家校共育视角下同伴侵害的影响因素探究:有调节的中介模型

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.06.09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探索家校共育理念指导下家庭与学校对青少年同伴侵害的交互影响,构建一个有调节的中介模型,探讨亲子关系、师生关系、抑郁情绪对同伴侵害的影响。采用父母依恋问卷、师生关系量表简版、多维同伴侵害量表、流调中心抑郁量表简版对1710名5~8年级学生进行调查。结果显示:(1)亲子关系一方面直接影响同伴侵害,另一方面通过抑郁情绪间接影响同伴侵害;(2)师生关系对中介模型的三条路径均有调节作用,且扮演着不同角色。具体来说,师生关系能强化亲子关系对同伴侵害的保护作用,分担亲子关系对抑郁情绪的影响,缓冲抑郁情绪对同伴侵害的不良影响。研究证实了从家校共育的视角防治校园欺凌的可行性,建议校园欺凌专项治理活动要充分考虑到家庭与学校的交互作用,以最大程度上发挥两者的双保险作用。

关键词: 亲子关系, 师生关系, 同伴侵害, 抑郁情绪, 家校共育

Abstract: To explore the influencing factors related to peer victimization from the home-school co-parenting perspective, a moderated mediation model was constructed to examine the effects of parent-child relationship, teacher-student relationship, and depressive symptoms on peer victimization. The Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment, the short version of the Student-Teacher Relationship Scale, the Multidimensional Peer Victimization Scale, and the short version of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale were used to investigate the students’ parent-child relationship, teacher-student relationship, peer victimization and depressive symptoms. 1710 5th-8th grade students participated in the study. The results showed that: (1) On the one hand, parent-child relationship directly affects depressive symptoms, and indirectly affects peer victimization through depressive symptoms on the other hand; (2) Teacher-student relationship had a moderating effect on all three pathways of the mediating model and played different roles. Specifically, teacher-student relationship would enhance the protection effect of parent-child relationship on peer victimization, weaken the prediction of parent-child relationship on depressive symptoms and the positive prediction of depressive symptoms on peer victimization. The present study confirmed the feasibility of preventing school bullying from the perspective of home-school cooperation, and suggested that special school bullying management activities should fully consider the interaction between family and school to maximize the double insurance role of both.

Key words: parent-child relationship, teacher-student relationship, peer victimization, depressive symptoms, home-school cooperation

中图分类号:

B844

黄强, 侯金芹, 陈祉妍. 家校共育视角下同伴侵害的影响因素探究:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 845-852.

HUANG Qiang, HOU Jinqin, CHEN Zhiyan. A Study on Exploring Factors Related to Peer Victimization from a Home-school Cooperation Perspective:A Moderated Mediation Model[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(6): 845-852.

参考文献

Arnau, R., Rosen, D., Finch, J., Rhudy, J., & Fortunato, V. (2007). Longitudinal effects of hope on depression and anxiety: A latent variable analysis. Journal of Personality, 75(1), 43-64.
Boldt, L. J., Kochanska, G., Yoon, J. E., & Koenig Nordling, J. (2014). Children’s attachment to both parents from toddler age to middle childhood: Links to adaptive and maladaptive outcomes. Attachment & Human Development, 16(3), 211-229.
Brendgen, M., Girard, A., Frank, V., Ginette, D., & Michel, B. (2016). Personal andfamilial predictors of peer victimization trajectories from primary to secondary school. Developmental Psychology, 52(7), 1103-1114.
Doty, J. L., Gower, A. L., Rudi, J. H., McMorris, B. J., & Borowsky, I. W. (2017). Patterns ofbullying and sexual harassment: Connections with parents and teachers as direct protective factors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(11), 2289-2304.
Epstein, J. L., & Salinas, K. C. (2004). Partnering with families and communities.Educational Leadership, 61(8), 12-18.
Espelage D. L., Ryzin M. J. Van, & Holt M. K. (2017). Trajectories of bully perpetration across early adolescence: Static risk factors, dynamic covariates, and longitudinal outcomes. Psychology of Violence, 8(2), 141-150.
Ge, X.,Natsuaki, M. N., & Conger, R. D. (2006). Trajectories of depressive symptoms and stressful life events among male and female adolescents in divorced and nondivorced families. Development and Psychopathology, 18(1), 253-273
Goossens, F. A., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (1990). Quality of infants’ attachments to professional caregivers:Relation to infant - parent attachment and day-care characteristics. Child Development, 61(3), 832-837.
Joseph, S., & Stockton, H. (2018). The multidimensional peer victimization scale: A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 42(5), 96-114.
Lau, J. Y. F.,& Eley T. C. (2008). Disentangling gene-environment correlations and interactions on adolescent depressive symptoms. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(2), 142-150.
Marsh, H. W., Craven, R. G., Parker, P. D., Parada, R. H., Guo, J. S., Dicke, T., & Abduljabbar, A. S. (2016). Temporal ordering effects of adolescent depression, relational aggression, and victimization over six waves: Fully latent reciprocal effects models.Developmental Psychology, 52(12), 1994-2009.
Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic:Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227-238.
Mynard, H., & Joseph, S. (2000). Development of the multidimensional peer - victimization scale. Aggressive Behavior, 26(2), 169-178.
Nickerson, A. B., Mele, D., & Osborne, O. K. M. (2010).Parent-Child Relationships and Bullying. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Peters, E., Riksen-Walraven, J. M., Cillessen, A. H. N., & De Weerth, C. (2011). Peer rejection and HPA activity in middle childhood: Friendship makes a difference.Child Development, 82(6), 1906-1920.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Rudolph, K. D., Flynn, M., & Abaied, J. L. (2008). A developmental perspective on interpersonal theories of youth depression. In J. R. Z. Abela & B. L. Hankin (Eds.), Child and adolescent depression: Causes, treatment, and prevention (pp. 79-102). Guilford.
Schwartz, D., Proctor, L., & Chien, D. (2001). The aggressive victim of bullying: Emotional and behavioral dysregulation as a pathway to victimization by peers.In J.Juvonen & S.Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 147-174). Guilford.
Sentse, M., Prinzie, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2017). Testing the direction of longitudinal paths between victimization, peer rejection, and different types of internalizing problems in adolescence.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 45(5), 1013-1023.
Sieving, R. E., Mcree, A. L., Mcmorris, B. J., Shlafer, R. J., Gower, A. L., Kapa, H. M.,… Resnick, M. D. (2017). Youth-adult connectedness: A key protective factor for adolescent health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(3), 275-278.
Smeraglia, K. F. (2017).The mediating role of social preference in the relationship between teacher - student relationship quality and peer victimization (Master's thesis). University of Tennessee.
Snyder, C. R. (2000). Thepast and possible futures of hope. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 11-28.
Stapinski, L. A., Araya, R., Heron, J., Montgomery, A. A., & Stallard, P. (2015). Peer victimization during adolescence: Concurrent and prospective impact on symptoms of depression and anxiety. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 28(1), 105-120.
Sweeting, H., Young, R., West, P., & Der, G. (2006). Peer victimization and depression in early - mid adolescence: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 577-594.
鲍振宙, 张卫, 李董平, 李丹黎, 王艳辉. (2013). 校园氛围与青少年学业成就的关系:一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 29(1), 61-70.
边玉芳, 周欣然. (2021). 我国70年家校合作: 政策视角下的发展历程与未来展望. 中国教育学刊, (03), 1-6.
陈亮. (2017). 青少年期的同伴侵害: 影响因素及干预建议. 青少年学刊, (01), 20-25.
何津, 陈祉妍, 郭菲, 章婕, 杨蕴萍, 王倩. (2013). 流调中心抑郁量表中文简版的编制. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 22(12), 1133-1136.
侯金芹, 陈祉妍. (2016). 青少年抑郁情绪的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素. 心理学报, 48(8), 957-968.
侯金芹, 陈桂娟. (2017). 亲子依恋与师生关系对中学生掌握目标定向学习动机影响的追踪研究.中国特殊教育, (04), 79-84.
黄彦, 谢晓琳, 周晖. (2016). 亲子依恋与儿童问题行为的相关:师生关系的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(6), 1074-1078.
李董平. (2012). 多重生态学风险因素与青少年社会适应:风险建模与作用机制研究 (博士学位论文). 华南师范大学, 广州.
李董平, 许路, 鲍振宙, 陈武, 苏小慧, 张微. (2015). 家庭经济压力与青少年抑郁:歧视知觉和亲子依恋的作用. 心理发展与教育, 31(03), 342-349.
廖友国, 陈建文, 张妍, 彭聪. (2022). 儿童青少年同伴侵害与内化问题的双向关系: 纵向研究的元分析. 心理学报, 54(7), 828-849.
美国精神医学学会. (2016). 精神障碍诊断与统计手册(第五版). 北京大学出版社.
苏萍, 许阳, 喻承甫, 甄霜菊, 张卫. (2018). 初中生情绪智力与问题性网络游戏使用:一个有调节的中介模型. 教育测量与评价, (12), 57-64.
唐淼, 闫煜蕾, 王建平. (2016). 师生关系和青少年内化问题:自尊的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(06), 1101-1104.
田菲菲, 田录梅. (2014). 亲子关系、朋友关系影响问题行为的3种模型. 心理科学进展, 22(6), 968-976.
王艳辉, 张卫, 彭家欣, 莫滨瑞, 熊丝. (2009). 亲子依恋、自我概念与大学生自我伤害的关系. 心理学探新, 29(5), 56-61.
许阳, 张卫, 喻承甫, 苏萍, 刘莎, 甄霜菊. (2017). 父母体罚与青少年焦虑抑郁的关系:同伴侵害的中介效应与亲子关系的调节效应. 心理发展与教育, 33(4), 457-467.
杨会芹, 刘晖, 周宁. (2016). 社会支持在城市流动儿童生活事件与心理健康关系中的调节效应. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(6), 1120-1122.
张兴旭, 郭海英, 林丹华. (2019). 亲子、同伴、师生关系与青少年主观幸福感关系的研究. 心理发展与教育, 35(4), 458-466.
张迎黎, 张亚林, 张迎新, 王杰利, 黄存云. (2011). 修订版青少年依恋问卷中文版在初中生中应用的信效度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 25(1), 66-70.
赵凯莉. (2018). 亲子依恋与青少年学校适应:中介效应与调节效应 (硕士学位论文). 宁波大学.
甄霜菊, 邱博宇, 刘楚铜, 张卫. (2019). 社会经济地位与儿童同伴侵害:母亲教养与学业成就的链式中介作用. 测量与评价, (8), 55-64.
周宗奎, 曹敏, 田媛, 黄淳, 杨秀娟, 宋友志. (2021). 初中生亲子关系与抑郁:自尊和情绪弹性的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 37(6), 864-872.
中华人民共和国教育部. (2020). 中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十四个五年规划和二○三五年远景目标的建议. 2020-11-03 取自 http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s6052/moe_838/202011/t20201104_498130.html
朱皕, 雷雳. (2005). 中学生受欺负状况与心理控制感的关系. 心理发展与教育, 21(1), 91-95.
朱永新. (2017). 家校合作激活教育磁场: 新教育实验“家校合作共育”的理论与实践. 教育研究, 38(11), 75-80.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	林丹华, 冯姝慧, 申子姣, 肖家乐. 流动儿童亲子沟通与同伴侵害亚类别的关系:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 832-844.
[2]	洪德帆, 徐逸杰, 胡茜, 张嘉瑛, 黄莹莹, 毛然, 陈静, 蒋索. 青少年校园受欺凌与自杀意念的关系: 基于潜调节的结构方程模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 706-719.
[3]	李喜, 张鹏程, 汪海彬. 农村中小学寄宿生亲子关系对抑郁的影响:基于变量中心和个体中心的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(4): 524-532.
[4]	黄鹤, 王小英. 正念教养与学前儿童问题行为的关系:亲子关系与心理弹性的链式中介[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(4): 533-541.
[5]	田惠东, 张玉红, 孙昊翔, 李瑛, 哈尼夏. 师生关系对智力障碍学生同伴交往能力的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 44-54.
[6]	李妍, 梁丽婵, 周欣然, 边玉芳. 家师关系与小学生学校态度：师生关系的中介作用及父母差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 74-82.
[7]	辛钊阳, 王庆林, 王明辉, 杜静, 赵国祥. 师生关系与硕士研究生学习适应:科研自我效能和专业承诺的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 825-832.
[8]	胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
[9]	余易达, 潘斌, 苗新煜, 陈光辉. 班级师生关系调节学生反欺凌态度与欺凌行为的关系:一项多水平分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 550-558.
[10]	王英杰, 张刈, 张美霞, 李燕. 母亲正念与幼儿问题行为的关系:正念养育和亲子关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 184-191.
[11]	蒋索, 丁金琦, 刘艳, 陆元圆, 李小青, 陈静. 青少年早期网络欺凌/受欺凌对睡眠质量的影响:社交焦虑和抑郁情绪的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 85-96.
[12]	苏金龙, 苏彦捷. 早期亲子触觉经验促进个体社会性发展的心理机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 739-748.
[13]	王旭, 刘衍玲, 林杰, 刘传星, 魏灵真, 邱涵宇. 亲子关系对中学生心理健康的影响:社会支持和心理素质的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 263-271.
[14]	周宗奎, 曹敏, 田媛, 黄淳, 杨秀娟, 宋友志. 初中生亲子关系与抑郁:自尊和情绪弹性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 864-872.
[15]	任萍, 魏一, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 王璇. 受欺负对抑郁情绪的影响:悲伤、愤怒反刍的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 873-881.