心理发展与教育 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 465-471.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.04.02

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

“它”是所有者吗?幼儿对所有权主体的理解

李占星1, 朱莉琪2,3   

  1. 1. 西安交通大学人文社会科学学院社会心理学研究所, 西安 710049;
    2. 中国科学院行为科学重点实验室, 中国科学院心理研究所, 北京 100101;
    3. 中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京 100049
  • 发布日期:2021-07-26
  • 通讯作者: 朱莉琪 E-mail:zhulq@psych.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国博士后基金面上项目(2018M633484);西安交通大学基本科研业务费(SK2019018)。

Can It Be Owner? Young Children's Understanding of Ownership Agents

LI Zhanxing1, ZHU Liqi2,3   

  1. 1. Institute of Social Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049;
    2. CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101;
    3. Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049
  • Published:2021-07-26

摘要: 所有者是所有权关系的重要组成部分。社会秩序的正常运行也需要我们合理地判断所有者。本研究考查幼儿能否像成人一样,区分可能的所有者和不可能的所有者。研究采用等级评定的方式,考查了3~5岁幼儿和成人对“什么是所有者”的直觉理解。结果发现,无论是成人还是幼儿,均认为能力健全者、能力不健全者是所有者,但不认为人造物可能是所有者。3~5岁幼儿评价动植物是所有者的可能性显著高于成人,表明相对于成人,他们仍存在认为动植物是所有者的倾向。研究提示,幼儿对所有权主体的理解既与成人之间存在一致性也存在差异,成人可以基于幼儿的所有权认知引导儿童正确理解所有权概念,进而提高幼儿在该领域的社会认知。

关键词: 幼儿, 所有权, 所有者, 主体, 人造物, 动植物

Abstract: An essential component in the ownership relationship is the owner. To understand who is the owner of an object is important for the normal running of society. This study explored whether young children could discriminate the possible owner from the impossible owner like adults. With a rank-order method, we recruited 93 3~5-year-olds as subjects and a group of adults as comparison to detect preschoolers' intuitions about what can be the owner. The results showed that whether adults or young preschoolers, they all accepted that competent humans as well as incompetent humans could be owners, but denied that artifacts could be owners. The evaluation of 3~5-year-old children on the possibility that animals and plants are owners is significantly higher than that of adults, indicating that compared with adults, they still have the tendency to think that animals and plants are owners. The results demonstrate that there are consistencies and differences between young children and adults in the understanding of ownership agents. We can guide children to understand ownership concept correctly based on development of ownership cognition, so as to improve their social cognition in this field.

