心理发展与教育 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 691-699.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.06.07

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

网络成瘾倾向者对负性表情注意的脱离困难

雷玉菊1,2,3, 贺金波2,3, 牛更枫2,3, 周宗奎2,3, 田媛2,3   

  1. 1. 华中师范大学, 国家数字化学习工程技术研究中心, 武汉 430079;
    2. 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430079;
    3. 华中师范大学心理学院, 武汉 430079
  • 出版日期:2017-11-15 发布日期:2017-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 周宗奎,E-mail:zhouzk@mail.ccnu.edu.cn E-mail:zhouzk@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    本研究得到国家社科基金重大项目(11&ZD151);国家自然科学基金面上项目(31571139);华中师范大学专项资金项目(CCNU14Z02004,CCNU15A02042);北京师范大学中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心课题(2016-04-003-BZK01)的资助。

Impaired Disengagement from Negative Emotional Faces in Youth with Internet Addiction

LEI Yuju1,2,3, HE Jinbo2,3, NIU Gengfeng2,3, ZHOU Zongkui2,3, TIAN Yuan2,3   

  1. 1. National Engineering Research Center for E-Learning, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079;
    2. Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079;
    3. School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079
  • Online:2017-11-15 Published:2017-11-15

摘要: 采用Young编制的IAT量表从382名青少年中筛选出网络成瘾倾向者15名,非网络成瘾控制组被试18名,利用视觉搜索范式比较了两组被试对真人面孔和卡通面孔表情的注意偏向差异。结果表明:(1)在注意快速定向阶段,当要求被试快速准确地从中性面孔矩阵中搜索高兴或者愤怒面孔时,相较于控制组被试,网络成瘾倾向者搜索愤怒面孔更迅速,尤其表现为对卡通愤怒面孔的快速定向优势;(2)在注意的维持和脱离阶段,当在愤怒或高兴面孔矩阵中搜索中性面孔时,相较于控制组被试,网络成瘾倾向者在更具威胁性的真人愤怒面孔矩阵中最难脱离。结论:网络成瘾倾向者具有负性注意偏向特点,表现为对负性表情具有快速定向和解脱困难。且相较于控制组被试,网络成瘾倾向者对卡通面孔注意定向更快而更难从真人愤怒面孔矩阵中脱离,也说明了其注意偏向主要为对负性信息的注意解除困难。

关键词: 网络成瘾, 真人面孔, 卡通面孔, 注意偏向, 视觉搜索任务

Abstract: It has been consistently found that Internet Addiction Disorder(IAD) has deficits in realistic social interaction while not in online interaction. The ability to perceive human face is the basis of social activities. Realistic and online interaction deal with different kinds of faces, the former is usually realistic faces while the latter is usually cartoon faces.A visual search paradigm was used to investigate attentional biases to realisticistic and cartoon emotinal faces in individuals who suffer from Internet Addiction Disorder and in controls.Totally 382 adolescents were identified based on Young's Online Internet Addiction test (IAT), and were selected15 IADs, and 18 HCs.The results showed that IADs showed quick orientation to angry face in real face and cartoon face condition; especially with showing the fastest detecting the angry face from the cartoon face matrix. More importantly, compared with the HCs, IADs had difficult disengagement from angry faces only in real face condition. IADs showed more negative emotional attentional bias to realisticistic faces than cartoon faces, with taking a longer time to disengage from realistic faces matrix. The results suggested that difficult disengagement from threatening stimuliaffect IADs' attentional bias to realisticistic and cartoon emotional faces.

Key words: internet addiction, realface, cartoon face, attentional bias, visual search task

Amichai-Hamburger, Y., & Hayat, Z. (2011). The impact of the Internet on the social lives of users:A representative sample from 13 countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (1), 585-589.

Amir, N., Beard, C., Taylor, C. T., Klumpp, H., Elias, J., Burns, M., et al. (2009). Attentiontraining in individuals with generalized social phobia:A randomized controlledtrial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77 (5), 961-973.

Bane, C. M. H., Cornish, M., Erspamer, N., Kampman, L. (2010). Self-disclosure through weblogs and perceptionsof online and "real-life" friendships among femalebloggers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and SocialNetworking, 13 (2), 131-139.

Bishop, S. J. (2009). Trait anxiety and impoverishedprefrontal control of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 12 (1), 92-98.

Caplan, S. E. (2007). Relations Among Loneliness, Social Anxiety, and Problematic Internet Use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10 (2), 234-242.

Cisler, J. M., Bacon, A. K., & Williams, N. L. (2009). Phenomenological characteristics of attentional biases towards threat:Acritical review. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 33 (2), 221-234.

Cisler, J. M., & Koster, E. H. (2010). Mechanisms ofattentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders:Anintegrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30 (2), 203-216.

Çek, D., Sánchez, A., & Timpano, K. R. (2016). Social Anxiety-Linked Attention Bias to Threat Is Indirectly Related to Post-Event Processing Via Subjective Emotional Reactivity to Social Stress. Behavior therapy, 47 (3), 377-387.

Dong, G. H., Lin, X., Zhou, H. li., & Lu, Q. L. (2014). Cognitive flexibility in internet addicts:fMRI evidence from difficult-to-easy and easy-to-difficult switching situations. Addictive Behaviors, 39 (3), 677-683.

Dodd, H. F., Vogt, J., Turkileri, N., & Notebaert, L. (2017). Task relevance of emotional information affects anxiety-linked attention bias in visual search. Biological psychology, 122, 13-20.

Eimer, M., & Holmes, A. (2002). An ERP study on the time course of emotional face processing. Neuroreport, 13 (4), 427-431.

Eimer, M., Holmes, A., & McGlone, F. P. (2003). The role of spatial attention in the processing of facial expression:An ERP study of rapid brain responses to six basic emotions. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3 (2), 97-110.

Fox, E., Russo, R., & Dutton, K. (2002). Attentional bias for threat:Evidence for delayed disengagement from emotional faces. Cognition & Emotion, 16 (3), 355-379.

Gilboa-Schechtman, E., Foa, E. B., & Amir, N. (1999). Attentional biases for facial expressions in social phobia:The face-in-the-crowd paradigm. Cognition & Emotion, 13 (3), 305-318.

Green, Tom, Wilhelmsen, Tiril, Wilmots, Eva, Dodd, Beth, & Quinn, Sally. (2016). Social anxiety, attributes of online communication and self-disclosure across private and public Facebook communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 206-213.

He, J.-b., Liu, C.-j., Guo, Y.-y., & Zhao, L. (2011). Deficits in early-stage face perception in excessive internet users. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Internet, 14 (5), 303-308.

Lazarov, A., Abend, R., & Bar-Haim, Y. (2016). Social anxiety is related to increased dwell time on socially threatening faces. J ournal of Affective Disorders, 193, 282-288.

Lee, B. W., & Stapinski, L. A. (2012). Seeking safety on the internet:Relationship between social anxiety and problematic internet use. Journal of Anxiety Disorder, 26 (1), 197-205.

Martonik, M., & Loka, J. (2016). Do World of Warcraft (MMORPG) players experience less loneliness and social anxiety in online world (virtual environment) than in real world (offline)? Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 127-134.

Odac?, H., & Kalkan, M. (2010). Problematic Internet use, loneliness and dating anxiety among young adult university students. Computers & Education, 55 (3), 1091-1097.

Okdie, B. M., Guadagno, R. E., Bernieri, F. J., Geers, A. L.,& McLarney-Vesotski, A. R. (2011). Getting to know you:Face-to-face versus online interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 27 (1), 153-159.

Schupp, H. T., Öhman, A., Junghöfer, M., Weike, A. I., Stockburger, J., & Hamm, A. O. (2004). The facilitated processing of threatening faces:an ERP analysis. Emotion, 4 (2), 189-200.

Shalom, J. G., Israeli, H., Markovitzky, O., & Lipsitz, J. D. (2015). Social anxiety andphysiological arousal during computer mediated vs. face to face communication. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 202-208.

Sheppes, G., Luria, R., Fukuda, K., & Gross, J. J. (2013).There's more to anxiety than meets the eye:Isolatingthreat-related attentional engagement and disengagement biases. Emotion, 13 (3), 520-528.

Suler, J. R. (1999). To get what you need:healthy and pathological Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2 (5), 385-393.

Taylor, Charles T., Bomyea, Jessica, & Amir, Nader. (2010). Attentional bias away from positive social information mediates the link between social anxiety and anxiety vulnerability to a social stressor. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 24 (4), 403-408.

van Rooij, A. J., Schoenmakers, T. M., van de Eijnden, R., & van de Mheen, D. (2010). Compulsive Internet Use:The Role of Online Gaming and Other Internet Applications. Journal of Adolescent Health, 47 (1), 51-57.

Weidman, A. C., Fernandez, K. C., Levinson, C. A., Augustine, A. A., Larsen, R. J., & Rodebaugh, T. L. (2012). Compensatory internet use among individuals higher in social anxiety and its implications for well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(3), 191-195.

Young, K. S. (2009). Internet Addiction Test (IAT). In. www.netaddiction.net

邓林园, 方晓义, 万晶晶, 张锦涛,夏翠翠. (2012). 大学生心理需求及其满足与网络成瘾的关系. 心理科学, 35(1), 123-128.

高鹏程, 黄敏儿. (2008). 高焦虑特质的注意偏向. 心理学报,40(3), 307-318.

