Psychological Development and Education ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 320-328.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2019.03.09

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Influence of Communicative Context on Learners' Language Selective Attention in the Learning Process

ZHANG Hengchao   

  1. Department of Psychology, School of Law, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134
  • Published:2019-06-19

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Abstract: According to the characteristics of communication context, the study created language communication, language communication of shared object, language communication of shared object and expression. It used the communication paradigm to explore the influence of communicative context on learners' language selective attention in the learning process. The results showed that:(1) The overall level of language selective attention was the highest under the condition of language communication; the overall level of selective attention in different contexts increased with the time course of communication. (2) The directivity level under the condition of language communication was the highest; the shared object and expression condition was the lowest, but the concentration level was the highest. Generally speaking, the levels of directivity and concentration relatively steadily increased with the learning process, but the concentration levels of learning stage 1 were significantly higher than that of intermediate learning stage under the condition of language communication and the condition of shared object. The results suggested that:while the communicative context was different, the effects of different non-language factors on the cognitive processing of language were different. The process of cognitive coordination of both sides of communication was influenced by both language and non-language factors. In short, non-language factors reduced the overall and directional levels of language selective attention, but expression factor improved the level of concentration.

Key words: context, communication, language, selective attention

CLC Number: 

  • G442
Abney, D. H., Paxton, A., Dale, R., & Kello, C. T. (2014). Complexity matching in dyadic conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 143(6), 2304-2315.
Alibali, M. W., Nathan, M. J., Wolfgram, M. S., Church, R. B., Jacobs, S. A., Johnson Martinez, C., & Knuth, E. J. (2014). How teachers link ideas in mathematics instruction using speech and gesture:a corpus analysis. Cognition and Instruction, 32, 65-100.
Arnold, J. E., Kahn, J. M., & Pancani, G. C. (2012). Audience design affects acoustic reduction via production facilitation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(3), 505-512.
Beaudoin-Ryan, L., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2014). Teaching moral reasoning through gesture. Developmental Science, 17(6), 984-990.
Bezuidenhout, A. (2013). Perspective taking in conversation:a defense of speaker non-egocentricity. Journal of Pragmatics 48, 4-16.
Brennan, S. E. (2005). How conversation is shaped by visual and spoken evidence. In J. Trueswell & M. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Approaches to Studying World-Situated Language Use:Bridging the Language-as-Product and Language-Action Traditions (95-129). Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
Brennan, S. E., Chen, X., Dickinson, C. A., Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). Coordinating cognition:The costs and benefits of shared gaze during collaborative search. Cognition, 106(3), 1465-1477.
Brennan, S. E., & Hanna, J. E. (2009). Partner-specific adaptation in dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 274-291.
Brown-Schmidt, S., & Heller, D. (2014). What language processing can tell us about perspective taking:A reply to Bezuidenhout (2013). Journal of Pragmatics, 60, 279-284.
Cook, S. W., Duffy, R. G., & Fenn, K. M. (2013). Consolidation and transfer of learning after observing hand gesture. Child Development, 84(6), 1863-1871.
Cooperrider, K., Wakefield, E., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2015). More than meets the eye:Gesture changes thought, even without visual feedback. In R. Dale, C. Jennings, P. P. Maglio, T. Matlock, D. Noelle, A. Warlaumont, & J. Yoshimi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (441-446). Austin, TX:Cognitive Science Society.
Fay, N., Walker, B., Swoboda, N., & Garrod, S. (2018). How to create shared symbols. Language, 13(1), 1-29.
Ferguson, H. J., Apperly, I. A., Ahmad, J., & Bindermann, M. (2015). Task constraints distinguish perspective inferences from perspective use during discourse interpretation. Cognition, 139, 50-70.
Fusaroli, R., Raczaszek-Leonardi, J., & Tylén, K. (2014). Dialog as interpersonal synergy. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 147-157.
Galati, A. (2009). Assessing common ground in conversation:The effect of linguistic and physical co-presence on early planning (doctorial dissertation). Stony Brook University, New York.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2015). From action to abstraction:Gesture as a mechanism of change. Developmental Review, 38, 167-184.
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Alibali, M. W. (2013). Gesture's role in speaking, learning, and creating. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 257-283.
Graziano, M., & Gullberg, M. (2013). Gesture production and speech fluency in competent speakers and language learners. In Tilburg Gesture Research Meeting (TiGeR) 2013. Tilburg University.
Hostetter, A. B. (2011). When do gestures communicate-A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 297-315.
Hu, F. T., Ginns, P., & Bobis, J. (2015). Getting the point:tracing worked examples enhances learning. Learning and Instruction, 35, 85-93.
James, K. H., & Swain, S. N. (2011). Only self-generated actions create sensori-motor systems in the developing brain. Developmental Psychology, 14, 1-6.
Kita S., & Özyürek, A. (2003).What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language. 48,16-32.
Koppensteiner, M., Stephan, P., & Jäschke, J. P. M. (2016). Moving speeches:Dominance, trustworthiness and competence in body motion. Personality and Individual Differences, 94, 101-106.
Krauss, R. M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak? Current Directions in Psychological Science. 7(2), 54-60.
Krauss, R. M., & Weinheimer, S. (1964). Changes in reference phrases as a function of frequency of usage in social interaction:A preliminary study. Psychonomic Science, 1, 113-114.
Markman, A. B., & Makin, V. S. (1998). Referential communication and category acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 127(4), 331-354.
Mol, L., & Kita, S. (2012). Gesture structure affects syntactic structure in speech. In Naomi Miyake, David Peebles, & Richard P. Cooper (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of The Cognitive Science Society (761-766). Austin, TX:Cognitive Science Society.
Molenberghs, P., Johnson, H., Henry, J. D., & Mattingley, J. B. (2016). Understanding the minds of others:A neuroimaging meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 65, 276-291.
Mumford, K. H., & Kita, S. (2014). Children use gesture to interpret novel verb meanings. Child Development, 85(3), 1181-1189.
Novack, M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2015). Learning from gesture:How our hands change our minds. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 405-412.
O'Carroll, S., Nicoladis, E., & Smithson, L. (2015). The effect of extroversion on communication:Evidence from an interlocutor visibility manipulation. Speech Communication, 69, 1-8.
Pine, K. J, Bird, H & Kirk, E. (2007). The effects of prohibiting gestures on children's lexical retrieval ability. Developmental Science, 10(6), 747-754.
Rogers, S. L., Fay, N., & Maybery, M. (2013). Audience design through social interaction during group discussion. PloS one, 8(2), e57211.
Theisen, C. A., Oberlander, J., & Kirby, S. (2010). Systematicity and arbitrariness in novel communication systems. Interaction Studies, 11(1), 14-32.
Vanlangendonck, F., Willems, R. M., Menenti, L., & Hagoort, P. (2013). The role of common ground in audience design:Beyond an all or nothing story. In the Workshop on the Production of Referring Expressions:Bridging the Gap between Computational and Empirical Approaches to Reference the (PRE-CogSci 2013).
Vesper, C., Schmitz, L., Safra, L., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2016). The role of shared visual information for joint action coordination. Cognition, 153, 118-123.
Vigliocco, G., Perniss, P., & Vinson, D. (2014). Language as a multimodal phenomenon:Implications for language learning, processing, and evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20130292.
Wakefield, E.M., Hall, C., James, K.H., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2017). Representational gesture as a tool for promoting word learning in young children. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA.
