, YU Guo-liang2, LIN Chong-de3   

  1. 1. Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition and Department of Psychology, Capital Normal University 100048, China;
    2. Institute of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872;
    3. Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University 100875, China
  • Online:2011-05-15 Published:2011-05-15

摘要: 以101名小学五年级的儿童为被试,采用实验法考察小学高年级儿童内隐智力理论的特点,及不同归因取向的表扬对儿童内隐智力理论的影响。结果表明:(1)三组儿童对智力不可控性的得分显著低于中值,说明小学高年级儿童持有智力的发展观;控制组对努力因素的重要性评定显著高于能力因素,说明小学高年级儿童强调努力的重要性;(2)接受能力取向表扬的儿童对智力不可控性的得分显著高于接受努力取向表扬的儿童和控制组,表明能力取向的表扬使儿童倾向于认为智力是不可控的。

关键词: 表扬, 内隐智力理论, 能力, 努力

Abstract: With 101 children of 5th-grade students as subjects,the experimental study explored the characteristics of the development of implicit theory of intelligence and the influences of praise on it.The results were:(a) All children in three different conditions endorsed an incremental theory of intelligence,indicating children in higher grader of primary school in our country emphasized the plasticity of intelligence; children in the control condition rated effort more important than ability,indicating children in higher grader of primary school considered effort more important for our achievement; (b) The degree to which the groups endorsed an entity theory of intelligence showed significant differences among the children in the three conditions,children that praised for ability more inclined to consider intelligence as an fixed、uncontrollable trait.

Key words: praise, implicit theory of intelligence, ability, effort

中图分类号: 

  • B844.1
[1] Ablard,K.E.,& Mills,C.J.(1996).Implicit theories of intelligence and self-perception of academically talented adolescents and children.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,25,137-148.
[2] Blackwell,L.S.,Trzesniewski,K.H.,& Dweck,C.S.(2007).Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition:A longitudinal study and an intervention.Child Development,78(1),246-263.
[3] Dupeyrat,C.,& Mariné,C.(2005).Implicit theories of intelligence,goal orientation,cognitive engagement,and achievement:A test of Dweck's model with returning to school adults.Contemporary Educational Psychology,30,43-59.
[4] Dweck,C.S.,& Leggett,E.(1988).A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality.Psychological Review,95(1),256-273.
[5] Dweck,C.S.,Chiu,C.Y.,& Hong,Y.Y.(1995).Implicit theories:elaboration and extension of the model.Psychological Inquiry,6(4),322-333.
[6] Dweck,C.S.(2010).Mind-sets and equitable education.Principal leadership,2010,January,26-29.
[7] Henderlong,J.,& Lepper,M.R.(2002).The effects of praise on children's intrinsic motivation:A review and synthesis.Psychological Bulletin,128(5),774-795.
[8] Kamins,M.L.,& Dweck,C.S.(1999).Person versus Process Praise and Criticism:Implications for Contingent Self-Worth and Coping.Developmental Psychology,35(3),835-847.
[9] Lavanya,S.(2011).Implicit Beliefs,Achievement Goals,and Affect:A Cross-Cultural Comparison.Dissertation.McGill University (Canada).
[10] Mihlon,M.A.(2011).The role of self-theories of intelligence and self-efficacy in adaptive help-seeking by college students.Doctoral Dissertation,City University of New York.
[11] Morris,M.W.,& Peng,K.P.(1994).Culture and cause:American and Chinese attributions for Social and Physical Events.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,67(6),949-971.
[12] Mueller,C.M.,& Dweck,C.S.(1998).Praise for intelligence can undermine children's motivation and performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,75(1),33-52.
[13] Raven,J.C.(1976).Standard progressive matrices.Oxford,England:Oxford Psychologists Press.
[14] Stevenson,H.W.,Lee,S.,Chen,C.,Stigler,J.W.,Hsu,C.C.,& Kitamura,S.(1990).Contexts of achievement:A study of American,Chinese,and Japanese children.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development,55.
[15] Yussen,S.R.,& Kane,P.T.(1985).Children's concept of intelligence.In:Yussen S R ed.The growth of reflection in children.New York:Academic Press,207-240.
[16] Zentall,S.R.,& Morris,B.J.(2010)."Good job,you are so smart":The effects of inconsistency of praise type of young children's motivation.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,107,155-163.
[17] 邴倩.(2004).表扬、儿童的能力理论与其失败后反应的关系.山东 师范大学硕士学位论文.
[18] 成子娟,侯杰泰.(2002).相信智力不变是否也认为个性难改?——个人属性内隐观的普遍性.心理学报,34(1),81-88.
[19] 卡罗尔·德韦克(美)(2007).心理定向与成功,王成全等译,人民邮电出版社,3-54.
[20] 王美芳.(2003).儿童掌握能力概念的特点.心理学报,35(1),69-75.
[1] 梁丹丹, 闫晓民, 葛志林. 4~8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童基于语言线索的情绪识别能力发展研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 169-175.
[2] 田惠东, 张玉红, 孙昊翔, 李瑛, 哈尼夏. 师生关系对智力障碍学生同伴交往能力的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 44-54.
[3] 赵京伟, 陈晓旭, 任立文, 耿喆, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与小学儿童焦虑:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[4] 程阳春, 黄瑾. 近似数量系统与数学能力的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 379-390.
[5] 刘双, 李梅, 冯晓杭, 张向葵. 幼儿掌控动机与能力关系的纵向研究:任务类型与气质的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 161-172.
[6] 张玉平, 董琼, 宋爽, 舒华. 小学低年级儿童的阅读发展轨迹:早期语言认知技能的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 210-218.
[7] 鲁明辉, 王融, 张丽敏. 父母心理弹性与自闭症谱系障碍儿童情绪行为问题的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 247-254.
[8] 刘钰, 苏彦捷, 曹春梅, 丁宇, 樊煜. 社区老年人执行功能和加工速度与运动能力的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 769-777.
[9] 姚琳, 刘福会, 李伟强, 张晓琪, 袁博. 能力社会比较与归因反馈对不诚实行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 778-785.
[10] 杨晨, 连帅磊, 陈春宇, 孙晓军, 周宗奎. 同伴依恋与初中生手机成瘾的关系:有调节的中介效应分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 538-545.
[11] 张小敏, 陈欣, 务凯, 赵国祥. 学校联结和学业能力对高中生自尊的影响:一个多层线性模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 358-365.
[12] 张和颐, 洪秀敏. 家庭认知环境与0~3岁婴幼儿发展的关系:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 178-185.
[13] 占淑玮, 杨宁, 赵必华. 留守学前儿童接受性语言能力与社会退缩的关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 834-844.
[14] 田瑾, 毛亚庆, 熊华夏. 变革型领导对教师职业倦怠的影响:社会情感能力和幸福感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 743-751.
[15] 杨文敏, 鲁嘉晨, 谭欣, 梁静远, 雷怡. 大学生主观童年创伤症状对抑郁的影响:抗挫折能力和外向性的多重中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 128-136.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!