龚栩, 黄宇霞, 王妍, 罗跃嘉. (2011). 中国面孔表情图片系统的修订. 中国心理卫生杂志, 5(1), 40-46.

贺金波, 陈昌润, 贺司琪, 周宗奎. (2014). 网络社交存在较低的社交焦虑水平吗? 心理科学进展, 22(2), 288-294.

贺金波, 洪伟琦, 鲍远纯, 雷玉菊. (2012). 网络成瘾者的大脑异于常人吗? 心理科学进展, 20(12), 2033-2041.

李沐曦. (2010). 网络成瘾者的注意偏向研究(硕士研究生学位论文). 吉林大学,长春.

李翔宇, 郑希付. (2010). 病理性网络使用者对情绪信息的注意偏向研究.心理发展与教育, 26(4), 357-363.

刘宏艳,胡治国. (2013). 社交焦虑者的面部表情加工. 心理科学进展, 21(11), 1927-1938.

刘树娟. (2005). 过度网络使用者的认知偏向研究 (硕士研究生学位论文). 浙江大学理学院,杭州.

王智, 江琦, 张大均. (2008). 网络成瘾者的编码和再认实验研究. 心理发展与教育, 24(1), 106-112.

叶冬梅, 钱铭怡, 刘兴华, 陈曦. (2007). 社会交往焦虑量表和社交恐惧量表的修订. 中国临床心理学杂志, 15(2), 115-117.

张锋, 马定松, 周艳艳. (2007). 不同动机网络使用者对网络使用线索的注意偏向. 应用心理学, 13(2), 108-114.

张微, 周兵平, 臧玲, 莫书亮. (2015). 网络成瘾倾向者在视觉工作记忆引导下的注意捕获. 心理学报, 47(10), 1223-1234.

张禹, 罗禹, 赵守盈, 陈维, 李红. (2014). 对威胁刺激的注意偏向:注意定向加速还是注意解除困难? 心理科学进展,22(7), 1129-1138.

赵仑, 高文彬. (2007). 网络成瘾患者早期面孔加工N170. 航天医学与医学工程, 20(1), 72-74.

郑丽丹, 张锋, 马定松, 周艳艳. (2007). 情感性动机网络使用者对负性情绪线索的前注意偏向. 应用心理学, 13(3), 204-210.

郑希付. (2008). 认知干扰还是情绪干扰:病理性互联网使用大学生的内隐心理特点比较. 心理学报, 40(8), 920-926.

郑希付. (2009). 网络成瘾者不同情绪状态下的认知加工特征. 心理学报, 41(7), 630-638.
[1] 张陆, 孙山, 游志麒. 网络成瘾对大学生学业压力的影响:睡眠质量与自我控制的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 279-287.
[2] 李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[3] 曹瑞琳, 梅松丽, 梁磊磊, 李传恩, 张莹. 感恩与大学生网络成瘾的关系:核心自我评价和生命意义感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 286-294.
[4] 张妍, 王峥, 罗娜, 王小莹, 李晓南. 失恋经历对爱情相关刺激注意偏向的影响:趋近还是回避?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 12-20.
[5] 陈建文, 刘艳, 谭千保. 累积生态风险与高职生学习倦怠:消极自我图式和网络成瘾的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 576-583.
[6] 魏华, 何灿, 刘元, 周宗奎, 李倩. 青少年留守经历对网络成瘾的影响:病理性互联网使用的认知行为模型视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 399-406.
[7] 魏华, 李倩, 周宗奎, 丁倩, 熊婕. 中庸思维与大学生网络成瘾:同伴冲突和性别的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 668-674.
[8] 郑晨烨, 黄焰, 王静梅, 姜存对, 卢英俊. 面孔线索对4~6岁幼儿真人与卡通面孔记忆的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 472-480.
[9] 施芳婷, 郑晨烨, 颜秀琳, 陆露, 王静梅, 邸波, 卢英俊. 5~6岁幼儿对不同文化背景卡通面孔再认的眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 323-334.
[10] 吴捷, 魏芙蓉, 李佳琪, 吴瑕. 高中生的亲子沟通质量对情绪性刺激注意偏向的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 159-166.
[11] 王佳乐, 张慧, 杨敏. 情绪效价与面孔类型对幼儿无意视盲的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 153-158.
[12] 汪海彬, 张鹏程, 卢家楣, 瞿琼, 张燕. 职前教师情绪觉察能力对情绪信息注意偏向的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 462-468.
[13] 魏华, 段海岑, 周宗奎, 平凡, 丁倩. 童年期虐待对网络成瘾的影响:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 77-83.
[14] 王琼, 肖桃, 刘慧瀛, 胡伟. 父母拒绝与留守儿童网络成瘾的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 749-758.
[15] 马建苓, 刘畅. 错失恐惧对大学生社交网络成瘾的影响:社交网络整合性使用与社交网络支持的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 605-614.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!