摘要： 进化遗传学是现代遗传学的主要研究领域之一。文章首先对进化遗传学研究的理论基础及早期重要的研究进行回顾及简要介绍。进而着重阐述了当前该领域的三种主要进化遗传机制模型,选择中立机制、突变——选择平衡机制以及平衡选择机制,对个体智力差异和人格差异的解释,并列举一系列实证研究证据。最后本文探讨了进化遗传学研究对于解释个体心理差异的贡献与不足。
中图分类号:
| [1] Tamarin R H.Principles of genetics,4th ed.London:Wm.C.Brown Publishers.1996:10-12. [2] 彭奕欣 黄诗笺.进化生物学.武汉:武汉大学出版社,1997:1-10. [3] Joshi A.Sir R A.Fisher and the evolution of genetic.Resonance,1997,2 (1):27-31. [4] Yang M J,Tzeng C H,Tseng J Y,et al.Determination of twinzy-gosity using a commercially available STR analysis of 15 unlinked loci and the gender-determining marker amelogenin-a preliminary report.Human Reproduction,2006,21 (8):2175-2179. [5] Polderman TJ,Gosso M F,Posthuma D,et al.A longitudinal twin study on IQ,executive functioning,and attention problems during childhood and early adolescence.Acta Neurologica Belgica,2006,6 (4):191-207. [6] Dunn J,Stocker C,Plomin,R.Nonshared experiences within the family:Correlates of behavioral problems in middle childhood.Development and Psychopathology,1990,2 (1):113-126. [7] Nicholson N.Evolutionary psychology:toward a new view of human nature and organization society.Human Relations,1997,9 (50):1053-1076. [8] Buss D M.Handbook of evolutionary psychology.New York:Oxford University,2005:479-490. [9] Tooby J,Cosmides L.The psychological foundations of culture.In Barkow J H,Cosmides L,Tooby J,The Adapted Mind,Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture.New York:Oxford University Press,1992:19-136. [10] Penke L,Jaap J A,Denissen,et al.The Evolutionary Genetics of Personality.European Journal of Personality,2007,21 (5):549-587. [11] Prokosch M D,Yeo R A,Miller G F.Intelligence tests with higher gloadings show higher correlations with body symmetry:evidence for a general fitness factor mediated by developmental stability.Intelligence,2005,33 (2):203-213. [12] Miller G F,Penke L.The evolution of human intelligence and the coefficient of additive genetic variance in human brain size.Intelligence,2007,35 (2):97-114. [13] Penke L,Jaap J A,Denissen,et al.Authors'response evolution,genes,and inter-disciplinary personality research.The Evolutionary Genetics of Personality,2007,21 (5):639-665. [14] Gosso M F,de Geus E J C,van Belzen M J,et al.The SNAP-25 gene is associated with cognitive ability:evidence from a family-based study in two independent Dutch cohorts.Molecular Psychiatry,2006,11 (9):878-886. [15] Kevin M D.Evolution,the five factor model,and levels of personality.Special Issue of Journal of Personality,2006,63 (3):525-567. [16] Nettle D.The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals.American Psychologist,2006,61 (6):622-631. [17] Nettle D.An evolutionary approach to the extraversion continuum.Evolution and Human Behavior,2005,26 (4):363-373. [18] Dingemanse N J,Both C,van Noordwijk A J,et al.Natal dispersal and personalities in great tits (parus major).Proceedings of the Royal Society Series Biological Sciences,2003,270 (1516):741-747. [19] Samochowiec J,Lesch K P,Rottman M,et al.Association of a regulatory polymorphism in the promoter region of the monoamine oxidase A gene with antisocial alcoholism.Psychiatry Research,1999,86 (1):67-72. [20] Schmidt L G,Sander T,Kuhn S,et al.Different allele distribution of a regulatory MAOA gene promoter polymorphism in anti-social and anxious-depressive alcoholics.Journal of Neural Transmission,2000,107 (6):681-689. [21] Matthew C K,Geoffrey M.Resolving the paradox of common,harmful,heritable mental disorders:which evolutionary genetic models work best ? Behavioral and Brain Sciences,2006,29 (4):385-404. [22] Evolutionary theory and applied psychology.Robert hogan.Hogan Assessment Systems,2006. [23] 陈少华,郑雪.西方人格心理学的困境与出路.自然辩证 法通讯,2002,3:41-45. [24] 郑雪.人格心理学.广州:广东高等教育出版社,2004:143-149. |
| [1] | 刘艳春, 邓玉婷, 张曦. 智力障碍儿童对不同对象的分享行为：心理理论的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 160-168. |
| [2] | 高斌, 张丹丹, 朱根, 蔡艳香, 郭羽希. 高中生主动性人格与网络学习投入：网络学习自我效能和学业期望的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 224-230. |
| [3] | 田惠东, 张玉红, 孙昊翔, 李瑛, 哈尼夏. 师生关系对智力障碍学生同伴交往能力的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 44-54. |
| [4] | 黄杰, 朱丹, 杨澳. 实习初期教师职业认同的发展轨迹及其与主动性人格的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 40-47. |
| [5] | 郑爽, 刘红瑞, 李静, 席雨, 姚梅林. 主动性人格与大学生创业准备行为的关系:创业意向的中介效应与创业社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 813-821. |
| [6] | 李玉华, 王桐, 刘悦, 俞劼, 林崇德. 教师创造性教学行为与小学生创造性思维的关系：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 513-519. |
| [7] | 王治乔, 胡清芬. 什么是智力？成年人的朴素智力理论[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 144-152. |
| [8] | 刘文, 王依宁, 张嘉琪, 车翰博. 9~11岁儿童创造性人格与欺骗行为的关系:亲子沟通质量的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 508-516. |
| [9] | 王艳红, 叶丽媛, 李府桂, 周明洁. D型人格对大学新生心理健康的影响:基于三个时间点调查数据的有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 120-127. |
| [10] | 韩燕, 徐芬. 儿童青少年时期加工速度和执行功能在流体智力发展中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 394-405. |
| [11] | 何安明, 包灿灿, 惠秋平. 大学生情绪智力与心理健康的关系:社会支持的中介作用和手机依赖的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 494-501. |
| [12] | 叶宝娟, 孙原, 高良, 夏扉, 杨强. 主动性人格与大学生职业成熟度的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 304-310. |
| [13] | 林颐宣. 主动性人格对小学教师工作满意度的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 103-112. |
| [14] | 宫剑, 梁晓燕, 刘晓飞. 神经质人格与MMORPG游戏成瘾的关系:链式中介效应分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 113-120. |
| [15] | 李梦婷, 范为桥, 陈欣银. 同伴侵害与人际关系取向人格特质的交叉滞后分析:城市原住儿童与农村随迁儿童的比较[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 682-691. |
|
||
