同伴地位对青少年早期不同类型攻击行为发展的影响:性别与班级规范的调节作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.01.05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用同伴提名法，对2470名初二学生进行为期半年的追踪研究，考察两种同伴地位（社会喜好和社会支配）对三种攻击类型（身体、言语和关系攻击）发展的预测，以及性别与班级规范在其中的调节作用。多层线性分析发现：（1）社会喜好负向、社会支配正向预测个体半年后的三类攻击行为，且男生的社会喜好对关系攻击的预测作用强于女生；（2）对于男生而言，身体和言语攻击的班级规范强化个体后续的攻击行为，但关系攻击的班级规范则无显著影响；对于女生而言，身体攻击的班级规范强化个体后续的攻击行为，言语和关系攻击的班级规范强化初始攻击水平低的个体相应的攻击行为、而对于初始攻击水平高的个体表现出弱化效应；（3）班级规范还能调节社会支配对攻击行为的影响，在言语攻击规范高的班级中，社会支配对个体言语攻击的正向预测作用更强。

关键词: 攻击类型, 班级规范, 同伴地位, 性别, 青少年早期

Abstract: Using peer nomination procedure, a longitudinal study of 2470 students in grade eight was carried out to investigate the impact of prior aggression, social preference, social dominance on physical, verbal and relational aggression, and whether these effects would be moderated by gender and corresponding classroom norms. Multilevel linear analysis found that:(1) Social preference negatively predicted adolescents' aggression half a year later, while social dominance positively predicted it, and the effect of social preference on relational aggression was stronger for boys. (2) The moderating effects of class norms were different for boys and girls. For boys, higher levels of class norms on physical and verbal aggression, but not relational aggression, were associated with increases in subsequent aggressive behavior. For girls, with the increase of class norm on physical aggression, all of their physical aggression went up; but with the increase of class norm on verbal or relational aggression, their verbal or relational aggressive behavior rose only for girls whose initial level of aggression were low. (3) Social dominance positively predicted verbal aggression over time, especially in the classrooms with higher level of class norm.

Key words: aggression, class norm, peer status, gender, early adolescence

张云运, 牛丽丽, 任萍, 秦幸娜. 同伴地位对青少年早期不同类型攻击行为发展的影响:性别与班级规范的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(1): 38-48.

ZHANG Yunyun, NIU Lili, REN Ping, QIN Xingna. Effects of Peer status on Different Types of Aggression in Early Adolescence: Moderating Effects of Gender and Class Aggression Norms[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(1): 38-48.

参考文献

Adams, R. E., Bartlett, N. H., & Bukowski, W. M. (2010). Peer victimization and social dominance as intervening variables of the link between peer liking and relational aggression. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(1), 102-121.

Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1998). Peer power:Preadolescent culture and identity. New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press.

Andreou, E. (2006). Social preference, perceived popularity and social intelligence:Relations to overt and relational aggression. School Psychology International, 27(3), 339-351.

Allen, J. P., Porter, M. R., Mcfarland, F. C., Marsh, P., & Mcelhaney, K. B. (2005). The two faces of adolescents' success with peers:adolescent popularity, social adaptation, and deviant behavior. Child Development, 76(3), 747-760.

Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings:A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8(4), 291-322.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory:An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26.

Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18(2), 117-127.

Boor-Klip, H. J., Segers, E., Hendrickx, M. M., & Cillessen, A. H. (2015). The moderating role of classroom descriptive norms in the association of student behavior with social preference and popularity. Journal of Early Adolescence, 37(6), 414-426.

Boulton, M. J., & Smith, P. K. (1990). Affective bias in children's perceptions of dominance relationships. Child Development, 61(1), 221-229.

Busching, R., & Krahé, B. (2015). The girls set the tone:Gendered classroom norms and the development of aggression in adolescence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(5), 659-676.

Chang, L. (2004). The role of classroom norms in contextualizing the relations of children's social behaviors to peer acceptance. Developmental Psychology, 40(5), 691-702.

Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A focus theory of normative conduct:A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24(1), 201-234.

Cillessen, A. H., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement:Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child development, 75(1), 147-163.

Closson, L. M., & Hymel, S. (2016). Status Differences in Target-Specific Prosocial Behavior and Aggression. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(9), 1836-1848.

Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status:a cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557-570.

Cowie, H., & Jennifer, D. (2008). New perspectives on bullying. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Crick, N. R. (1997). Engagement in gender normative versus nonnormative forms of aggression:Links to social-psychological adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 610-617.

Crick, N. R., Casas, J. F., & Mosher, M. (1997). Relational and overt aggression in preschool. Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 579-588.

Dijkstra, J. K., & Gest, S. D. (2015). Peer norm salience for academic achievement, prosocial behavior, and bullying:implications for adolescent school experiences. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(1), 79-96.

Dijkstra, J. K., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. (2008). Beyond the class norm:bullying behavior of popular adolescents and its relation to peer acceptance and rejection. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(8), 1289-1299.

Dijkstra, J. K., Cillessen, A. H. N., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. (2010). Same-Gender and Cross-Gender Likeability:Associations with Popularity and Status Enhancement:The TRAILS study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(6), 773-802.

Dishion, T. J., & Tipsord, J. M. (2011). Peer contagion in child and adolescent social and emotional development. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 189-214.

Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models:A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121.

Faris, R., & Felmlee, D. (2011). Status struggles:network centrality and gender segregation in same-and cross-gender aggression. American Sociological Review, 76(1), 48-73.

Hartup, W. W. (1996). The company they keep:Friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67(1), 1-13.

Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance:A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19(1), 97-132.

Hawley, P. H. (2003). Strategies of control, aggression, and morality in preschoolers:An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85(3), 213-235.

Hawley, P. H. (2015). Social dominance in childhood and its evolutionary underpinnings:why it matters and what we can do. Pediatrics, 135(Supplement 2), S31-S38.

Henry, D., Guerra, N., Huesmann, R., Tolan, P., Vanacker, R., & Eron, L. (2000). Normative influences on aggression in urban elementary school classrooms. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(1), 59-81.

Kellam, S. G., Ling, X., Merisca, R., Brown, C. H., & Ialongo, N. (1998). The effect of the level of aggression in the first grade classroom on the course and malleability of aggressive behavior into middle school. Development and Psychopathology, 10(02), 165-185.

Krahé, B., & Busching, R. (2014). Interplay of normative beliefs and behavior in developmental patterns of physical and relational aggression in adolescence:a four-wave longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5,1146.

La Freniere, P., & Charlesworth, W. R. (1983). Dominance, attention, and affiliation in a preschool group:a nine-month longitudinal study. Ethology & Sociobiology, 4(2), 55-67.

Laninga-Wijnen, L., Harakeh, Z., Steglich, C., Dijkstra, J. K., Veenstra, R., & Vollebergh, W. (2017). The norms of popular peers moderate friendship dynamics of adolescent aggression. Child Development, 88(4), 1265-1283.

Lease, A. M., Musgrove, K. T., & Axelrod, J. L. (2002). Dimensions of social status in preadolescent peer groups:likability, perceived popularity, and social dominance. Review of Social Development, 11(4), 508-533.

Li, Y., & Wright, M. F. (2014). Adolescents' Social Status Goals:Relationships to Social Status Insecurity, Aggression, and Prosocial Behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(1), 146-160.

Mayeux, L., Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2008). Is being popular a risky proposition? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18(1), 49-74.

Mcquade, J. D., Breaux, R. P., Miller, R., & Mathias, L. (2016). Executive functioning and engagement in physical and relational aggression among children with ADHD. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 45(5),899-910.

Noakes, M. A., & Rinaldi, C. M. (2006). Age and gender differences in peer conflict. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 35(6), 881-891.

Olthof, T., Goossens, F. A., Vermande, M. M., Aleva, E. A., & van der Meulen, M. (2011). Bullying as strategic behavior:Relations with desired and acquired dominance in the peer group. Journal of School Psychology, 49(3), 339-359.

Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2001). Dominance in early adolescent boys:Affiliative and aggressive dimensions and possible functions. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47(1), 142-163.

Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437-448.

Renouf, A., Brendgen, M., Parent, S., Vitaro, F., Zelazo, P. D., & Boivin, M., et al. (2010). Relations between theory of mind and indirect and physical aggression in kindergarten:evidence of the moderating role of prosocial behaviors. Review of Social Development, 19(3), 535-555.

Rohlf, H., Krahé, B., & Busching, R. (2016). The socializing effect of classroom aggression on the development of aggression and social rejection:a two-wave multilevel analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 58, 57-72.

