心理发展与教育 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 449-461.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.04.08

• 教与学心理 • 上一篇    下一篇

认知能力对学业成绩的影响:有中介的调节模型

梁兴丽1,2, 何津3, 周佶俊4, 刘萍萍1,2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院心理健康重点实验室(中国科学院心理研究所), 北京 100101;
    2. 中国科学院大学 心理学系, 北京 100049;
    3. Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands 1081 BT;
    4. 译泰教育测评研究院, 北京 100102
  • 发布日期:2020-07-21
  • 通讯作者: 刘萍萍 E-mail:liupp@psych.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目（31600887）。

The Influence of Cognitive Ability on Academic Performance of Junior Middle School Students: A Mediated Moderation Model

LIANG Xingli1,2, HE Jin3, ZHOU Jijun4, LIU Pingping1,2   

  1. 1. CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101;
    2. Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049;
    3. Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands 1081 BT;
    4. Yitai Education and Evaluation Institute, Beijing 100102
  • Published:2020-07-21

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

摘要： 学业成绩是衡量学生掌握知识水平的重要指标，受到认知能力、社会支持和学习动机等多重因素的显著影响，而这多重因素间的关系及其对学业成绩的共同作用机制尚不明确。本研究采用标准化的认知能力测验、社会支持量表、学习动机量表对4，973名初中生进行测试，并以各科测验成绩总分的平均值作为学业成绩指标。结果表明：（1）认知能力、社会支持、学习动机均与学业成绩正相关；（2）社会支持在认知能力对学业成绩的影响中起调节作用，学生感受到的社会支持水平越高，学业成绩表现越好，且其认知能力对学业成绩的预测作用越强；（3）社会支持的调节作用部分通过学习动机这一中介变量实现。本研究构建了一个基于个体因素（认知能力和学习动机）和环境因素（社会支持）共同影响学业成绩的理论模型，有利于人们深入理解认知能力影响学业成绩的内在机制和边界条件，为提升学生学业成绩提供了理论依据和实证支持。

关键词: 认知能力, 学业成绩, 学习动机, 社会支持, 有中介的调节模型

Abstract: Academic performance has been widely known to be influenced by multiple factors, including cognitive ability, academic motivation and social support. However, the relationships between these factors and the mechanism under their effects on academic performance are still unclear. According to information processing theory, cognitive ability of students would promote the improvement of academic achievement. Based on self-determination theory, perceived social supports may influence learning behavior through academic motivation. However, it is still unclear how individual and environmental factors jointly affect academic performance. Therefore, the present study aimed to test a mediated moderation model to explore the impact of social support and academic motivation on the relationships between cognitive ability and academic performance. The present study, using cluster sampling approach, investigated 4,973 junior high school students in Yanqing District, Beijing. Students were required to complete cognitive tests (i.e., attention, memory and reasoning ability), social support (i.e., teacher-student relationship, friendship quality and parental support) and academic motivation. The mean of school testing measures on all participants in junior high school were used to represent academic performance. There were three main findings. First, in line with previous studies, cognitive ability, social support, and academic motivation were positively related to academic performance. Second, social support significantly moderated the association between cognitive ability and academic performance. The effect of cognitive ability on academic performance was stronger for students with higher social support than those with lower level of social support. Third, academic motivation mediated the influence of cognitive ability on academic performance, and the mediation was affected by social support. Specifically, the link from cognitive ability to academic motivation then to academic performance was stronger for students with high level of social support than those with low level of social support. The present study confirms the self-determination theory by providing evidences that the effect of individual factors (cognitive ability and academic motivation) on academic performance may vary in social environments with different levels of interpersonal supports. Our findings provide the understanding about mechanisms of the effect of cognitive ability on academic performance, and suggest the importance of supportive interpersonal relationships in educational practice.

Key words: cognitive ability, academic performance, academic motivation, social support, mediated moderation

中图分类号: 

  • G442
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions-institute for social and economic research(iser), 14(2), 167-168.
Ahmed, W., Minnaert, A., Van Der Werf, G., & Kuyper, H. (2010). Perceived social support and early adolescents’ achievement: The meditational roles of motivational beliefs and emotions. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(1), 36-46.
Barnes, V., Potter, E. H., & Fiedler, F. E. (1983). Effect of interpersonal stress on the prediction of academic performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(4), 686-697.
Beaujean, A. A., Firmin, M. W., Attai, S., Johnson, C. B., Firmin, R. L., & Mena, K. E. (2011). Using personality and cognitive ability to predict academic achievement in a young adult sample. Personality & Individual Differences, 51(6), 709-714.
Bong, M. (2009). Age-related differences in achievement goal differentiation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 879-896.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 52(4), 691-691.
Cohen, S. (2004). Social relationships and health. American Psychologist, 59(8), 676-684.
Connell, J. P., Wellbom, J. G., Gunnar, M., & Sroufe, L. A. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 65, 43-77.
Erceg-Hurn, D. M., & Mirosevich, V. M. (2008). Modem robust statistical methods: An easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. American Psychologist, 63(7), 591-601.
Ebrahimi, N., Sabaghian, Z., Abolghasemi, M. (2011). Investigating relationship of hope and academic success of college students. The Quarterly Journal of Research and Programming in Higher Education, 60, 1-16.
Eric J. L., Stewart, E., & Enedina, G. (2010). Acculturation, social support and academic achievement of Mexican and Mexican American high school students: An exploratory study. Psychology in the Schools, 39(3), 245-257.
Formazin, M., Schroeders, U., Köller, O., Wilhelm, O., & Westmeyer, H. (2015). Studierendenauswahl im Fach Psychologie. Psychologische Rundschau, 62(4), 221-236.
Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2016). Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(2), 269-299.
Ghaith, G. M. (2002). The relationship between cooperative learning, perception of social support, and academic achievement. System, 30(3), 263-273.
Gijselaers, H. J. M., Meijs, C., Neroni, J., Kirschner, P. A., & De Groot, R. H. M. (2017). Updating and not shifting predicts learning performance in young and middle-aged adults. Mind, Brain, and Education, 11(4), 190-200.
Gloria, A. M., Castellanos, J., Lopez, A. G., & Rosales, R. (2005). An examination of academic nonpersistence decisions of latino undergraduates. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 27(2), 202-223.
Goertz, M. E., & Duffy, M. C. (2001). Assessment and accountability systems in the 50 states, 1999-2000. Consortium for Policy Research in Education, 3-4.
Guttenberg, B. E. (2015). The moderating role of social-emotional functioning in predicting the relationship between cognitive abilities and academic achievement (Doctoral dissertation).St. John’s University, New York.
Hariz, E. W., & Asep, A. J. (2017). The role of social emotional health on academic achievemont of college students. International Conference on Education & Training, 7(1), 23-28.
Helsen, M., Vollebergh, W., & Meeus, W. (2000). Social support from parents and friends and emotional problems in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29(3), 319-335.
Institute, D. T. (2005). Explaining student performance: Evidence from the international PISA, TIMSS and PIRLS surveys.
Jang, S. J., & Chen, K. C. (2010). From PCK to TPACK: developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 19(6), 553-564.
Jiang, Y., Song, J., Lee, M., & Bong, M. (2014). Self-efficacy and achievement goals as motivational links between perceived contexts and achievement. Educational Psychology, 34(1), 92-117.
Jihyun Lee, & Valerie J. Shute. (2010). Personal and social-contextual factors in k-12 academic performance: An integrative perspective on student learning. Educational Psychologist, 45(3), 185-202.
Jihyun, L., & Lazar, S. (2018). Non-cognitive predictors of academic achievement: Evidence from TIMSS and PISA. Learning and Individual Differences, 65, 50-64.
Kelava, A., Werner, C. S., Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., Zapf, D., Ma, Y., et al. (2011). Advanced nonlinear latent variable modeling: Distribution analytic LMS and OML estimators of interaction and quadratic effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 18(3), 465-491.
Khanna, L., Singh, S. N., & Alam, M. (2018). Multidimensional analysis of psychological factors affecting students academic performance.
Kiuru, N., Aunola, K., Lerkkanen, M. K., Pakarinen, E., Poskiparta, E., Ahonen, T., et al. (2015). Positive teacher and peer relations combine to predict primary school students' academic skill development. Developmental Psychology, 51(4), 434-446.
Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65(4), 457-474.
Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance: Can one construct predict them all? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 148-161.
Levitt, M. J., Guacci-Franco, N., & Levitt, J. L. (1994). Social support and achievement in childhood and early adolescene: A multicultural study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15(2), 207-222.
Ludger, W. (2016). The importance of school systems: Evidence from international differences in student achievement. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 3-32.
Manne, S. L., & Zautra, A. J. (1989). Spouse criticism and support: Their association with coping and psychological adjustment among women with rheumatoid arthritis. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 56(4), 608-617.
Mccoach, D. B., Yu, H., Gottfried, A. W., & Gottfried, A. E. (2017). Developing talents: A longitudinal examination of intellectual ability and academic achievement. High Ability Studies, 28, 1-22.
Malecki, C. K., & Elliot, S. N. (1999). Adolescents' ratings of perceived social support and its importance: validation of the student social support scale. Psychology in the Schools, 36(6), 473-483.
Parameswari, J., & Maharishi, R. (2015). Influence of academic motivation on study involvement among adolescents. Journal of Psychosocial Research, 10(2), 319-325.
Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adolescents' perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(1), 83-98.
Pianta, R. C. (1994). Patterns of relationships between children and kindergarten teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 32(1), 15-31.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Poropat,A.E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 322-328.
Raufelder, D., Bukowski, W. M., & Mohr, S. (2013). Thick description of the teacher-student relationship in the educational context of school: Results of an ethnographic field study. Journal of Education & Training Studies, 1(2), 1-18.
Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353-387.
Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. J. (1998). Academic and emotional functioning in early adolescence: Longitudinal relations, patterns, and prediction by experience in middle school. Development and Psychopathology, 10(2), 321-352.
Rohde, T. E., & Thompson, L. A. (2007). Predicting academic achievement with cognitive ability. Intelligence, 35(1), 83-92.
Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147-177.
Song, J., Bong, M., Lee, K., & Kim, S. (2014). Longitudinal investigation into the role of perceived social support in adolescents’ academic motivation and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 821-841.
Stadler, M., Aust, M., Becker, N., Niepel, C., & Greiff, S. (2016). Choosing between what you want now and what you want most: self-control explains academic achievement beyond cognitive ability. Personality & Individual Differences, 94, 168-172.
Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., Keefe, D. E., Hayes, B. E., & Shearin, E. N. (1986). Cognitive interference: Situational determinants and traitlike characteristics. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 51(1), 215-226.
Sternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, K. (2009). Cognitive psychology (6th Ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Koestner, R. (2008). Reflections on self-determination theory. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 257-262.
Vasquez, A. C., Patall, E. A., Fong, C. J., Corrigan, A. S., & Pine, L. (2016). Parent autonomy support, academic achievement, and psychosocial functioning: A meta-analysis of research. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 605-644.
Vock, M., Preckel, F., & Holling, H. (2011). Mental abilities and school achievement: a test of a mediation hypothesis. Intelligence, 39(5),357-369.
杜刚, 吕厚超. (2017). 青少年未来时间洞察力和学业成绩的关系:时间管理倾向的中介作用. 心理科学, 40(1), 96-102.
郭雯婧, 边玉芳. (2013). 初二学生感知到的社会支持与学习成绩的关系——学业自我概念的中介作用. 心理科学, 36(3), 627-631.
侯杰泰, 温忠麟, 成子娟. (2004). 结构方程模型及其应用. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
黄希庭. (1999). 心理学导论. 北京: 人民教育出版社.
姜媛, 林崇德. (2010). 情绪测量的自我报告法述评. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版)(6), 135-139.
李董平, 周月月, 赵力燕, 王艳辉, 孙文强. (2016). 累积生态风险与青少年网络成瘾:心理需要满足和积极结果预期的中介作用. 心理学报, 48(12), 1519-1537.
李慧勤, 李晓双, 王晓航. (2017). 城乡学生认知能力差异的实证研究——基于云南五个县市的报告. 教育研究(07), 117-123.
李雁冰. (2011). 论综合素质评价的本质. 教育发展研究(24), 58-64.
李玉, 柴阳丽, 闫寒冰. (2018). 思维导图对学生学业成就的影响效应——近十年国际思维导图教育应用的元分析. 中国远程教育(综合版)(1), 16-28.
林崇德. (2002). 发展心理学. 浙江教育出版社.
刘桂荣, 滕秀芹. (2016). 父母参与对流动儿童学业成绩的影响:自主性动机的中介作用. 心理学探新, 36(5), 433-438.
刘晓, 黄希庭. (2010). 社会支持及其对心理健康的作用机制. 心理研究,3(1), 3-8.
刘晓玲. (2017). 小学生父母教养方式、家庭环境与学业成绩的关系研究. 上海教育科研 (9), 32-36.
乔娜, 张景焕, 刘桂荣, 林崇德. (2013). 家庭社会经济地位、父母参与对初中生学业成绩的影响:教师支持的调节作用. 心理发展与教育,29(5), 507-514.
齐静. (2016). 关于初中生认知能力家庭影响因素的统计分析(硕士学位论文). 首都经济贸易大学, 北京.
王蕾. (2007). 能力测试题库的建构——来自PISA的启示. 中国考试(12), 12-18.
王玉龙, 覃雅兰, 肖璨, 蔺秀云. (2016). 父母冲突与青少年自伤的关系:一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 32(3), 377-384.
王云霞, 万明钢. (2003). 简易初中生应对方式自陈量表的编制. 内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版), 16(1), 71-75.
万晶晶. (2002). 初中生友谊发展及其与攻击行为的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.
温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰. (2006). 有中介的调节变量和有调节的中介变量. 心理学报, 38(3), 448-452.
谢东宝. (2009). 美国基础教育学业成绩评定特点及其启示. 当代教育科学 (10), 37-40.
徐芬, 李春花. (2015). 初中生认知能力对学业成就的影响. 心理科学,38 (1), 11-18.
杨洋. (2009). 对标准化考试的误解和误用之校正. 湖北招生考试(24), 41-44.
姚德雯, 严林峰, 阿曼古丽·木沙, 刘革. (2011). 初中生认知风格、学习动机、学习策略与学业成绩的关系. 心理研究, 4(6), 92-96.
叶宝娟, 温忠麟. (2013). 有中介的调节模型检验方法:甄别和整合. 心理学报, 45(9), 1050-1060.
易芳, 郭雅洁, 俞宗火, 徐霜雪. (2017). 中小学生学业成绩主要影响因素的元分析, 心理学探新, 37(2), 140-148.
张宝歌, 姜涛. (2009). 初中生师生关系对学业成绩的影响研究. 心理科学(4), 1015-1017.
张丹慧, 符定梦, 刘红云, 刘鲁曼. (2018). 学生感知教师自主支持对学生学业成绩的影响:自主心理需要、内部动机的中介作用.教师教育研究, 30(1), 79-86.
张军翎. (2008). 中小学生的逻辑推理能力、元认知及注意力水平与学业成绩的比较. 心理科学, 31(3), 707-710.
张晓龙. (2011). 学生学业成绩评价改革研究. 太原学院学报(自然科学版)(3), 21-24.
邹泓, 屈智勇, 叶苑. (2007). 中小学生的师生关系与其学校适应. 心理发展与教育, 23(4), 77-82.
邹泓, 周晖, 周燕. (1998). 中学生友谊、友谊质量与同伴接纳的关系. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版)(1), 43-50.
[1] 苑媛, 梁周健, 张丽. 结构性校园氛围与中学生抑郁:社会支持的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 869-876.
[2] 张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[3] 李腾飞, 马玉鑫, 宋瑞君, 陈亮. 青少年早期身体侵害、关系侵害与学业成绩的关系:交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 559-567.
[4] 张鹏程, 李喜, 韩午阳, 沈永江. 睡眠不足对中小学生负性情绪的影响:一个链式中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 402-409.
[5] 李金文, 白荣, 王雨萌, 刘霞. 青少年抑郁与自伤行为的发展轨迹及其关系:基于两年的追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 429-438.
[6] 李星凯, 武峻生, 姚筱彤, 刘映珊, 任杰, 陈穗清. 自闭症和智力障碍儿童行为问题与父母焦虑的关系:育儿压力的中介作用与领悟社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 77-84.
[7] 徐文明, 方烨仪, 叶彩霞. 家庭早期的累积风险对青少年内化问题的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 793-803.
[8] 郑爽, 刘红瑞, 李静, 席雨, 姚梅林. 主动性人格与大学生创业准备行为的关系:创业意向的中介效应与创业社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 813-821.
[9] 吕书鹏, 王莹, 王昕红, 郭雪松, 姚秀颖. 父母严苛型教养方式与青少年自杀倾向:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 869-878.
[10] 余青云, 王文超, 伍新春. 感恩与大学生创伤后成长的关系：社会支持和希望的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 703-710.
[11] 谢云天, 史滋福, 尹霖, 兰洛. 中国父母教养方式与儿童学业成绩关系的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 366-379.
[12] 王旭, 刘衍玲, 林杰, 刘传星, 魏灵真, 邱涵宇. 亲子关系对中学生心理健康的影响:社会支持和心理素质的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 263-271.
[13] 任萍, 宋子婧, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 张云运. 青少年学业成绩、攻击行为与受欢迎程度的关系:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 710-718.
[14] 邱依雯, 娄熠雪, 雷怡. 青少年抑郁:基于社会支持的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 288-297.
[15] 薛璐璐, 姜媛, 方平. 述情障碍与中学生人际关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 92-100.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《心理发展与教育》编辑部
地址：北京新街口外大街19号北京师范大学院内　 邮政编码：100875
联系电话：010-58807700 E-mail:pdae@bnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发