心理发展与教育 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 226-234.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2025.02.08

• 教与学心理 • 上一篇    下一篇

父母协同教养与初中生学校适应:教养投入和亲子依恋的作用及父母差异

刘畅1, 伍新春2,3, 邹盛奇4   

  1. 1. 北京教育学院学前教育学院, 北京 100120;
    2. 北京师范大学心理学部, 应用实验心理北京市重点实验室, 心理学国家级实验教学示范中心, 北京 100875;
    3. 北京师范大学文理学院心理系, 珠海 519087;
    4. 湖南师范大学教育科学学院, 长沙 410081
  • 发布日期:2025-03-17
  • 通讯作者: 伍新春 E-mail:xcwu@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    全国教育科学规划教育部重点课题“二孩家庭长子女的人际关系与心理适应研究”(DBA190309)。

Coparenting and School Adaptation in Families with Junior Middle School Students: The Role of Parental Involvement and Attachment and Parent Difference

LIU Chang1, WU Xinchun2,3, ZOU Shengqi4   

  1. 1. Preschool Academy, Beijing Institute of Education, Beijing 100120;
    2. Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    3. Deparment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Science, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai 519087;
    4. School of Educational Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081
  • Published:2025-03-17

摘要: 基于协同教养生态模型,采用问卷调查1370名初中生,探讨协同教养与学校适应之间的关系,检验其中的中介机制及父母差异。结果表明:团结行为与亲社会能力的相关关系最大,团结负向作用反社会行为,冲突与贬低行为正向作用反社会行为;团结与学校适应的关系主要通过链式中介作用,冲突、贬低与学校适应的关系主要通过亲子依恋的中介作用;父亲比母亲的一致行为与亲社会能力的相关关系更大,母亲链式中介团结与亲社会行为的效应大于父亲,其他中介效应的父母差异均表现为父亲显著地大于母亲。本研究提示了提高父母协同教养在家庭水平上的互动、改善亲子依恋关系的重要性。

关键词: 协同教养, 学校适应, 教养投入, 亲子依恋, 初中生

Abstract: Based on ecological model of coparenting, a total of 1370 junior middle school students were surveyed to explore the effect of coparenting on school adaptation and examine the mediated role of parental involvement and attachment. Structural equation modeling results revealed social competence was mainly influenced by family integrity of coparenting, via the chain mediations of parental involvement and attachment. Antisocial behavior was influenced by family integrity, conflict and disparagement, in which the effect of negative coparenting behaviors on school adaptation mediated by parental attachment. Reprimand was the only dimension for which father had more contribution to social competence than that of mother. In addition, significant differences in mediating effect per gender of parent were mainly found that the associations between family integrity, conflict and school adaptation. The effect size of mediating role showed significantly greater of father than that of mother, excepting serial mediation in the associations between family integrity and social competence. These findings suggested that family integrity and attachment played an important role to school adaptation.

Key words: coparenting, school adaptation, parental involvement, attachment, junior middle school students

中图分类号: 

  • G442
Caldera, Y. M., & Lindsey, E. W. (2006). Coparenting, mother-infant interaction, and infant-parent attachment relationships in two-parent families.Journal of Family Psychology, 20(2), 275-283.
Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (2008). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Cummings, E. M., Merrilees, C. E., & George, M. W. (2010). Fathers, marriages and families: Revisiting and updating the framework for fathering in family context. In M. E. Lamb (Eds.), The role of the father in child development (5th ed., pp. 154-176). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Dagan, O., & Sagi‐Schwartz, A. (2018). Early attachment network with mother and father: An unsettled issue. Child Development Perspectives, 12(2), 115-121.
De Wolff, M. S., & van Ijzendoorn, M. H. (1997). Sensitivity and attachment: A meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachment.Child Development, 68, 571-591.
Erel, O., & Burman, B. (1995).Interrelatedness of marital relations and parent-child relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 108-132.
Feinberg, M. E. (2003).The internal structure and ecological context of coparenting: A framework for research and intervention. Parenting: Science and Practice, 3(2), 95-131.
Feinberg, M. E., Kan, M. L., & Hetherington, E. M. (2007). The longitudinal influence of coparenting conflict on parental negativity and adolescent maladjustment. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 687-702.
Finley, G. E., Mira, S. D., & Schwartz, S. J. (2008). Perceived paternal and maternal involvement: Factor structures, mean differences, and parental roles.Fathering, 6(1), 62-82.
Kwon, K. A., Jeon, H. J., & Elicker, J. (2013).Links among coparenting quality, parental gentle guidance, and toddlers’ social emotional competencies: Testing direct, mediational, and moderational models. Journal of Family Studies, 19(1), 19-34.
Lee, J. Y., Volling, B. L., Lee, S. J., & Altschul, I. (2020). Longitudinal relations between coparenting and father engagement in low-income residential and nonresidential father families.Journal of Family Psychology, 34(2), 226-236.
Mangelsdorf, S. C., Laxman, D. J., & Jessee, A. (2011). Coparenting in two-parent nuclear families. In J. P. McHale, & K. M. Lindahl, Coparenting: A conceptual and clinical examination of family systems (pp.39-59). Washington: American Psychological Association.
McHale, J., & Irace, K. (2011). Coparenting in diverse family system. In J. P. McHale, & K. M. Lindahl, Coparenting: A conceptual and clinical examination of family systems (pp.15-37). Washington: American Psychological Association.
Minuchin, P. (1985). Families and individual development: Provocations from the field of family therapy. Child Development, 56(2), 289-302.
Pudasainee-Kapri, S., & Razza, R. A. (2015). Associations among supportive coparenting, father engagement and attachment: The role of race/ethnicity.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(12), 3793-3804.
Riina, E. M., & McHale, S. M. (2014). Bidirectional influences between dimensions of coparenting and adolescent adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(2), 257-269.
Spencer, M. B. (1999). Social and cultural influences on school adjustment: The application of an identity-focused.Educational Psychologist, 34(1), 43-57.
Zhao, F. Q., Liu, M. X., & Li, S. (2020). Paternal coparenting behavior and adolescent prosocial behaviors: Roles of parent-child attachment, peer attachment, and gender. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105629
