数学概率问题解决学习中的测试效应及有效促进

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.02.08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究通过3个实验,探讨了材料复杂度对数学概率问题解决中测试效应的影响,并在此基础上,进一步考察提取方式对学习者运用提取练习策略解决复杂概率问题的作用效果。结果发现:(1)相比于重学,通过提取练习策略学习简单数学概率问题时的后测成绩更佳,出现测试效应。在学习复杂数学概率问题时,通过提取练习和重学的后测成绩差异不显著,未出现测试效应;(2)相比于重学和自由回忆提取练习,通过线索提取学习复杂数学概率问题的后测成绩更高;(3)相比于重学和无反馈的自由回忆提取练习,通过加入反馈的自由回忆提取练习学习复杂数学概率问题的后测成绩更好。该结果表明,材料难度影响学习者运用提取练习策略学习问题解决任务的效果,并且线索提取练习方式和提供反馈的自由回忆提取练习方式均能有效促进学生学习复杂概率问题解决任务的效果。

关键词: 测试效应, 问题解决任务, 材料复杂度, 提取练习方式, 反馈

Abstract: Three experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of material complexity on the test effect in mathematical probability problem solving, and on this basis, to further examine the effect of retrieval methods on learners' use of retrieval practice strategies to solve complex probability problems.The results were as follows: (1) Compared with restudy, the post-test results were better when learning simple mathematical probability problems through the retrieval practice strategy, and there was a test effect. When learning complex mathematical probability problems, there was no significant difference on post-test scores between the retrieval practice and restudy, and there was no testing effect; (2) Compared with restudy and initial free recall retrieval practice, learning complex mathematical probability problems through cued retrieval is more effective. The post-test scores were higher; (3) Compared with restudy and no-feedback free recall retrieval practice, the post-test results of learning complex mathematical probability problems through the free-recall retrieval practices with feedback were better. The study implied that, complexity of materials affects the learning effect of learners using retrieval practice strategies to solve problem-solving tasks, and both cued retrieval practice and free-recall retrieval practice with feedback can effectively enhance students' learning of complex probability problem-solving task.

Key words: testing effect, problem solving tasks, complexity of material, retrieval practice condition, feedback

中图分类号:

G442

刘岩, 张宏飞, 卢鑫, 曲可佳. 数学概率问题解决学习中的测试效应及有效促进[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 215-223.

LIU Yan, ZHANG Hongfei, LU Xin, QU Kejia. Test Effect in Mathematical Probability Problem Solving Learning and Effective Promotion[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(2): 215-223.

参考文献

Adesope, O. O., Trevisan, D. A., & Sundararajan, N. (2017). Rethinking the use of tests:A meta-analysis of practice testing.Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 659-701.
Aslan., A. & Bäuml, K. H. T. (2016). Testing enhances subsequent learning in older but not in younger elementary school children. Developmental Science, 19(6), 992-998.
Agarwal, P. K., Karpicke, J. D., Kang, S. H., Roediger III, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (2008). Examining the testing effect with open and closed book tests.Applied Cognitive Psychology:The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 22(7), 861-876.
Eglington, L. G., & Kang, S. H. (2018). Retrieval practice benefits deductive inference.Educational Psychology Review, 30(1), 215-228.
Fiechter, J. L., & Benjamin, A. S. (2018). Diminishing-cues retrieval practice:A memory-enhancing technique that works when regular testing doesn't. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(5), 1868-1876.
Foster, N. L., Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2018). Self-regulated learning of principle-based concepts:Do students prefer worked examples, faded examples, or problem solving?Learning and Instruction, 55, 124-138.
Friedman, R. B., Sullivan, K. L., Snider, S. F., Luta, G., & Jones, K. T. (2017). Leveraging the test effect to improve maintenance of the gains achieved through cognitive rehabilitation.Neuropsychology, 31(2), 220-228.
Hinze, S. R., & Wiley, J. (2011). Testing the limits of testing effects using completion tests.Memory, 19(3), 290-304.
Jacoby, L. L., Shimizu, Y., Daniels, K. A., & Rhodes, M. G. (2005). Modes of cognitive control in recognition and source memory:Depth of retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(5), 852-857.
Karpicke, J. D. (2017). Retrieval-based learning:A decade of progress. In J. H. Byrne (Eds.), Learning and Memory:A Comprehensive Reference (2nd ed.,pp. 487-514). Oxford, UK:Elsevier.
Karpicke, J. D., & Aue, W. R. (2015). The testing effect is alive and well with complex materials.Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 317-326.
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2010). Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials?Memory and Cognition, 38, 116-124.
Kornell, N., Bjork, R. A., & Garcia, M. A. (2011). Why tests appear to prevent forgetting:A distribution-based bifurcation model. Journal of Memory & Language. 65(2), 85-97.
Lee, H. S., & Ahn, D. (2018). Testing prepares students to learn better:The forward effect of testing in category learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(2), 203-217.
Leahy, W., Hanham, J., & Sweller, J. (2015). High element interactivity information during problem solving may lead to failure to obtain the testing effect. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 291-304.
Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2019). Cognitive load theory, resource depletion and the delayed testing effect.Educational Psychology Review, 31(4-5), 1-22.
Lima, M. F. R. de., Venâncio, S., Feminella, J., & Buratto, L. G. (2020). Does item difficulty affect the magnitude of the retrieval practice Effect? An evaluation of the retrieval effort Hypothesis. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 23,e31. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2020.33
Ossenberg, C., Henderson, A., & Mitchell, M. (2019). What attributes guide best practice for effective feedback? A scoping review. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 24(2), 383-401.
Paas, F. G., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (1994). Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills:A cognitive-load approach.Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(1), 122-133.
Pan, S. C., & Rickard, T. C. (2018). Transfer of test-enhanced learning:Meta-analytic review and synthesis.Psychological Bulletin, 144(7), 710-756.
Rawson, K. A. (2015). The status of the testing effect for complex materials:Still a winner.Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 327-331.
Rowland, C. A., Littrell-Baez, M. K., Sensenig, A. E., & DeLosh, E. L. (2014). Testing effects in mixed versus pure-list designs. Memory and Cognition, 42(6), 912-921.
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). The power of testing memory basic research and implications for educational practice.Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(3), 181-210.
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load.Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123-138.
Tran, R., Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2015). Retrieval practice:The lack of transfer to deductive inferences.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(1), 135-140.
Tse, C. S., Balota, D. A., & Roediger III, H. L. (2010). The benefits and costs of repeated testing on the learning of face-name pairs in healthy older adults.Psychology & Aging, 25(4), 833- 845.
Tullis, J. G., & Benjamin, A. S. (2015). Cue generation:How learners flexibly support future retrieval.Memory & Cognition, 43(6), 922-938.
Van Gog, T., & Kester, L. (2012). A test of the testing effect:Acquiring problem-solving skills from worked examples. Cognitive Science, 36(8), 1532-1541.
Van Gog, T., & Sweller, J. (2015). Testing after worked example study does not enhance delayed problem-solving performance compared to restudy. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 265-289.
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited:A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 3087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087
Yang, C., Luo, L., Vadillo, M. A., Yu, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2021). Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning:A systematic and meta-analytic review.Psychological Bulletin, 147(4), 399-435.
陈琦, 刘儒德. (2019). 当代教育心理学(第3版). 北京:北京师范大学出版社.
马小凤, 李增艳, 李甜甜, 周爱保. (2019). 提取练习能够促进程序性知识的学习吗?——基于有提示提取的检验[摘要]. 见第二十二届全国心理学学术会议摘要集 (pp. 492-493).中国心理学会.
曲可佳, 杨小彤, 杨立娜, 张丽敏. (2018). 异分母分数加法运算样例学习中的测试效应.辽宁师范大学学报 (社会科学版), 41(06), 38-44.
郑俊, 张玮, 罗良. (2014). 线索强度对测试效应的调节:时间间隔上的差异.心理发展与教育, 30(6), 609-615.
周爱保, 杨天成, 程晨, 马小凤, 赵静. (2015). 多篇章学习中提取练习策略对高阶技能的影响.心理学报, 47(7), 928-938.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	姚琳, 刘福会, 李伟强, 张晓琪, 袁博. 能力社会比较与归因反馈对不诚实行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 778-785.
[2]	严益霞, 刘颜蓥, 丁芳. 心理理论与社会互动方式对初中生社会善念发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 485-494.
[3]	姜永志, 白晓丽, 张璐, 赵思琦. 青少年线上积极自我呈现与幸福感的关系:线上积极反馈与自尊的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 45-53.
[4]	衡书鹏, 赵换方, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 朋友圈点赞与主观幸福感的关系:一个有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 341-349.
[5]	邹雨晨, 丁颖, 张旭然, 李燕芳. 不同类型反馈对儿童学习效果的影响及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 567-575.
[6]	孟男, 王玉慧, 雷雳. 自拍照编辑与女大学生主观幸福感的关系:积极反馈与自我概念的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(6): 751-758.
[7]	孙晓军, 柴唤友, 牛更枫, 崔曦曦, 连帅磊, 田媛. 社交网站中的自我表露对青少年孤独感的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(4): 477-486.
[8]	崔曦曦, 孙晓军, 牛更枫. 社交网站中的自我呈现对青少年友谊质量的影响:积极反馈的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(3): 294-300.
[9]	李永芬, 唐丹丹, 曹碧华, 梁秀玲, 李红. 大学生第二外语词汇学习中的测试效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 198-204.
[10]	郝嘉佳, 陈英和. 小学儿童分享的发展及反馈信息的促进效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(6): 641-647.
[11]	郑俊, 张玮, 罗良. 线索强度对测试效应的调节:时间间隔上的差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 609-615.
[12]	张俊, 刘儒德, 贾玲. 反馈在自我调节学习中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(2): 218-224.
[13]	金颖, 刘翔平, 兰彦婷, 张功, 李开强. 反馈对注意缺损多动障碍儿童错误监控能力的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(4): 359-364.
[14]	王树芳, 莫雷, 金花. 任务难度和反馈学习对儿童类比推理能力的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(1): 24-30.
[15]	孙燕青. 重述：第二语言学习中的重要反馈方式[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2005, 21(4): 116-121.