Scholte, R., Sentse, M., & Granic, I. (2010). Do actions speak louder than words? Classroom attitudes and behavior in relation to bullying in early adolescence. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 39(6), 789-799.

Sentse, M., Scholte, R., Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2007). Person-group dissimilarity in involvement in bullying and its relation with social status. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(6), 1009-1019.

Sentse, M., Veenstra, R., Kiuru, N., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). A longitudinal multilevel study of individual characteristics and classroom norms in explaining bullying behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(5), 943-955.

Shachar, K., Ronen-Rosenbaum, T., Rosenbaum, M., Orkibi, H., & Hamama, L. (2016). Reducing child aggression through sports intervention:the role of self-control skills and emotions. Children & Youth Services Review, 71, 241-249.

Shi, B., & Xie, H. (2012). Socialization of physical and social aggression in early adolescents' peer groups:high-status peers, individual status, and gender. Review of Social Development, 21(1), 170-194.

Thomas, D. E., Bierman, K. L., & Powers, C. J. (2011). The influence of classroom aggression and classroom climate on aggressive-disruptive behavior. Child Development, 82(3), 751-757.

Vaillancourt, T., & Hymel, S. (2006). Aggression and social status:the moderating roles of sex and peer-valued characteristics. Aggressive Behavior, 32(4), 396-408.

Veenstra, R., Dijkstra, J. K., & Kreager, D. A. (2017). Pathways, networks, and norms. A sociological perspective on peer research. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K. H. Rubin (eds.) Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. New York, NY:Guilford.

Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., & Barker, E. D. (2006). Subtypes of aggressive behaviors:A developmental perspective. Interntional Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(1), 12-19.

Wang, M. (2017). Harsh parenting and peer acceptance in Chinese early adolescents:three child aggression subtypes as mediators and child gender as moderator. Child Abuse & Neglect, 63, 30-40.

Zwaan, M., Dijkstra, J. K., & Veenstra, R. (2013). Status hierarchy, attractiveness hierarchy and sex ratio:Three contextual factors explaining the status-aggression link among adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 37(3), 211-221.

冯华润. (2014). 青少年同伴群体中的社会地位. (Doctoral dissertation, 华东师范大学).

孔艳红, 赵伟佳, 陈光辉. (2016). 群体视角同伴地位与个体视角同伴地位的关系. 青少年学刊,(1), 59-64.

覃玉宇. (2004). 童年中期儿童的攻击行为对同伴关系的影响研究(博士学位论文),华中师范大学,武汉.

王美芳, 闫秀梅, 姚利. (2010). 儿童青少年对身体攻击和关系攻击的道德判断. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(4), 523-525.

魏华, 范翠英, 周宗奎, 田媛, 亓艳丽. (2011). 不同性别儿童的关系攻击、友谊质量和孤独感的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 19(5), 681-683.

魏星, 纪林芹, 陈亮, 吕娜, 张文新. (2012). 青少年早期攻击和违纪行为的关系:受欢迎度的调节作用. 心理与行为研究, 10(5), 355-361.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系：双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2]	王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[3]	邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[4]	李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[5]	辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[6]	赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[7]	汪悦, 熊昱可, 任萍, 杨柳, 苗薇. 受欺负对初中生主动性和反应性攻击的影响:道德推脱和性别的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 410-418.
[8]	李小青, 刘银章, 汪玥, 蒋索. 暴力暴露对不同性别青少年早期校园欺凌的影响:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 255-265.
[9]	李奕萱, 王泽宇, 周铭扬, 杨玉川, 赵敏翔, 董妍. 高中生物理和化学学科中同伴学业支持与学业情绪的关系:学习效能感的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 58-67.
[10]	蒋索, 丁金琦, 刘艳, 陆元圆, 李小青, 陈静. 青少年早期网络欺凌/受欺凌对睡眠质量的影响:社交焦虑和抑郁情绪的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 85-96.
[11]	诸钟烨, 谢于宏, 刘雷. 正负参照点下性别和损益情景对大学生延迟折扣的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 618-625.
[12]	李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[13]	白荣, 闫嵘, 王千, 李叶, 邢淑芬. 学前儿童执行功能与问题行为的关系:情境和性别的特异性[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 35-44.
[14]	刘春晖, 刘思佳, 郭筱琳, 罗良. 母亲男孩偏好和亲子沟通的关系:子女性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 64-71.
[15]	李启明. 双元孝道代际传递:亲子性别和子女年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 808-817.