心理发展与教育 ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 198-205.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.02.09

• 教与学心理学 • 上一篇    下一篇

学校氛围与初中生学业成就:学业情绪的中介和未来取向的调节作用

李文桃1, 刘学兰1, 喻承甫2, 张彩霞1, 叶佩珏1   

  1. 1. 华南师范大学心理学院/心理应用研究中心, 广州 510631;
    2. 广州大学教育学院, 广州 510006
  • 出版日期:2017-03-15 发布日期:2017-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘学兰,E-mail:liuxuelan@m.scnu.edu.cn E-mail:liuxuelan@m.scnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    广州市人文社科重点研究基地“幸福广州心理服务与辅导基地”资助项目。

School Climate and Academic Achievement among Junior Middle School Students:A Moderated Mediation Model of Academic Emotions and Future Orientation

LI Wentao1, LIU Xuelan1, YU Chengfu2, ZHANG Caixia1, YE Peijue1   

  1. 1. School of Psychology, South China Normal University/Psychology Applied Research Center, Guangzhou 510631;
    2. Faculty of education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006
  • Online:2017-03-15 Published:2017-03-15

摘要: 采用问卷法对1243名初中生进行调查研究,考察了学业情绪在学校氛围与初中生学业成就间的中介效应,以及未来取向对这一中介过程的调节效应。结果发现,(1)在控制了性别、年级、社会经济地位后,学校氛围对学业成就具有正向预测作用;(2)积极低唤醒学业情绪和消极低唤醒学业情绪显著中介学校氛围与学业成就的关系;(3)未来取向显著调节学校氛围对初中生学业成绩的直接路径,以及通过积极低唤醒和消极低唤醒学业情绪影响学业成绩的间接路径;即学校氛围和积极低唤醒学业情绪对学业成绩的影响在低未来取向的青少年群体中更为强烈;而学校氛围对消极低唤醒学业情绪的影响在高未来取向的青少年群体中更为强烈。总之,在学校氛围影响初中生学业成就的过程中,既存在中介效应,又存在调节效应。实际干预时,可以通过改善初中生学业情绪提高初中生的学业成就,未来取向可以进一步调节该过程。

关键词: 初中生, 学校氛围, 学业成就, 学业情绪, 未来取向

Abstract: The present study investigated the relationship between school climate and junior middle school students'academic achievement,and was to explore the mediating effect of academic emotions as well as the moderating effect of future orientation.The school climate questionnaire,academic emotions questionnaire,future orientation scale,and academic achievement questionnaire were administered to 1243 junior middle school students (51% female) from two junior middle schools.Results were as follows:(1) after controlling for gender,grade,and SES,school climate could positively predict junior middle school students'academic achievement.(2) school climate influenced junior middle school students'academic achievement directly and indirectly through the positive low arousal and negative low arousal academic emotions.(3) future orientation moderated the mediation models:school climate-positive low arousal/negative low arousal academic emotions-academic achievement.Moreover,future orientation moderated the relationship between school climate and positive low arousal academic emotions,such that this indirect effect was much stronger for junior middle school students with high future orientation.While future orientation moderated the relationship between negative low arousal academic emotions and academic achievement,such that this indirect effect was much stronger for junior middle school students with low future orientation.

Key words: junior middle school students, school climate, academic achievement, academic emotions, future orientation

中图分类号: 

  • B844

Anderson, C. S. (1982). The search for school climate:a review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 52(3), 368-420.

Bowles. (2008). The relationship of time orientation with perceived academic performance and preparation for assessment in adolescents.Educational Psychology, 28(5), 551-565.

Cohen, J., Mccabe, L., Michelli, N. M., & Pickeral, T. (2009). School climate:research, policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 180-213.

Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education:The self-determination perspective. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346.

Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2011). Schools as developmental contexts during adolescence. Journal of research on adolescence, 21(1), 225-241.

Erceg-Hurn, D. M., & Mirosevich, V. M. (2008). Modern robust statistical methods:an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research. American Psychologist, 63(7), 591-601.

Hartas, D. (2011). Families' social backgrounds matter:socio-economic factors, home learning and young children's language, literacy and social outcomes. British Educational Research Journal, 37(6), 893-914.

Hirschi,T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.

Hoogstra, M. A., & Schanz, H. (2009). Future orientation and planning in forestry:a comparison of forest managers' planning horizons in germany and the netherlands. European Journal of Forest Research, 128(1), 1-11.

Hoyle, R. H. (2012). Handbook of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press:New York.

Jia, Y., Way, N., Ling, G., Yoshikawa, H., Chen, X., Hughes, D. & Lu, Z. (2009). The influence of student perceptions of school climate on socioemotional and academic adjustment:A comparison of Chinese and American adolescents. Child Development, 80(5), 1514-1530.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford press.

