心理发展与教育 ›› 2007, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (2): 68-75.

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国父母关爱行为的多维度测量研究

王燕1, 张雷2   

  1. 1. 复旦大学心理学系 上海200433;
    2. 香港中文大学教育心理系 中国香港
  • 出版日期:2007-04-15 发布日期:2007-04-15
  • 作者简介:王燕,女,复旦大学心理学系讲师,博士.E-mail:yanwang@fudan.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    香港特区研究项目基金(RGC-CUHK4620-05H);上海市浦江人才计划(KBH3548534);复旦大学金苗项目(EYH3710012)基金资助

A Study on the Multi-Dimensional Structure of Chinese Parents’ Warmth Behavior

WANG Yan1, CHNAG Lei2   

  1. 1. Department of Psychology, FuDan University, ShangHai 200433, China;
    2. Department of Educational Psychology, The Chinese University of HongKong, HongKong, China
  • Online:2007-04-15 Published:2007-04-15

摘要: 运用问卷法,对北京905名中小学生及其父母进行了问卷测量,并用验证性因素分析对父母关爱行为的维度结构进行了检验.数据分析结果表明,与西方研究者所使用的单维度关爱结构不同,中国父母的关爱行为具有多维度结构,除了情感关爱之外,物质关爱(包括行为关爱和饮食关爱两种)也作为独立的维度单独存在.此外,数据分析显示,中国父母在情感关爱和饮食关爱上有较高的水平表现,小学生父母在情感、物质层面上的关爱表现水平要高于中学生父母,父母的情感关爱表现水平与其受教育程度之间存在着正向关联.并且,父母不同维度的关爱行为与不同年龄段及不同性别儿童的发展之间,展现出了不同的关联程度,因此也从另一侧面支持了父母关爱行为的多维度结构.

关键词: 父母教养, 情感关爱, 物质关爱, 验证性因素分析

Abstract: Parental warmth and control have been two major focuses of parenting research in the West. Similar work has also been carried out in China. The cross cultural comparisons seem to suggest that Chinese parents are not as warm as Western parents and, to some ext ent, are also more controlling than Western parents. Whereas culture has been used as a convenient explanation for these differences, we believe that Chinese parents and Western parents may have different conceptualizat ions about warmth and, to a lesser degree, control. In the present study, we focused on warmth and tested the hypothesis that, whereas Western parents, as well as the instrument used to measure parenting, emphasize emotional or psychological warmth, Chinese parents might distinguish between motional and physical warmth. The latter refers to parental behaviors and actions directed at improving the child's physical or material well-being. We constructed parenting questionnaire items that were aimed to differentiate among emotional, health-oriented physical, and material oriented physical warmth. The sample was taken from two primary schools and one secondary school in Beijing and one primary and one secondary school in Shanghai. Primary school grades 2, 3 and 4 and secondary school grade 2 students and their parents were included in the sampling. The total number of students approached was 1040, of whom 905 had complete data from both the students and their parents and were included in the analyses. Of the 905 students, 49.2% were female and 50.8% were from secondary schools. The average age of students was 11.09(SD= 2.90). Among the 905 parents, 73.52% were mothers. The average age of parents was 39.26(SD=4.74). The Parenting Style and Dimensions Quest ionnaire(PSDQ) were administered to the parents. Of interest were the nine items that targeted emotional support and warmth. In addition to the PSDQ, parents were also given 23 self-constructed items of which 8 were related to emotional warmth(e. g., "I'll spend time to keep my child company"), 9 were related to health oriented physical warmth(e. g., "I am concerned with my child's diet"), and 6 were related to material-oriented physical warmth(e. g., "I will make sure that my child has a good material life"). Various child variables were also obtained. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses support the three-factor-model. The three factors were emotional warmth, health-oriented physical warmth, and material-oriented physical warmth. The average factor loading was 0. 62. Most of the goodness of fit statistics was satisfactory. On all three factors, parents of primary school children had higher scores than parents of secondary school students. The threewarmth factors showed both similar and different correlations with such child outcome variables as academic achievement, peer acceptance, and self-concept. For example, emotional warmth was more strongly correlated with child outcome variables than physical warmth and health-oriented physical warmth was least correlated with child social outcome variables. The different warmth dimensions were also more strongly correlated with child outcome variables for primary than secondary school children. However, all the correlations were moderate. These findings lend some support to our hypothesis that Chinese parents and children conceptualize parental warmth differently than what have been reported in the Western literature. Chinese parents emphasize both physical and emotional support of their children even though the former may not be felt by children as much as and thus has less effect on child social outcomes than the latter.

