青少年早期同伴侵害的亚类别及其稳定性:个体定向的分析

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.02.03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以山东省济南市12所初中的2015名初一学生为被试，对其持续追踪至初二年级，采用自我报告法测查青少年的同伴侵害、受欺负和社交退缩，采用同伴提名法测查青少年的攻击行为。采用潜在剖面分析和潜在转变分析，探讨青少年早期同伴侵害的亚类别以及各亚类别中青少年受侵害身份的稳定性与发展变化。结果发现：（1）同伴侵害亚类别可以分为：未受侵害组、低受侵害组、中等受侵害组和高受侵害组四类，各亚类别间的异质性主要体现在受侵害程度上；（2）中等受侵害组和高受侵害组表现出高水平的攻击行为和社交退缩，且高受侵害组的社交退缩行为更多；（3）青少年早期个体的受侵害身份具有中到高水平的稳定性，同时也存在着一定的发展变化，主要表现为高受侵害组青少年倾向于向中等受侵害组转变，中等受侵害组青少年倾向于向低受侵害组转变。攻击行为是受侵害身份转变的重要预测因素。

关键词: 同伴侵害, 潜在剖面分析, 潜在转变分析, 青少年早期

Abstract: Peer victimization refers to the experience of being a target of peers' aggressive behaviors, in the forms of physical, verbal, and relational abuse, and property infringement. The current study aimed to use latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify subgroups of victims, and to examine individual behavior factors that could distinguish these subgroups. In addition, we used latent transition analysis (LTA) to examine the stability and developmental changes of peer victimization status during the two time points. Participants were 2,015 seventh graders (T1:mean age 13.20±0.36 years old) sampled from 12 middle schools in Jinan, who were assessed again one year later. The main findings of this study were as follows:(1) LPA identified four classes of adolescents representing non-victimized class, lowly victimized class, moderately victimized class, and highly victimized class at both T1 and T2. Findings indicated there were multiple heterogeneous subgroups based on the severity of peer victimization. (2) Class differences were found on measures of aggressive behavior and social withdrawn, validating the LPA classes. High victims and moderate victims reported higher levels of aggressive behavior than the groups of low victims and non-victims. In terms of social withdrawn, all four classes differed from each other. Students in highly victimized class reported more social withdrawn behaviors than the other three classes. (3) Latent transition analyses (LTA) revealed moderate to high level of stabilities of victimization status over time. In addition, transitions across different class were also evident. The highly victimized class was more likely to transit into the moderately victimized class, while the moderate victims were more likely to transit into the low victims. In addition, aggressive behavior can promote the mutual transformation between the lowly and moderately victimized classes. This study enhanced our understanding of the complex patterns of peer victimization and lent theoretical supports to prevention and intervention programs on adolescent peer victimization.

Key words: peer victimization, latent profile analysis, latent transition analysis, early adolescence

中图分类号:

B844

杨晓霞, 陈亮, 曹衍淼, 毕馨文, 陈光辉, 张文新. 青少年早期同伴侵害的亚类别及其稳定性:个体定向的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 146-156.

YANG Xiaoxia, CHEN Liang, CAO Yanmiao, BI Xinwen, CHEN Guanghui, ZHANG Wenxin. Peer Victimization During Early Adolescence: Person Centered Analysis[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2020, 36(2): 146-156.