Lerner, R. M. (2007). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. Handbook of child psychology.

Melby, J. N., Conger, R. D., Fang, S. A., Wickrama, K. A. S., & Conger, K. J. (2008). Adolescent family experiences and educational attainment during early adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1519-1536.

Nurmi, J. E. (1991). How do adolescents see their future:A review of the development of adolescents' future orientation and planning. Developmental Review, 11, 1-59.

Nuttin, J. (1985). Future time perspective and motivation:theory and research method. Leuven University Press; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement:A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 91-105.

Pekrun, R., Molfenter. S., Titz. W., & Perry, R. P. (2006). Emotion, learning and achievement in university students:longitudinal studies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American. Educational Research Association. New Orleans LA.

Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., & Lee, J. Y. (2003). The mismeasure of man(agement) and its implications for leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 615-656.

Roeser, R. W., Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. C. (1996). Perceptions of the school psychological environment and early adolescents' psychological and behavioral functioning in school:The mediating role of goals and belonging. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 408-422.

Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. J. (2000). School as a context of early adolescents' academic and social-emotional development:A summary of research findings. Elementary School Journal, 100(5), 443-471.

Ryan, M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.

鲍振宙, 张卫, 李董平, 李丹黎, 王艳辉. (2013). 校园氛围与青少年学业成就的关系:一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 29(1), 61-70.

董妍, 俞国良. (2007). 青少年学业情绪问卷的编制及应用. 心理学报, 39(5), 852-860.

董妍, 俞国良. (2010). 青少年学业情绪对学业成就的影响. 心理科学, (4), 934-937.

洪群芳. (2014). 校园氛围, 学业情绪, 成就动机与初中生学业成就的关系研究(博士学位论文). 华中师范大学.

刘霞, 黄希庭, 普彬, 毕翠华. (2010). 未来取向研究概述. 心理科学进展, (3), 385-393.

陆桂芝, 庞丽华. (2008). 初中1~3年级学生的学业情绪与学业成就的相关研究. 教育探索(12), 124-125.

喻承甫, 谢敏, 林枝, 罗丹, 唐翠莲. (2015). 初中生未来取向与学业成绩, 问题行为的关系:学校参与的中介作用. 教育测量与评价:理论版, (1), 35-41.

俞国良, 董妍. (2005). 学业情绪研究及其对学生发展的意义. 教育研究,26(10), 39-43.

翟曼. (2014). 初中生感知的学校气氛与学业情绪的关系(博士学位论文). 天津师范大学.

张光珍, 梁宗保, 邓慧华, 陆祖宏. (2014). 学校氛围与青少年学校适应:一项追踪研究. 教育科学文摘, 33(6), 76-77.

张平平, 李凌艳, 辛涛. (2011). 学校氛围对学生数学成绩影响的跨文化比较:基于多水平分析的结果. 心理发展与教育, 27(6), 625-632.

张文新, 张玲玲, 纪林芹. (2006). 青少年的个人未来发展目标和担忧. 心理科学, 29(2), 274-277.

郑圆皓, 张卫, 李盛兵. (2015). 学校氛围与初中生学校适应:意向性自我调节的中介作用. 教育测量与评价:理论版, (4), 47-52.
[1] 秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响:同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[2] 吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[3] 陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[4] 周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[5] 辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[6] 冯全升, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 张艳红, 连帅磊. 负性生活事件与初中生内化问题:反刍思维的中介作用与同伴依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 419-428.
[7] 李奕萱, 王泽宇, 周铭扬, 杨玉川, 赵敏翔, 董妍. 高中生物理和化学学科中同伴学业支持与学业情绪的关系:学习效能感的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 58-67.
[8] 刘志国, 齐冰, 李亚平, 王润洲, 崔佳, 宋耀武. 成就目标定向在学业自我概念与学业成绩关系中的调节作用:基于内/外参照模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 68-76.
[9] 李明, 尚新华, 方晓义, 姬文广. 从父母教育卷入到学业成就:自主支持与自主学习力的链式中介[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 839-847.
[10] 肖雪, 郭磊, 赵永萍, 陈富国. 累积生态风险与初中生受欺凌的关系模式:心理弹性的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 648-657.
[11] 严益霞, 刘颜蓥, 丁芳. 心理理论与社会互动方式对初中生社会善念发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 485-494.
[12] 郎悦茹, 龚少英, 曹阳, 吴亚男. 网络学习中师生交互与大学生学习投入的关系:自主动机与学业情绪的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 530-537.
[13] 李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[14] 王国霞, 赵扬. 教师自主支持与学生学业成就关系的元分析:心理需要满足、动机及投入的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 380-390.
[15] 陈奕荣, 吴忠良. 特殊教育师范生感知班级氛围对学习投入的影响:专业认同的中介作用与未来取向的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 244-253.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!