心理发展与教育 ›› 2008, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 19-24.

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

关系因素与个体因素在儿童早期社会能力中的作用

张晓1, 陈会昌2   

  1. 1. 香港大学心理系, 香港;
    2. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京, 100875
  • 出版日期:2008-10-15 发布日期:2008-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 陈会昌,北京师范大学发展心理研究所教授.E-mail:chen47hc@yahoo.com.cn E-mail:chen47hc@yahoo.com.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目(项目号:06JJDXLX002)

Relational and Individual Predictors of Children’s Early Social Competence

Zhang Xiao1, CHEN Hui-chang2   

  1. 1. Department of Phychology, The University of HongKong, Hongkong;
    2. Institute of Department Psychology, Beijing Normal University 100875
  • Online:2008-10-15 Published:2008-10-15

摘要: 采用儿童早期行为评价量表、亲子关系量表和师生关系量表,对443名幼儿的父母和教师进行了测查,在生态系统理论的框架下探讨了儿童性别、年级及父子、母子、师生关系对早期社会能力的影响。结果发现:小班和中班儿童的师生关系好于托班;女孩的社会能力高于男孩,小班和中班儿童的社会能力高于托班。控制了性别与年级的作用之后,父子、母子与师生关系对儿童社会能力都有显著的正向预测作用,但三者的平均值具有最强的预测作用,这一结果支持了多重关系作用于儿童发展的"平均化假说"。

关键词: 早期社会能力, 亲子关系, 师生关系, 个体因素

Abstract: Based on a sample of 443 kindergartners and their parents and teachers,the present study investigated the effects of individual(i.e.,child gender,grade)and relational(i.e.,children's relationships with fathers,mothers, and teachers)factors on children's early social competence.The results showed that girls'social competence was higher than boys'and K3 and K2 children's teacher-child relationships and social competence were higher than K1 children's. In addition,although relationships with fathers,mothers,and teachers separately predicted children's social competence,the average score of these relationships was the strongest predictor.

Key words: early social competence, parent-child relationship, teacher-child relationship, individual factors

中图分类号: 

  • B844.1
[1] La Paro KM,PiantaR C.Predicting children's conlpetence in the early school years:A meta-analytic review.Review of Educational Research,2000.70(4).443-484.
[2] Brodeabrenner U,Morris P A.The ecology of developmental processes.In:Damon W(Editor-in-chief),Lemer R M.(Vol.Ed.),Handbook of child psychology:Vol.1.Theory medels of human development (Sth ed.,PP.993-1028).New York:Wiley,1998.
[3] Verschueren K,Marcom A.Representation of self and socioemctioml competence in kindergartnes:Differential and combined effects of attachment to mother and to father.Child Developmem,1999,70,183-201.
[4] Schneider B H,Atkinson L,Tardif C.Child-parent attachment and children's peer relatiom:A quantitative:review.Developmental Psycholngy,2001,37,86-100.
[5] Landry S H,Smith K E,Miller-Loncar C L et al.The rehitioa of change in maternal Interactive styles with infants'developing social competence scross the first three years of life.Child Development,1998,69,105-123.
[6] Hewes C,Matheson C C.Hamilton C E.Maternal,teacher,and child care history correlates of children's relationships with peers.Child Development,1994,65,264-273.
[7] Hughes J N,Cavell T A.Jackson T.Influence of the teacher student relationship on childhood conduct problem:A prospective study.Journal of Clinical Child Psychology,1999,28,173-184.
[8] 张晓,陈会昌.儿童早期师生关系的研究概述.心理发展与教育.2006,22(4),120-124.
[9] Lambert S F M.Children's relationships with parents,teachers,and peers:Linkages with intenmlizing and externalizing behavior.Unpublished doctoral dissertation.University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign,1999.
[10] 刘艳,邹泓.社会能力研究的概述与展望.教育研究与实验,2003,1,47-50.
[11] 张晓,陈会昌,张桂芳等.亲子关系与问题行为的动态相互作用模型:对儿童早期的追踪研究.心理学报,2008,40(5),571-582.
[12] 张晓,陈会昌,张桂芳.母子关系、师生关系与儿童人园第一年的问题行为.心理学报,2008,40(4),418-426.
[13] Peters D L.Kontos S.Continuity and diseominmty of experience:An intervention perspective.In Peters D L & Kontos S(Eds.),Continuity and discontinuity of experience in child care(PP.1-16).Norwood,NJ:Ablex.1987.
[14] Bretherton Ⅰ.Attachment theory:Retrospect and prospect.InⅠ.Bretherton & E.Waters(Eds.),Growing points in attachment theory and research.Monographs 0f the Society for Research in Child Development.1985,50.3-35.
[15] van Uzendeom M H,sagi A,Lamberlmon M W E.The multiple caretaker daradox:Data from Holland and Israel.New Directions for Child Development,1992,57.5-25.
[1] 田惠东, 张玉红, 孙昊翔, 李瑛, 哈尼夏. 师生关系对智力障碍学生同伴交往能力的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 44-54.
[2] 李妍, 梁丽婵, 周欣然, 边玉芳. 家师关系与小学生学校态度:师生关系的中介作用及父母差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 74-82.
[3] 辛钊阳, 王庆林, 王明辉, 杜静, 赵国祥. 师生关系与硕士研究生学习适应:科研自我效能和专业承诺的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 825-832.
[4] 余易达, 潘斌, 苗新煜, 陈光辉. 班级师生关系调节学生反欺凌态度与欺凌行为的关系:一项多水平分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 550-558.
[5] 王英杰, 张刈, 张美霞, 李燕. 母亲正念与幼儿问题行为的关系:正念养育和亲子关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 184-191.
[6] 苏金龙, 苏彦捷. 早期亲子触觉经验促进个体社会性发展的心理机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 739-748.
[7] 王旭, 刘衍玲, 林杰, 刘传星, 魏灵真, 邱涵宇. 亲子关系对中学生心理健康的影响:社会支持和心理素质的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 263-271.
[8] 周宗奎, 曹敏, 田媛, 黄淳, 杨秀娟, 宋友志. 初中生亲子关系与抑郁:自尊和情绪弹性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 864-872.
[9] 刘田田, 李燕, 李有嘉, 姜新苗. 父母协同教养与学前儿童社会行为的关系:亲子关系和同胞关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 638-647.
[10] 楚啸原, 理原, 黄志华, 雷雳, 俞明延. 师生关系对研究生自我效能感的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 174-181.
[11] 罗海风, 刘坚, 周达. 家长参与在家庭社会经济地位和高中生学习品质之间的中介作用——师生关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 199-210.
[12] 吴晗, 魏昶, 陆惠诗, 赖伟平, 邢锦涛, 喻承甫, 甄霜菊, 张卫. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁:社会退缩的中介作用与师生关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 249-256.
[13] 姜倩云, 王兴超, 刘兵, 王鹏程, 雷雳. 父母低头行为对儿童青少年心理发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 137-145.
[14] 范志宇, 吴岩. 亲子关系与农村留守儿童孤独感、抑郁:感恩的中介与调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 734-742.
[15] 牛更枫, 李占星, 王辰宵, 马晓彤, 孙晓军, 周宗奎. 网络亲子沟通对留守初中生社会适应的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 678-685.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!