Key words: preschooler, ownership, owner, agent, artifacts, animals and plants

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Bentham, J. (1911). Objects of the civil law. In Bentham J. & Hildreth, R.(Transl.). Theory of Legislation (pp.93-157). Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Company.
Blake, P. R., & Harries, P. L. (2011). Early representation of ownership. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 132, 39-51.
Chow, G. C. (1997). Challenges of china's economic system for economic theory. American Economic Review, 87(2), 321-327.
Djalal, F. M., Ameel, E., & Storms, G. (2016). The typicality ranking task:A new method to derive typicality judgments from children.PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0157936.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157936
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human:A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864-886.
Fasig, L. G. (2000). Toddlers' understanding of ownership:Implications for self-concept development. Social Development, 9(3), 370-382.
Fouquet,N., Megalakaki,O., & Labrell, F. (2017). Children's understanding of animal, plant, and artifact properties between 3 and 6 years. Infant & Child Development, 26, e2032.https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2032
Friedman, O. (2009). First possession beyond the law:Adults' and young children's intuitions about ownership. Tulane Law Review, 83(1), 1-12.
Friedman, O., & Neary, K. R. (2008). Determining who owns what:Do children infer ownership from first possession? Cognition, 107, 829-849.
Friedman, O., Van de Vondervoort, J. W., Defeyter, M. A., & Neary, K. R. (2013). First possession, history, and young children's ownership judgments. Child Development, 84(5), 1519-1525.
Hay, D. F. (2006). Yours and mine:Toddlers' talk about possessions with familiar peers. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(1), 39-52
Kalish, C. W., & Anderson, C. D. (2011). Ownership as a social status. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 132, 65-77.
Kanngiesser, P., Gjersoe, N., & Hood, B. M. (2010). The effect of creative labor on property-ownership transfer by preschool children and adults. Psychological Science, 21(9), 1236-1241.
Kanngiesser, P., Itakura, S., & Hood, B. M. (2014). The effect of labor on ownership decisions in two cultures:Developmental evidence from Japan and the United Kingdom. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 32(3), 320-329.
Kanngiesser, P., Itakura, S., Zhou, Y., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., & Hood, B. (2015). The role of social eye-gaze in children's and adults' ownership attributions to robotic agents in three cultures. Interaction Studies, 16(1), 1-28.
Kanngiesser, P., Rossano, F., & Tomasello, M. (2015). Late emergence of the first possession heuristic:Evidence from a small-scale culture. Child Development, 86(4),1282-1289.
Li, Z., Qi, M., Yu, J., & Zhu, L. (2018). Who is the rightful owner? Young children's ownership judgments in different transfer contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1314.
Macpherson, C. B. (1978). The meaning of property. In C.B. Macpherson(Ed.), Property:Mainstream and Critical Positions (p.2). Canada, Toroto:University of Toronto Press.
Murray, L. K. (Ed.).(2007). Mirror of morality:Chinese narrative illustration and Confucian ideology. Honolulu:University of Hawaii Press.
Nancekivell, S. E., Friedman, O., & Gelman, S. A. (2019). Ownership matters:People possess a naïve theory of ownership. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(2), 102-113.
Nancekivell, S. E., Millar, C. J., Summers, P. C., & Friedman, O. (2016). Ownership rights. In J. Sytsma & W. Buckwalter (Eds.), A Companion to Experimental Philosophy(p.23). Blackwell:John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Neary, K. R., Van de Vondervoort, J. W., & Friedman, O. (2012). Artifacts and natural kinds:Children's judgments about whether objects are owned. Developmental Psychology, 48(1), 149-158.
Noles, N. S., & Keil, F. C. (2011). Exploring ownership in a developmental context. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 132, 91-103.
Noles, N. S., Keil, F. C., Bloom, P., & Gelman, S. A. (2012). Children's and adults' intuitions about who can own things. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 12(3-4), 265-286.
Okanda, M., & Itakura, S. (2007). When do children exhibit a "yes" bias? Child Development, 81(2), 568-580.
Piaget, J. (Ed.).(1929). The child's conception of the world. New York:Harcourt, Brace.
Rakoczy, H., & Schmidt, M. F. (2013). The early ontogeny of social norms. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 17-21.
Rochat, P., Robbins, E., Passos-Ferreira, C., Oliva, A. D., Dias, M. D. G., & Guo, L. P. (2014). Ownership reasoning in children across cultures. Cognition, 132(3), 471-484.
Rossano, F., Rakoczy, H., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Young children's understanding of violations of property rights. Cognition, 121, 219-227.
Starmans, C., & Friedman, O. (2016). If I am free, you can't own me:Autonomy makes entities less ownable. Cognition, 148, 145-153.
Van de Vondervoort, J. W., & Friedman, O. (2015). Children have difficulty using object location to recognize when natural objects are owned. Cognitive Development, 35, 50-64.
Wellmen, H. M., & Gelman, S. A. (1992). Cognitive development:Foundational theories of core domains. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 337-375.
李占星, 朱莉琪. (2016). 儿童基于不同线索的所有权判断及其文化差异. 心理科学进展, 24(12), 1889-1896.
亢蓉, 方富熹. (2005). 幼儿朴素理论发展的研究现状. 心理科学进展, 13(1), 53-58.
刘璐, 肖雪, 刘丽莎, 徐良苑, 张旭然, 李燕芳. (2019). 儿童在不同卷入情境下基于资源价值的分配行为特点:内群体偏爱的作用. 心理学报, 51(5), 584-597.
亚当·斯密. (2016). 国富论(冉明志 译). 中国台湾:台海出版社.
[1] 高子惠, 焦雨, 王曦, 刘肖岑. 电子绘本文字的动静态呈现方式对幼儿阅读体验和学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 817-824.
[2] 王英杰, 栾金鑫, 李燕. 母亲养育压力与幼儿焦虑的关系:亲子冲突的中介作用和母亲正念的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 702-709.
[3] 张文洁, 范增, 黎蕾, 刘毅, 钟毅平. 接受对象的常规行为与资源需求对5~6岁幼儿分享行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 465-472.
[4] 牛湘, 冉光明. 同伴关系与幼儿问题行为关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 473-487.
[5] 刘双, 李梅, 冯晓杭, 张向葵. 幼儿掌控动机与能力关系的纵向研究:任务类型与气质的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 161-172.
[6] 王英杰, 张刈, 张美霞, 李燕. 母亲正念与幼儿问题行为的关系:正念养育和亲子关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 184-191.
[7] 刘晓洁, 李燕. 母亲感知的共同教养对幼儿行为问题的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 626-634.
[8] 张和颐, 洪秀敏. 家庭认知环境与0~3岁婴幼儿发展的关系:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 178-185.
[9] 王薇, 贡德英, 程春, 陈科, 李永鑫, 闫晶晶. 5~7岁自闭症谱系障碍幼儿数感的特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 818-825.
[10] 刘田田, 李燕, 李有嘉, 姜新苗. 父母协同教养与学前儿童社会行为的关系:亲子关系和同胞关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 638-647.
[11] 周思妤, 王艺卓, 李晓巍. 幼儿园新教师学历与离职意向的关系:入职适应、工作满意度的多重中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 675-682.
[12] 贺晓玲, 陈俊, 刘灵, 张甜. 3~5岁幼儿职业声望垂直空间、大小双重隐喻发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 457-464.
[13] 郑晨烨, 黄焰, 王静梅, 姜存对, 卢英俊. 面孔线索对4~6岁幼儿真人与卡通面孔记忆的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 472-480.
[14] 施芳婷, 郑晨烨, 颜秀琳, 陆露, 王静梅, 邸波, 卢英俊. 5~6岁幼儿对不同文化背景卡通面孔再认的眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 323-334.
[15] 王佳乐, 张慧, 杨敏. 情绪效价与面孔类型对幼儿无意视盲的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 153-158.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!