前摄干扰对汉语听写困难儿童字形工作记忆的影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.02.01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 字形工作记忆（O-WM）是书写加工过程中汉字部件的临时存储点，其重要功能之一是保证部件表征的区分性特征。关于汉语O-WM的研究主要来自脑损伤个案，目前还没有关于汉语听写困难儿童是否存在O-WM损伤的报道。本研究采用两个实验，分别探讨视觉和语音前摄干扰对听写困难儿童汉字部件再认的影响。结果发现：（1）听写困难儿童的部件判断存在视觉前摄干扰效应，而正常儿童没有表现出视觉前摄干扰效应（实验一）；（2）两组儿童均没有出现明显的语音前摄干扰效应（实验二）。该结果表明，汉语听写困难儿童O-WM在保证部件视觉表征的区分性功能上存在缺陷，并支持汉语O-WM中汉字部件的表征是以字形为基础的观点。

关键词: 听写困难, 前摄干扰, 字形工作记忆, 表征区分性

Abstract: The orthographic working memory (O-WM) is the temporal storage of radicals during Chinese character writing. One of the key functions of O-WM is maintaining the representational distinctiveness of radicals. Literatures on the O-WM system of Chinese writing processes are mainly from the case studies on dysgraphia patients, O-WM deficits in Chinese children with spelling difficulties have rarely been reported. The present study investigated the visual and auditory proactive interference (PI) effects on radical recognition in two experiments separately. Results showed that:(1) the visual PI effect was found in children with spelling difficulties, but not in the control group (Exp.1); (2) the auditory PI effects were not observed in both groups (Exp.2). The results indicate that the visual representational distinctiveness function of O-WM is impaired in children with spelling difficulties, and support the view that Chinese radicals are represented in the O-WM on the basis of visual features.

Key words: spelling difficulties, proactive interference, orthographic working memory, representational distinctiveness

中图分类号:

B844

温凯玲, 陈萍, 杨双, 宁宁. 前摄干扰对汉语听写困难儿童字形工作记忆的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 153-160.

WEN Kailing, CHEN Ping, YANG Shuang, NING Ning. Proactive Interference Effects on the Orthographic-working Memory in Chinese Children with Spelling Difficulties[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(2): 153-160.

参考文献

American Psychiatric Association. (2015).Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders:DSM-V (Chinese version). Peking University Press.
Baddeley, A. D., Hitch, G. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (2018). Is thephonological similarity effect in working memory due to proactive interference? Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(8), 1312-1316.
Cordewener, K. A. H., Bosman, A. M. T., & Verhoeven, L. (2012). Specific language impairment affects the early spelling process quantitatively but not qualitatively.Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33(4), 1041-1047.
Caramazza, A., & Miceli, G. (1990). The structure of graphemic representations. Cognition, 37(3), 243-297.
Costa, V., Fischer-Baum, S., Capasso, R., Miceli, G., & Rapp, B. (2011). Temporal stability and representational distinctiveness:Key functions of orthographic working memory.Cognitive Neuropsychology, 28(5), 338-362.
Han, Z., Zhang, Y., Shu, H., & Bi, Y. (2007). The orthographic buffer in writing Chinese characters:Evidence from a dysgraphic patient.Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24(4), 431-450.
Kong, M. Y. (2020). The association between children's common Chinese stroke errors and spelling ability.Reading and Writing, 33(1), 635-670.
Law, S. P. (1994). The structure of orthographic representations of Chinese characters:From the perspective of the cognitive neuropsychological approach.Bulletin of Institute of History and Philology, 65, 81-130.
Law, S. P. (2004). Writing Errors of a Cantonese Dysgraphic Patient and their Theoretical Implications.Neurocase, 10, 132-140.
Law, S. P., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Cognitive processes in writing Chinese characters:Basic issues and some preliminary data. In D. Gelder, & J. Morais (Eds.), Speech and reading:A comparative approach (pp. 143-190). Hove, UK:Psychology Press.
Law, S. P., & Leung, M. (2000). Structural representations of characters in chinese writing:Evidence from a case of acquired dysgraphia.Psychologia An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 43, 67-83.
Law, S. P., & Or, B. (2001). A case study of acquired dyslexia and dysgraphia in cantonese:Evidence for nonsemantic pathways for reading and writing Chinese.Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18(8), 729-748.
Law, S. P., Yeung, O., Wong, W., & Chiu, K. M. Y. (2005). Processing of semantic radicals in writing Chinese characters:Data from a Chinese dysgraphic patient.Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(7), 885-903.
Leung, M. M. P., Lam, C. S. Y., Lam, S. S. T., Pao, N. W. Y., & Li-Tsang, C. W. P. (2014). Visual profile of children with handwriting difficulties in Hong Kong Chinese.Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(1), 144-152.
Liu, D., Chen, X., & Wang, Y. (2016). The impact of visual-spatial attention on reading and spelling in Chinese children.Reading and Writing, 29, 1435-1447.
Mccloskey, M., & Rapp, B. (2017). Developmental dysgraphia:An overview and framework for research.Cognitive Neuropsychology, 34(3-4), 1-18.
Mehlhase, H., Bakos, S., Landerl, K., Schulte-Korne, G., & Moll, K. (2019). Orthographic learning in children with isolated and combined reading and spelling deficits.Child Neuropsychology, 25(3), 370-393.
Mo, J., McBride, C., & Yip, L. (2018). Identifying the unique role of orthographic working memory in acomponential model of Hong Kong kindergarteners' Chinese written spelling. Reading and Writing, 31, 1083-1108.
Moriguchi, Y., Okanda, M., & Itakura, S. (2008). Young children's yes bias:How does it relate to verbal ability, inhibitory control, and theory of mind? First Language, 28(4), 431-442.
Purcell, J. J., Jiang, X., & Eden, G. F. (2017). Shared orthographic neuronal representations for spelling and reading.NeuroImage, 147, 554-567.
Quinde-Zlibut, J. M., Okitondo, C. D., Williams, Z. J., Weitlauf, A., & Cascio, C. J. (2020). Elevatedthresholds for light touch in children with autism reflect more conservative perceptual decision-making rather than a sensory deficit. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14. 122.https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00122