Zou, S., Wu, X., Huang, B., & Liu, C. (2020). Double-edged effect of coparenting on Chinese adolescents’ emotional instability: An inconsistent mediation model.Journal of Child and Family Studies, 29(5), 1413-1423.
丁芳, 吴伟, 周鋆, 范李敏. (2014). 初中流动儿童的内隐群体偏爱、社会支持及其对学校适应的影响. 心理学探新, 34(3), 249-254.
侯芬, 伍新春, 邹盛奇, 刘畅, 黄彬彬. (2018). 父母教养投入对青少年亲社会行为的影响: 亲子依恋的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 34(4), 417-425.
胡牡丽, 王孟成, 蔡琳, 朱熊兆, 姚树桥. (2012). 青少年主观社会经济地位量表的初步编制. 中国临床心理学杂志, 20(2), 155-157.
黄彬彬, 邹盛奇, 伍新春, 刘畅. (2019). 父亲协同教养行为与青少年同伴依恋的关系: 父子依恋的中介作用与青少年情绪性的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 35(2), 176-183.
黄敏学, 冯小亮, 谢亭亭. (2010). 消费者态度的新认知: 二元化的矛盾态度. 心理科学进展, 18(6), 987-996.
李文道, 邹泓, 赵霞. (2003). 初中生的社会支持与学校适应的关系.心理发展与教育, 19(3), 73-81.
李文道, 邹泓, 赵霞. (2008). 大学生同一性发展及其与亲子依恋的关系研究. 首都师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 113-119.
李勉, 张平平, 张兴慧, 王耘.(2015). 初中寄宿生亲子依恋与学校适应的关系: 分离-个体化的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 23(4), 718-721.
蔺秀云, 方晓义, 李辉, 刘朝莹, 杨志稳. (2006). 云南省学生亲社会倾向发展趋势及对学校适应的预测. 心理发展与教育, 22(4), 44-51.
刘世宏, 李丹, 刘晓洁, 陈欣银. (2014). 青少年的学校适应问题: 家庭亲密度、家庭道德情绪和责任感的作用. 心理科学, 37(3), 617-624.
刘万伦, 沃建中. (2005). 师生关系与中小学生学校适应性的关系. 心理发展与教育, 21(1), 87-90.
刘畅, 伍新春, 邹盛奇. (2017). 父母协同教养问卷青少年评定版的修订及其信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(5), 845-849.
石伟, 张进辅, 黄希庭. (2004). 初中生亲子关系特性的研究. 心理与行为研究, 2(1), 328-332.
王争艳, 程南华. (2014). 共同养育研究及对儿童适应的影响. 心理科学进展, 22(6), 889-901.
王争艳, 刘迎泽, 杨叶. (2005). 依恋内部工作模式的研究概述及探讨. 心理科学进展, 13(5), 629-639.
吴艳, 温忠麟. (2011). 结构方程建模中的题目打包策略. 心理科学进展, 19(12), 1859-1867.
伍新春, 刘畅, 邹盛奇, 侯芬. (2018). 青少年评价父母教养投入行为问卷的修订及其信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(4), 647-651.
赵凤青, 程贝贝, 李奕萱, 刘志斌, 刘兵, 张宝山. (2022). 核心家庭父亲协同教养对青少年抑郁的影响:父子依恋和母子依恋的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 38(1), 109-117.
张樱樱, 吴银银, 叶一舵, 叶海, 熊猛. (2021). 父亲参与教养与农村寄宿制初中生学校适应: 自我控制的中介作用和相对剥夺感的调节作用. 心理科学, 44(6), 1354-1360.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.
[1] 曾成伟, 张斌, 张安琪, 曾奕欣, 戴回锋, 熊思成, 王亚楠, 杨莹. 学校联结对青少年手机成瘾的纵向影响:社交焦虑和亲子依恋的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 256-264.
[2] 周姿言, 胡潇, 张一林, 苏瑞琳, 辛素飞, 盛靓. 负性生活事件与初中生网络成瘾的关系: 社交焦虑和无聊倾向的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 109-116.
[3] 王恩娜, 夏梦雅, 屈笛扬, 张俊杰, 梁凯欣, 肖嘉林, 迟新丽. 家庭功能发展轨迹类型对初中阶段青少年网络成瘾的影响:心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 853-864.
[4] 向燕辉, 马丽平. 初中生认知与情感幸福感发展趋势及影响因素: 基于潜变量增长模型分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 645-657.
[5] 秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响:同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[6] 邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[7] 唐莹莹, 蔺秀云, 殷锦绣, 何婷, 周少嘉, 曹志涛. 亲子依恋和祖孙依恋的一致与不一致和儿童主观幸福感的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 859-868.
[8] 吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[9] 陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[10] 任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
[11] 周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[12] 冯全升, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 张艳红, 连帅磊. 负性生活事件与初中生内化问题:反刍思维的中介作用与同伴依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 419-428.
[13] 楚啸原, 楚子强, 王琦, 吉舒天, 雷雳. 农村初中学生亲子依恋回避与智能手机依赖:社交焦虑的中介作用和家庭经济困难的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 192-199.
[14] 陈传锋, 葛国宏, 卢丹凤, 岳慧兰. 祖辈协同教养与幼儿错误信念理解能力的关系:亲子依恋与祖辈同住的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 21-30.
[15] 刘志国, 齐冰, 李亚平, 王润洲, 崔佳, 宋耀武. 成就目标定向在学业自我概念与学业成绩关系中的调节作用:基于内/外参照模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 68-76.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!