心理发展与教育 ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 465-472.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2025.04.02

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

提取关键步骤促进问题解决

马小凤, 姬喜莹, 张骐韵, 刘明惠, 张晶   

  1. 西北师范大学心理学院, 甘肃省行为与心理健康重点实验室, 兰州 730070
  • 发布日期:2025-07-12
  • 通讯作者: 马小凤 E-mail:psymaxiaofeng@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金地区项目资助(31860282);甘肃省双一流科研重点项目(GSSYLXM-01)。

Retrieve Key Steps to Promote Problem Solving

MA Xiaofeng, JI Xiying, ZHANG Qiyun, LIU Minghui, ZHANG Jing   

  1. Provincial Key Laboratory of Behavioral and Mental Health, School of Psychology, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070
  • Published:2025-07-12

摘要: 在问题解决的材料中使用自由回忆的方式进行提取,给学生带来比较大的认知负荷,很难观测到提取练习效应。本研究通过一个实验考察提取关键步骤对问题解决类任务的促进作用。选取89名大学生随机分配到3种学习条件(样例-重复学习组、样例-问题解决组、样例-提取关键步骤组)。结果发现样例-提取关键步骤组的测试成绩显著高于样例-重复组、样例-问题解决组,发现了提取练习效应。表明在难度适中的问题解决类任务中,提取关键步骤能够有效促进问题解决的学习。

关键词: 提取练习, 样例学习, 关键步骤

Abstract: Recent research has shown that example study only(EE) was more effective(higher test performance) and efficient(attained with less effort invested in learning or test tasks) than example-problem pairs(EP). For problem solving, free recall and problem-solving bring a heavy cognitive load. The process of acquiring knowledge is gradual, and fade example can be used as scaffolding to support the transition from schema acquisition to schema application. And Carpenter et al. (2020) showed that the potential of retrieval practice to promote problem solving depends on how well it enhances the memory of the necessary information needed to solve problems. The necessary information needed to solve the problem may be the key step in the solution step. Therefore, in order to reduce the cognitive load and ensure that the necessary information for solving new problems can be retrieved, this study assumes that retrieving the key steps in problem solving in the learning process can promote the performance of problem solving. Through an experiment, this study investigated the influence of retrieving key steps on problem solving. In the experiment, the complementary method is used to determine the key steps in the example. One hundred and twenty college students participated in the material evaluation. One hundred and twenty college students were randomly assigned to four experimental conditions (lack of worked example from step one or step two or step three or step four). Chi-square test was conducted for the number of people who wrote correctly and the wrong number of people. It is found that the fourth step in the example is the key step to solve the problem. For the formal experiment, eighty-nine college students participated in the experiment. The experiment was designed by single factor (learning strategy: worked example repeated learning group, worked example-problem solving group, worked example-key step retrieved group) between subjects. The results show that the main effect of learning strategies is significant, and the test scores of the worked example-key step retrieved group are significantly higher than those of the worked example repeated learning group and the worked example-problem solving group. There is no significant difference between the worked example repeated learning group and the worked example-problem solving group. For cognitive load, the main effect of learning strategies is not significant. As for the comprehensive index of cognitive load, the main effect of learning strategies is significant. And the cognitive load of worked example repeated learning group is significantly higher than that of worked example-key step retrieved group and worked example-problem solving group. There is no significant difference between the cognitive load of the worked example-key step retrieved group and the worked example-problem solving group. The results of this study have a positive influence on actual instructions. For the study of problem solving, teachers can provide appropriate teaching tips for students in the learning process, that students can retrieve the key steps in problem solving, and help students to effectively promote learning and solve problems.

Key words: retrieval practice, worked example, key step

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Butler, A. C., & lii, H. L. R. (2007). Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4-5), 514-527.
Carpenter, S. K., Endres, T., & Hui, L. (2020). Students' use of retrieval in self-regulated learning:Implications for monitoring and regulating effortful learning experiences. Educational Psychology Review, 32(8), 1-26.
Carpenter, S. K., & Pashler, H. (2007).Testing beyond words:Using tests to enhance visuospatial map learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(3), 474-478.
Carpenter, S. K., Pashler, H., & Vul, E. (2006).What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(5), 826-830.
Coppens, L. C., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2011). Learning Adinkra symbols:The effect of testing. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(3), 351-357.
Foster, N. L., Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2018). Self-regulated learning of principle-based concepts:Do students prefer worked examples, faded examples, or problem solving? Learning and Instruction, 55, 124-138.
Hanham, J., Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2017). Cognitive load theory,element interactivity, and the testing and reverse testing effects. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(3), 265-280.
Hostetter, A. B., Penix, E. A., Norman, M. Z., Batsell, W. R., & Carr, T. H. (2018). The role of retrieval practice in memory and analogical problem-solving. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(4), 858-871.
Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2009). A testing effect with multimedia learning.Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 621-629.
Karpicke, J. D., & Aue, W. R. (2015). The testing effect is alive and well with complex materials. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 317-326.
Karpicke, J. D., Blunt, J. R., Smith, M. A., & Karpicke, S. S. (2014). Retrieval-based learning:The need for guided retrieval in elementary school children. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(3), 198-206.
Karpicke, J. D., & Iii, H. L. R. (2007). Repeated retrieval during learningis the key to long-term retention. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(2), 151-162.
Mason, L., & Tornatora, M. C. (2016). Analogical encoding with and without instruction phenomena.Educational Psychology, 36(3), 391-412.
McDaniel, M. A., Anderson, J. L., Derbish, M. H., & Morrisette, N. (2007). Testing the testing effect in the classroom. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19(4-5), 494-513.
Paas, F. G. W. C. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics:A cognitive load approach.Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(6), 129-434.
Paas, F. G. W. C., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., & Gerven, P. W. M. V. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 63-71.
Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis:Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 437-447.
Rittle-Johnson, B., Star. J. R., & Durin, K. (2011). The power of comparison in learning and instruction:learning outcomes supported by different types of comparison. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 55, 199-225.
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). Test-Enhanced Learning Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention.Psychological Science, 17(3), 249-255.
Sidney, P. G., Hattikudur, S., & Alibali, M. W. (2015). How do contrasting cases and self-explanation promote learning? Evidence from fraction division. Learning and Instruction, 40, 29-38.
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous and germane cognitive load.Educational Psychology Review, 22, 123-138.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-296.
van Gog, T., Kester, L., Dirkx, K., Hoogerheide, V., Boerboom, J., & Verkoeijen,P. P. J. L. (2015). Testing after worked example study does not enhance delayed problem-solving performance compared to restudy. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 265-289.
Van Gog, T., & Sweller, J. (2015). Not new, but nearly forgotten:the testing effect decreases or even disappears as the complexity of learning materials increases. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 247-264.
Yeo, D. J., & Fazio, L. K. (2019). The optimal learning strategy depends on learning goals and processes:Retrieval practice versus worked examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(1), 73-90.
林洪新. (2009). 初一学生数学运算样例中关键步骤的学习研究(博士学位论文). 辽宁师范大学, 大连.
马小凤, 李增艳, 周爱保. (2022). 提取练习能够促进程序性知识的学习吗?——基于有提示提取的检验. 心理科学, 45(04),849-855.
张奇, 郑伟, 万莹. (2014). "解释法"样例对小学生学习新运算规则的促进. 心理发展与教育, 30(2), 153-159.
[1] 刘岩, 张宏飞, 卢鑫, 曲可佳. 数学概率问题解决学习中的测试效应及有效促进[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 215-223.
[2] 马小凤, 文美琪, 史凯, 杜青青, 姚贝, 穆缘, 霍小宁. 记忆编码策略对心境一致性记忆的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 161-170.
[3] 曲可佳, 刘颖英. 先前知识和样例设计对学习分数乘法规则的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 539-545.
[4] 马小凤, 周爱保, 杨小娥. 线索强度:检验提取练习效应内部机制的重要变量[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(3): 313-320.
[5] 张奇, 郑伟, 万莹. “解释法”样例对小学生学习新运算规则的促进[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 153-159.
[6] 刘兆敏, 罗良, 张玮. 记忆提取促进学习:实验证据与机制解释[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(4): 441-447.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!