Psychological Development and Education ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 443-452.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.04.08

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Accuracy and Form of Fraction Magnitude Representation for 4 to 8 Graders

GAO Ruiyan1, NIU Meixin2, YANG Tao2, ZHOU Xinlin3   

  1. 1. Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment toward Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    2. Beijing Daxing Local Taxation Bureau, Beijing 102600;
    3. National Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875
  • Online:2018-07-15 Published:2018-07-15

PDF (PC)

237

Abstract: Fraction is a useful tool for exploring the relationship between the two quantities in real life, and fraction magnitude representation plays an important role in fraction study. This study adopted number line task to investigate the patterns of fraction magnitude representation for fourth to eighth graders. The results demonstrated that:(1) The accuracy of fraction magnitude representation raised along with grade increasing; (2) The accuracy of unit fraction representation and non-unit fraction representation was different, the representation of unit fraction was significantly more accurate than non-unit fraction representation, furthermore, this difference was larger in junior grades (fourth to sixth graders) and could be ignorable in senior grades (seventh to eighth graders); (3) Students showed linear rather than logarithmic form in fraction magnitude representation on the 0~3 number line, the linear representation emerged in sixth graders and developed gradually with age increasing. Children in China and the West have similar development path for the accuracy and form of fraction magnitude representation, while Chinese children showed higher accuracy, and the linear representation emerged earlier.

Key words: fraction magnitude representation, number line estimation, accuracy, linear representation, children

CLC Number: 

  • G442

Bailey, D. H., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Geary, D. C. (2012). Competence with fractions predicts gains in mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113(3), 447-455.

Bailey, D. H., Zhou, X., Zhang, Y., Cui, J., Fuchs, L. S., Jordan, N. C., et al. (2015). Development of fraction concepts and procedures in u.s. and chinese children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 129, 68-83.

Berch, Daniel B., Foley, Elizabeth J., Hill, Rebecca J., & Ryan, Patricia McDonough. (1999). Extracting parity and magnitude from Arabic numerals:Developmental changes in number processing and mental representation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 74(4), 286-308.

Bonato, M., Fabbri, S., Umilta, C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). The mental representation of numerical fractions:real or integer?. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 33(6), 1410-1419.

Booth, J. L., & Newton, K. J. (2012). Fractions:Could they really be the gatekeeper's doorman? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37(4), 247-253.

Booth, J. L., Newton, K. J., & Twissgarrity, L. K. (2014). The impact of fraction magnitude knowledge on algebra performance and learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 118(1), 110-118.

Booth, J. L., & Siegler, R. S. (2006). Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 189-201.

Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense:How the mind creates mathematics. New York:Oxford University Press, 53-76.

Dehaene, S., & Mehler, J. (1992). Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words. Cognition, 12(1), 119-149.

Fazio, L. K., Bailey, D. H., Thompson, C. A., & Siegler, R. S. (2014). Relations of different types of numerical magnitude representations to each other and to mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 123(123), 53-72.

Girelli, L., Lucangeli, D., & Butterworth, B. (2000). The development of automaticity in accessing number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76(2), 104-122.

Hevia, M. D. D., & Spelke, E. S. (2009). Spontaneous mapping of number and space in adults and young children. Cognition, 110(2), 198-207.

Ischebeck, A., Schocke, M., & Delazer, M. (2009). The processing and representation of fractions within the brain:An fmri investigation. Neuroimage, 47(1), 403-413.

Jacob, S. N., & Nieder, A. (2009). Notation-independent representation of fractions in the human parietal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 29(14), 4652-4657.

Lemaire, P., & Lecacheur, M. (2002). Children's strategies in computational estimation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 82(4), 281-304.

Liu, C. H., Xin, Z. Q., Lin, C. D., & Thompson, C. A. (2013). Children's mental representation when comparing fractions with common numerators. Educational Psychology, 33(2), 175-191.

Liu, Y. (2017). Fraction magnitude understanding and its unique role in predicting general mathematics achievement at two early stages of fraction instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(5), 1-18.

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Olson, J. F., Preuschoff, C., Erberber, E., et al. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international mathematics report:Findings from IEA's trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA:TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. 31-42.

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA:TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. 36-50.

Opfer, J. E., & Devries, J. M. (2008). Representational change and magnitude estimation:Why young children can make more accurate salary comparisons than adults. Cognition, 108(3), 843-849.

Opfer, J. E., Thompson, C. A., & Devries, J. M. (2007). Why children make better estimates of fractional magnitude than adults. Xxix Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. 1361-1366.

Schneider, M., & Siegler, R. S. (2010). Representations of the magnitudes of fractions. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 36(5), 1227-1238.

Siegler, R. S. (1996). Emerging minds:The process of change in children's thinking. New York:Oxford University Press, 49-83.

Siegler, R. S., Duncan, G. J., Davis-Kean, P. E., Duckworth, K., Claessens, A., Engel, M., et al. (2012). Early predictors of high school mathematics achievement. Psychological Science, 23(7), 691-697.

Siegler, R. S., & Mu, Y. (2008). Chinese children excel on novel mathematics problems even before elementary school. Psychological Science, 19(8), 759-763.

Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. E. (2003). The development of numerical estimation:Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14(3), 237-243.

Siegler, R. S., Thompson, C. A., & Schneider, M. (2011). An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. Cognitive Psychology, 62(4), 273-296.

Stapel, J. C., Hunnius, S., Bekkering, H., & Lindemann, O. (2015). The development of numerosity estimation:Evidence for a linear number representation early in life. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(4), 400-412.

Stevenson, H. W., Chen, C., & Uttal, D. H. (1990). Beliefs and achievement:A study of black, white, and hispanic children. Child Development, 61(2), 508-523.

