基于时间投入——专注度双维核心模型的高中生学业勤奋度研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为避免单维评估存在高估或者低估学生学业勤奋表现的不足,以学业勤奋度研究的"时间(行为)投入"和"专注度"两种取向为基础,提出了高中生学业勤奋度的时间(行为)投入—专注度双维核心模型,并考察386名高中生在该模型上的分布特点,进而检验其应用效果。结果表明:(1)以学业勤奋度的双维核心模型为基础,将学生分为四组,并且这四组学生在时间投入和专注度上的差异表现为:在时间投入上,高时间投入的两个组学生的时间投入水平较高,低时间投入两个组学生的时间投入水平较低;在专注度上的分布也是如此。这说明本研究的分组是有效的。(2)模型能够有效将高中生分组,其中高时间投入—低专注度组所占比例最大(30.4%),其次为低时间投入—低专注度组(28.6%),再次是低时间投入—高专注度组(23.6%),高时间投入—高专注度组所占比例最小(17.4%)。(3)模型在不同总体学业成绩和语文、数学、英语等单科成绩上的分组效应均显著,同时拥有高学习时间(行为)投入和高专注度的高中生具有最佳的总体和单科学业成绩。因此,学业勤奋度的学习时间(行为)投入—专注度模型具有良好的应用效果。

关键词: 高中生, 学业勤奋度, 时间投入, 专注度, 模型

Abstract: To avoid deficiency that one dimensional assessment exists that overestimate or underestimate performance of diligent learning,based on two approaches,degree of diligent learning in "time (behavior) into"and "focus on the degree",proposed the two dimensional core model of 386 high school students'the academic diligence in "time (behavior) into" and "focus on the degree",and examine the model results in the high school application.The results show that: (1) Based on the double-dimension core of academic deligent,divide students into four groups,and the difference on time investment and focus the degree of this four groups students are as followings: in time investment,two high time investment groups students have higher time investment level,the other two groups students have lower time investment level; and the distribution on focus the degree also is so.This illustrate that the grouping of this research is effective.(2) The model can divide high school students into groups efficiently, Firstly high time investment-low interest group makes up the largest proportion (30.4%),secondly low time investment-low degree of focus group (28.6%),again low time investment-high degree of focus group(23.6%), high investment of time-high focus on makes up the smallest percentage of severe group (17.4%).(3) Model has significant effect in monitoring of overall academic achievement and chinese,mathematics,english.At the same time high school students of having a high learning time (behavior) and high degree of concern have the best level of overall overall and single of the academic performance.Therefore,the model of academic diligent degree (behavior) into-focus on the degree has good effect.

Key words: High school students, Academic diligence, Time investment, Focus the degree, Model

中图分类号:

G442

雷浩, 刘衍玲, 魏锦, 田澜, 王鑫强. 基于时间投入——专注度双维核心模型的高中生学业勤奋度研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(4): 384-391.

LEI Hao, LIU Yan-ling, WEI Jin, TIAN Lan, WANG Xin-qiang. Based on Two Dimensional Models of Time-Investment——Focus on the Degree of Research of High School Students’ the Academic Diligence[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2012, 28(4): 384-391.

