心理发展与教育 ›› 2001, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4): 6-11.

• 儿童青少年心理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

13-18岁青少年表象能力的发展和脑电α波的关系

潘昱, 沃建中, 林崇德   

  1. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 100875
  • 出版日期:2001-10-15 发布日期:2001-10-15
  • 作者简介:潘昱(1976- ),女,汉族,北京人,北京师范大学发展心理研究所98级硕士.
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助,项目号:30170328

The Developmental Features of Imagery Ability and Its Relationship with electroencephalography (EEG): A Study of Adolescent Aged from 13 to 18

  • Online:2001-10-15 Published:2001-10-15

摘要: 本研究以188名1318岁青少年为研究对象,采用脑电波超慢涨落分析技术(简称ET),对其12导联脑电波(EEG)进行了记录和分析,并对其表象能力进行了考察。重点探讨了表象能力的发展与脑α波特点之间的关系。结果表明:(1)13~18岁青少年随年龄增长,对表象任务正确反应需要的时间逐渐下降,其反应时变化的转折时期为16岁;(2)男女生之间差异不显著;(3)在句图匹配和心理旋转作业中好组10Hzα波的比率均高于差组,其它频率差异不显著,说明表象能力好组与占主频的α波相联系。

关键词: 青少年, 表象能力, EEG, 发展

Abstract: In the present work,12-channel electroencephalography(EEG) of 188 adolescent aged from 13 to 18 were recorded and analyzed by Encephalofluctuography Technology (ET).And all subjects completed two imagery tasks including sentence-figure matching and mental rotation.The research put emphasis on the developmental characteristics of the imagery ability and its relationships with electroencep halograp by(EEG).The results obtained were as follows:(i) With the increase of the age,the time decreased when 13 to 18 age groups reacted correctly to the imagery tasks.The turning period of the reaction is at the age of 16 writh no marked difference for the boys and girls.(ii) In twa imagery tasks of sentence-figure matching and mental rotation,10Hz α brain powers in the good group of imagery ability are hyper than that in the low group of imagery ability, but it showed no significant difference in other α powers frequency of different groups with different ages.

Key words: adolescent, imagery ability, EEG, developmental

[1] William, J. R., & Harry, W. C. EEG alpha activity reflects attentional demands, and beta activity reflects emotional and cognitive processes. Science, 1985, 228: 750-752.
[2] 李德明、梅磊、刘昌等.与年龄及认知功能相关的成人脑波功率涨落图特点.心理学报,1996,28(4),405-412.
[3] 韩东旭、梅磊、周传岱.青、老年组脑波涨落图的研究.航天医学与医学工程,1994,7(增刊):S61-S68.
[4] Byring, R. R., Salmi, T. K., Sainia, K. O., & Orn,H. P. EEG in children with spelling disabilities. Electroencephalography and clinical Neurophysiology, 1991, 79:247-255.
[5] Crawford, H.J. & Barabasz, M. Quantitative EEG magnitudes in children with and without attention deficit disorder during neurological screening and cognitive tasks. Child Study Journal,1996, 26: 71-86.
[6] Davidson R. J., & Schwartz, G. E. Brain mechanisms subserving self-generated imagery: Electrophysiological specificity and patterning. Psychophysiology, 1977, 14: 585-601.
[7] Kosslyn S. M. Image and mind. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1980.
[8] Brunet, J. S., Olver, R. O., & Greenfield, P. M.(1996). Studies in cognitive growth. New York: Wiley.
[9] Piaget, J., &Inhelder, B. (1971). Mental imagery in the child. New York: Basic.
[10] Kosslyn, S. M., Margolis, J. A., Barrett, A. M.,Goldknopf, E. Y., and Daly, P. F. Age differences in imagery abilities. Child Development, 1990, 61: 995-1010.
[11] Maccoby, E. E. & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford Universiy Press.
[12] Kail, R., Carter, P., & Pellegrino, J. The locus of sex differences in spatial ability. Perception and Psychophysics,1979, 26: 182-186.
[13] Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., Kim, I. J., & Alpert, N. M. Topographical representations of mental images in primary visual cortex. Nature, 1995, 378(6556):496-498.
[14] Brown B. B. Specificity of EEG phoptic flicker responses to color as related to visual imagery ability. Psychophysiology,1966, 2(3): 197-207.
[15] 曹河圻、沃建中、林崇德、潘昱.6-12岁儿童脑电α波频率分布特点与信息加工速度的关系.心理学探新,2000,20(4),32-37.
[1] 王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2] 王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系:意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[3] 肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[4] 林崇德. 需要是教育与发展的动力源[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 1-7.
[5] 陈书玲, 贾会宾, 靳璨, 张欣, 王恩国. 发展性协调障碍儿童视觉通道前注意加工的特点:来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 19-28.
[6] 魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系:压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[7] 邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[8] 姚计海, 蒋雨含, 邹弘晖. 教师教学自主权与教学反思的关系:心理授权和职业承诺的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 842-849.
[9] 彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[10] 刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[11] 刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[12] 沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分?学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[13] 张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[14] 洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[15] 王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!