Rapp, B., & Caramazza, A. (1997). From graphemes to abstract letter shapes:Levels of representation in written spelling. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1130-1152.
Rapp, B., Purcell, J., Hillis, A. E., Capasso, R., & Miceli, G. (2015). Neural bases of orthographic long-term memory and working memory in dysgraphia.Brain, 139, 588-604.
Reich, S., Chou, T. L., & Patterson, K. (2003). Acquired dysgraphia in Chinese:Further evidence on the links between phonology and orthography.Aphasiology, 17, 585-604.
Roncoli, S., & Masterson, J. (2016). ‘Unexpected’ spelling difficulty in a 10-year-old child with good reading skills:An intervention case study.Writing Systems Research, 8, 143-166.
Tan, Y., & Liu, X. (2018). Influence ofgrapheme and syllable learning on handwriting output of Chinese characters in children with dictation difficulties. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1671. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01671
Tong, X., McBride, C., Chor, J., Lo, M., & Shu, H. (2017). Athree-year longitudinal study of reading and spelling difficulty in Chinese developmental dyslexia:The matter of morphological awareness. Dyslexia, 23, 372-386.
Wilbiks, J. M. P., & Dyson, B. J. (2016). Thedynamics and neural correlates of audio-visual integration capacity as determined by temporal unpredictability, proactive interference, and SOA. PLoS One, 11(12), Article e0168304.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168304
Wong, G. (2005).Visual orthographic skills in Hong Kong primary school students with spelling difficulties (Doctorial dissertation). University of Hong Kong.
Weekes, B. S., Yin, W. G., Su, Y. F., & Chen, M. Z., (2006). The cognitive neuropsychology of reading and writing in Chinese. Language and Language, 7(3), 595-617.
Wright, A. A., Kelly, D. M., & Katz, J. S. (2018). Comparing cognition by integrating concept learning, proactive interference, and list memory.Learning and Behavior, 46(2), 107-123.
Yachini, M., & Friedmann, N. (2010). Developmental graphemic buffer dysgraphia.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 6, 148-149.
Yeung, P.-S., Ho, C. S.-H., Chan, D. W.-O., & Chung, K. K.-H. (2016). Orthographic skills important to Chinese literacy development:the role of radical representation and orthographic memory of radicals. Reading and Writing, 29(9), 1935-1958.
戴莉, 李燕, 刘翔平. (2017). 汉语听写障碍儿童形音跨通道捆绑加工的通道优势. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(4), 36-39.
靖敏. (2019). 降低空间负荷对听写困难儿童汉字记忆的促进效应. 青年与社会, (12), 254-255.
靖敏, 杨双. (2019). 听写困难儿童的空间编码和记忆特点. 中国临床心理学杂志, (4), 662-667.
李晓玉. (2019). 汉字部件的理据性对对外汉语教学的影响. 黑龙江教育学院学报, (8), 37-39.
林敏, 刘翔平, 张婧乔, 康雪. (2009). 读写困难与听写困难儿童的言语和视知觉认知缺陷. 中国心理卫生杂志, 23(1), 40-43.
栾辉, 舒华, 张大成. (2001). 听写任务下儿童汉字输出特点及影响因素的研究. 心理发展与教育, 17(1), 1-5.
毛荣建. (2015). 汉字听写困难儿童视觉加工实验研究. 黑龙江教育学院学报, 21(5), 89-90.
宁宁, 杨双. (2016a). 汉语听写困难儿童的字形结构表征缺陷. 中国特殊教育, 192(6), 75-79.
宁宁, 杨双. (2016b). 语音信息对听写困难儿童字形-空间捆绑编码的影响. 中国特殊教育, 193(7), 61-65.
宁宁, 杨双, 沈晨雁, 蔡艳艳, 袁卓, 季柏庭. (2017). 联结竞争对听写困难儿童形音联结编码的影响. 心理学报, 49(4), 439-449.
宁宁, 杨双, 袁卓. (2016). 整体干扰对听写困难儿童字形辨别的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(6), 30-33.
宁宁, 杨双, 袁卓, 刘翔平. (2017). 部件字形加工难度对听写困难儿童字形-空间捆绑编码的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(1), 17-20.
阮怡君, 齐春婷, 刘翔平. (2018). 多重感觉通道训练对听写落后儿童的教学. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(4), 197-201.
谭雅倩, 刘翔平, 齐婷婷. (2016). 汉语听写困难儿童一般视觉整体和部分加工特点. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(2), 13-16.
杨双, 宁宁, 刘栋梁. (2010). 图形和语音编码难度对听写困难儿童形音联结记忆的影响. 中国特殊教育, (1), 31-34.
杨双, 宁宁, 刘翔平, 潘益中. (2009a). 听写障碍儿童的字形输出错误特点. 心理科学, 32(2), 352-355.
杨双, 宁宁, 刘翔平, 潘益中. (2009b). 听写困难儿童对客体-空间特征的联结记忆. 中国心理卫生杂志, 23(6), 411-414.
杨双, 宁宁, 刘翔平, 严云堂, 潘益中. (2008). 听写困难儿童的整体字形加工特点. 心理发展与教育, 24(4), 34-38.
杨双, 宁宁, 潘益中, 石卫霞. (2010). 不同编码对听写困难儿童字形记忆的促进效应. 心理学报, 42(8), 845-852.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	潘益中, 杨双, 杨美玲. 充分加工条件下听写困难儿童的整体字形加工特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(4): 344-350.
[2]	杨双, 宁宁, 刘翔平, 严云堂, 潘益中. 听写困难儿童的整体字形加工特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(4): 34-38,49.