心理发展与教育 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 457-464.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2025.04.01

• 认知与社会性发展 •    下一篇

学龄儿童与成人形音整合的比较研究:字形与字音的相互影响

王宇轩1,2, 刘梦连3, 杨滢晖4, 毕鸿燕1,2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室, 北京 100101;
    2. 中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京 100049;
    3. 河北中医药大学人文管理系, 石家庄 050200;
    4. 中国福利会发展研究中心, 上海 200031
  • 发布日期:2025-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 毕鸿燕 E-mail:bihy@psych.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(32371119)。

A Comparative Study of Form-sound Integration between School-aged Children and Adults: The Mutual Influence of Visual Form and Phonetic Information

WANG Yuxuan1,2, LIU Menglian3, YANG Yinghui4, BI Hongyan1,2   

  1. 1. CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101;
    2. Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049;
    3. Department of Humanities Management, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050200;
    4. China Welfare Institute Development Research Center, Shanghai 200031
  • Published:2025-07-12

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

摘要： 本研究采用词汇判断任务,探究了学龄儿童与成人在形音整合中,字形与字音加工的相互影响的差异。结果表明:(1)字音影响字形加工方面,不一致字音干扰了儿童的字形加工,一致字音促进了成人的字形加工;(2)字形影响字音加工方面,一致字形促进了儿童和成人的字音加工,且对成人字音加工的促进作用更大,不一致字形干扰了儿童和成人的字音加工。本研究从字音影响字形加工和字形影响字音加工两个角度出发,揭示了学龄儿童与成人形音整合能力的差异。

关键词: 字形, 字音, 形音整合, 词汇判断任务, 儿童

Abstract: This study employed a lexical decision task to investigate the differences between school-aged children and adults in the mutual influence between visual form processing and phonetic processing during form-sound integration. The results showed: (1) Regarding the influence of phonetic information on visual form processing, incongruent phonetic information interfered with visual form processing in children, while congruent phonetic information facilitated visual form processing in adults; (2) Regarding the influence of visual forms on phonetic processing, congruent visual forms facilitated phonetic processing in both children and adults, with a greater facilitating effect on phonetic processing in adults, while incongruent visual forms interfered with phonetic processing in both children and adults. This study reveals the differences in form-sound integration abilities between school-aged children and adults from two perspectives, that is, the influence of phonetic information on visual form processing and the influence of visual forms on phonetic processing.

Key words: visual form, phonetic information, form-sound integration, lexical decision task, children

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Blau, V., van Atteveldt, N., Ekkebus, M., Goebel, R., & Blomert, L. (2009). Reduced neural integration of letters and speech sounds links phonological and reading deficits in adult dyslexia. Current Biology, 19(6), 503-508.
Blau, V., van Atteveldt, N., Formisano, E., Goebel, R., & Blomert, L. (2008). Task-irrelevant visual letters interact with the processing of speech sounds in heteromodal and unimodal cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 28(3), 500-509.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum Associates.
Ernst, M. O., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 162-169.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3:A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.
Froyen, D. J., Bonte, M. L., van Atteveldt, N., & Blomert, L. (2009). The long road to automation:Neurocognitive development of letter-speech sound processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(3), 567-580.
Froyen, D., van Atteveldt, N., & Blomert, L. (2010). Exploring the role of low level visual processing in letter-speech sound integration:A visual MMN study. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 4, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2010.00009
Froyen, D., van Atteveldt, N., Bonte, M., & Blomert, L. (2008). Cross-modal enhancement of the MMN to speech-sounds indicates early and automatic integration of letters and speech-sounds. Neuroscience Letters, 430(1), 23-28.
Karipidis, I. I., Pleisch, G., Di Pietro, S. V., Fraga-González, G., & Brem, S. (2021). Developmental trajectories of letter and speech sound integration during reading acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 750491. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.750491
Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. (2004). Attention and cognitive control. In D. A. Balota & E. J. Marsh (Eds.), Cognitive psychology:Key readings (pp. 205-223). New York, NY:Psychology Press.
Spence, C. (2007). Audiovisual multisensory integration. Acoustical Science and Technology, 28(2), 61-70.
Spence, C., & Squire, S. (2003). Multisensory integration:Maintaining the perception of synchrony. Current Biology, 13(13), R519-R521.
Talsma, D., Senkowski, D., Soto-Faraco, S., & Woldorff, M. G. (2010). The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(9), 400-410.
Tan, L. H., Feng, C. M., Fox, P. T., & Gao, J. H. (2001). An fMRI study with written Chinese. Neuroreport, 12(1), 83-88.
Tan, L. H., Liu, H. L., Perfetti, C. A., Spinks, J. A., Fox, P. T., & Gao, J. H. (2001). The neural system underlying Chinese logograph reading. Neuroimage, 13(5), 836-846.
van Atteveldt, N. M., Formisano, E., Blomert, L., & Goebel, R. (2007). The effect of temporal asynchrony on the multisensory integration of letters and speech sounds. Cerebral Cortex, 17(4), 962-974.
van Atteveldt, N., Formisano, E., Goebel, R., & Blomert, L. (2004). Integration of letters and speech sounds in the human brain. Neuron, 43(2), 271-282.
Yang, Y., Yang, Y. H., Li, J., Xu, M., & Bi, H. Y. (2020). An audiovisual integration deficit underlies reading failure in nontransparent writing systems:An fMRI study of Chinese children with dyslexia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 54, 100884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2019.100884
[1] 王彦姣, 黄家桢, 龙嘉, 王沛. 领域一般和领域特殊能力与计算障碍的内在联系及其启示——基于元分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 473-481.
[2] 冯娜, 梁峰, 王芬, 何春丽, 张慧. 基本情绪与道德情绪对不同年龄群体道德判断的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 491-499.
[3] 施利承, 冷英, 谭顶良. 实物操作促进儿童几何概念学习的神经基础:一项fNIRS研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 500-509.
[4] 邢淑芬, 白荣, 刘霞, 李森. 母亲拒绝与多巴胺基因对学前儿童外化问题的联合作用:努力控制的近端机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 518-527.
[5] 张璟, 刘格格, 曹碧华. 背景线索对儿童选择性信任的影响:积极信息和非循环解释信息的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 313-321.
[6] 李莉, 李倩倩, 阮世芳, 张云运. 师幼互动质量与儿童发展的领域内和跨领域关联——基于国内外45项实证研究的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 332-347.
[7] 林悦, 苏彦捷. 儿童的注意瞬脱:注意在时间维度上的精细化发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 292-304.
[8] 周海淳, 陈英和, 戚玥, 陈悦, 杜星雨, 于玲珺, 于晓. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的类比能力缺陷: 执行功能还是类比策略？[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 1-11.
[9] 谢瑞波, 方园园, 伍新春, 阮世芳, 赵英. 小学中年级儿童成语理解的发展轨迹及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 68-76.
[10] 徐珊珊, 黄书珍, 崔秀敏, 陈慧, 蔺秀云. 留守儿童人际敏感性与问题行为的相互作用: 个体间和个体内效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 86-98.
[11] 李艳玮, 黄一依, 翟清灼, 周文沁, 袁宗金. 儿童早期易怒:特性、评估、风险因素与干预[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 135-144.
[12] 崔佳歆, 冯佳佳, 左钰涵, 崔占玲, 周新林. 形状知觉在儿童语言能力中的独立性预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 782-791.
[13] 肖雪, 李燕芳. 群体竞争对儿童公平分配行为的影响:群体偏见动机的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 792-807.
[14] 冯瑶, 王佳雯, 沈岚岚, 李宜逊, 宋学玲, 伍新春, 李虹, 陈文, 程亚华. 小学低年级儿童部件知识对三年级汉字识别和阅读理解的预测[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 816-823.
[15] 林丹华, 冯姝慧, 申子姣, 肖家乐. 流动儿童亲子沟通与同伴侵害亚类别的关系:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 832-844.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《心理发展与教育》编辑部
地址：北京新街口外大街19号北京师范大学院内　 邮政编码：100875
联系电话：010-58807700 E-mail:pdae@bnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发