Zhou, H., Majka, E. A., & Epley, N. (2017). Inferring perspective versus getting perspective:Underestimating the value of being in another person's shoes. Psychological Science, 28(4), 482-493.
沈德立, 白学军. (2006). 高效率学习的心理机制研究. 心理科学, 29(1), 2-6.
张恒超. (2013). 参照性交流中的"听者设计". 心理发展与教育, 29(5), 552-560.
张恒超. (2017). 共享因素对参照性交流双方学习的影响. 心理学报, 49(2), 197-205.
张恒超. (2018a). 交流语言认知特征. 心理科学进展, 26(2), 270-282.
张恒超. (2018b). 交流手势的认知特征. 心理科学进展, 26(5), 796-809.
张恒超, 阴国恩. (2012a). 关系复杂性对关系类别间接性学习的影响. 心理发展与教育, 28(2), 193-200.
张恒超, 阴国恩. (2012b). 关系复杂性对关系类别间接性学习中选择性注意的影响. 心理科学, 35(4), 823-828.
[1] LIANG Dandan, YAN Xiaomin, GE Zhilin. The Development of Emotion Recognition Ability in 4~8 Years Old Chinese Children with High-functioning Autism Based on Language Cues [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(2): 169-175.
[2] HE Can, WEI Hua, DING Qian, GUI Yong. The Influence of Parents’ Working through Information and Communication Technologies after Hours on Harsh Parenting: Mediating Effect of Anxiety/Depression and Moderating Effect of Perceived Supervisor Support [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(6): 903-912.
[3] MA Xing, LIU Wenli. The Mechanism of Vowel Influence on Stops Identification in Chinese Monosyllables [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(4): 513-521.
[4] HU Yihao, XU Luyan, BIAN Xiaohua, ZHOU Ying, LIU Junsheng. Peer Victimization and Depression among Chinese Adolescents: The Moderating Effects of Classroom Norm Salience for Aggression [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
[5] LIN Yao, ZHANG Baoshan, XU Ran, ZHANG Heyating. The Relationship between Sleep Quality and Family Communication and Its Mechanism among the Older Adults [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(2): 200-209.
[6] LI Jun, WANG Yue, CHEN Xiani, LI Ying. The Effects of Second Language Learning on Cognitive Control and Lexical Access in School-age Children: The Influence of Age and Second Language Proficiency [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(2): 219-227.
[7] XIANG Cheng, JIANG Yali, PENG Kaiping, LIU Xiaoshi. Technoference and Relationship Satisfaction: A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(1): 48-57.
[8] ZHENG Wanting, WANG Wei, XU Limin, LI Mohan, XU Zhiqi, LI Yongxin, ZHAO Jing, LIANG Ziyan, LIU Jingjia. Characteristics of Environmental Print Reading of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Aged 5 to 7 Years [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(6): 822-829.
[9] TONG Yuguang, LI Yaping, LIU Zhiguo, SONG Yaowu. The Influence of Different Context Shift on the Recall of Category-example Words under the Condition of Repetitive Learning [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(3): 305-314.
[10] WU Guojing, CHENG Xuelin, LI Ye, BAI Rong, XING Shufen, LI Yuhua. The Reciprocal Relations between Executive Functions and Language Ability: The Moderating Effects of Socioeconomic Status [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(2): 186-194.
[11] LIU Chunhui, LIU Sijia, GUO Xiaolin, LUO Liang. Relationship between Mother's Son Preference and Parent-child Communication: The Moderating Role of Children's Gender [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2022, 38(1): 64-71.
[12] SHEN Yijia, ZHANG Guohua, HE Jiankang, LUO Lilan, HAN Jintao, JIANG Bo. The Relationship between Parental Learning Companionship and Children's Academic Underachievement: The Mediating Effect of Parent-child Academic Communication and the Moderating Effect of Learning Burden [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(6): 826-833.
[13] ZHAN Shuwei, YANG Ning, ZHAO Bihua. Receptive Language Skills and Social Withdrawal among Chinese Left-behind Preschool Children: A Moderated Mediation Model [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(6): 834-844.
[14] LIU Wen, WANG Yining, ZHANG Jiaqi, CHE Hanbo. The Relationship Between Creative Personality and Deceptive Behaviors in Children Aged 9~11: The Moderating Effect of Parent-child Communication Quality [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(4): 508-516.
[15] YUAN Keman, LI Bailu, LIANG Lichan, BIAN Yufang. Cumulative Contextual Risk and Subjective Well-being in Migrant Children: The Compensatory Effect and Protective Effect of Individual Protective Factors [J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(4): 546-557.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright 2018 © Editorial office of Psychological Development and Education
Supported by Beijing Magtech Co.Ltd