Key words: parenting, emotional warmth, physical warmth, confirmatory factor analysis

中图分类号: 

  • G78
[1] Becker W C,Peterson D R,Luria Z,shoemaker D J,Hellmer L A.Relations of factors derived from parent-interview ratings to behavior problems of five-year-olds.Child Development,1962,33:509-535.
[2] Renson G J,Schaefer E S,Levy B I.Cross-national validity of a spherical conceptual model for parent behavior.Child Development,1968,39:1229-1235.
[3] Roff M.A factorial study of the FELS parent behavior scales.Child Development,1949,20:29-45.
[4] Schaefer E S.Children's report of parental behavior:An inventory.Child Development,1965,36:413-424.
[5] Holden G W,Edwards L A.Parental attitudes toward child rearing:Instruments,issues,and implications.Psychological-Bulletin,1989,106:29-58.
[6] Chen X,Hastings P,Rubin K H,Cen G.,Stewart S L.Childrearing attitudes and behavioral inhibition in Chinese and Canadian toddlers:a cross-cultural study.Developmental Psychology,1998,34:677-686.
[7] MacDonald K.Warmth as a developmental construct:An evolutionary analysis.Child Development,1992,63:753-773.
[8] Ryback D,Sanders A L,Lorentz J,Koestenblatt M.Child-rearing practices reported by students in six cultures.Journal of Social Psychology,1980,110:153-162.
[9] Rothbanm F,Morelli G,Pott M,Liu c Y.Immigrant-Chinese and Euro-American parents' physical closeness with young children:Themes of family relatedness.Journal of Family Psychology,2000,14:334-348.
[10] 马冠生,胡小琪,马文军,潘慧,杨育林,居建云,徐留臣,刘兵.我国城市青少年家庭食物购买及其影响因素.中国校医 2002年,20-23.
[11] 郑慧,蔡东联.饮食与儿童生长发育状况调查.中国临床营养杂志,2005,13(3):167-169.
[12] Bond M H.The handbook of Chinese Psychcology.London:Oxford University Press.1996.
[13] Stevenson H W,Chen C,Lee S.Chinese Families.In J.L.Roopnarine & D.B.Carter(Eds.),Annual advances in applied developmental psychology v.5(pp.17-33).Norwood:Ablex Publishing Corporation.1992.
[14] Rohner R P.The warmth dimension:Foundations of parental acceptance-rejection theory.Beverly Hills:SAGE publications.1986.
[5] Wu P,Robinson C C,Yang C,Hart C H,Olson S F,Porter C L,Jin S,Wo J,Wu X.Similarities and differences in mothers' parenting of preschoolers in China and the United States.International Journal of Behavioral Development,2002,26:481-491.
[16] Robinson C C,Mandleco B,Olsen S F,Hart C.H.Authoritative,authoritarian,and permissive parenting practices:Development of a new measure.Psychological Reports,1995,77:819-830.
[17] Harter S.The perceived competence scale for children.Child Development,1982,53:87-97.
[18] Chang L,McBride-Chang C,Stewart S M,Au E.Life satisfaction,self-concept,and family relations in Chinese adolescents and children.International Journal of Behavioral Development,2003,27:182-190.
[19] Chen X,Dong,Q,Zhou H.Authoritative and authoritarian parenting practices and social and school performance in Chinese children.International Journal of Behavioral Development,1997,21:855-873.
[1] 秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响:同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[2] 刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[3] 赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[4] 高峰, 白学军, 章鹏, 曹海波. 中国青少年父母教养方式与自杀意念的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 97-108.
[5] 谢云天, 史滋福, 尹霖, 兰洛. 中国父母教养方式与儿童学业成绩关系的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 366-379.
[6] 李婷, 张又文, 李玥漪, 黄峥. 坚毅力的代际传递:父母教养方式的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 207-215.
[7] 李文福, 贾旭卿, 李功迎, 张庆林. 父母教养方式与大学生手机依赖:自我控制和感觉寻求的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 660-667.
[8] 吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.
[9] 赖燕群, 连榕, 杨琪, 牛更枫. 家庭功能与初中生欺负行为:有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 727-734.
[10] 罗世兰, 张大均, 刘云艳. 家庭社会经济地位对幼儿良好行为习惯的影响:父母教养方式与幼儿心理素质的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 26-33.
[11] 彭自芳, 傅纳, 张新杰. 父母冲突与中学生应对方式的关系:教养方式和情绪安全感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 668-676.
[12] 李甜甜, 王娟娟, 顾吉有, 徐鹤文. 有无二胎与父母教养能力感的关系:头胎子女亲子依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 563-568.
[13] 王亚丹, 孔繁昌, 赵改, 张星杰, 周博, 唐凤, 周宗奎. 父母教养方式影响青少年感恩:心理特权和观点采择的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 422-429.
[14] 雷丽丽, 冉光明, 张琪, 米倩文, 陈旭. 父母教养方式与幼儿焦虑关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 329-340.
[15] 李永占. 父母教养方式对高中生学习投入的影响:一个链式中介效应模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 576-585.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!