Torbeyns, J., Schneider, M., Xin, Z., & Siegler, R. S. (2015). Bridging the gap:Fraction understanding is central to mathematics achievement in students from three different continents. Learning & Instruction, 37(3), 5-13.

Van Galen, M. S., & Reitsma, P. (2008). Developing access to number magnitude:A study of the SNARC effect in 7-to 9-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 101(2), 99-113.

Wang, Y. Q., & Siegler, R. S. (2013). Representations of and translation between common fractions and decimal fractions. Chinese Science Bulletin, 58(36), 4630-4640.

Zhou, Z., Peverly, S. T., & Lin, J. (2005). Understanding early mathematical competencies in american and chinese children. School Psychology International, 26(4), 413-427.

陈英和. (2015). 儿童数量表征与数概念的发展特点及机制. 心理发展与教育, 31(1), 21-28.

郭红力. (2010)小学高年级儿童的分数数量表征(硕士学位论文). 山东师范大学,济南.

卢淳, 郭红力, 司继伟, 孙燕. (2014). 不同数字线下儿童与成人分数估计的表征模式.心理发展与教育, 30(5), 449-456.

孙玉, 司继伟, 黄碧娟. (2016). 分数的数量表征.心理科学进展, 24(8), 1207-1216.

辛自强, 李丹. (2013). 小学生在非符号材料上的分数表征方式.心理科学,36(2), 364-371.

张帆, 赖颖慧, 陈英和. (2015). 儿童数字线表征的发展——心理长度的影响.心理发展与教育,31(2), 149-156.

张丽, 卢彩芳, 杨新荣. (2014). 3~6年级儿童整数数量表征与分数数量表征的关系.心理发展与教育,30(1), 1-8.

张丽, 辛自强, 王琦, 李红. (2012). 整数构成对分数加工的影响.心理发展与教育, 28(1), 31-38.

周广东, 莫雷, 温红博. (2009). 儿童数字估计的表征模式与发展. 心理发展与教育, 25(4), 21-29.
[1] CHU Yue, LIU Xiping, XU Hui, TANG Weihai. Developmental Characteristics of Socially Shared Retrieval-induced Forgetting in Children [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(2): 153-159.
[2] LIU Yanchun, DENG Yuting, ZHANG Xi. Sharing Behavior towards Different Recipients in Children with Intellectual Disabilities: The Role of Theory of Mind [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(2): 160-168.
[3] LIANG Dandan, YAN Xiaomin, GE Zhilin. The Development of Emotion Recognition Ability in 4~8 Years Old Chinese Children with High-functioning Autism Based on Language Cues [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(2): 169-175.
[4] SHI Mengmeng, REN Guiqin, SUN Junhong, ZHANG Xinxing. Effects of Vocabulary Type and Reading Ability on Reading Comprehension Monitoring in First Grade Pupils [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[5] LENG Xinyi, SU Mengmeng, LI Wenling, YANG Xiujie, XING Ailing, ZHANG Xianglin, SHU Hua. The Relation between Home Environment and Early Language Development in Rural China [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[6] ZHAO Jingwei, CHEN Xiaoxu, REN Liwen, GENG Zhe, XU Fuzhen. Parental Psychological Control and Children’s Anxiety: A Moderated Mediating Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[7] ZHU Naping, LIU Yanling, XIONG Hongmei, ZHAO Pan. Justice Comes Sooner or Later: The Development Characteristics of Children’s Fair Normative Executive Behavior in Different Resource Allocation Situations [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(6): 772-780.
[8] GAO Zihui, JIAO Yu, WANG Xi, LIU Xiaocen. The Influence of Dynamic and Static Text Presentation of Electronic Picture Books on Children’s Reading Experience and Learning Effect [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(6): 817-824.
[9] REN Liwen, MA Yuanchi, ZHANG Qingyao, ZHANG Lingling, XU Fuzhen. Reciprocal Relations between Parental Psychological Control and Children's School Adjustment: A Cross-lagged Analysis [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
[10] WANG Yingjie, LUAN Jinxin, LI Yan. The Relationship between Maternal Parenting Stress and Preschool Children's Anxiety: The Mediating Effect of Mother-child Conflict and the Moderating Effect of Maternal Mindfulness [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(5): 702-709.
[11] LI Tiantian, DONG Huiqin. Children's Perception of Interparental Conflict and Anxiety: The Mediating Effect of Attention to Positive and Negative Information and the Moderating Effect of Gender [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[12] YIN Xiaolan, ZHOU Lujun, ZHU Cuiying. The Effect of School Environment on the Rural Left-behind Children's Prosocial Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital and Life Satisfaction [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[13] JIN Xing, LIU Jinghong, MA Yue, YU Zhanyu. A Comparative Study on the Attentional Blink of Body Expression between Deaf and Normal Children [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(3): 305-312.
[14] ZHAO Xian, WANG Zhihang, WANG Dongfang, YUAN Yanyun, YIN Xiayun, LI Zhihua. Developmental Trajectory of Prosocial Behavior in Impoverished Children during Early Adolescence: The Effects of Gender and Parenting Style Heterogeneity [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[15] LIU Shuang, LI Mei, FENG Xiaohang, ZHANG Xiangkui. A Longitudinal Study of Mastery Motivation and Competence in Early Childhood: The Moderating Effects of Types of Task and Temperament [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(2): 161-172.
Viewed
Full text
237
HTML PDF
Just accepted Online first Issue Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 0 0 0 237

  From Others local
  Times 43 194
  Rate 18% 82%

Abstract
1640
Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 1640
  From Others local
  Times 856 784
  Rate 52% 48%

Cited
Web of Science  Crossref   ScienceDirect  Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>
 
This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Psychological Development and Education
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd