心理发展与教育 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 139-144.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.02.02

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同人际情境影响工作记忆的初探

曹钰舒, 徐璐璐, 贺雯, 罗俊龙, 李海江   

  1. 上海师范大学教育学院, 上海 200234
  • 出版日期:2017-03-15 发布日期:2017-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 贺雯,E-mail:hewen@shnu.edu.cn E-mail:hewen@shnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    上海哲社规划课题(2015BSH004);国家社科基金青年项目(CEA130144)。

A Study about the Effects of Different Interpersonal Situations on Working Memory

CAO Yushu, XU Lulu, HE Wen, LUO Junlong, LI Haijiang   

  1. College of Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234
  • Online:2017-03-15 Published:2017-03-15

摘要: 采用信任博弈任务创设人际信任、人际背叛及背叛后利他惩罚三种人际情境,探讨三种人际情境对不同任务难度工作记忆的影响。结果发现:(1)随着工作记忆的难度增加,三组正确率均显著下降。在低难度任务中,人际信任组和背叛后利他惩罚组正确率均高于人际背叛组;中等难度任务中,人际信任组正确率高于背叛后利他惩罚组和人际背叛组;高难度任务中,三组正确率无明显差异;(2)随着工作记忆的难度增加,三组反应时均显著增加。低难度任务中,人际信任组、背叛后利他惩罚组反应时均低于人际背叛组;中等难度和高难度任务中,三组反应时无明显差异。结论:人际信任、人际背叛及背叛后利他惩罚对工作记忆有不同作用。

关键词: 人际信任, 人际背叛, 利他惩罚, 工作记忆

Abstract: To investigate the effects of interpersonal context on working memory (WM),participants first underwent one of the three interpersonal situations (interpersonal trust,interpersonal betrayal and altruistic punishment after the betrayal) in trust game task and then performed an N-Back WM task.The results showed that:(1) the accuracies of N-back WM task decreased significantly with the increase of task difficulty.In addition,in the 1-back condition,the accuracies of interpersonal trust and altruistic punishment after the betrayal were higher than that of interpersonal betrayal;in the 2-back condition,the accuracy of interpersonal trust was higher than that of interpersonal betrayal and altruistic punishment after the betrayal;in the 3-back condition,there were no significant differences between groups;(2) the reaction time became significantly longer with the increase of the task difficulty.In the 1-back condition,the reaction time of interpersonal trust and altruistic punishment after the betrayal was lower than that of interpersonal betrayal;in the 2-back and 3-back condition,no significant difference was found across groups.These results suggested that the effect of interpersonal experiences on WM performance is modulated by task difficulty.

Key words: interpersonal trust, interpersonal betrayal, altruistic punishment, working memory

中图分类号: 

  • B844

Baumeister, R. F., Twenge, J. M., & Nuss, C. K. (2002). Effects of Social Exclusion on Cognitive Processes:Anticipated Loneliness Reduces Intelligent Thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(4), 817-827.

Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2005). When high-powered people fail:Working memory and "choking under pressure" in math. Psychological Science, 16(2), 101-105.

Beilock, S. L., Kulp, C. A., Holt, L. E., & Carr, T. H. (2004). More on the fragility of performance:Choking under pressure in mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 133(4), 584-600.

Boyd, R., Gintis, H., & Bowles, S. (2010). Coordinated Punishment of Defectors Sustains Cooperation and can Proliferate When Rare. Science, 328(5978), 617-620.

Cho, R., Konecky, R., & Carter, C. (2006). Impairments in Frontal Cortical γ Synchrony and Cognitive Control in Schizophrenia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(52), 19878-19883.

Civai, C., Corradi-Dell'Acqua, C., Gamer, M., & Rumiati, R. I. (2010). Are Irrational Reactions to Unfairness Truly Emotionally-Driven? Dissociated Behavioral and Emotional Responses in the Ultimatum Game task. Cognition, 114(1), 89-95.

Csukly, G., Polgár, P., Tombor, L., Réthely, J., & Kéri, S. (2011). Are Patients with Schizophrenia Rational Maximizers? Evidence from An Ultimatum Game Study. Psychiatry Research, 187(1-2), 11-17.

de Quervain, D. J., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., Schellhammer, M., Schnyder, U., Buck, A., & Fehr, E. (2004). The Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishment. Science, 305(5688), 1254-1258.

Delgado, M. R. (2007). Reward-Related Responses in Human Striatum. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1104(1), 70-88.

Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic Punishment in Humans. Nature, 415(6868), 137-140.

Graham, S. (1988). Children's Developing Understanding of the Motivational Role of Affect:An Attributional Analysis. Cognitive Development, 3(1), 71-88.

Greer, J., & Rosen, M. (1997). How Could you Do This to Me? -Learning to Trust After Betrayal (Doubleday, New York).

Gross, E. F. (2009). Logging on, Bouncing Back:An Experimental Investigation of Online Communication Following Social Exclusion. Developmental Psychology, 45(6), 1787-1793.

Hedva, B. (2001). Betrayal, Trust, and Forgiveness:A Guide to Emotional Healing and Self-Renewal (Celestial Arts, Berkeley).

Hopfensitz, A., & Reuben, E. (2009). The Importance of Emotions for the Effectiveness of Social Punishment. Economic Journal, 119 (540), 1534-1559.

Johannes, K., Michaela, P., Dmitrij, A., & Eva, J. (2013). Who is to Blame? Oxytocin Promotes Nonpersonalistic Attributions in Response to A Trust Betrayal. Biological Psychology, 92(2), 387-394.

Jones, W. H., Moore, D. S., Schratter, A., & Negel, L. A. (2001). Interpersonal transgressions and betrayals. American Psychological Association, 9, 233-256.

Jostmann, N. B., & Koole, S. L. (2006). On the waxing and waning of working memory:Action orientation moderates the impact of demanding relationship primes on working memory capacity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(12), 1716-1728.

Jostmann, N. B., & Koole, S. L. (2007). On the Regulation of Cognitive Control:Action Orientation Moderates the Impact of Situational Demands in Stroop Interference Tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 136(4), 593-609.

Kuppens, P., Van Mechelen, I., Smits, D. J., & De Boeck, P. (2003). The Appraisal Basis of Anger:Specificity, Necessity and Sufficiency of Components.Emotion, 3(3), 254-269.

Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1995). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. Trust in Organizations:Frontiers of Theory and Research, 114-139.

Lustenberger, D. E., & Jagacinski, C. M. (2010). Exploring the Effects of Ostracism on Performance and Intrinsic Motivation. Human Performance, 23(4), 283-304.

McQuade, J. D., Murray-Close, D, Shoulberg, E. K., & Hoza, B. (2013). Working Memory and Social Functioning in Children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(3), 422-435.

Reina, D. S., & Reina, M. L. (2006). Trust and Betrayal in the Workplace:Building Effective Relationships in Your Organization, 2nd Edition (Berrett-KoehlerPublishers, San Francisco, CA).

Rotenberg, K. J., Addis, N., Betts, L. R., Corrigan, A., Fox, C., & Hobson, Z., et al. (2010). The relation between trust beliefs and loneliness during early childhood, middle childhood, and adulthood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(8), 1086-1100.

Rotenberg, K. J., Boulton, M. J., & Fox, C. L. (2005). Cross-sectional and longitudinal relations among children's trust beliefs, psychological maladjustment and social relationships:are very high as well as very low trusting children at risk? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 200(5), 697-701.

Rotter, J. (1967). A new scale for measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35(4), 651-665.

Schmader, T., Johns, M., & Forbes, C. (2008). An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance. Psychological Review, 115(2), 336-356.

Sigmund, K. (2007). Punish or Perish? Retaliation and Collaboration among Humans. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22(11), 593-600.

Sliwinski, M. J., Smyth, J. M., Hofer, S. M., & Stawski, R. S. (2006). Intraindividual Coupling of Daily Stress and Cognition. Psychol Aging, 21(3), 545-557.

Straub, P.G., & Murnighan, J. K. (1995). An Experimental Investigation of Ultimatum Games-Information, Fairness, Expectations, and Lowest Acceptable Offers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27 (3), 345-364.

Strobel, A., Zimmermann, J., Schmite, A., Reuter, M., Lis, M., Windmann, S., & Kirsch, P. (2011). Beyond Revenge:Neural and Genetic Bases of Altruistic punishment. Neuro Image, 54(1), 671-680.

Tomlinson, E. C., & Mayer, R. C. (2009). The role of causal attribution dimensions in trust repair. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 85-104.

Van't Wout, M., Kahn, R. S., Sanfey, A. G., & Aleman, A. (2006). Affective State and Decision-Making in the Ultimatum Game. Experimental Brain Research, 169(4), 564-568.

陈剑梅. (2011). 人际信任危机对青少年心理发展的影响、原因及干预. 河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 38(6), 249-251.

陈亚林, 刘昌. (2009). 有关工作记忆的压力下"Choking". 心理科学进展, 17(4), 691-698.

丁毅, 纪婷婷, 陈旭. (2012). 利他惩罚的发生机制及其神经基础. 心理发展与教育, 28(6), 658-664.

李雪冰, 罗跃嘉. (2011). 空间及言语工作记忆任务的情绪效应:来自ERP/fMRI的证据. 心理科学进展, 19(2), 166-174.

李艺敏, 李永鑫. (2015). 青少年人际关系能力对社交自卑感和心理健康的影响:社会适应性的作用. 心理科学, 38(1), 109-115.

刘文雯. (2014). 社会排斥对工作记忆的影响(硕士学位论文). 西南大学, 重庆.

孙亚文, 贺雯, 罗俊龙. (2015). 随迁儿童元刻板印象威胁对工作记忆的影响:群际焦虑的中介作用. 心理学报, 47(11), 1349-1359.

吴燕, 罗跃嘉. (2011). 利他惩罚中的结果评价——ERP研究. 心理学报, 43(6), 661-673.

徐芬, 何振芬, 马凤玲, 李欢. (2013). 大学生信任倾向与心理健康的关系:个体差异的视角. 应用心理学, 19(2), 136-145.

张奇勇,卢家楣,闫志英. (2013). 有人际关系困扰的大学生的内隐心理活动. 中国心理卫生杂志, 27(9), 698-702.
[1] 彭越, 张和颐, 陈英和, 雷秀雅, 戚玥, 于晓, 乔学文, 刘沫漩, 颜露懿. 类比推理策略与工作记忆、抑制控制关系的年龄差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 761-771.
[2] 宋佳汝, 刘媛媛, 王秀礼, 李寿欣. 视觉与言语工作记忆表征对视觉注意的引导[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 609-617.
[3] 温凯玲, 陈萍, 杨双, 宁宁. 前摄干扰对汉语听写困难儿童字形工作记忆的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 153-160.
[4] 吴国婧, 程雪林, 李叶, 白荣, 邢淑芬, 李玉华. 学前期儿童执行功能和语言的双向关系:社会经济地位的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 186-194.
[5] 许郡婷, 鲍未, 罗俊龙. 不稳定控制感剥夺损害工作记忆刷新功能[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 1-9.
[6] 刘聪慧, 董妍, 王鸿飞, 张登浩. 农村老年人的社会排斥体验与健康状况:有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 752-760.
[7] 刘湍丽, 单亚菲, 邢敏, 白学军. 工作记忆中的部分线索效应:任务呈现方式的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 489-497.
[8] 王沛, 刘雨婷, 梁雅君, 谈晨皓. 关系认知与善意认知对大学生人际信任的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 406-413.
[9] 吴文春, 陈嘉倩, 刘昌. 客体和空间工作记忆中三维图形的特征加工时程[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 513-521.
[10] 潘毅, 张琳. 工作记忆内容驱动完全无关刺激捕获注意[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 522-529.
[11] 易梅, 田园, 明桦, 黄四林, 辛自强. 公正世界信念与大学生社会责任感的关系:人际信任的解释作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 282-287.
[12] 王静梅, 张义宾, 郑晨烨, 卢英俊, 秦金亮. 3~6岁儿童执行功能子成分发展的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 1-10.
[13] 王凯旋, 苗沂林, 车晓玮, 李寿欣. 空间工作记忆负载对中央注视线索返回抑制的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 649-655.
[14] 吴文春, 孙悦亮, 徐学. 三维图形的客体和空间工作记忆存储机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(2): 145-152.
[15] 郭庆科, 徐萍, 吴睿, 胡姗姗. 群体偏好与年级对小学生利他惩罚行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(4): 402-408.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!