词内汉字逐级加黑和系列呈现对中文转换字符效应的影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2026.02.07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 字母语言系统中,词内字母逐级加黑和系列呈现等视觉因素对转换字母效应的影响已受到相关研究关注,但中文转换字符效应是否受这些视觉因素调节尚不清楚。本研究采用单一呈现词汇判断任务对真词、转换假词和替换假词进行视觉特征操作,实验1为词内汉字一致或逐级加黑,实验2为词内汉字同时呈现或系列呈现来探究这些视觉因素对中文转换字符效应的影响。研究结果表明:词内汉字逐级加黑对中文转换字符效应不具有显著调节作用,而系列呈现使得转换字符效应显著减小,原因可能是系列呈现时汉字身份信息加工更加灵活,这反映了中文汉字系统特点;中文转换字符效应稳定存在表明它可能主要受语言因素影响。研究结果将推动中文阅读核心加工机制及中文阅读模型等相关理论发展,并对提高中文词汇识别学习效率和阅读理解能力具有重要启示。

关键词: 中文, 汉字, 转换字符效应, 身份信息, 位置信息, 视觉

Abstract: In alphabetic languages, the influence of visual factors such as grading black and serially presenting letters within words, on the transposed-letter effect has gained the attention in relevant studies. However, whether the transposed-character effect is modulated by these visual factors remains unclear. In this study, we conducted two experiments using a single-presentation lexical decision task with real words, transposed-character pseudowords, and substituted-letter pseudowords, manipulating the visual features of the stimuli. In Experiment 1, the characters within words were either monochromatic or grading black. In Experiment 2, the characters were presented either simultaneously or serially, character by character. The results showed that grading black characters did not significantly modulate the transposed-character effect, while serial presentation of characters significantly reduced the transposed-character effect. This is likely due to the increased flexibility in character identity processing under this condition, which reflects the unique characteristics of the Chinese character system. The stable presence of the transposed-character effect suggests that it may be primarily influenced by linguistic factors. These findings will promote the development of related theories like the core processing mechanism of Chinese reading and the Chinese reading model, as well as will provide important insights for improving the learning efficiency of Chinese vocabulary recognition and reading comprehension.

Key words: Chinese, characters, transposed-character effect, identity information, position information, visual factors

中图分类号:

G442

张妍萃, 孙悦, 王敬欣. 词内汉字逐级加黑和系列呈现对中文转换字符效应的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 212-221.

ZHANG Yancui, SUN Yue, WANG Jingxin. The Influence of Grading Black and Serial Presenting Characters on Transposed-character Effect[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(2): 212-221.

参考文献

Adelman, J. S. (2011). Letters in time and retinotopic space.Psychological Review, 118(4), 570-582.
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items.Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390-412.
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255-278.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese Word and Character Frequencies Based on Film Subtitles.PLoS ONE, 5(6), e10729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729
Chang, M., Hao, L. S., Zhao, S. N., Li, L., Paterson, K. B., & Wang, J. X. (2020). Flexible parafoveal encoding of character order supports word predictability effects in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 82(6), 2793-2801.
Collis, N. L., Kohnen, S., & Kinoshita, S. (2013). The role of visual spatial attention in adult developmental dyslexia. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(2), 245-260.
Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713-758.
Development Core Team, R. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved November 3, 2023, from https://www.R-project.org/
Giovagnoli, G., Vicari, S., Tomassetti, S., & Menghini, D. (2016). The Role of Visual-Spatial Abilities in Dyslexia: Age Differences in Children’s Reading? Frontiers in Psycholology, 7, 1997. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01997
Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115(3), 577-601.
Grainger, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701578013
Grainger, J. (2018). Orthographic processing: A 'mid-level’ vision of reading: The 44th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(2), 335-359.
Grainger, J., Dufau, S., & Ziegler, J. C. (2016). A vision of reading.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(2), 171-179.
Grainger, J., Granier, J.-P., Farioli, F., Van Assche, E., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2006). Letter position information and printed word perception: The relative-position priming constraint. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(4), 865-884.
Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.),Mental lexicon: Some words to talk about words (pp. 1-23). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Grainger, J., & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(2), 58-59.
Gu, J. J., & Li, X. S. (2015). The effects of character transposition within and across words in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(7), 272-281.
Kezilas, Y., Mckague, M., Kohnen, S., Badcock, N. A., & Castles, A. (2017). Disentangling the developmental trajectories of letter position and letter identity coding using masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(2), 250-258.
Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2020). An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading.Psychological Review, 127(6), 1139-1162.
Liu, Z., Li, Y., Cutter, M., Paterson, K. B., & Wang, J. (2022). A transposed-word effect across space and time: Evidence from Chinese. Cognition, 218, 104922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104922
Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2012). Semantic predictability eliminates the transposed-letter effect.Memory & Cognition, 40(4), 628-641.
Marcet, A., Perea, M., Baciero, A., & Gomez, P. (2018). Author accepted manuscript: Can letter position encoding be modified by visual perceptual elements? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(6), 1344-1353.
Meade, G., Mahnich, C., Holcomb, P. J., & Grainger, J. (2021). Orthographic neighborhood density modulates the size of transposed-letter priming effects.Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 21, 948-959.
Milena, R., Simone, G., Daniela, B., Massimo, M., & Andrea, F. (2014). Spatial and temporal attention in developmental dyslexia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 331. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00331
Morey, R. D., Rouder, J. N., & Jamil, T. (2015). Package 'BayesFactor’. Retrieved from November 3, 2023, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BayesFactor/
Norris, D., Kinoshita, S., & van Casteren, M. (2010). A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order. Journal of Memory and Language, 62(3), 254-271.
Perea, M., Baciero, A., Marcet, A., Fernández-López, M., & Gómez, P. (2021). Do grading gray stimuli help to encode letter position? Vision, 5, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision5010012
Perea, M., & Wang, X. Y. (2017). Do alternating-color words facilitate reading aloud text in Chinese? Evidence with developing and adult readers. Memory & Cognition, 45(7), 1160-1170.
Taran, N., Farah, R., DiFrancesco, M., Altaye, M., Vannest, J., Holland, S., … Horowitz-Kraus, T. (2022).The role of visual attention in dyslexia: Behavioral and neurobiological evidence. Human Brain Mapping, 43(5), 1720-1737.
Vergara-Martinez, M., Perea, M., Gómez, P.,& Swaab, T. Y. (2013). ERP correlates of letter identity and letter position are modulated by lexical frequency. Brain & Language, 125(1), 11-27.
Wang, H. F. (2013). Influence of highlighting, columns, and font size on visual search performance with respect to on-screen Chinese characters.Perceptual & Motor Skills, 117(2), 528-541.
Winskel, H., & Perea, M. (2013).Consonant/vowel asymmetries in letter position coding during normal reading: Evidence from parafoveal previews in Thai. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 119-130.
Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 221-243.
Zhou, W., Wang, A. P, Shu, H., Kliegl, R. & Yan, M. (2018). Word segmentation by alternating colors facilitates eye guidance in Chinese reading. Memory & Cognition. 46(5), 729-740.
Zhang, Y., Chang, M., & Wang, J. (2022). Increasing intercharacter spacing reduces the transposed-character effect in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements.Visual Cognition, 30(5), 371-377.
Zhang, Y., Wang, M., & Wang, J. (2022). The sequence effect: Character position processing in Chinese words. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 877627. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877627
卞迁, 崔磊, 闫国利. (2010). 词素位置颠倒对汉语句子阅读影响的眼动研究. 心理研究, 03(1), 29-35.
顾俊娟, 高志华, 屈青青. (2020). 汉字位置加工的词边界效应. 心理与行为研究, 18(2), 193-199.
徐迩嘉, 隋雪. (2018). 身份信息与位置信息的加工进程及语境预测性的影响. 心理学报, 50(06), 28-43.
赵婧. (2019). 发展性阅读障碍的视觉注意广度技能. 心理科学进展, 27(1), 20-26.
张妍萃, 江莹, 董青, 王敬欣. (2021). 汉字、数字和符号的身份信息和位置信息加工比较——中文阅读的特别机制.心理学探新, 41(06), 504-514.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	林悦, 苏彦捷. 儿童的注意瞬脱:注意在时间维度上的精细化发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 292-304.
[2]	冯瑶, 王佳雯, 沈岚岚, 李宜逊, 宋学玲, 伍新春, 李虹, 陈文, 程亚华. 小学低年级儿童部件知识对三年级汉字识别和阅读理解的预测[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 816-823.
[3]	陈书玲, 贾会宾, 靳璨, 张欣, 王恩国. 发展性协调障碍儿童视觉通道前注意加工的特点：来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 19-28.
[4]	宋佳汝, 刘媛媛, 王秀礼, 李寿欣. 视觉与言语工作记忆表征对视觉注意的引导[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 609-617.
[5]	刘敏, 杜晓新, 刘巧云. 汉语母语者视听言语知觉发展趋势研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 768-773.
[6]	张忠炉, 易俊如, 张竹青, 邢强, 雷怡, 李红. 部件类型还是交错关系信息的习得促进问题解决？[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 609-618.
[7]	古婵媛, 毕鸿燕. 主观声旁家族对汉语儿童汉字命名的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 68-75.
[8]	孟红霞, 白学军, 谭珂, 苏娟. 发展性阅读障碍的视觉拥挤效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 762-768.
[9]	刘志方, 仝文, 张骏. 中文阅读中词汇加工的年老化:眼动证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 665-677.
[10]	潘毅, 张琳. 工作记忆内容驱动完全无关刺激捕获注意[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 522-529.
[11]	刘星泽, 陈明慧, 崔佳伟, 赵光. 真实场景视觉搜索中的背景线索效应特点与机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 504-512.
[12]	左婷婷, 胡清芬. 视角采择的自动性[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(2): 236-245.
[13]	陈朝阳, 刘志方, 苏永强, 程亚华. 高低阅读技能聋生词汇加工的语境预测性效应特点:眼动证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 692-699.
[14]	刘涵隆, 赵婧. 汉语发展性阅读障碍儿童视觉注意广度的发展及其对阅读流畅性的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 533-540.
[15]	刘宇飞, 钱怡, 宋耀武, 毕鸿燕. 4~6岁汉语儿童正字法意识的萌芽与发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(1): 65-72.