参考文献

[1] Australian Council for Educational Research.(2008).Attracting,engaging and retaining: New conversations about learning.Melbourne:ACER.
[2] Bardin,J.A.,& Lewis,S.(2008).A survey of the academic engagement of students with visual impairments in general educationn classes.Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness,102 (8),472-483.
[3] Bardin,J.A.,& Lewis,S.(2011).General education teachers' ratings of the academic engagement level of students who read braille:A comparison with sighted peers.Journal of Visual Impairment &Blindness,105(8),479-492.
[4] Buckley,K.E.,& Anderson,C.A.(2006).A theoretical model of the effects and consequences of playing video games.In P.Vorderer and J.Bryant (Eds.),Playing video games: Motives,responses,and consequences (pp.363-378).Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[5] Carroll,J.(1963).A model of school learning.The Teachers College Record,64(8),723.
[6] Day,V.,Mensink,D.,& O'Sullivan,M.(2000).Patterns of academic procrastination.Journal of College Reading and Learning,30(2),120-134.
[7] Ellis,A.,& Knaus,W.J.(1977).Overcoming procrastination: Or how to think and act rationally in spite of life's inevitable hassles.New York: Institute for Rational Living.
[8] Finn,J.D.(1993).School engagement & students at risk.Washington,DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
[9] Fredricks,J.A.,Blumenfeld,P.C.,& Paris,A.H.(2004).School engagement: Potential of the concept,state of the evidence.Review of Educational Research,74(1),59.
[10] Jackson,P.M.(Ed.).(1992).Handbook of research on curriculum:A project of the American Educational Research Association.New York:Macmillan.
[11] Jasinevicius,T.,Bernard,H.,& Schuttenberg,E.(1998).Application of the diligence inventory in dental education.Journal of Dental Education,62(4),294-301.
[12] Lovat,T.,Clement,N.,Dally,K.,& Toomey,R.(2011).The impact of values education on school ambience and academic diligence.International Journal of Educational Research,50(3),123-132.
[13] Nicholson,H.,Kehle,T.J.,Bray,M.A.,& Heest,J.V.(2011).The effects of antecedent physical activity on the academic engagement of children with autism spectrum disorder.Psychology in the Schools,48(2),198-213.
[14] Potts,T.J.(1987).Predicting procrastination on academic tasks with self-report personality measures.Dissertation Abstracts International,48(5),1543.
[15] Schaufeli,W.B.,Salanova,M.,González-Romá,V.,& Bakker,A.B.(2002).The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach.Journal of Happiness Studies,3(1),71-92.
[16] Skinner,E.A.,& Belmont,M.J.(1993).Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year.Journal of Educational Psychology,85(4),571-581.
[17] Suárez-Orozco,C.,Onaga,M.,& Lardemelle,C,D.(2010).Promoting academic engagement among immigrant adolescents through School-Family-Community collaboration.Professional School Counseling,14(1),15-26.
[18] Suárez-Orozco,C.,Pimentel,A.,& Martin,M.(2009).The significance of relationships: Academic engagement and achievement among newcomer immigrant youth.Teachers College Record,111,5-6.
[19] Suárez-Orozco,C.,Rhodes,J.,& Milburn,M.(2009).Disengagement among recently arrived immigrant youth unraveling the immigrant paradox: Academic engagement and disengagement among
[20] recently arrived immigrant youth.Youth and Society,41 (2),151-185.
[21] Tyler,K.M.,& Boelter,C.M.(2008).Linking black middle school students' perceptions of teachers' expectations to academic engagement and efficacy.Negro Educational Review,59(2),27-44.
[22] Yenna,S.,Sharon,A.,Bronwyn,E.(2009).Academic engagement and disengagement as predictors of performance in pathophysiology among nursing students.Contemporary Nurse,32(1),123-132.
[23] 连榕,杨丽娴,吴兰花.(2006).大学生专业承诺,学习倦怠的状况及其关系.心理科学,29(1),47-51.
[24] 雷浩,刘衍玲,田澜.(2012).班级环境、家庭环境与学业成绩的关系: 学业勤奋度的中介作用.上海教育科研,32(4),17-20.
[25] 雷浩,田澜,李顺雨,黄金斌.(2011).高中生学业勤奋度的现状调查.教育测量与评价(理论版),(11),42-44.
[26] 雷浩,田澜,刘衍玲.(2011).高中生学业勤奋度与学业成绩的相关研究.中国学校卫生,32(2),168-169.
[27] 刘在花.(2010).高中生积极心理品质培养研究.中国特殊教育,(11),35-39.
[28] 田澜,雷浩.(2009).中学生学业勤奋度问卷的编制.中华行为医学与脑科学杂志,18(11),1046-1047.
[29] 张轶文,甘怡群.(2005).中文版 Utrecht 工作投入量表 (UWES)的信效度检验.中国临床心理学杂志,13(3),268-270.
[30] 赵明仁.(2010).农村中小学生学习时间投入、心理感受与学业成绩.课程·教材·教法,30(10),20-25.

相关文章 15

[1]	高斌, 张丹丹, 朱根, 蔡艳香, 郭羽希. 高中生主动性人格与网络学习投入：网络学习自我效能和学业期望的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 224-230.
[2]	杨宝琰, 柳玉姣. 元刻板印象威胁对县城农村高中生学校归属感的影响:身份认同整合和自我肯定的作用机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 645-653.
[3]	银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[4]	余易达, 潘斌, 苗新煜, 陈光辉. 班级师生关系调节学生反欺凌态度与欺凌行为的关系:一项多水平分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 550-558.
[5]	刘志国, 齐冰, 李亚平, 王润洲, 崔佳, 宋耀武. 成就目标定向在学业自我概念与学业成绩关系中的调节作用:基于内/外参照模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 68-76.
[6]	金花, 梁紫平, 单金磊, 张羽萍, 朱子良. 老年人整体运动知觉衰退的视觉机制——基于知觉模板模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 761-768.
[7]	张陆, 黄雪芳, 游志麒, 叶娜. 儿童期虐待对大学生公正世界信念的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 804-812.
[8]	张洋, 张婉莹, 王燕青, 赵婷婷, 王福兴. 生成性绘图与合作对高中生科学知识学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 830-838.
[9]	张锋, 尹华站, 靳凯歌, 臧鑫磊, 朱芷毅, 赵俊峰. 聋生1秒以下与以上的视时距知觉研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 457-465.
[10]	张小敏, 陈欣, 务凯, 赵国祥. 学校联结和学业能力对高中生自尊的影响:一个多层线性模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 358-365.
[11]	魏华, 何灿, 刘元, 周宗奎, 李倩. 青少年留守经历对网络成瘾的影响:病理性互联网使用的认知行为模型视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 399-406.
[12]	马小凤, 文美琪, 史凯, 杜青青, 姚贝, 穆缘, 霍小宁. 记忆编码策略对心境一致性记忆的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 161-170.
[13]	徐鑫锫, 莫玲菲, 刘明, 邓赐平. 高一学生成就目标特征模式及学业适应:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 81-89.
[14]	吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.
[15]	陈慧, 何婷, 唐远琼, 唐怡欣, 陆风勇, 蔺秀云. 共情与青少年内外化问题的关系及影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 439-446.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed