心理发展与教育 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 313-322.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.03.02

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

儿童空间观点采择的自动性及其发展

左婷婷1, 胡清芬2   

  1. 1. 南京师范大学心理学院, 南京 210003;
    2. 北京师范大学发展心理研究院, 北京 100875
  • 发布日期:2021-05-18
  • 通讯作者: 胡清芬 E-mail:qingfenhu@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年项目“空间位置表征中自我参照与环境参照的发展与个体差异”(31500900);安徽省高校人文社会科学研究一般项目“心理理论中视角采择的发展特点与影响因素研究”(SK2018B02);滁州学院课程综合改革项目“儿童发展心理学”(2018kcgg047)。

The Automaticity of Children's Spatial Perspective-taking and Its Development

ZUO Tingting1, HU Qingfen2   

  1. 1. School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 239000;
    2. Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Published:2021-05-18

摘要: 使用空间观点采择任务,探究7~11岁儿童的空间观点采择的自动性和发展趋势。结果发现:(1)在他人任务中,正确率随着角度的增长而减小;(2)在自我任务中,相比于空间关系不一致时,一致时的正确率更高,且反向的一致性效应出现在150°~180°间。本研究结果显示:本项空间观点采择任务对儿童有效;7~9岁的儿童可以自动进行空间转换;11岁的儿童可以自动进行需要判断左右位置的空间观点采择。本研究首次证明,11岁是儿童自动进行需要判断左右位置的空间观点采择的相对年龄转折点。

关键词: 空间观点采择, 儿童, 自动性, 发展趋势

Abstract: In this study, we used spatial perspective-taking task to examine the automaticity and developmental trajectory of spatial perspective-taking for children aged 7~11. The results showed that:(1) In the other tasks, the accuracy decreased as the angular disparity between the doll and the subject increased; (2) In the self tasks when the spatial relationship were consistent, the correct rates was higher than when the spatial relationship was inconsistent. And the reverse consistency effect appeared when the angular disparity between the doll and the subject was during 150°~180°. The results of this study prove that the task of this study is an effective spatial perspective-taking task for children. Seven to nine-year-old children can automatically transform spatial perspectives. Eleven-year-old children can automatically make spatial perspective-taking that needs to make left-right judgements. This study demonstrates for the first time that the age of eleven is the relative turning point in the age at which children automatically make spatial perspective-taking that needs to make left-right judgements.

Key words: spatial perspective-taking, children, automaticity, developmental trajectory

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Bukowski, H., Hietanen, J. K., & Samson, D. (2015). From gaze cueing to perspective taking:Revisiting the claim that we automatically compute where or what other people are looking at. Visual Cognition, 23(8), 1020-1042.
Frick, A., Möhring, W., & Newcombe, N. S. (2014). Picturing perspectives:Development of perspective-taking abilities in 4-to 8-year-olds. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 386.
Kessler, K., & Thomson, L. A. (2010). The embodied nature of spatial perspective taking:Embodied transformation versus sensorimotor interference. Cognition, 114(1), 72-88.
Kozhevnikov, M., & Hegarty, M. (2001). A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability. Memory & Cognition, 29(5), 745-756.
Michelon, P., & Zacks, J. M. (2006). Two kinds of visual perspective taking. Perception & Psychophysics, 68(2), 327-337.
Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity:A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 297-326.
Nardini, M., Burgess, N., Breckenridge, K., & Atkinson, J. (2006). Differential developmental trajectories for egocentric, environmental and intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. Cognition, 101(1), 153-172.
Surtees, A. D. R., & Apperly, I. (2012). Egocentrism and automatic perspective taking in children and adults. Child Development, 83(2), 452-460.
Surtees, A.D.R., Apperly, I., & Samson, D. (2013). Similarities and differences in visual and spatial perspective-taking processes. Cognition, 129(2), 426-438.
Surtees, A. D. R., Butterfill, S. A., & Apperly, I. (2012). Direct and indirect measures of level-2 perspective-taking in children and adults. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30(1), 75-86.
Vander Heyden, K. M., Huizinga, M., Raijmakers, M. E. J., & Jolles, J. (2017). Children's representations of another person's spatial perspective:Different strategies for different viewpoints?. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 153, 57-73.
Zacks, J. M., & Michelon, P. (2005). Transformations of visuospatial images. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 4(2), 96-118.
左婷婷, 胡清芬. (2018). 成人空间视角采择的自动性. 心理与行为研究, 16(2), 170-179.
[1] 储月, 刘希平, 徐慧, 唐卫海. 儿童社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 153-159.
[2] 刘艳春, 邓玉婷, 张曦. 智力障碍儿童对不同对象的分享行为:心理理论的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 160-168.
[3] 梁丹丹, 闫晓民, 葛志林. 4~8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童基于语言线索的情绪识别能力发展研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 169-175.
[4] 史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[5] 冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[6] 赵京伟, 陈晓旭, 任立文, 耿喆, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与小学儿童焦虑:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[7] 朱娜平, 刘雁伶, 熊红梅, 赵攀. “公无远近”有早晚:不同资源分配情境中儿童公平规范执行行为发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 772-780.
[8] 颜志强, 周可, 曾晓, 徐惠, 朱晓倩, 张娟. 学前期儿童执行功能与攻击性行为的关系:认知共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[9] 任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
[10] 李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[11] 银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[12] 赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[13] 张玉平, 董琼, 宋爽, 舒华. 小学低年级儿童的阅读发展轨迹:早期语言认知技能的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 210-218.
[14] 李君, 王悦, 陈夏妮, 李莹. 二语学习对汉语学龄儿童认知控制与词汇通达的作用——年龄和二语熟练程度的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 219-227.
[15] 鲁明辉, 王融, 张丽敏. 父母心理弹性与自闭症谱系障碍儿童情绪行为问题的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 247-254.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!