参考文献

Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 Child Profile. Burlington, VT:University of Vermont.
Booth-LaForce, C., & Oxford, M. L. (2008). Trajectories of social withdrawal from grades 1 to 6:Prediction from early parenting, attachment, and temperament. Developmental Psychology, 44(5), 1298-1311.
Bradshaw, C. P., Waasdorp, T. E., & O'Brennan, L. M. (2013). A latent class approach to examining forms of peer victimization. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 839-849.
Casper, D. M., & Card, N. A. (2017). Overt and relational victimization:A meta analytic review of their overlap and associations with social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 88(2), 466-483.
Chen, L., Zhang, W., Ji, L., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2019). Developmental trajectories of Chinese adolescents' relational aggression:Associations with changes in social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 90(6), 2153-2170.
Crick, N. R., & Bigbee, M. A. (1998). Relational and overt forms of peer victimization:A multiinformant approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 337-347.
Ettekal, I., & Ladd, G. W. (2017). Developmental continuity and change in physical, verbal, and relational aggression and peer victimization from childhood to adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 53(9), 1709-1721.
Goldbaum, S., Craig, W. M., Pepler, D., & Connolly, J. (2003). Developmental trajectories of victimization:Identifying risk and protective factors. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(2), 139-156.
Haltigan, J. D., & Vaillancourt, T. (2018). The influence of static and dynamic intrapersonal factors on longitudinal patterns of peer victimization through mid-adolescence:A latent transition analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46(1), 11-26.
Ladd, G. W. (2006). Peer rejection, aggressive or withdrawn behavior, and psychological maladjustment from ages 5 to 12:An examination of four predictive models. Child Development, 77(4), 822-846.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA:Muthén & Muthén.
Mynard, H., & Joseph, S. (2000). Development of the multidimensional peer-victimization scale. Aggressive Behavior, 26(2), 169-178.
Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simonsmorton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among us youth:Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(16), 2094-2100.
Nguyen, A. J., Bradshaw, C., Townsend, L., Gross, A.L., & Bass, J. (2016). A latent class approach to understanding patterns of peer victimization in four low-resource settings. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27639270#
Nylund, K., Bellmore, A., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2007). Subtypes, severity, and structural stability of peer victimization:What does latent class analysis say? Child Development, 78(6), 1706-1722.
Perren, S., & Alsaker, F. D. (2006). Social behavior and peer relationships of victims, bully-victims, and bullies in kindergarten. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(1), 45-57.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research:A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Rudolph, K. D., Troopgordon, W., Monti, J. D., & Miernicki, M. E. (2014). Moving against and away from the world:The adolescent legacy of peer victimization. Development & Psychopathology, 26(3), 721-734.
Schäfer, M., Werner, N. E., & Crick, N. R. (2002). A comparison of two approaches to the study of negative peer treatment:General victimization and bully/victim problems among German school children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(2), 281-306.
Schwartz, D., Proctor, L., & Chien, D. (2001). The aggressive victim of bullying:Emotional and behavioral dysregulation as a pathway to victimization by peers. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school:The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 147-174). New York, NY:Guilford Press.
Sentse, M., Prinzie, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2017). Testing the direction of longitudinal paths between victimization, peer rejection, and different types of internalizing problems in adolescence. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 45(5), 1013-1023.
Sugimura, N., Berry, D., Troop-Gordon, W., & Rudolph, K. D. (2017). Early social behaviors and the trajectory of peer victimization across the school years. Developmental Psychology, 53(8), 1447-1461.
Wang, J., Iannotti, R. J., Luk, J. W., & Nansel, T. R. (2010). Co-occurrence of victimization from five subtypes of bullying:Physical, verbal, social exclusion, spreading rumors, and cyber. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 35(10), 1103-1112.
Williford, A. P., Brisson, D., Bender, K. A., Jenson, J. M., & Forrest-Bank, S. (2011). Patterns of aggressive behavior and peer victimization from childhood to early adolescence:A latent class analysis. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(6), 644-655.
Wu, L., Zhang, D., Su, Z., & Hu, T. (2015). Peer victimization among children and adolescents:A meta-analytic review of links to emotional maladjustment. Clinical Pediatrics, 54(10), 941-955.
陈亮. (2012). 青少年早期的同伴侵害:发展轨迹、相关因素及性别差异(博士学位论文). 山东师范大学, 济南.
纪林芹, 潘斌, 王春燕, 娄萍, 陈亮, 张文新. (2018). 青少年早期同伴拒绝、同伴侵害与抑郁的关系:交叉滞后分析. 心理科学, 41(3), 579-585.
王姝琼, 张文新, 陈亮, 李海垒, 李春, 周利娜. (2011). 儿童中期攻击行为测评的多质多法分析. 心理学报, 43(3), 294-307.
张文新, 陈亮, 纪林芹, 张玲玲, 陈光辉, 王姝琼. (2009). 童年中期身体侵害, 关系侵害与儿童的情绪适应. 心理学报, 41(5), 433-443.
张文新, 武建芬, Jones, K. (1999). Olweus儿童欺负问卷中文版的修订. 心理发展与教育, 15(2), 7-12.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.

相关文章 15

[1]	刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[2]	王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
[3]	胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
[4]	辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[5]	李小青, 刘银章, 汪玥, 蒋索. 暴力暴露对不同性别青少年早期校园欺凌的影响:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 255-265.
[6]	蒋索, 丁金琦, 刘艳, 陆元圆, 李小青, 陈静. 青少年早期网络欺凌/受欺凌对睡眠质量的影响:社交焦虑和抑郁情绪的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 85-96.
[7]	徐鑫锫, 莫玲菲, 刘明, 邓赐平. 高一学生成就目标特征模式及学业适应:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 81-89.
[8]	纪林芹, 张蒙, 董美慧, 潘斌, 张文新. 童年晚期至青少年早期攻击和同伴侵害的关系:交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 701-709.
[9]	陈子循, 冯映雪, 宋文莉, 刘霞. 亲子分离与青少年同伴侵害和抑郁的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 429-438.
[10]	张云运, 陈嘉仪, 杨妙, 任萍, 刘思辰. 父母学业参与、父母学业压力与青少年早期的学业投入:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 211-221.
[11]	吴晗, 魏昶, 陆惠诗, 赖伟平, 邢锦涛, 喻承甫, 甄霜菊, 张卫. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁:社会退缩的中介作用与师生关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 249-256.
[12]	陈子循, 王晖, 冯映雪, 刘霞. 同伴侵害对留守青少年主观幸福感的影响:自尊和社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 605-614.
[13]	董及美, 周晨, 侯亚楠, 赵蕾, 魏淑华. 留守初中生同伴侵害与攻击性的关系:链式多重中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 615-623.
[14]	张云运, 黄美薇, 任萍, 张瑞平. 朋友的学业成就会影响我的学业成就吗？——成对友谊关系中成就目标取向的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 54-66.
[15]	谢家树, 魏宇民, ZHU Zhuorong. 当代中国青少年校园欺凌受害模式探索:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 95-102.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed