大学生网络社会支持与网络人际信任的关系:一个有调节的中介模型

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.02.01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 从社会认知理论的视角来探讨网络社会支持和网络人际信任的关系,并在此基础上提出了一个有调节的中介模型,考察网络社交效能的中介作用以及自尊的调节作用.采用整群抽样法对432名大学生进行问卷调查,结果表明:(1)网龄对网络人际信任有显著的负向预测作用;网络社会支持对网络人际信任具有显著正向预测作用;(2)网络社交效能在网络社会支持与网络人际信任的关系中起部分中介作用;(3)网络社会支持通过网络社交效能对网络人际信任的间接效应受到自尊的调节.对高自尊个体而言,网络社交效能起部分中介作用;对低自尊个体而言,网络社交效能的中介效应不显著,网络社会支持对网络人际信任只有直接作用.

关键词: 网络社会支持, 网络人际信任, 网络社交效能, 自尊

Abstract: Based on social cognitive theory, this study constructed a moderated mediation model to examine whether online social efficacy mediated the relation between online social support and online interpersonal trust, and whether this mediating process was moderated by self-esteem. Based on cluster sampling, 432 college students were recruited to participate in this study. The results indicated that: (1) internet age significantly negatively predicted online interpersonal trust;and online social support significantly positively predicted online interpersonal trust; (2) online social efficacy played a partial mediating role between the online social support and internet interpersonal trust; (3)the mediation of online social efficacy was moderated by self-esteem. In the term of high self-esteem individual, online social efficacy played a partial mediating role. But for individuals with low self-esteem, the mediating effect of online social self-efficacy was not significant, and online social support only had direct effect on online social support.

Key words: online social support, online interpersonal trust, online social efficacy, self-esteem

中图分类号:

B844

孙晓军, 赵竞, 周宗奎, 谢笑春, 童媛添. 大学生网络社会支持与网络人际信任的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(2): 129-136.

SUN Xiaojun, ZHAO Jing, ZHOU Zongkui, XIE Xiaochun, TONG Yuantian. The Relationship between Online Social Support and Online Interpersonal Trust of College Students': A Moderated Mediation Model[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2015, 31(2): 129-136.

参考文献

Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics, 85 (2), 207-234.
Awad, N. F., & Ragowsky, A. (2008). Establishing trust in electronic commerce through online word of mouth: An examination across genders.Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(4), 101-121.
Bagheri, E., Zafarani, R., & Barouni-Ebrahimi, M. (2009). Can reputation migrate? On the propagation of reputation in multi-context communities. Knowledge-Based Systems, 22(6), 410-420.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American psychologist, 37(2), 122-147.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control: Worth Publishers.
Bargh, J. A., & McKenna, K. Y. (2004). The Internet and social life. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 55, 573-590.
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological bulletin, 98(2), 310.
Dearing, E., & Hamilton, L. C. (2006). V. Contemporary advances and classic advice for analyzing mediating and moderating variables. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 71(3), 88-104.
Fan, C., & Mak, A. S. (1998). Measuring social self-efficacy in a culturally diverse student population. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 26(2), 131-144.
Ford, M. B., & Collins, N. L. (2010). Self-esteem moderates neuroendocrine and psychological responses to interpersonal rejection. Journal of personality and social psychology, 98(3), 405.
Forest, A. L., & Wood, J. V. (2012). When Social Networking Is Not Working: Individuals With Low Self-Esteem Recognize but Do Not Reap the Benefits of Self-Disclosure on Facebook. Psychological Science, 23(3), 295-302.
Hobfoll, S. E., Nadler, A., & Leiberman, J. (1986). Satisfaction with social support during crisis: intimacy and self-esteem as critical determinants. Journal of personality and social psychology, 51(2), 296.
Ho, S. M., Ahmed, I., & Salome, R. (2012). Whodunit? Collective trust in virtual interactions.Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling and Prediction, 7227 , 348-356.
Jeong, E. J., & Kim, D. H. (2011). Social activities, self-efficacy, game attitudes, and game addiction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(4), 213-221.
Joinson, A. N., Reips, U. D., Buchanan, T., & Schofield, C. B. P. (2010). Privacy, trust, and self-disclosure online. Human-Computer Interaction, 25(1), 1-24.
Ko, H., Wang, L., & Xu, Y. (2013). Understanding the Different Types of Social Support Offered by Audience to A-List Diary-Like and Informative Bloggers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(3), 194-199.
Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of personality and social psychology, 68, 518-518.
Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of personality and social psychology, 89(6), 852.
Namasivayam, K., & Guchait, P. (2013). The role of contingent self-esteem and trust in consumer satisfaction: Examining perceived control and fairness as predictors. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33, 184-195.
Park, L. E., & Maner, J. K. (2009). Does self-threat promote social connection? The role of self-esteem and contingencies of self-worth. Journal of personality and social psychology, 96(1), 203.
Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Arndt, J., & Schimel, J. (2004). Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review. Psychological bulletin, 130(3), 435.
Schumacher, P., & Morahan-Martin, J. (2001). Gender, Internet and computer attitudes and experiences. Computers in human behavior, 17(1), 95-110.
Teng, F., & Chen, Z. (2012). Does social support reduce distress caused by ostracism? It depends on the level of one's self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
Tsai, M.J., & Tsai, M.J. (2010). Junior high school students' Internet usage and self-efficacy: A re-examination of the gender gap. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1182-1192.
Turner, J. W., Grube, J. A., & Meyers, J. (2001). Developing an optimal match within online communities: An exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support. Journal of Communication, 51(2), 231-251.
Walther, J. B., & Boyd, S. (2002). Attraction to computer-mediated social support. In C. A. Lin & D. Atkin (Eds.), Communication technology and society: Audience adoption and uses (pp. 153-188). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Wang, Y. D., & Emurian, H. H. (2005). An overview of online trust: Concepts, elements, and implications. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(1), 105-125
Wei, M., Russell, D. W., & Zakalik, R. A. (2005). Adult attachment, social self-efficacy, self-disclosure, loneliness, and subsequent depression for freshman college students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(4), 602.
Wilson, J. M., Straus, S. G., & McEvily, B. (2006). All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(1), 16-33.
Yang, S. U., & Lim, J. S. (2009). The effects of blog-mediated public relations (BMPR) on relational trust. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21(3), 341-359.
鲍振宙, 张卫, 李董平, 李丹黎, 王艳辉. (2013). 校园氛围与青少年学业成就的关系: 一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 29(1), 61-70.
池思晓, 龚文进. (2011). 大学生网络人际信任与网络社会支持的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志, 19(1), 94-96.
丁道群, 沈模卫. (2005). 人格特质, 网络社会支持与网络人际信任的关系. 心理科学, 28(2), 300-303.
方紫薇. (2010). 网路沉迷, 因应, 孤寂感与网路社会支持之关系:男女大学生之比较. 教育心理学报, 41(4), 773-797.
郭毅, 朱扬帆, 朱熹. (2003). 人际关系互动与社会结构网络化. 社会科学, (8), 64-74.
黄厚铭. (2000). 网络人际关系的亲疏远近. 台大社会学刊, 10(28), 117-154.
田录梅. (2003). 不同归因方式的诱导对自尊不同学生失败后测验成绩的影响. 心理发展与教育, 19(4), 62-65.
田录梅. (2006). Rosenberg (1965) 自尊量表中文版的美中不足. 心理学探新, 26(2), 88-91.
王可可. (2009). 大学生羞怯与社会支持, 自我评价, 社交效能感的关系. 济南: 山东师范大学.
王艳辉, 张卫, 彭家欣, 莫滨瑞, 熊丝. (2009). 亲子依恋, 自我概念与大学生自我伤害的关系. 心理学探新, 29(5), 56-61.
温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 张雷. (2005). 调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用. 心理学报, 37(2), 268-274.
郁太维. (2010). 大学生网络人际信任研究. 兰州大学哲学社会学院.
张建新, 张妙清, 梁觉. (2000). 殊化信任与泛化信任在人际信任行为路径模型中的作用. 心理学报, 32(3), 311-316.
赵竞, 孙晓军, 周宗奎, 魏华, 牛更枫. (2013). 网络交往中的人际信任. 心理科学进展, 21(8), 1493-1501.
郑显亮. (2013). 现实利他行为与网络利他行为: 网络社会支持的作用. 心理发展与教育, 29(1), 31-37.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12 (6), 942-950.

相关文章 15

[1]	王鑫强, 李金文, 卢红燕, 赖正伟, 李佳源. 择偶优劣势对师范大学生教师职业认同的影响：择偶价值感的中介及自尊的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 64-73.
[2]	路翠萍, 郑希付. 低自尊还是高“他尊”？高、低社交焦虑者的不同内隐自尊特性——来自EAST的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 808-816.
[3]	沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分？学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[4]	辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[5]	高玲, 孟文慧, 刘介地, 杨继平, 王兴超. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负行为:自尊和基本共情的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 439-448.
[6]	鲁明辉, 王融, 张丽敏. 父母心理弹性与自闭症谱系障碍儿童情绪行为问题的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 247-254.
[7]	田玮宜, 徐健捷, 吕广林, 王轶楠. 父母自尊与青少年主观幸福感间的关系:亲子信任与青少年自尊的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 331-338.
[8]	张小敏, 陈欣, 务凯, 赵国祥. 学校联结和学业能力对高中生自尊的影响:一个多层线性模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 358-365.
[9]	姜永志, 白晓丽, 张璐, 赵思琦. 青少年线上积极自我呈现与幸福感的关系:线上积极反馈与自尊的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 45-53.
[10]	袁言云, 王志航, 孙庆, 王东方, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 累积家庭风险与贫困儿童情绪问题的关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 100-108.
[11]	关文军, 胡梦娟, 刘晨. 自闭症儿童父母歧视知觉对群际关系的影响:一个有调节的中介作用模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 854-863.
[12]	周宗奎, 曹敏, 田媛, 黄淳, 杨秀娟, 宋友志. 初中生亲子关系与抑郁:自尊和情绪弹性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 864-872.
[13]	施国春, 赵东妍, 范会勇. 2004至2016年中国大学生身体自尊的变迁:一项横断历史研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 648-659.
[14]	王轶楠, 刘嘉. 让小我融入大我:适恰自尊的积极心理学意义[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 568-575.
[15]	孔莲, 崔馨月, 田录梅. 微信使用强度与大学生自尊之间的关系:上行社会比较和好友亲密度的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 576-583.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed