提示对3~11岁儿童解决类比推理问题的影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.05.09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随机抽取360名3~11岁儿童,采用几何图形、关系图形、词语、数字、故事五种材料,考察提示对儿童类比推理的影响。结果发现:(1)提示对3~4岁和8~9岁儿童几何图形类比推理成绩有影响;提示对3~4岁和9~11岁儿童词语类比推理成绩有影响;提示对3~11岁儿童数字类比推理成绩均有影响;提示对3岁和8~11岁儿童关系图形类比推理成绩有影响;提示对3~4岁和8~11岁儿童故事类比推理成绩有影响;(2)提示使原本不会类比推理的3岁儿童能够初步进行类比推理。

关键词: 儿童, 类比推理, 提示

Abstract: Randomly selected 360 children aged 3~11, this study used five kinds of materials including geometry, relational graphics, words, numbers and stores to investigate hints influence on children's analogical reasoning. The results showed that:(1) Hints influenced 3~4 years old children's performance on geometry analogical reasoning; Hints influenced 3~4 years old and 9~11 years old children's performance on word analogical reasoning; Hints influenced 3~11 years old children's performance on number analogical reasoning; Hints influenced 3 years old and 8~11 years old children's performance on relations graphics analogical reasoning; Hints influenced 3~4 years old and 8~11 years old children's performance on story analogical reasoning; (2) Hints made 3 years old children who couldn't use analogy reasoning learred to conduct some preliminary analogy reasoning.

Key words: Children, Analogical reasoning, Hints

中图分类号:

G442

费广洪, 王淑娟, 秦梅梅. 提示对3~11岁儿童解决类比推理问题的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(5): 578-585.

FEI Guanghong, WANG Shujuan, QIN Meimei. The Influences of Hints 3~11 Years Old Children's Performance on Analogical Reasoning[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2015, 31(5): 578-585.

参考文献

Alexander, P. A., Wilson, A. F., White, C. S., Willson, V. L., Tallent, M. K., & Shutes, R. E. (1987). Effects of teacher training on children's analogical reasoning performance.Teaching & Teacher Education,3(4), 275-285.

Antonietti, A. (1991). Effects of partial analogies on solving an ill-defined problem.Psychological Reports,68, 947-960.

Antonietti,A., & Gioletta,M.A. (1995). Individual differences in analogical problem solving.Personality and Individual Differences,18,611-619.

Chen,Z.(1996). Children's analogical transfer: Effects of superficial, structural and procedural similarity.Journal of ExperimentalChild Psychology,62, 410-431.

Chen,Z. (1999). Schema induction in children's analogical problem solving.Journal of Educational Psychology, 91,703-715.

Chen,Z. (2002). Analogical problem solving: A hierarchical analysis of procedural similarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 81-98.

Chen, Z., & Daehler, M. W. (1992). Intention and outcome: Key components of causal structure facilitating mapping in children's analogical transfer.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,53(3), 237-257.

Christie, S., & Gentner, D. (2007). Relational similarity in identity relation: The role of language. In Vosniadou, S. & Kayser, D. (Eds.).Proceedings of the Second European Cognitive Science Conference.

Crisafi, M.A., & Brown, A. L. (1986). Analogical transfer in very young children: Combining two separately learned solutions to reach a goal.Child Development,57, 953-968.

Daehler, M. W., & Chen, Z. (1993). Protagonist, theme, and goal object: Effects of surface features on analogical transfer. Cognitive Development, 8(2), 211-229.

Tunteler, E., Pronk, C.M., & Resing W. C.(2008).Inter-and intra-individual variability in the process of change in the use of analogical strategies to solve geometric tasks in children: A microgeneticanalysis.Learning and Individual Differences,18,44-60.

Gentner, D., & Anggoro,F.K. (2011). Structure Mapping and Relational Language Support Children's Learning of Relational Categories. Child Development, 82,1173-1188.

Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003).Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding.Journal of Educational Psychology,2,393-408.

Holyoak, K. J., Junn, E. N., & Billman, D.O.(1984). Development of analogical problem-solving skill. Child Development, 55(6),2042-2055.

Kostic, B., Cleary, A. M.,Severin, & Miller,S.W. (2010). Detecting analogical resemblance without retrieving the source analogy.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(3), 405-411.

Loewenstein, J., & Gentner, D. (2005). Relational language and the development of relational mapping.Cognitive Psychology,50,315-353.

Piaget, J., Montangero, J., & Billeter, J. (1977).La formation des correlats.In J. Piaget (Ed.),Recherches surl'abstraction reflechissante I.Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 115-129.

Richard C., (2006). The effects of surface and structural feature matches on the access of story analogs.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,28(2), 318-334.

Richland, L. E., & McDonough,IM. (2010).Learning by analogy: Discriminating between potential analogs.Contemporary Educational Psychology,35,28-43.

Richland, L. E., Morrison, R. G., ＆ Holyoak,K. J. (2006). Children's development of analogical reasoning: Insights from scene analogy problems.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,94(3), 249-273.

Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Component processes in analogical reasoning.Psychological Review, 31, 356-378.

Sternberg, R. J., & Nigro, G. (1980).Developmental patterns in the solution of verb-alanalogies.Child Development, 51, 27-83.

Thibaut, J. P., French, R., & Vezneva, M. (2008). Analogy-making in children: the importance of processing constraints, 30th annual meeting of the cognitive science society, Washington, DC.

Thibaut,J.P., French,R.,& Vezneva,M.(2010). Cognitive load and semantic analogies: Searching semantic space.Psychonomic bulletin & review, 17(4), 569-574.

查子秀.(1984). 3~6岁超常与常态儿童类比推理的比较研究.心理学报,16(4), 373-382.

陈英和, 赵笑梅. (2007). 小学3～5年级儿童类比问题解决及策略运用发展.心理发展与教育,(2), 18-22.

陈哲, 王瑞明,莫雷. (2008). 儿童问题解决中的类比迁移.心理科学进展,16(1), 65-70.

冯廷勇, 李宇, 李红, 苏缇, 龙长权. (2006). 3～5岁儿童表面与结构相似性类比推理的实验研究.心理科学, 29(5), 1091-1095.

刘建清. (1995). 9～12岁儿童类比推理能力的发展.心理科学, 18(1), 56-58.

马晓清, 冯廷勇, 李宇, 李红. (2008). 从知觉分心任务看儿童类比推理能力的发展.心理学报,40, 987-993.

邱琴, 胡竹菁, 闵容. (2005). 影响图式归纳和类比迁移的三因素实验研究.心理科学, 28(6), 92-96.

孙建梅. (1997). 7～12岁儿童类比推理能力发展研究.新疆教育学院学报, (2), 9-12.

王树芳, 莫雷, 金花.(2010). 任务难度和反馈学习对儿童类比推理能力的影响.心理发展与教育, (1), 24-30.

王亚同. 1999. 类比推理. 保定: 河北大学出版社.

王亚同. (1992). 3.5～5岁儿童类比推理的实验研究.心理发展与教育,(4), 10-16.

辛自强, 张莉. (2010). 5～9岁儿童在不同复杂性任务上类比推理的发展特点.心理发展与教育, (6), 584-591.

张嘉玮. (1980). 藏族和汉族小学儿童类比推理过程中思惟发展特点的比较.心理学报, (4),406-414.

赵顶位,戴海琦.(2012).4-8年级学生几何类比推理问题解决认知诊断.心理学探新, 32,(1),77-81.

赵鸣,徐知媛,刘涛,杜锋磊,李永欣,陈飞燕.(2012).语言类比推理的神经机制:来自 ERP研究的证据.心理学报,(6),711-719.

相关文章 15

[1]	储月, 刘希平, 徐慧, 唐卫海. 儿童社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 153-159.
[2]	刘艳春, 邓玉婷, 张曦. 智力障碍儿童对不同对象的分享行为：心理理论的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 160-168.
[3]	梁丹丹, 闫晓民, 葛志林. 4~8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童基于语言线索的情绪识别能力发展研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 169-175.
[4]	史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[5]	冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[6]	赵京伟, 陈晓旭, 任立文, 耿喆, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与小学儿童焦虑：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[7]	彭越, 张和颐, 陈英和, 雷秀雅, 戚玥, 于晓, 乔学文, 刘沫漩, 颜露懿. 类比推理策略与工作记忆、抑制控制关系的年龄差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 761-771.
[8]	朱娜平, 刘雁伶, 熊红梅, 赵攀. “公无远近”有早晚:不同资源分配情境中儿童公平规范执行行为发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 772-780.
[9]	颜志强, 周可, 曾晓, 徐惠, 朱晓倩, 张娟. 学前期儿童执行功能与攻击性行为的关系:认知共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[10]	任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
[11]	李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[12]	银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[13]	赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[14]	张玉平, 董琼, 宋爽, 舒华. 小学低年级儿童的阅读发展轨迹:早期语言认知技能的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 210-218.
[15]	李君, 王悦, 陈夏妮, 李莹. 二语学习对汉语学龄儿童认知控制与词汇通达的作用——年龄和二语熟练程度的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 219-227.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed