心理发展与教育 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 303-310.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.03.07

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

儿童同伴信任和同伴接纳的关系:社会行为的中介效应及其性别差异

李庆功, 吴素芳, 傅根跃   

  1. 浙江师范大学心理系, 金华 321004
  • 出版日期:2015-05-15 发布日期:2015-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 李庆功,E-mail:liqinggong@zjnu.com E-mail:liqinggong@zjnu.com
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省自然科学基金项目(LQ12C09001);国家自然科学基金项目(31400890).

The Mediating Role of Social Behavior between Children's Trust in Peers and Peer Acceptance and Its Gender Difference

LI Qinggong, WU Sufang, FU Genyue   

  1. Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, Zhejiang 321004, China
  • Online:2015-05-15 Published:2015-05-15

摘要: 在金华市和杭州市两所市区普通小学, 选取366名3~6年级儿童为被试, 采用同伴互评、同伴提名法和班级戏剧问卷, 考察了社会行为在小学儿童同伴信任和同伴接纳间的中介效应及其性别差异。结果表明:(1)总体而言, 亲社会行为、退缩行为在儿童同伴信任和同伴接纳间存在显著的中介效应, 而攻击行为的中介效应不显著;(2)社会行为的中介效应存在性别差异。女生的同伴信任对亲社会行为的预测、亲社会行为对同伴接纳的预测作用都显著高于男生, 使得女生亲社会行为的中介效应大于男生。男女生的同伴信任对退缩行为的预测作用没有性别差异, 但是男生的退缩行为对同伴接纳的预测作用显著高于女生, 使得男生退缩行为的中介效应大于女生。

关键词: 信任, 同伴接纳, 社会行为, 中介作用, 性别差异

Abstract: Previous studies have consistently shown that children's trust in others has positive effect on their peer relationship. However, the mechanism of how children's trust influence peer relationship is still unclear. This study tested the mediating role of social behavior on the relation between trust in peers and peer acceptance. The gender difference of the effect was also explored. Participants were 366 children (198 boys and 168 girls) from grade 3 to grade 6. Participants were tested on trust in peers, social behavior (i.e., prosocial behavior, withdrawal behavior, aggressive behavior), and peer acceptance. The results revealed:(1) Both prosocial and withdrawal behaviors were significant mediators on the relation between children's trust and peer acceptance, whereas the mediating effect of aggressive behavior was not significant. (2) There were also significant gender differences in the mediating effect of social behavior: the mediating effect of prosocial behavior was stronger for girls than boys and the mediating effect of withdrawal behavior was stronger for boys than girls. These findings thus offer a new insight into how children's trust influences their peer relationship.

Key words: trust, peer acceptance, social behavior, mediating effect, gender difference

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bernath, M. S., & Feshbach, N. D. (1995). Children's trust: Theory, assessment, development, and research directions. Applied and preventive psychology, 4(1), 1-19.
Bosak, J., Sczesny, S., & Eagly, A. H. (2008). Communion and agency judgments of women and men as a function of role information and response format. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(7), 1148-1155.
Butler, J. K. (1991). Toward understanding and measuring conditions of trust: Evolution of a conditions of trust inventory. Journal of Management, 17(3), 643-663.
Buzzelli, C. (1988). The development of trust in children's relations with peers. Child Study Journal, 18(1), 33-46.
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74-101.
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67(3), 993-1002.
Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children's peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1146-1158.
Eagly, A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64(8), 644-658.
Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.
Heyman, G. D., & Legare, C. H. (2004). Children's beliefs about gender differences in the academic and social domains. Sex Roles, 50(3-4), 227-239.
Hestenes, M. J. (1996). Early and middle adolescents' trust in parents and friends. (Ph D), Purdue University.
Layous, K., Nelson, S. K., Oberle, E., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2012). Kindness counts: Prompting prosocial behavior in preadolescents boosts peer acceptance and well-being. PLoS ONE, 7(12), 1-3.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Managment Review, 20(3), 709-734.
Mouratidis, A. A., & Sideridis, G. D. (2009). On social achievement goals: Their relations with peer acceptance, classroom belongingness, and perceptions of loneliness. The Journal of Experimental Education, 77(3), 285-308.
Oberle, E., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Thomson, K. C. (2010). Understanding the link between social and emotional well-being and peer relations in early adolescence: Gender-specific predictors of peer acceptance. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(11), 1330-1342.
Orobio de Castro, B., Merk, W., Koops, W., Veerman, J. W., & Bosch, J. D. (2005). Emotions in social information processing and their relations with reactive and proactive aggression in referred aggressive boys. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34(1), 105-116.
Ostrov, J. M., Murray-Close, D., Godleski, S. A., & Hart, E. J. (2013). Prospective associations between forms and functions of aggression and social and affective processes during early childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(1), 19-36.
Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 98-131.
Rotenberg, K. J., & Boulton, M. (2013). Interpersonal trust consistency and the quality of peer relationships during childhood. Social Development, 22(2), 225-241.
Rotenberg, K. J., Boulton, M. J., & Fox, C. L. (2005). Cross-sectional and longitudinal relations among children's trust beliefs, psychological maladjustment and social relationships: Are very high as well as very low trusting children at risk? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(5), 595-610.
Rotenberg, K. J., Qualter, P., Holt, N. L., Harris, R. A., Henzi, P., & Barrett, L. (2014). When Trust Fails: The Relation Between Children's Trust Beliefs in Peers and their Peer Interactions in a Natural Setting. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42(6), 967-980.
Rotter, J. B. (1971). Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. American Psychologist, 26(5), 443-452.
Rotter, J. B. (1980). Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. American Psychologist, 35(1), 1-7.
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon & R. H. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (6 ed., Vol. 3, pp. 619-700). New York: Wiley.
Rubin, K. H., Coplan, R. J., & Bowker, J. C. (2009). Social withdrawal in childhood. Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1), 141-171.
Wentzel, K. R. (1991). Relations between social competence and academic achievement in early adolescence. Child Development, 62(5), 1066-1078.
Witt, M. G., & Wood, W. (2010). Self-regulation of gendered behavior in everyday life. Sex Roles, 62(9), 635-646.
程利国, 高翔. (2003). 影响小学生同伴接纳因素的研究. 心理发展与教育, 19(2), 35-42.
李丹. (2000). 影响儿童亲社会行为的因素的研究. 心理科学,23(3), 285-288.
李庆功, 周小梅, 徐芬. (2013). 好友可信度与 9~ 12 岁儿童信任的关系及其发展. 心理发展与教育, 29(3), 232-237.
陈欣银, 李正云, 李伯黍. (1994). 同伴关系与社会行为:社会测量学分类方法在中国儿童中的适用性研究. 心理科学,17(1), 198-215.
孙晓军, 张永欣, 周宗奎. (2013). 攻击行为对儿童受欺负的预测: 社会喜好的中介效应及性别差异. 心理科学, 36(2), 383-389.
王昱文, 王振宏, 刘建君. (2011). 小学儿童自我意识情绪理解发展及其与亲社会行为, 同伴接纳的关系. 心理发展与教育, 27(1), 65-70.
韦志钢, 陈欣银. (1992). 儿童的社会行为研究. 心理发展与教育,8(1), 23-29.
徐芬, 汤玉龙, 蒋文明, 马凤玲. (2013). 不同年龄段小学生的一般信任倾向及同伴关系. 中国心理卫生杂志,27(3), 203-207.
赵冬梅, 周宗奎. (2010). 儿童同伴交往中的攻击行为: 文化和性别特征. 心理科学,33(1), 144-146.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展,12(6), 942-950.
周宗奎, 万晶晶. (2005). 初中生友谊特征与攻击行为的关系研究. 心理科学, 28(3), 573-575.
邹泓. (1998). 同伴关系的发展功能及影响因素. 心理发展与教育,24(2), 39-44.
[1] 郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系:双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2] 王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[3] 章洁敏, 陶云, 杨舒涵, 陈睿. 亲社会行为的概念表征及其方法述评[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 298-304.
[4] 秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响:同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[5] 颜志强, 周可, 曾晓, 徐惠, 朱晓倩, 张娟. 学前期儿童执行功能与攻击性行为的关系:认知共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[6] 邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[7] 牛湘, 冉光明. 同伴关系与幼儿问题行为关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 473-487.
[8] 银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[9] 鲍振宙, 储怡佳, 王帆, 柳希希. 校园欺凌中的“袖手旁观”:校园氛围、学校联结和道德推脱的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 580-589.
[10] 赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[11] 李强强, 胡佳. 时间定价启动与主观社会阶层对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 360-368.
[12] 项珵, 姜亚丽, 彭凯平, 刘啸莳. 科技侵扰与恋爱关系满意度:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 48-57.
[13] 雷晓玲, 赵冬梅, 杨文娇, 田晓红. 青少年家庭功能与亲社会行为的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 786-792.
[14] 王斯麒, 赵彬璇, 吴红, 刘伟. 婚姻质量对儿童亲社会行为的影响:父母积极情绪表达和教养行为的链式中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 323-330.
[15] 田玮宜, 徐健捷, 吕广林, 王轶楠. 父母自尊与青少年主观幸福感间的关系:亲子信任与青少年自尊的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 331-338.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!