心理发展与教育 ›› 2008, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 25-33.

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

小学儿童执行功能与问题解决能力的关系

王晶, 陈英和, 齐琳   

  1. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京, 100875
  • 出版日期:2008-10-15 发布日期:2008-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 陈英和,北京师范大学发展心理研究所教授,博士,E-mail:yinghechen@263.net E-mail:yinghechen@263.net
  • 基金资助:
    全国教育科学规划国家重点项目(ABA050001);国家自然科学基金项目(30770729);北京市哲学社会科学规划项目(06BaJY010)

The Relationship between Executive Function and Problem Solving among Primary School Children

WANG Jing, CHEN Ying-he, QI Lin   

  1. Beijing Normal University, Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing 100875
  • Online:2008-10-15 Published:2008-10-15

摘要: 本研究选取小学二、四、六年级儿童为被试,采用计算机操作的方式,考察小学生执行功能中抑制、工作记忆和认知灵活性与4类伦敦塔问题解决表现之间的关系。结果表明在问题解决的计划方面,抑制能力较高的被试体现出良好的适应性解决能力,而工作记忆高的被试更能有效的利用资源;根据问题解决路径的不同划分了三大伦敦塔问题解决表现类型,工作记忆和抑制在问题解决中均起到重要作用。

关键词: 执行功能, 抑制, 工作记忆, 问题解决, 伦敦塔任务, 小学生

Abstract: The purposes of the present study were to analyze the relationship between executive functions and problem solving of Tower of London(ToL),and to compare the effect of inhibition,working memory and cognitive flexibility on the performance of planning and different solutions in four kinds of ToL problems.121 7~11 years old were tested executive functions and ToL tasks by computers.The results revealed that subjects with high inhibition represented better adaptability in problem solving,and subjects with high working memory could use resources more efficiency;The ToL problem solving types could be distinguished into three according to different problem solving solutions.The results suggested that both inhibition and working memory played important roles in the process of ToL problem solving,while cognitive flexibility had no significant effect on it.

Key words: Executive function, inhibition, working memory, problem solving, Tower of London task, primary school children

中图分类号: 

  • B844.1
[1] Miyake A,Friedman N P,Emerson M J,et al.The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex"frontal lobe"tasks:Alatent variable analysis.Cognitive Psychology,2000,41,49-100.
[2] Lehto J E,Juujarvi P,Kooistra L,et al.Dimensions of executive functioning:Evidence from children.British Journal of Devdopmental Psychology,2003,21(1),59-80.
[3] 李美华,自学军.执行功能中认知灵活性发展的研究.心理学探新,2005,25(2),35-38.
[4] Simon JH,CaponA,CoppC,et al.Conditional reasoning and the Tower of Hanoi:The role of spatial and verbal working memory.British Journal of psychology,2002,93(4),501-518.
[5] Goel V,Pulhza S D,Grafinan J.A computational model of frontal lobe dysfunction:working memory and the Tower of Hanoi task.Cognitive science.2001.25,287-313.
[6] Bull R,Espy K A.Senn T E.A comparison of perfomtance on the towers of London and Hanoi in young children.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,2004,45(4),743-754.
[7] Kaller C P,Unterrainer J M,Bahm B,et al.The impact of problem strtteture on plannirig:insights from the Tower of London task.Cognitive Brain Research,2004,20,462-472.
[8] Brocki K C,Bohlin G.Executive functions in children aged 6 to 13:A dimensional and developmental study.Developmental Neuropsychology,2004,26(2),571-593.
[9] Grant J D,Dngenbaeh D.Further considerations regarding inhibitory processes,working memory,and cognitive aging.The American Journal of Psychology,2000,113(1),69-94.
[10] Welsll M C,Satterlee-Cartmcll T.Stine M.Towers of Hanoi and london:Contribution of working memory and inhibition to performance.Brain and Cognition.1999,41,231-242.
[11] Scheres A,Oosterlaan J,Geurts H,et al.Executive functioning in boys with ADHD:primarily an inhibition deficit?Archives of Clinical Neuropsycholngy.2004.19(4),569-594.
[12] Asato M R,Sweeney J A,hma B.Cognitive processes in the development of ToL performance.Neuropsychologia,2006,44,2259-2269.
[13] Morris R G,Miotto E C,Feigcnbaum J D,et al.The effect of goal-subgoal conflict on planning ability after frontal-and temporal-lobe lesions in humans.Neuropsychologia,1997.35(8),1147-1157.
[14] Sean T E,Espy K A,Kaufmann P M.Using path analysis to understand executive function organization in preschool children.Developmental Neuropsycholngy,2004,26(1),445-464.
[1] 储月, 刘希平, 徐慧, 唐卫海. 儿童社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 153-159.
[2] 刘岩, 张宏飞, 卢鑫, 曲可佳. 数学概率问题解决学习中的测试效应及有效促进[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 215-223.
[3] 陆信哲, 王智, 李勇, 王玢莹. 父母暴力暴露对中学生问题行为的纵向影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 231-239.
[4] 彭越, 张和颐, 陈英和, 雷秀雅, 戚玥, 于晓, 乔学文, 刘沫漩, 颜露懿. 类比推理策略与工作记忆、抑制控制关系的年龄差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 761-771.
[5] 颜志强, 周可, 曾晓, 徐惠, 朱晓倩, 张娟. 学前期儿童执行功能与攻击性行为的关系:认知共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[6] 王丽娟, 马嘉琳. 美术生和非美术生的动作记忆表象编码[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 457-464.
[7] 张鹏程, 李喜, 韩午阳, 沈永江. 睡眠不足对中小学生负性情绪的影响:一个链式中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 402-409.
[8] 于晓, 张和颐, 戚玥, 陈英和, 刘浩宁, 赵煜燨, 乔学文. 抑制控制在类比映射发展中的作用:认知负荷的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 1-11.
[9] 刘钰, 苏彦捷, 曹春梅, 丁宇, 樊煜. 社区老年人执行功能和加工速度与运动能力的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 769-777.
[10] 宋佳汝, 刘媛媛, 王秀礼, 李寿欣. 视觉与言语工作记忆表征对视觉注意的引导[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 609-617.
[11] 李继娜, 王玮玮, 张维军, 屈智勇. 累积创伤对儿童复杂性创伤后应激障碍的影响:经验回避与消极认知情绪调节策略的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 683-691.
[12] 汪玥, 张豹, 周晖. 中小学生正念注意觉知与心理健康:情绪调节和积极重评的跨时间中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 692-702.
[13] 温凯玲, 陈萍, 杨双, 宁宁. 前摄干扰对汉语听写困难儿童字形工作记忆的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 153-160.
[14] 吴国婧, 程雪林, 李叶, 白荣, 邢淑芬, 李玉华. 学前期儿童执行功能和语言的双向关系:社会经济地位的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 186-194.
[15] 王颖, 朱海东, 张馨艺, 肖沿. 学龄前留守儿童亲子依恋对执行功能的影响:祖孙依恋的调节作用和中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 195-206.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!