受助者结果类型对亲社会表现的影响:成人与儿童的对比研究

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2019.03.03

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 亲社会表现是指人们在社会交往中表现出来的谦让、帮助、合作、分享等行为，其影响机制受到广泛关注。本文通过两个研究（分别以大学生和二、四、六年级小学生为研究对象）探讨了受助者结果类型（受助者获得积极结果vs.受助者避免消极结果）对亲社会表现的影响。结果显示：（1）受助者避免消极结果条件比受助者获得积极结果条件诱发成人更高的亲社会意愿和行为；（2）六年级儿童帮助他人避免消极结果的亲社会意愿更强、情绪更积极；（3）相对于帮助他人避免消极结果，二年级儿童更倾向于帮助他人获得积极结果。这些结果说明受助者结果类型影响个体的亲社会表现（包括亲社会行为、亲社会意愿、亲社会情绪），并且这种影响因成人和儿童有所不同：成人和年长儿童表现出亲社会损失规避现象，年幼儿童则表现出相反效应。

关键词: 亲社会表现, 受助者结果类型, 成人, 儿童, 亲社会损失规避

Abstract: Prosocial performance refers to a broad category of actions that benefit other people or the society. The mechanisms underlying prosocial performance is a hot topic. Compared with other factors that affect prosocial performance, prosocial outcomes relatively received less attention. This research explored the effects of the recipient's outcomes (prosocial gains vs. prosocial non-losses) and age on prosocial performance. The results revealed that, (1) for adults, prosocial non-losses induced more prosocial performance than prosocial gains; (2) for Grade six children, the prosocial willingness to help others avoid negative outcomes was stronger; (3) Grade two children were more willing to help others gain positive outcomes. These results suggest that the recipient's outcomes produced an effect on prosocial performance, and only adults and old children exhibit prosocial loss aversion.

Key words: prosocial performance, recipient's outcomes, adults, children, prosocial loss aversion

中图分类号:

B844

肖凤秋, 郑志伟, 陈英和. 受助者结果类型对亲社会表现的影响:成人与儿童的对比研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 274-281.

XIAO Fengqiu, ZHENG Zhiwei, CHEN Yinghe. The Contrast Effect of the Recipient's Outcomes on Prosocial Performance between Adults and Children[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2019, 35(3): 274-281.

参考文献

Batson, C. D., Dyck, J. L., Brandt, J. R., Batson, J. G., Powell, A. L., McMaster, M. R., & Griffitt, C. (1988). Five studies testing two new egoistic alternatives to the empathy-altruism hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(1), 52-77.
Côté, S., Tremblay, R. E., Nagin, D., Zoccolillo, M., & Vitaro, F. (2002). The development of impulsivity, fearfulness, and helpfulness during childhood:Patterns of consistency and change in the trajectories of boys and girls. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(5), 609-618.
Dunfield, K. A. (2014). A construct divided:prosocial behavior as helping, sharing, and comforting subtypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(3), 958.
Gneezy, A., Imas, A., Brown, A., Nelson, L. D., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Paying to be nice:Consistency and costly prosocial behavior. Management Science, 58(1), 179-187.
Grant, A., & Dutton, J. (2012). Beneficiary or benefactor, are people more prosocial when they reflect on receiving or giving? Psychological Science, 23(9), 1033-1039.
Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K., & Vesterlund, L. (2002). Risk attitudes of children and adults:Choices over small and large probability gains and losses. Experimental Economics, 5(1), 53-84.
Higgins, E. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention:Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30(2), 1-46.
Idson, L. C., Liberman, N., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Imagining how you'd feel:The role of motivational experiences from regulatory fit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(7), 926-937.
Imuta, K., Henry, J. D., Slaughter, V., Selcuk, B., & Ruffman, T. (2016). Theory of mind and prosocial behavior in childhood:A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 52(8), 1192-1205.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory:An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica:Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(2), 263-292.
Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory:Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93(2), 136-153.
Levin, I. P., & Hart, S. S. (2003). Risk preferences in young children:Early evidence of individual differences in reaction to potential gains and losses. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16(5), 397-413.
Li, Y. J., Kenrick, D. T., Griskevicius, V., & Neuberg, S. L. (2012). Economic decision biases and fundamental motivations:How mating and self-protection alter loss aversion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 550-561.
Liberman, N., Idson, L. C., & Higgins, E. T. (2005). Predicting the intensity of losses vs. non-gains and non-losses vs. gains in judging fairness and value:A test of the loss aversion explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(5), 527-534.
McGraw, A. P., Larsen, J. T., Kahneman, D., & Schkade, D. (2010). Comparing gains and losses. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1438-1445.
Novemsky, N., & Kahneman, D. (2005). The boundaries of loss aversion. Journal of Marketing Research, 42(2), 119-128.
Paulus, M. (2018). The multidimensional nature of early prosocial behavior:Theoretical perspectives. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20(2), 111-116.
Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior:Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 365-392.
Polman, E. (2010). Information distortion in self-other decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 432-435.
Polman, E. (2012a). Effects of self-other decision making on regulatory focus and choice overload. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 980-993.
Polman, E. (2012b). Self-other decision making and loss aversion. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(2), 141-150.
Robbins, E. E. (2013). Inequity aversion and fairness in development(Doctral Dissertation). Emory University, Atlanta.
Steelandt, S., Broihanne, M. H., Romain, A., Thierry, B., & Dufour, V. (2013). Decision-making under risk of loss in children. PLoS One, 8(1), e52316.
Stocks, E. L., Lishner, D. A., & Decker, S. K. (2009). Altruism or psychological escape:Why does empathy promote prosocial behavior? European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(5), 649-665.
丁凤琴, 陆朝晖. (2016). 共情与亲社会行为关系的元分析. 心理科学进展, 24(8), 1159-1174.
寇彧, 唐玲玲. (2004). 心境对亲社会行为的影响. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),(5), 44-49.
肖凤秋, 郑志伟, 陈英和. (2014). 亲社会行为产生机制的理论演进. 心理科学,37(5), 1263-1270.

相关文章 15

[1]	王堃炎, 黄英航, 邓珏, 王璇, 张向葵. 从善念到善行:4~7岁儿童社会善念与亲社会行为的发展关联[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 457-466.
[2]	于晓, 张雅欣, 戚玥, 常尚钺, 何雯惺, 陈英和. 学龄儿童自然联结的发展轨迹及其与创造力倾向的关系:累加效应还是交互效应？[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 467-477.
[3]	陈紫薇, 黄潇潇, 俞国良. 父母教养行为与儿童心理健康关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 563-576.
[4]	吴旻, 张杰, 叶攀琴, 龚茜, 袁柯曼. 留守儿童非自杀性自伤行为的发展轨迹:同伴侵害模式的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 586-595.
[5]	舒展, 彭申立, 赵纤, 黎志华. 累积家庭风险对低收入家庭儿童外化问题影响的即时与延时效应:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 596-608.
[6]	韩燕, 郭筱琳, 杨文静, 张恒, 王腾飞. 阅读困难儿童的执行功能结构分化滞后于正常发展儿童[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 326-336.
[7]	张文洁, 杨丽, 汪雅琴, 张馨月, 范伟. 图画书伴读中成人手势对4~6岁幼儿故事复述的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 379-390.
[8]	范兴华, 靳嘉宁, 燕利飞, 李潇潼, 邓汇溪. 留守困境对初中儿童个人成长主动性发展的影响:社会支持的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 427-436.
[9]	张攀, 杨娟, 王小英. 象似性手势对3~4岁儿童汉语动作动词记忆和泛化的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 153-161.
[10]	袁雯, 张旭然, 郭惠, 李燕芳. 儿童欺凌网络的结构特征与变化特点：基于社会网络分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 234-244.
[11]	谢宇, 贺荟中, 王磊, 戴惟熙. 孤独症儿童与典型发展儿童内隐学习物品情景线索的比较研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 761-769.
[12]	范兴华, 燕利飞, 靳嘉宁, 李潇潼, 邓汇溪, 余思. 父母关爱对4~6年级留守儿童幸福感发展的影响:积极诠释生活的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 859-868.
[13]	张和颐, 余利. 屏幕时间类型与幼儿自我调节:成人参与的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 616-625.
[14]	刘畅, 蒋柳青, 郑天鹏, 边玉芳. 父母情绪调节困难与父母情绪社会化行为的关系:基于主客体互倚模型的交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 652-662.
[15]	王宇轩, 刘梦连, 杨滢晖, 毕鸿燕. 学龄儿童与成人形音整合的比较研究:字形与字音的相互影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 457-464.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed