心理发展与教育 ›› 2007, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 66-71.

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

大学生生活满意度判断的文化差异研究

邱林1,2, 郑雪2   

  1. 1. 华南理工大学工商管理学院, 广州, 510640;
    2. 华南师范大学教育科学学院, 广州, 510631
  • 出版日期:2007-01-15 发布日期:2007-01-15
  • 作者简介:邱林(1972- ),男,华南理工大学工商管理学院讲师,博士.E-mail:qle_mail@163.com

Cross-Cultural Difference in Life Satisfaction Judgments

QIU Lin1,2, ZHENG Xue2   

  1. 1. School of Business Administration, Southchina University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640;
    2. School of Educational Science, Southchina Normal University, Guangzhou 510631
  • Online:2007-01-15 Published:2007-01-15

摘要: 对36个国家8007名大学生的生活满意度进行了问卷调查。多层线性模型分析(HLM)的结果表明:(1)积极情感体验、自我满意和社会关系满意度能显著正向预测生活满意度,而消极情感体验能显著负向预测生活满意度;(2)情感体验、自尊和社会关系满意度对整体生活满意度的预测力存在着显著的国家间差异;(3)个人主义———集体主义是导致生活满意度水平国家间差异的重要因素,同时也对自尊与生活满意度的相关有显著预测作用,但它并不影响情感体验和社会关系满意度与整体生活满意度之间的关系。

关键词: 生活满意度, 情感体验, 自尊, 社会关系, 文化

Abstract: Based on a big sample of 8,007 subjects from 36 countries,this study tested the cross-cultural differences in life satisfaction judgments.The results of HLM analyses show that(1)positive affect experience,self-esteem and social relation satisfaction positively predicted life satisfaction,and negative affect experience was a negative predictor;(2) significant variability among nations was found in terms of their average life satisfaction and the correlation between affect, self-esteem,social relation satisfaction and life satisfaction;(3)individualism-collectivism explained the variability across nations of life satisfaction and its correlation with self-esteem,but it didn't made any contribution to explain the relationship between affect experience or social relation satisfaction and life satisfaction.

Key words: life satisfaction, affect experience, self-esteem, social relation, culture

[1] Diener E.Assessing subjective well-being:progress and opportunities.Social Indicators Research,1994,31:103-157.
[2] Gilovieh T,Savitsky K,and Medec V H.The illusion of transparency:Biased assessment of others' ability to read one's emotional states.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1998,75:332-346.
[3] Schimmack U,Diener E,Oishi S.Life satisfaction is a momentary judgment and a stable personality characteristic:The use of chronically accessille and stable sources.Journal of Personality,2001,70:345-38.
[4] Schwarz N,Strack F.Reports of subjective well-being:Judgmental processes and their methodological implications.In D Kahneman,E Diener,N Schwarz,eds,Well-being:The foundations of hedonic psychology.New:Russel Sage,1999.
[5] Diener E.Subjective well-being.Psychological Bulletin,1984,95:542-575.
[6] 周帆,王登峰.人格特质与外显自尊和内隐自尊的关系.心理学报,2005,37(1):100-105.
[7] Myers D G,Diener E.Who is happy? Psychological Science,1995,6(1):10-17.
[8] 邱林,郑雪,严标宾.文化常模和目标调节模型:两种幸福感文化观.心理科学进展,2002,10(3):290-294.
[9] Suh E,Diner E,Oishi S,et al.The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures:emotions versus norms.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1998,74(2):482-493.
[10] Diener E,Diener M.Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1995,68(4),653-663.
[11] Oishi S,Diener E,Lucas B,et al.Across-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction:Perspectives from needs and values.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,1999,25(8):980-990.
[12] 徐维东,吴明证,邱扶东.自尊与主观幸福感关系研究.心理科学,2005,28(3):562-565.
[13] Kwan V S Y,Bond M H,Singelis T M.Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction:Adding relationship harmony to self-esteem.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.1997,73:1038-1051.
[14] Triandis H C.Individualism and collectivism.Boulder,CO:Westview Press,1995.
[15] Diener E,Suh E M,Lucas R E,Snith H.Subjective well-being:Three decades of progress.Psychological Bulletin,1999,125:276-302.
[16] 张雷,雷雳,郭伯良.多层线形模型应用.北京,教育科学出版社,2003.
[17] Diener E,Oishi S.Money and happiness:income and subjective well-being across nations.In E Diener,E M Suh (eds),Subjective Wellbeing Across Cultures.Cambridge,MA:MIT Press,2001.
[18] Heine S J,Takata T,Lehman D R.Beyond self-presentation:Evidence for self-criticism among Japanese.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2000,26:71-78.
[19] Ryan R M,Sheldon K M,Kasser T,Deci E L.All goals are not created equal.In P.M.Gollwitzer and J.A.Bargh,eds.,The Psychology of Action:Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior.New York:Guilford,1996,7-26.
[20] Vandello J A,Cohen D.Patterns of individualism and collectivism across the United States.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1999,77,279-292.
[1] 王鑫强, 李金文, 卢红燕, 赖正伟, 李佳源. 择偶优劣势对师范大学生教师职业认同的影响:择偶价值感的中介及自尊的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 64-73.
[2] 樊香麟, 崔英锦. 客体化身体意识与女大学生限制性饮食行为的关系:外貌负面评价恐惧和社会文化压力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 122-131.
[3] 路翠萍, 郑希付. 低自尊还是高“他尊”?高、低社交焦虑者的不同内隐自尊特性——来自EAST的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 808-816.
[4] 沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分?学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[5] 周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[6] 银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[7] 辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[8] 张文新. 欺凌的界定:文化和发展的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 590-598.
[9] Peter K. Smith. 校园欺凌的跨文化差异问题:特征与干预[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 599-608.
[10] 高玲, 孟文慧, 刘介地, 杨继平, 王兴超. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负行为:自尊和基本共情的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 439-448.
[11] 鲁明辉, 王融, 张丽敏. 父母心理弹性与自闭症谱系障碍儿童情绪行为问题的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 247-254.
[12] 江盈颖, 安静, 马丽, 朱莉琪. 8~15岁儿童贫富观的发展特点及其与成人的比较[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 466-474.
[13] 田玮宜, 徐健捷, 吕广林, 王轶楠. 父母自尊与青少年主观幸福感间的关系:亲子信任与青少年自尊的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 331-338.
[14] 张小敏, 陈欣, 务凯, 赵国祥. 学校联结和学业能力对高中生自尊的影响:一个多层线性模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 358-365.
[15] 谢云天, 史滋福, 尹霖, 兰洛. 中国父母教养方式与儿童学业成绩关系的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 366-379.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!