语义分类任务中词素位置概率在中文词汇识别中的作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2025.01.07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过两个语义分类任务,考察词素位置概率信息在中文词汇识别中的作用。实验1以低频词为研究对象,结果发现,在反应时指标上词首词素位置概率效应显著,词尾词素位置概率效应不显著;实验2以高频词为研究对象,结果发现,在反应时指标上首、尾词素位置概率效应均不显著。结果表明,中文词汇加工过程中存在词素位置概率效应,表现为高词素位置概率的词汇加工快于低词素位置概率的词汇,且词首词素位置概率发挥了更大作用。同时,读者对词素位置概率信息的运用受词频影响,在低频双字词的识别中更依赖词素位置概率信息。

关键词: 语义分类任务, 词素位置概率, 词汇识别

Abstract: Understanding the cognitive mechanisms underlying word segmentation has been an important aspect of research on Chinese reading. Accordingly, to obtain insight into the influence of character positional frequency during Chinese word segmentation, we investigated the effects of orthogonally manipulating both initial and final character positional frequency for target words that were of either high or low lexical frequency through two semantic categorization tasks. In Experiment 1, low-frequency words were used to examine the effect of character positional frequency. The results indicated that the initial character positional frequency was significant in reaction time, and had no effect on the final character positional frequency for target words. In Experiment 2, high-frequency words were used to investigate the effect of character positional frequency. The results showed no character positional frequency effect for the initial or final target words. In conclusion, the findings show that the character positional frequency plays a more important role in word processing, which reveals a privileged role for the initial character positional frequency as a cue to word segmentation and recognition. Furthermore, this influence of character positional frequency depends on word frequency; and is only observed for words of lower lexical frequency.

Key words: semantic categorization task, character positional frequency, word recognition

中图分类号:

G442

曹海波, 兰泽波, 高峰, 王敬欣. 语义分类任务中词素位置概率在中文词汇识别中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 60-67.

CAO Haibo, LAN Zebo, GAO Feng, WANG Jingxin. The Role of Character Positional Frequency in Chinese Word Recognition in Semantic Categorization Task[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2025, 41(1): 60-67.

参考文献

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48.
Cai, Q., & Byrsbert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles.PLoS ONE, 5(6), e10729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729
Ho, C. S. H., Chan, D. W. O., Tsang, S. M., & Lee, S. H. (2002). The cognitive profile and multiple-deficit hypothesis in Chinese developmental dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 38(4), 543-553.
Ho, C. S. H., Ng, T. T., & Ng, W. K. (2003). A “radical” approach to reading development in Chinese: The role of semantic radicals and phonetic radicals. Journal of Literacy Research, 35(3), 849-878.
Jared, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1991). Does word identification in reading proceed from spelling to sound to meaning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120(4), 358-394.
Johnson, R. L., & Eisler, M. E. (2012). The importance of the first and last letter in words during sentence reading.Acta Psychologica, 141(3), 336-351.
Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2020). Anintegrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1139-1162.
Li, X., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading.Cognitive Psychology, 58(4), 525-552.
Liang, F. F., Gao, Q., Li, X., Wang, Y., Bai, X., & Liversedge, S. P. (2022). The importance of the positional probability of word final (but not word initial) characters for word segmentation and identification in children and adults’ natural Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 49(1), 98-115.
Marsh, J. E., Perham, N., Sörqvist, P., & Jones, D. M. (2014). Boundaries of semantic distraction: Dominance and lexicality act at retrieval.Memory & Cognition, 42(8), 1285-1301.
Milledge, S. V., Liversedge, S. P., & Blythe, H. I. (2022). Theimportance of the first letter in children’s parafoveal preprocessing in English: Is it phonologically or orthographically driven? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception Performance, 48(5), 427-442.
Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., Jamil, T., Urbanek, S., Forner, K., & Ly, A. (2018).Bayes Factor: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BayesFactor.
Pollatsek, A., & Hyönä,J. (2005). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(1-2), 261-290.
R Development Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention during reading, scene perception, and visual search.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457-1506.
Shillcock, R., Ellison, T. M., & Monaghan, P. (2000). Eye-fixation behavior, lexical storage, and visual word recognition in a split processing model.Psychological Review, 107(4), 824-851.
Taft, M. (2004). Morphological decomposition and the reverse base frequency effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57(4), 745-765.
Yan, G. L.,Tian, H. J., Bai, X. J., & Rayner, K. (2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. British Journal of Psychology, 97(2), 259-268.
Yen, M. -H., Radach, R., Tzeng, O. J. -L., & Tsai, J. -L. (2012). Usage of statistical cues for word boundary in reading Chinese sentences.Reading and Writing, 25(5), 1007-1029.
Zhu, M. Y., Zhuang, X. L., & Ma, G. J. (2021). Readers exact semantic information from parafoveal two-character synonyms in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 34(3), 773-790.
白学军, 闫国利. (2017). 阅读心理学. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
李明. (2018). 中文阅读中单字词及双字复合词字频与词频效应的眼动研究(硕士学位论文). 山东师范大学, 济南.
连坤予, 马杰, 魏玲, 张书帏, 白学军. (2021). 汉语朗读中词素位置概率线索作用的发展研究.心理与行为研究, 19(2), 179-185.
马国杰, 李兴珊. (2012). 阅读中的注意分配: 序列与平行之争.心理科学进展, 20(11), 1755-1767.
彭聃龄, 丁国盛, 王春茂, Taft, M., 朱晓平. (1999). 汉语逆序词的加工—词素在词加工中的作用. 心理学报, 31(1), 36-46.
申薇, 李兴珊. (2012). 中文阅读中词优效应的特异性.科学通报, 57(35), 3414-3420.
王春茂, 彭聃龄. (2000). 多词素词的通达表征: 分解还是整体.心理科学, 23(4), 395-398.
徐迩嘉, 隋雪. (2018). 身份信息与位置信息的加工进程及语境预测性的影响. 心理学报, 50(6), 606-621.
俞锦旺, 孟珠, 秦钊, 邓志洲, 赵绍晨, 闫国利. (2020). 中文词汇加工过程中的无关言语效应.心理与行为研究, 18(5), 611-617.

相关文章 15

[1]	王淏蘭, 陈红君, 伍新春, 赵英, 孙鹏. 阅读模式对汉语儿童阅读理解的影响:有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 369-378.
[2]	程阳春, 黄瑾. 近似数量系统与数学能力的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 379-390.
[3]	喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[4]	陈旭, 张大均, 程刚, 胡天强, 刘广增. 教师支持与心理素质对中学生学业成绩的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 707-714.
[5]	聂倩, 张大均, 滕召军, 陆星月, 郭成. 学生感知的学校氛围与主客观学业成绩:心理素质及其分维度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 715-723.
[6]	程刚, 唐昕怡, 牛娟, 李佳佳, 张大均. 中学生家庭社会经济地位与学业成绩的关系:心理素质各维度的多重中介作用分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 700-706.
[7]	陈朝阳, 刘志方, 苏永强, 程亚华. 高低阅读技能聋生词汇加工的语境预测性效应特点:眼动证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 692-699.
[8]	邹雨晨, 丁颖, 张旭然, 李燕芳. 不同类型反馈对儿童学习效果的影响及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 567-575.
[9]	李永占. 父母教养方式对高中生学习投入的影响:一个链式中介效应模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 576-585.
[10]	高瑞彦, 牛美心, 杨涛, 周新林. 4~8年级学生分数数量表征的准确性及形式[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 443-452.
[11]	张婕, 黄碧娟, 司继伟, 官冬晓. 乡镇小学生的数学焦虑与数学成绩:数学自我效能感和数学元认知的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 453-460.
[12]	王明忠, 王梦然, 王静. 父母冲突损害青少年学业成绩:努力控制与课堂参与的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 434-442.
[13]	池丽萍, 宗正, 辛自强, 陈英和. 建构主义教学与元思维的关系:认知压力的解释[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 181-190.
[14]	洪伟, 刘儒德, 甄瑞, 蒋舒阳, 金芳凯. 成就目标定向与小学生数学学习投入的关系:学业拖延和数学焦虑的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 191-199.
[15]	刘影, 柴晓运, 龚少英, 桑标. 父母参与作业的自主动机与小学生积极作业情绪:学生作业自主动机与教师支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 577-586.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed