心理发展与教育 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (3): 380-390.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.03.09

• 教与学心理 • 上一篇    下一篇

教师自主支持与学生学业成就关系的元分析:心理需要满足、动机及投入的中介作用

王国霞1, 赵扬2   

  1. 1. 东北师范大学心理学院, 长春 130024;
    2. 通化师范学院教育科学学院, 通化 134000
  • 发布日期:2022-05-17
  • 通讯作者: 王国霞 E-mail:wanggx690@nenu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    东北师范大学教师教育研究基金项目(JSJY20180302);吉林省教育科学规划课题(GH150012)。

A Meta-analysis about Teacher Autonomy-support and Student Academic Achievement: The Mediation of Psychological Need Satisfaction, Motivation and Engagement

WANG Guoxia1, ZHAO Yang2   

  1. 1. School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024;
    2. College of Educational Science, Tonghua Normal University, Tonghua 134000
  • Published:2022-05-17

摘要: 在教育实践中,教师作为教学活动的主要引导者,他们的教学风格对学生的学业成就具有重要影响。根据自我决定理论,自主支持型教师能够满足学生的基本心理需要,促进学习动机内化,进而提高学业投入及学业成就。本研究通过对37篇教师自主支持与学生学业成就的实证研究(53个独立样本,18278名学生)进行元分析,结果发现:(1)教师自主支持显著正向预测需要满足、动机、投入及学业成就;同时自主支持对需要满足、动机及投入的效应量高于对学业成就的效应量;(2)学生的需要满足及动机在教师自主支持对学业成就影响中起中介作用,但学业投入的中介作用不显著;(3)教师自主支持对学业成就的影响在不同年龄、经济与文化背景下没有显著差异。综上,在未来的教育活动中,教师应给予学生更多的自主支持,以满足学生基本心理需要,激发学生的学习动机,促进学业投入,提升学业成就。

关键词: 教师自主支持, 心理需要满足, 学业动机, 学业投入, 学业成就

Abstract: As the main guide of educational activities, teachers' teaching style has important impact on students' academic achievements. According to the self-determination theory, autonomy supporting teaching style can satisfy students' basic psychological needs, improve students' motivation and academic engagement, and greatly enhance their academic achievement. Based on the meta-analysis of 37 empirical studies about teacher autonomy support and students' academic achievement (53 independent samples, 18278 students), the results showed that: (1) Teacher autonomy support was positively related to need satisfaction, motivation, engagement and academic achievement. And the effect of autonomy support on need satisfaction, motivation and engagement was higher than academic achievement; (2) Though the need satisfaction and motivation played significant mediating roles in the relationship between teacher autonomy support and students’ academic achievement, the academic engagement’s mediation effect was not significant; (3) The students’ age, economic and cultural backgrounds did not moderate the link between autonomy support and academic achievement. Overall, in the future educational activities, teachers should provide students more autonomy support in order to satisfy their basic psychological needs, enhance learning motivation, promote academic engagement and improve academic achievement.

Key words: teacher autonomy support, psychological need satisfaction, academic motivation, academic engagement, academic achievement

中图分类号: 

  • G442
*Amoura,C., Berjot, S., Gillet, N., Caruana, S., Cohen, J., & Finez, L. (2015). Autonomy-supportive and controlling styles of teaching:Opposite or distinct teaching styles? Swiss Journal of Psychology,74(3), 141-158.
Ahmed, W., Minnaert, A., Werf, G.V. D., & Kuyper, H. (2010). Perceived social support and early adolescents' achievement:The mediational roles of motivational beliefs and emotions. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 39(1), 36-46.
Altschul, I. (2012). Linking socioeconomic status to the academic achievement of Mexican American youth through parent involvement in education.Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research,3(1), 13-30.
Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry:A self-determination theory perspective.Science Education, 84(6), 740-756.
*Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Ada, E. N., Ahmadi, M., Caltabiano, N., Wang, D., Thogersen- Ntoumani, C., & Hagger, M. S. (2019). Differential effects of perceptions of equal, favourable and unfavourable autonomy support on educational and well-being outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology,58, 33-43.
*Cheung, H. Y., & Wu, J. (2012). The prediction of cheating by university students' risk-taking personality. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,21(3), 454-463.
Chicote-López, J., Abarca-Sos, A., Gallardo, L. O., & García-González, L. (2017). Social antecedents in physical activity:Tracking the self-determination theory sequence in adolescents. Journal of Community Psychology,46(3), 356-373.
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness:A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), The Minnesota symposia on child psychology, Vol. 23.Self processes and development (pp.43-77). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
*D'Ailly, H. (2003). Children's autonomy and perceived control in learning:A model of motivation and achievement in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Psychology,95(1), 84-96.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsicmotivation and self-determination in human behavior. Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology,3(2), 437-448.
Deci, E. L., Schwartz, A. J., Sheinman, L., & Ryan, R. M. (1981). An instrument to assess adults' orientations toward control versus autonomy with children:Reflections on intrinsic motivation and perceived competence.Journal of Educational Psychology,73(5), 642-650.
Dincer, A., Yeşilyurt, S., Noels, K. A., & Vargas Lascano, D. I. (2019). Self-determination and classroom engagement of EFL learners:A mixed-methods study of the self-system model of motivational development.SAGE Open, 9(2), 1-15.
*Diseth,A., & Samdal, O. (2014). Autonomy support and achievement goals as predictors of perceived school performance and life satisfaction in the transition between lower and upper secondary school. Social Psychology of Education,17(2), 269-291.
*Froiland, J., Davison, M., & Worrell, F. (2016). Aloha Teachers:Teacher autonomy support promotes Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander students' motivation, school belonging, course-taking and math achievement.Social Psychology of Education,19, 879-894.
Garn, A. C., Morin, A. J. S., & Lonsdale, C. (2019). Basic psychological need satisfaction toward learning:A longitudinal test of mediation using bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 354-372.
*González, A., & Paoloni, P. V. (2015). Perceived autonomy-support, expectancy, value, metacognitive strategies and performance in chemistry:A structural equation model in undergraduates. Chemistry Education Research and Practice,16(3), 640-653.
*González-Cutre, D., Sicilia, A., Beas-Jiménez, M., & Hagger, M. S. (2014). Broadening the trans-contextual model of motivation:A study with Spanish adolescents.Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports,24(4), 306-319.
Gupta, V., Hanges, P. J., & Dorfman, P. (2002). Cultural clusters:Methodology and findings.Journal of World Business, 37, 11-15.
*Gutiérrez, M., & Tomás, J. M. (2019). The role of perceived autonomy support in predicting university students' academic success mediated by academic self-efficacy and school engagement. Educational Psychology,39(6), 729-748.
*Gutiérrez, M., & Tomás, J. M. (2018). Motivational class climate, motivation and academic success in university students. Revistade Psicodidactica,23(2),94-101.
*Hagger, M., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Hein, V., Soós, I., Karsai, I., Lintunen, T., & Leemans, S. (2009). Teacher, peer and parent autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity:A trans-contextual model of motivation in four nations.Psychology and Health,24(6), 689-711.
*Hagger, M. S., & Hamilton, K. (2018). Motivational predictors of students' participation in out-of-school learning activities and academic attainment in science:An application of the trans-contextual model using Bayesian path analysis.Learning and Individual Differences,67, 232-244.
*Hagger, M. S., Sultan, S., Hardcastle, S. J., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2015). Perceived autonomy support and autonomous motivation toward mathematics activities in educational and out-of-school contexts is related to mathematics homework behavior and attainment. Contemporary Educational Psychology,41, 111-123.
*Hagger, M. S., Sultan, S., Hardcastle, S. J., Reeve, J., Patall, E. A., Fraser, B., … Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2016). Applying the integrated trans-contextual model to mathematics activities in the classroom and homework behavior and attainment. Learning and Individual Differences,45, 166-175.
*Halvari, H., Ulstad, S. O., Bagøien, T. E., & Skjesol, K. (2009). Autonomy support and its links to physical activity and competitive performance:Mediations through motivation, competence, action orientation and harmonious passion, and the moderator role of autonomy support by perceived competence. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,53(6), 533-555.
*Hardre, P. L., & Reeve, J. (2003). A motivational model of rural students' intentions to persist in, versus drop out of, high school.Journal of Educational Psychology,95(2), 347-356.
Hofferber, N., Basten, M., Großmann, N., & Wilde, M. (2016). The effects of autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching behaviour in biology lessons with primary and secondary experiences on students' intrinsic motivation and flow-experience. International Journal of Science Education,38(13), 2114-2132.
Hospel, V., & Galand, B. (2016). Are both classroom autonomy support and structure equally important for students' engagement? A multilevel analysis.Learning and Instruction,41, 1-10.
Hofstede, G. (1984). Cultural dimensions in management and planning.Asia Pacific Journal of Management,1(2), 81-99.
*Hyungshim, J., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Ahyoung, K. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students? Journal of Educational Psychology,101(3), 644-661.
Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice:a cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 349-366.
*Jang, H., Kim, E. J., & Reeve, J. (2012). Longitudinal test of self-determination theory's motivation mediation model in a naturally occurring classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology,104(4), 1175-1188.
Jang, H., & Reeve, J. (2006). Whatteachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology,98(1), 209-218.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engagingstudents in learning activities:It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology,102(3), 588-600.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Halusic, M. (2016). Anew autonomy-supportive way of teaching that increases conceptual learning:Teaching in students' preferred ways. Journal of Experimental Education,84(4), 686-701.
*Jia, Y., Way, N., Ling, G., Yoshikawa, H., Chen, X., Hughes, D.,… Lu, Z. (2009). The influence of student perceptions of school climate on socioemotional and academic adjustment:A comparison of Chinese and American adolescents. Child Development,80(5), 1514-1530.
*Jungert, T., & Koestner, R. (2015). Science adjustment, parental and teacher autonomy support and the cognitive orientation of science students.Educational Psychology,35(3), 361-376.
*Kiefer, S. M., & Pennington, S.(2016). Associations of teacher autonomy support and structure with young adolescents' motivation, engagement, belonging, and achievement. Middle Grades Research Journal,11(1), 29-46.
*Leenknecht, M. J.M., Wijnia, L., Loyens, S. M. M., & Rikers, R. M. J. P. (2017). Need-supportive teaching in higher education:Configurations of autonomy support, structure, and involvement. Teaching and Teacher Education,68, 134-142.
Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement:A meta-analysis.Social Behavior and Personality, 46 (3), 517-528.
Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Chiu, M.M. (2018). The relationship between teacher support and students' academic emotions:A meta-analysis.Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2288.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02288
*Legrain, P., Gillet, N., Gernigon, C., & Lafreniere, M. A. (2015). Integration of information and communication technology and pupils' motivation in a physical education setting.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,34(3), 384-401.
*Li, J., Deng, M., Wang, X., & Tang, Y. (2018). Teachers' and parents' autonomy support and psychological control perceived in junior-high school:Extending the dual-process model of self-determination theory.Learning and Individual Differences,68, 20-29.
Lochbaum, M., & Jean-Noel, J. (2016). Perceivedautonomy-support instruction and student outcomes in physical education and leisure-time:A meta-analytic review of correlates. Ricyde-Revista Internacional De Ciencias Del Deporte,12(43), 29-47.
Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). The coach-athlete relationship:A motivational model. Journal of Sports Sciences,21(11), 883-904.
*McDavid, L., Cox, A. E., & Amorose, A. J. (2012). The relative roles of physical education teachers and parents in adolescents' leisure-time physical activity motivation and behavior.Psychology of Sport and Exercise,13(2), 99-107.
*Mih, V., & Mih, C. (2013). Perceived autonomy-supportive teaching, academic self-perceptions and engagement in learning:Toward a process model of academic achievement.Cognition, Brain, Behavior,17(4), 289-313.
*Moreno-Murcia, J. A., & Hernández, E. H. (2013). The importance of supporting adolescents' autonomy in promoting physical-sport exercise.Spanish Journal of Psychology,16, Article e81.https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2013.81
Mouratidis, A., Michou, A., Aelterman, N., Haerens, L., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2018). Begin-of- school-year perceived autonomy-support and structure as predictors of end- of-school-year study efforts and procrastination:The mediating role of autonomous and controlled motivation. Educational Psychology,38(4), 435-450.
Núñez, J. L., & León, J. (2016). The mediating effect of intrinsic motivation to learn on the relationship between Student's autonomy support and vitality and deep learning.Spanish Journal of Psychology,19, Article e42.https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2016.43
OECD. (2016).Education at a glance 2016:OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.
*Ommundsen, Y., & Kvalø, S. E. (2007). Autonomy-mastery, supportive or performance focused? Different teacher behaviours and pupils' outcomes in physical education.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,51(4), 385-413.
*Oriol-Granado, X., Mendoza-Lira, M., Covarrubias-Apablaza, C.-G., & Molina-Lopez, V.-M. (2017). Positiveemotions, autonomy support and academic performance of university students:The mediating role of academic engagement and self-efficacy. Revista de Psicodidactica,22(1), 45-53.
Patall, E. A., Steingut, R. R., Vasquez, A. C., Trimble, S. S., Pituch, K. A., & Freeman, J. L. (2018). Daily autonomy supporting or thwarting and students' motivation and engagement in the high school science classroom.Journal of Educational Psychology,110(2), 269-288.
*Pitzer, J., & Skinner, E. (2017). Predictors of changes in students' motivational resilience over the school year:The roles of teacher support, self-appraisals, and emotional reactivity.International Journal of Behavioral Development,41(1), 15-29.
Quested, E., & Duda, J. L. (2011). Antecedents of burnout among elite dancers:A longitudinal test of basic needs theory.Psychology of Sport & Exercise,12(2), 159-167.
Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive.Educational Psychologist,44(3), 159-175.
Ruzek, E. A., Hafen, C. A., Allen, J. P., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., & Pianta, R. C. (2016). How teacher emotional support motivates students:The mediating roles of perceived peer relatedness, autonomy support, and competence.Learning and Instruction,42, 95-103.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017).Self-determination theory:Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
*Schuitema, J., Peetsma, T., & van der Veen, I. (2016). Longitudinal relations between perceived autonomy and social support from teachers and students' self-regulated learning and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences,49, 32-45.
*Shen, B., McCaughtry, N., Martin, J., & Fahlman, M. (2009). Effects of teacher autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning in physical education.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,80(1), 44-53.
Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement anddisaffection in the classroom:Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology,100(4), 765-781.
Sofie, L., Debora, R., Ferre, L., Karine, V., & Bieke, D. F. (2015). The gender gap in student engagement:The role of teachers' autonomy support, structure, and involvement.British Journal of Educational Psychology,85(4), 498-518.
Steinberg, L., & Silverberg, S. B. (1986). The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence.Child Development, 57(4), 841-851.
Thomas, A. E., & Mueller, F. H. (2017). A magic dwells in each beginning? Contextual effects of autonomy support on students' intrinsic motivation in unfamiliar situations. Social Psychology of Education,20(1), 1-15.
*Thuy Hang, B. T., Kaur, A., & Busthami Nur, A. H. (2017). A self-determination theory based motivational model on intentions to drop out of vocational schools in Vietnam.Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction,14(1), 1-21.
*Van Ryzin, M. J. (2011). Protectivefactors at school:reciprocal effects among adolescents' perceptions of the school environment, engagement in learning, and hope. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,40(12), 1568-1580.
Vasquez, A. C., Patall, E. A., Fong, C.J., Corrigan, A. S., & Pine, L. (2016). Parent autonomy support, academic achievement, and psychosocial functioning:A meta-analysis of research. Educational Psychology Review,28 (3), 605-644.
*Wang, L. (2017). Using the self-determination theory to understand Chinese adolescent leisure-time physical activity.European Journal of Sport Science,17(4), 453-461.
Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement:A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective.Learning and Instruction,28(3), 12-23.
World Bank. (2010).World Development Report 2010:Development and Climate Change. World Bank Publications.
*Yarahmadi, Y., Asadzadeh, H., Ahadi, H., & Banijamali, S. (2010). Amotivational model of rural Students intention to persist in versus drop out of secondary school in Sanandaj city (Iran). Education Sciences & Psychology,17(2), 8-20.
*Zhang, T., Solmon, M. A., Kosma, M., Carson, R. L., & Gu, X. (2011). Need support, need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and physical activity participation among middle school students.Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,30(1), 51-68.
陈继文, 郭永玉, 胡小勇. (2015). 教师自主支持与初中生的学习投入:家庭社会阶层与学生自主动机的影响. 心理发展与教育,31(2), 180-187.
黄慧静, 辛涛. (2007). 教师课堂教学行为对学生学业成绩的影响:一个跨文化研究. 心理发展与教育,23(4), 57-62.
罗青, 孙志萍, 田媛, 周宗奎. (2014). 教师自主支持与高中生自我决定动机、学习投入和学习成绩的关系[摘要].第十七届全国心理学学术会议论文摘要集(pp.835-837).中国心理学会.
罗云, 赵鸣, 王振宏. (2014). 初中生感知教师自主支持对学业倦怠的影响:基本心理需要、自主动机的中介作用. 心理发展与教育,30(3), 312-321.
刘靖东, 钟伯光, 姒刚彦. (2013).自我决定理论在中国人人群的应用. 心理科学进展,21(10), 1803-1813.
刘俊, 秦传燕. (2018). 企业社会责任与员工绩效的关系:一项元分析. 心理科学进展, 26(07), 1152-1164.
唐芹, 方晓义, 胡伟, 陈海德, 吴梦希, 王帆. (2013). 父母和教师自主支持与高中生发展的关系. 心理发展与教育,29(6), 604-615.
吴波, 方晓义. (2006). 青少年自主性发展的特点. 心理与行为研究,4(1), 22-27.
王萍. (2018). 教师自主支持、自我决定动机对高中生学习投入、学业成绩的影响 (硕士学位论文). 南京师范大学.
叶宝娟, 胡笑羽, 杨强, 胡竹菁. (2014). 领悟社会支持、应对效能和压力性生活事件对青少年学业成就的影响机制. 心理科学,37(2), 342-348.
张云运, 黄美薇, 任萍, 张瑞平. (2020). 朋友的学业成就会影响我的学业成就吗?——成对友谊关系中成就目标取向的中介作用. 心理发展与教育,36(1), 54-66.
[1] 沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分?学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[2] 辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[3] 李明, 尚新华, 方晓义, 姬文广. 从父母教育卷入到学业成就:自主支持与自主学习力的链式中介[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 839-847.
[4] 夏晓彤, 段锦云, 黄辛隐. 错失恐惧对亲社会行为的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 344-352.
[5] 张云运, 陈嘉仪, 杨妙, 任萍, 刘思辰. 父母学业参与、父母学业压力与青少年早期的学业投入:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 211-221.
[6] 彭顺, 牛更枫, 汪夏, 张红坡, 胡祥恩. 父母自主支持对青少年积极情绪适应的影响:基本心理需要满足的中介与调节作用模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 240-248.
[7] 程翠萍, 黄希庭. 个人取向勇气对中学生学业成就的影响:问题解决和求助应对方式的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 60-67.
[8] 张云运, 刘思辰, 任萍, 牛丽丽. 学生学业和行为特征如何影响教师支持?来自个体和圈子层面的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 318-328.
[9] 张云运, 黄美薇, 任萍, 张瑞平. 朋友的学业成就会影响我的学业成就吗?——成对友谊关系中成就目标取向的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 54-66.
[10] 方建东, 常保瑞. 怀旧与亲社会行为的关系:一个有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 303-311.
[11] 陈秀珠, 李怀玉, 陈俊, 杨静宇, 黄莉君. 初中生心理资本与学业成就的关系:自我控制的中介效应与感恩的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 76-84.
[12] 侯珂, 张云运, 向小平, 任萍. 青少年早期学业成就的同伴团体社会化:感知学校氛围的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(3): 294-303.
[13] 杨莹, 寇彧. 亲社会自主动机对青少年幸福感及亲社会行为的影响:基本心理需要满足的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(2): 163-171.
[14] 任萍, 张云运, 秦幸娜, 郭筱琳, 赵茜. 初中生公正世界信念对其学业成就的影响:感知的教师支持和班级公正的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(2): 191-197.
[15] 李文桃, 刘学兰, 喻承甫, 张彩霞, 叶佩珏. 学校氛围与初中生学业成就:学业情绪的中介和未来取向的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(2): 198-205.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!