记忆编码策略对心境一致性记忆的调节作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.02.02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 情绪对记忆的影响会受记忆编码策略的调节。本研究通过2个实验探讨编码策略对心境一致性记忆的调节作用。实验1和实验2均采用2（编码策略：提取练习策略、重复学习策略）×2（词性：消极词、中性词）的实验设计，分别探讨了不同记忆编码策略对普通大学生（实验1）和非临床抑郁大学生（实验2）心境一致性记忆的影响。结果发现：无论是被成功诱导出抑郁情绪的普通大学生，还是非临床抑郁倾向大学生，使用重复学习策略时回忆出的消极词均显著多于中性词，表现出显著的心境一致性记忆，而使用提取练习策略时回忆出的消极词和中性词没有显著性差异，未表现出心境一致性记忆。实验结果表明，记忆编码策略对心境一致性记忆具有调节作用，提取练习策略能够抑制心境一致性记忆。研究结果指明了心境一致性记忆的边界条件，并对非临床抑郁个体的学习与记忆具有重要的启示。

关键词: 提取练习, 心境一致性效应, 情绪, 抑郁倾向, 情绪渗透模型

Abstract: A wealth of researches has indicated that emotions can affect different memory processing stages, such as memory coding, storage and retrieval. However, the impact of emotions on memory coding will vary depending on the coding strategy. The affect infusion model believes that the generation of mood-consistent memory to a large extent depends on the processing strategies used by individuals in specific situations. When adopting high-permeability processing strategies(such as heuristic strategies:tasks are relatively simple, familiar, and self-independent), the degree of emotional penetration is higher; when using low-permeability processing strategies(such as motivation-driven strategies:have clear goals and motivations, and occupy a large number of cognitive resources), the degree of emotional penetration is lower. Current research on mood-consistent memory principally focuses on the effects of explicit and implicit processing methods on mood-consistent memory. No studies have yet explored the inhibitory effect of low-permeability processing strategies on mood-consistent memory at the level of explicit memory. In the study, two experiments were conducted to test the effect of coding strategies on mood-consistent memory. In Experiment 1, adopting ordinary college students as subjects, and the experimental design of 2 (coding strategy:retrieve practice strategy, repetitive learning strategy)×2 (part of speech:negative words, neutral words). The purpose of Experiment 1 was to explore the effects of different memory coding strategies on mood-consistent memory. It was found that the main effect of coding strategy is significant, the main effect of part of speech is significant, and the interaction between coding strategy and part of speech is significant. A further simple effect analysis found that the subjects recalled more negative words than neutral words when using the repetitive learning strategy, showing obvious mood-consistent memory. When using retrieve practice strategy, no matter whether it was in the final test or in the three extractions during the learning phase, the recalled negative words and neutral words had no significant difference, which effectively suppressed the mood-consistent memory. In Experiment 2, adopting non-clinical depression college students as subjects, and also adopted the experimental design of 2 (coding strategy:retrieve practice strategy, repetitive learning strategy)×2 (part of speech:negative words, neutral words), which was aimed to study the effect of different memory coding strategies on mood-consistent memory. The results were the same as in Experiment 1.The experiment had the following results. Firstly, memory coding strategy has a regulating effect on mood-consistent memory, and retrieve practice strategy as a high-quality coding strategy can effectively suppress mood-consistent memory. Secondly, the research results indicate the boundary conditions of mood-consistent memory and have important implications for the learning and memory of non-clinical depressed individuals.

Key words: retrieve practice, mood-consistent effects, emotions, depression tendency, affect infusion model

中图分类号:

B844

马小凤, 文美琪, 史凯, 杜青青, 姚贝, 穆缘, 霍小宁. 记忆编码策略对心境一致性记忆的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 161-170.

MA Xiaofeng, WEN Meiqi, SHI Kai, DU Qingqing, YAO Bei, MU Yuan, HUO Xiaoning. “Retrieve Practice” Impede Mood Congruence in Memory[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(2): 161-170.

参考文献

Beck, A. T. (2008). The evolution of the cognitive model of depression and its neurobiological correlates.American Journal of Psychiatry, 165(8), 969-977.
Bjork, R. A. (1975).Retrieval as a memory modifier. In R. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition:The Loyola Symposium (pp. 123-144). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
Blaney, P. H. (1986). Affect and memory:A review. Psychological Bulletin, 99(2), 229-246.
Bower, G. H. (1981). Mood and Memory.American Psychologist, 36(2), 129-148.
Bower, G. H. (1987). Commentary on mood and memory.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 25(6), 443-455.
Bradley, B. P., Mogg, K., & Williams, R. (1994). Implicit and explicit memory for emotional information in non-clinical subjects.Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32(1), 65-78.
Brewer, D. H., Doughtie, E. B., & Lubin, B. (1980). Induction of Mood and Mood Shift.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 36(1), 215-226.
Buchanan, T. W. (2007). Retrieval of emotional memories.Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 761-779.
Carpenter, S. K. (2011). Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention:Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1547-1552.
Cook, E. W., Atkinson, L. S., & Lang, K. G. (1987). Stimulus control and data acquisition for IBM PCs and compatibles.Psychophysiology,24(6), 726-727
Deveney, C. M., & Deldin, P. J. (2004). Memory of faces:A slow wave ERP study of major depression. Emotion, 4(3), 295-304.
Dolcos, F., Labar, K. S., & Cabeza, R. (2005). Remembering one year later:Role of the amygdala and the medial temporal lobe memory system in retrieving emotional memories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(7), 2626-2631.
Eich, E., & Forgas, J. P. (2003). Mood, cognition, and memory. In A. F. Healy, & R. W. Proctor (Eds.), Handbook of psychology:Experimental psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 61-83). New York:Wiley.
Gaddy, M. A., & Ingram, R. E. (2014). A meta-analytic review of mood-congruent implicit memory in depressed mood. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(5), 402-416.
Hadley,C. B., & MacKay,D. G. (2006). Does emotion help or hinder immediate memory? Arousal versus priority-binding mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition,32,79- 88.
Hamann, S. (2001). Cognitive and neural mechanisms of emotional memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(9), 394-400.
Joormann, J., Teachman, B. A., & Gotlib, I. H. (2009). Sadder and less accurate? False memory for negative material in depression. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118(2), 412-417.
Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger III, H. L. (2009).Metacognitive strategies in student learning:Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17(4), 471-479.
Karpicke, J. D., & Blunt, J. R. (2011). Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science, 331(6018), 772-775.
Karpicke, J. D., Lehman, M., & Aue, W. R. (2014). Retrieval-based learning:An episodic context account.In B. H. Ross(Ed.). The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 61, pp. 237-284). Academic Press.
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319(5865), 966-968.
Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2004). Two routes to emotional memory:Distinct neural processes for valence and arousal.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(9), 3310-3315.
Knott, L. M., & Thorley, C. (2014). Mood congruent false memories persist over time.Cognition & Emotion, 28(5), 903-912.
Lehman, M., Smith, M. A., & Karpicke, J. D. (2014). Toward an episodic context account of retrieval-based learning:Dissociating retrieval practice and elaboration. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory and Cognition, 40(6), 1787-1794.
Lewinsohn, P. M., & Rosenbaum, M. (1987). Recall of parental behavior by acute depressives, remitted depressives, and nondepressives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 611-619.
Maria, G., & Juan, G. (2017). Negative bias in the perception and memory of emotional information in alzheimer disease.Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 30(3), 131-139.
Martin, M. (1990). On the induction of mood.Clinical Psychology Review, 10(6), 669-697.
Mathews, A., & MacLeod, C. (2005). Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders.Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 167-195.
Mayer, J. D., Allen, J. P., & Beauregard, K. (1995). Mood inductions for four specific moods:A procedure employing guided imagery vignettes with music.Journal of Mental Imagery, 19(1-2), 151-159.
McGaugh, J. L., & Roozendaal, B. (2002). Role ofadrenal stress hormones in forming lasting memories in the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12(2), 205-210.
Phelps, E. A. (2004). Human emotion and memory:Interactions of the amygdala and hippocampal complex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14(2), 198-202.
Provencio, M., Vazquez, C., Valiente, C., & Hervas, G. (2012). Depressive primes stimulate initial avoidance of angry faces:An eye-tracking study of paranoid ideation.Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36(5), 483-492.
Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis:Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 437-447.
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-enhanced learning taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17(3), 249-255.
Rowland, C. A., Littrell-Baez, M. K., Sensenig, A. E., & DeLosh, E. L. (2014). Testing effects in mixed-versus pure-list designs.Memory & Cognition, 42(6), 912-921.
Ruci, L., Tomes, J. L., & Zelenski, J. M. (2009). Mood-congruent false memories in the DRM paradigm.Cognition & Emotion, 23(6), 1153-1165.
Scher, C. D., Ingram, R. E., & Segal, Z. V. (2005). Cognitive reactivity and vulnerability:Empirical evaluation of construct activation and cognitive diatheses in unipolar depression. Clinical Psychology Review, 25(4), 487-510.
Singer, J. A., & Salovey, P. (1988). Mood and memory:Evaluating the Network Theory of Affect. Clinical Psychology Review, 8(2), 211-251.
Smith, A. M., Floerke, V. A., & Thomas, A. K. (2016). Retrieval practice protects memory against acute stress.Science, 354(6315), 1046-1048.
Smith, A. M., & Thomas, A. K. (2018). Reducing the Consequences of Acute Stress on Memory Retrieval. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 7(2), 219-229.
Stenson, A. F., Leventon, J. S., & Bauer, P. J. (2019). Emotion effects on memory from childhood through adulthood:Consistent enhancement and adult gender differences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,178, 121-136.
Taylor, J. L., & John, C. H. (2004). Attentional and memory bias in persecutory delusions and depression.Psychopathology, 37(5), 233-241.
Watkins, P. C., Mathews, A., Williamson, D. A., & Fuller, R. D. (1992). Mood-congruent memory in depression:Emotional priming or elaboration? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 101(3), 581-586.
Westermann, R., Spies, K., Stahl, G., & Hesse, F. W. (1996). Relative effectiveness and validity of mood induction procedures:a meta-analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(4), 557-580.
Wing, E. A., Marsh, E. J., & Cabeza, R. (2013). Neural correlates of retrieval-based memory enhancement:An fMRI study of thetesting effect. Neuropsychologia, 51(12), 2360-2370.
Wisco, B. E. (2009). Depressive cognition:Self-reference and depth of processing.Clinical Psychology Review, 29(4), 382-392.
Zhang, W., Gross, J., & Hayne, H. (2017). The effect of mood on false memory for emotional DRM word lists. Cognition & Emotion, 31(3), 526-537.
丁道群, 郭程, 尹霖, 来棘.(2018).不同注意资源条件下厌恶与恐惧情绪的记忆增强效应. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(05), 835-840.
郭力平. (1997). 再认记忆测验中抑郁个体的心境一致性记忆研究. 心理学报, 29(4), 357-363.
骆宏, 马剑虹. (2004). 大学生抑郁症状、问题解决能力与压力感知的关系分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 12(04), 367-368+364.
毛新瑞, 徐慧芳, 郭春彦. (2015). 双加工再认提取中的情绪记忆增强效应. 心理学报, 47(9), 1111-1123.
屈智勇, 张秀兰. (2008). 中西部大学生抑郁现状、人群特征及干预效果. 清华大学学报:哲学社会科学版, 23(2), 120-134.
谭曦, 张靖, 吴朝阳, 杜渐, 孔军辉. (2010). 大学生抑郁倾向的特点及中医心理干预. 吉林中医药, 30(9), 741-744.
王海宝, 张达人, 余永强. (2009). 情绪记忆增强效应的时间依赖性. 心理学报, 41(10), 932-938.
谢韵梓, 阳泽. (2016). 不同情绪诱发方法有效性的比较研究.心理与行为研究, 14(5), 591-599.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	成梦婷, 徐琴美, 葛雨箐, 马洒, 严晨毓. 母亲回应方式与婴儿情绪调节策略使用的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 162-171.
[2]	李金凤, 詹洁辰, 王大华. 情绪唤醒度对老年人健康谣言转发意愿的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 202-211.
[3]	张森森, 丁凤琴. 情随境迁:道德情绪概念净脏隐喻及其情境性[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 9-17.
[4]	金梦菡, 徐慧, 龚先旻, 彭华茂. 主播情绪唤醒度对中老年人直播购物的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 50-59.
[5]	王祯, 史保莹, 赵好莉, 郭云飞, 王恩国. 情感教学代理的情绪表达和角色对视频学习的影响:学习者经验的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 60-69.
[6]	杨淑芸, 李紫涵, 任萍. 欺凌受害对早期青少年自伤的影响:孤独感与情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 121-130.
[7]	刘畅, 蒋柳青, 郑天鹏, 边玉芳. 父母情绪调节困难与父母情绪社会化行为的关系:基于主客体互倚模型的交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 652-662.
[8]	马小凤, 姬喜莹, 张骐韵, 刘明惠, 张晶. 提取关键步骤促进问题解决[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 465-472.
[9]	冯娜, 梁峰, 王芬, 何春丽, 张慧. 基本情绪与道德情绪对不同年龄群体道德判断的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 491-499.
[10]	范萌, 刘欣怡, 岳佳莹, 陈旭. 不同依恋类型在情绪共情过程中的个体差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 598-608.
[11]	胡莹莹, 杨一鸣, 王文静. 中小学教师情绪劳动与职业倦怠的纵向联系:情绪弹性和师生关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 357-367.
[12]	王薇, 程奕芸, 吴洋, 薛立成, 李永鑫, 赵静. 5～7岁孤独症谱系障碍儿童情绪主题绘本阅读的注意偏向[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 163-172.
[13]	顾红磊, 黄佳, 李家成. 同一性混乱与青少年自伤的关系:疏离感的中介作用和情绪调节困难的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 126-134.
[14]	李艳玮, 黄一依, 翟清灼, 周文沁, 袁宗金. 儿童早期易怒:特性、评估、风险因素与干预[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 135-144.
[15]	丁倩, 宋紫薇, 李明蔚, 李晓彤, 周宗奎. 流言让人分心:校园负面八卦对中学生上课走神的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 824-831.