心理发展与教育 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 457-464.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2025.04.01

• 认知与社会性发展 •    下一篇

学龄儿童与成人形音整合的比较研究:字形与字音的相互影响

王宇轩1,2, 刘梦连3, 杨滢晖4, 毕鸿燕1,2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院心理研究所行为科学重点实验室, 北京 100101;
    2. 中国科学院大学心理学系, 北京 100049;
    3. 河北中医药大学人文管理系, 石家庄 050200;
    4. 中国福利会发展研究中心, 上海 200031
  • 发布日期:2025-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 毕鸿燕 E-mail:bihy@psych.ac.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(32371119)。

A Comparative Study of Form-sound Integration between School-aged Children and Adults: The Mutual Influence of Visual Form and Phonetic Information

WANG Yuxuan1,2, LIU Menglian3, YANG Yinghui4, BI Hongyan1,2   

  1. 1. CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101;
    2. Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049;
    3. Department of Humanities Management, Hebei University of Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050200;
    4. China Welfare Institute Development Research Center, Shanghai 200031
  • Published:2025-07-12

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

摘要： 本研究采用词汇判断任务,探究了学龄儿童与成人在形音整合中,字形与字音加工的相互影响的差异。结果表明:(1)字音影响字形加工方面,不一致字音干扰了儿童的字形加工,一致字音促进了成人的字形加工;(2)字形影响字音加工方面,一致字形促进了儿童和成人的字音加工,且对成人字音加工的促进作用更大,不一致字形干扰了儿童和成人的字音加工。本研究从字音影响字形加工和字形影响字音加工两个角度出发,揭示了学龄儿童与成人形音整合能力的差异。

关键词: 字形, 字音, 形音整合, 词汇判断任务, 儿童

Abstract: This study employed a lexical decision task to investigate the differences between school-aged children and adults in the mutual influence between visual form processing and phonetic processing during form-sound integration. The results showed: (1) Regarding the influence of phonetic information on visual form processing, incongruent phonetic information interfered with visual form processing in children, while congruent phonetic information facilitated visual form processing in adults; (2) Regarding the influence of visual forms on phonetic processing, congruent visual forms facilitated phonetic processing in both children and adults, with a greater facilitating effect on phonetic processing in adults, while incongruent visual forms interfered with phonetic processing in both children and adults. This study reveals the differences in form-sound integration abilities between school-aged children and adults from two perspectives, that is, the influence of phonetic information on visual form processing and the influence of visual forms on phonetic processing.

Key words: visual form, phonetic information, form-sound integration, lexical decision task, children

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Blau, V., van Atteveldt, N., Ekkebus, M., Goebel, R., & Blomert, L. (2009). Reduced neural integration of letters and speech sounds links phonological and reading deficits in adult dyslexia. Current Biology, 19(6), 503-508.
Blau, V., van Atteveldt, N., Formisano, E., Goebel, R., & Blomert, L. (2008). Task-irrelevant visual letters interact with the processing of speech sounds in heteromodal and unimodal cortex. European Journal of Neuroscience, 28(3), 500-509.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum Associates.
Ernst, M. O., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(4), 162-169.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3:A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.
Froyen, D. J., Bonte, M. L., van Atteveldt, N., & Blomert, L. (2009). The long road to automation:Neurocognitive development of letter-speech sound processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(3), 567-580.
Froyen, D., van Atteveldt, N., & Blomert, L. (2010). Exploring the role of low level visual processing in letter-speech sound integration:A visual MMN study. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 4, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2010.00009
Froyen, D., van Atteveldt, N., Bonte, M., & Blomert, L. (2008). Cross-modal enhancement of the MMN to speech-sounds indicates early and automatic integration of letters and speech-sounds. Neuroscience Letters, 430(1), 23-28.
Karipidis, I. I., Pleisch, G., Di Pietro, S. V., Fraga-González, G., & Brem, S. (2021). Developmental trajectories of letter and speech sound integration during reading acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 750491. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.750491
Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. (2004). Attention and cognitive control. In D. A. Balota & E. J. Marsh (Eds.), Cognitive psychology:Key readings (pp. 205-223). New York, NY:Psychology Press.
Spence, C. (2007). Audiovisual multisensory integration. Acoustical Science and Technology, 28(2), 61-70.
Spence, C., & Squire, S. (2003). Multisensory integration:Maintaining the perception of synchrony. Current Biology, 13(13), R519-R521.
Talsma, D., Senkowski, D., Soto-Faraco, S., & Woldorff, M. G. (2010). The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(9), 400-410.
Tan, L. H., Feng, C. M., Fox, P. T., & Gao, J. H. (2001). An fMRI study with written Chinese. Neuroreport, 12(1), 83-88.
Tan, L. H., Liu, H. L., Perfetti, C. A., Spinks, J. A., Fox, P. T., & Gao, J. H. (2001). The neural system underlying Chinese logograph reading. Neuroimage, 13(5), 836-846.
van Atteveldt, N. M., Formisano, E., Blomert, L., & Goebel, R. (2007). The effect of temporal asynchrony on the multisensory integration of letters and speech sounds. Cerebral Cortex, 17(4), 962-974.
van Atteveldt, N., Formisano, E., Goebel, R., & Blomert, L. (2004). Integration of letters and speech sounds in the human brain. Neuron, 43(2), 271-282.
Yang, Y., Yang, Y. H., Li, J., Xu, M., & Bi, H. Y. (2020). An audiovisual integration deficit underlies reading failure in nontransparent writing systems:An fMRI study of Chinese children with dyslexia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 54, 100884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2019.100884
[1] 王堃炎, 黄英航, 邓珏, 王璇, 张向葵. 从善念到善行:4~7岁儿童社会善念与亲社会行为的发展关联[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 457-466.
[2] 于晓, 张雅欣, 戚玥, 常尚钺, 何雯惺, 陈英和. 学龄儿童自然联结的发展轨迹及其与创造力倾向的关系:累加效应还是交互效应？[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 467-477.
[3] 陈紫薇, 黄潇潇, 俞国良. 父母教养行为与儿童心理健康关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 563-576.
[4] 吴旻, 张杰, 叶攀琴, 龚茜, 袁柯曼. 留守儿童非自杀性自伤行为的发展轨迹:同伴侵害模式的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 586-595.
[5] 舒展, 彭申立, 赵纤, 黎志华. 累积家庭风险对低收入家庭儿童外化问题影响的即时与延时效应:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 596-608.
[6] 韩燕, 郭筱琳, 杨文静, 张恒, 王腾飞. 阅读困难儿童的执行功能结构分化滞后于正常发展儿童[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 326-336.
[7] 范兴华, 靳嘉宁, 燕利飞, 李潇潼, 邓汇溪. 留守困境对初中儿童个人成长主动性发展的影响:社会支持的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 427-436.
[8] 张攀, 杨娟, 王小英. 象似性手势对3~4岁儿童汉语动作动词记忆和泛化的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 153-161.
[9] 袁雯, 张旭然, 郭惠, 李燕芳. 儿童欺凌网络的结构特征与变化特点：基于社会网络分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 234-244.
[10] 谢宇, 贺荟中, 王磊, 戴惟熙. 孤独症儿童与典型发展儿童内隐学习物品情景线索的比较研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 761-769.
[11] 范兴华, 燕利飞, 靳嘉宁, 李潇潼, 邓汇溪, 余思. 父母关爱对4~6年级留守儿童幸福感发展的影响:积极诠释生活的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 859-868.
[12] 刘畅, 蒋柳青, 郑天鹏, 边玉芳. 父母情绪调节困难与父母情绪社会化行为的关系:基于主客体互倚模型的交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 652-662.
[13] 王彦姣, 黄家桢, 龙嘉, 王沛. 领域一般和领域特殊能力与计算障碍的内在联系及其启示——基于元分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 473-481.
[14] 冯娜, 梁峰, 王芬, 何春丽, 张慧. 基本情绪与道德情绪对不同年龄群体道德判断的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 491-499.
[15] 施利承, 冷英, 谭顶良. 实物操作促进儿童几何概念学习的神经基础:一项fNIRS研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 500-509.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《心理发展与教育》编辑部
地址：北京新街口外大街19号北京师范大学院内　 邮政编码：100875
联系电话：010-58807700 E-mail:pdae@bnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发