童年晚期至青少年早期攻击和同伴侵害的关系:交叉滞后研究

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.05.11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用整群抽样法抽取2178名小学生为被试（平均年龄11.05±0.69岁，男生1132人）自5年级追踪至8年级，通过纵向交叉滞后模型对攻击与同伴侵害间的关系进行考察。结果发现，各年级关系攻击均可预测之后的关系侵害，7年级身体攻击预测8年级身体侵害，此外6年级关系侵害经历对7年级关系攻击具有预测作用。攻击与同伴侵害间的纵向联系不存在性别差异。这些结果表明，童年晚期至青少年早期攻击与同伴侵害之间总体上符合连续性社交过程模型，即攻击对随后的同伴侵害具有更明显预测作用，但在小学升初中的学校过渡阶段关系侵害预测随后的关系攻击，部分支持两者间存在双向关系。该结果提示需关注儿童青少年的攻击与同伴侵害经历，采取措施避免其陷入攻击与同伴侵害间的恶性循环之中。

关键词: 儿童青少年, 攻击, 同伴侵害, 纵向联系

Abstract: In a sample of 2178 children (M_age=11.05, SD_age=0.69 years, 1132 boys) who were recruited from 14 elementary schools and followed from grade 5 to grade 8, the current study examined the cross-lagged longitudinal associations between aggression and peer victimization. The results revealed that relational aggression at grade 5, 6, and 7 predicted increases in relational victimization 1 year later, physical aggression at grade 7 predicted increases in physical victimization at grade 8, and experience of relational victimization at grade 6 predicted increases in relational aggression at grade 7. These results did not differ across gender. The results indicated that the longitudinal association between aggression and peer victimization was generally consistent with a sequential model stating that aggression predicts later experience of peer victimization, while at the same time partially supported the bidirectional association between aggression and peer victimization. The finding had implications for intervention and prevention of children's aggression and victimization.

Key words: children and adolescence, aggression, peer victimization, longitudinal association

中图分类号:

B844

纪林芹, 张蒙, 董美慧, 潘斌, 张文新. 童年晚期至青少年早期攻击和同伴侵害的关系:交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 701-709.

JI Linqin, ZHANG Meng, DONG Meihui, PAN Bin, ZHANG Wenxin. The Bidirectional Associations between Aggression and Peer Victimization from Late Childhood to Early Adolescence: A Cross-lagged Study[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(5): 701-709.

参考文献

Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression.Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 27-51.
Archer, J., & Coyne, S. M. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression.Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 212-230.
Boivin, M., & Hymel, S. (1997). Peer experiences and social self-perceptions:A sequential model.Developmental Psychology, 33(1), 135-145.
Campbell, S. B.,Spieker, S., Vandergrift, N., Belsky, J., Burchinal, M., & NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2010). Predictors and sequelae of trajectories of physical aggression in school-age boys and girls. Development and Psychopathology, 22(1), 133-150.
Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D.,Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence:A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79(5), 1185-1229.
Casper, D. M., & Card, N. A. (2017).Overt and relational victimization:A meta-analytic review of their overlap and associations with social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 88(2), 466-483.
Chen, L., Zhang, W., Ji, L., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2019). Developmental trajectories of Chinese adolescents' relational aggression:Associations with changes in social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 90(6), 2153-2170.
Cicchetti, D., & Lynch, M. (1993). Toward an ecological/transactional model of community violence and child maltreatment:Consequences for children's development.Psychiatry:Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 56(1), 96-118.
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710-722.
Daukantait, D., Lundh, L. G., & Wångby-Lundh, M. (2019). Association of direct and indirect aggression and victimization with self-harm in young adolescents:A person-oriented approach. Development and Psychopathology, 31(2), 727-739.
Ettekal, I., & Ladd, G. W. (2015). Costs and benefits of children's physical and relational aggression trajectories on peer rejection, acceptance, and friendships:Variations by aggression subtypes, gender, and age. Developmental Psychology, 51(12), 1756-1770.
Ettekal, I., & Ladd, G. W. (2017). Developmental continuity and change in physical, verbal, and relational aggression and peer victimization from childhood to adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 53(9), 1709-1721.
Frey, K. S., & Strong, Z. H. (2018). Aggression predicts changes in peer victimization that vary by form and function.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46(2), 305-318.
Giesbrecht, G. F., Leadbeater, B. J., & MacDonald, S. W. (2011). Child and context characteristics in trajectories of physical and relational victimization among early elementary school children.Development and Psychopathology, 23(1), 239-252.
Haltigan, J. D., & Vaillancourt, T. (2014). Joint trajectories of bullying and peer victimization across elementary and middle school and associations with symptoms of psychopathology. Developmental Psychology, 50(11), 2426-2436.
Hoglund, W. L., G., & Chisholm, C. A. (2014). Reciprocating risks of peer problems and aggression for children's internalizing problems. Developmental Psychology, 50(2), 586-599.
Lam, S. F., Law, W., Chan, C. K., Zhang, X., & Wong, B. P. (2018). Will victims become aggressors or vice versa? A cross-lagged analysis of school aggression.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46(3), 529-541.
Leadbeater, B. J., & Hoglund, W. L. G. (2009). The effects of peer victimization and physical aggression on changes in internalizing from first to third grade. Child Development, 80(3), 843-859.
Little, T. D. (2013).Longitudinal structural equation modeling. New York:The Guilford Press.
Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., Parker, P. D., Parada, R. H., Guo, J.,Dicke, T., & Abduljabbar, A. S. (2016). Temporal ordering effects of adolescent depression, relational aggression, and victimization over six waves:Fully latent reciprocal effects models. Developmental Psychology, 52(12), 1994-2009.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus statistical modeling software. Los Angeles:Muthén & Muthén.
Mynard, H., & Joseph, S. (2000). Development of the Multidimensional Peer-victimization Scale. Aggressive Behavior, 26(2), 169-178.
Ostrov, J. M. (2008). Forms of aggression and peer victimization during early childhood:A short-term longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(3), 311-322.
Ostrov, J. M. (2010). Prospective associations between peer victimization and aggression. Child Development, 81(6), 1670-1677.
Ostrov, J. M., & Godleski, S. A. (2010). Toward an integrated gender-linked model of aggression subtypes in early and middle childhood. Psychological Review, 117(1), 233-242.
Ostrov, J. M., & Godleski, S. A. (2013). Relational aggression, victimization, and adjustment during middle childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 25(3), 801-815.
Pellegrini, A. D. (2008). The roles of aggressive and affiliative behaviors in resource control:A behavioral ecological perspective.Developmental Review, 28(4), 461-487.
Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school.British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(2), 259-280.
Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting:The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71-90.
Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes:Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 98-131.
Rubin, K. H.,Bulkowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology:Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 571-645). New York:Wiley
Rutkowski, L., & Svetina, D. (2017). Measurement invariance in international surveys:Categorical indicators and fit measure performance. Applied Measurement in Education, 30(1), 39-51.
Sameroff, A. J., & MacKenzie, M. J. (2003). Research strategies for capturing transactional models of development:The limits of the possible. Development and Psychopathology, 15(3), 613-640.
Steinberg, L. (2016).Adolescence (11th ed.). New York:McGraw-Hill Education.
Vaillancourt, T.,Brendgen, M., Boivin, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2003). A longitudinal confirmatory factor analysis of indirect and physical aggression:Evidence of two factors over time? Child Development, 74(6), 1628-1638.
陈亮, 张文新, 纪林芹, 陈光辉, 魏星, 常淑敏. (2011). 童年中晚期攻击的发展轨迹和性别差异:基于母亲报告的分析. 心理学报, 43(6), 629-638.
纪林芹, 潘斌, 王春燕, 娄萍, 陈亮, 张文新. (2018). 青少年早期同伴拒绝、同伴侵害与抑郁的关系:交叉滞后分析. 心理科学, 2018, 41(3), 579-585.
纪林芹, 魏星, 陈亮, 张文新. (2012). 童年晚期同伴关系不利与儿童的攻击行为:自我概念与同伴信念的中介作用. 心理学报, 44(11), 1479-1489.

相关文章 15

[1]	颜志强, 周可, 曾晓, 徐惠, 朱晓倩, 张娟. 学前期儿童执行功能与攻击性行为的关系:认知共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[2]	洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[3]	胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
[4]	汪悦, 熊昱可, 任萍, 杨柳, 苗薇. 受欺负对初中生主动性和反应性攻击的影响:道德推脱和性别的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 410-418.
[5]	王浩, 俞国良. 大学生依恋焦虑与抑郁的关系:恋爱中关系攻击和关系质量的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 879-885.
[6]	傅雪薇, 孙佳宁, 肖家乐, 王浩森, 林丹华. 父母感知的家庭压力对儿童问题行为的影响：父母心理攻击和儿童应激下皮质醇反应的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 635-647.
[7]	余思, 张春阳, 徐慰. 特质正念与大学生焦虑和攻击性的纵向关系：心理弹性的中介和留守经历的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 711-719.
[8]	刘田田, 李燕, 李有嘉, 姜新苗. 父母协同教养与学前儿童社会行为的关系:亲子关系和同胞关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 638-647.
[9]	任萍, 宋子婧, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 张云运. 青少年学业成绩、攻击行为与受欢迎程度的关系:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 710-718.
[10]	陈子循, 冯映雪, 宋文莉, 刘霞. 亲子分离与青少年同伴侵害和抑郁的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 429-438.
[11]	吴晗, 魏昶, 陆惠诗, 赖伟平, 邢锦涛, 喻承甫, 甄霜菊, 张卫. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁:社会退缩的中介作用与师生关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 249-256.
[12]	刘啸莳, 刘世宏, 莫碧波, 李丹, 傅锐. 幼儿外倾性与攻击行为的关系:自我控制和母亲温暖教养的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 538-544.
[13]	陈子循, 王晖, 冯映雪, 刘霞. 同伴侵害对留守青少年主观幸福感的影响:自尊和社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 605-614.
[14]	董及美, 周晨, 侯亚楠, 赵蕾, 魏淑华. 留守初中生同伴侵害与攻击性的关系:链式多重中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 615-623.
[15]	韩燕, 徐芬. 儿童青少年时期加工速度和执行功能在流体智力发展中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 394-405.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed