心理发展与教育 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 774-783.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.06.03

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

自发性观点采择对宽恕不同程度人际伤害的影响

范若琳1, 汝涛涛2, 郑允佳1, 徐贵平3   

  1. 1. 广东金融学院应用心理学系, 广州 510521;
    2. 华南师范大学国家绿色光电子 国际联合研究中心, 广州 510631;
    3. 暨南大学华文学院, 广州 510610
  • 发布日期:2021-11-16
  • 通讯作者: 徐贵平 E-mail:xuguiping@hwy.jnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    暨南大学华文学院发展基金项目(2019FZJJYB12);广东省教育科学规划课题(2018GXJK123);2018年广东金融学院“创新强校工程”特色创新类项目。

The Impact of Spontaneous Perspective Taking on the Forgiveness to Interpersonal Harm of Varying Severity

FAN Ruolin1, RU Taotao2, ZHENG Yunjia1, XU Guiping3   

  1. 1. Department of Applied Psychology, Guangdong University of Finance, Guangzhou 510521;
    2. National Center for International Research on Green Optoelectronics, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631;
    3. College of Chinese Language and Culture, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510610
  • Published:2021-11-16

摘要: 设计并采用“换位体验”的社会互动范式,结合自陈报告法和情感错误归因程序的内隐态度研究范式,通过2个实验比较了面对不同程度的人际伤害,自发性观点采择和语言劝说这两种不同的人际伤害消解方式分别对外显和内隐宽恕的影响。结果发现:无论面对何种程度的人际伤害,(1)与自发性观点采择相比,语言劝说可以有效的促进外显宽恕;(2)自发性观点采择可以有效减少负面内隐态度,促进内隐宽恕,而语言劝说会提高负面内隐态度,阻碍内隐宽恕。该研究结果说明不同人际伤害消解方式对内隐和外显宽恕的影响是不同的,同时也证明了观点采择可以在人际互动中自发产生,并且会对人际关系产生隐性影响。

关键词: 自发性观点采择, 语言劝说, 人际伤害, 内隐宽恕, 外显宽恕

Abstract: Combined with self-report questionnaire and the AMP implicit attitude test, "experiencing the other side" paradigm is designed and used to explore the impact of spontaneous perspective taking and verbal persuasion on forgiveness to interpersonal harm in different severity, focusing on the role of spontaneous perspective taking in forgiveness via 2 experiments. Results indicate that:regardless of severity of interpersonal harms, (1) compared with spontaneous perspective taking, verbal persuasion can facilitate explicit forgiveness more effectively; (2) spontaneous perspective taking can significantly reduce explicit negative attitude to transgressors, thereby facilitating explicit forgiveness. By contrast, verbal persuasion increases the explicit negative attitude, hindering explicit forgiveness. The outcomes suggest that the way to resolve conflicts has different effects on forgiveness, and noticeably, in a real-time interactive activity, a process of perspective taking can be triggered automatically, which can affect interpersonal activities implicitly.

Key words: spontaneous perspective taking, verbal persuasion, interpersonal harm, implicit forgiveness, explicit forgiveness

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Aron, A., Aron, E. N., Tudor, M., & Nelson, G. (1991). Close Relationships as Including Other in the Self.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 60(2), 241-253.
Batson, C. D., & Moran, T. (1999). Empathy-induced Altruism in a Prisoner's Dilemma.European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(7), 909-924.
Blair, I. (2001). Implicit stereotypes and prejudice. In G. B. Moskowitz (Ed.), Cognitive Social Psychology:The Princeton Symposium on the Legacy and Future of Social Cognition (pp. 359-374). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
Brown, R. P. (2003). Measuring individual differences in the tendency to forgive:Construct validity and links with depression.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(6), 759-771.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C.(1987). Politeness:Some Universals in Language Usage.New York:Cambridge University Press.
Bush, R. A. B. (1996). What do we need a mediator for? Mediation's ‘value-added’ for negotiators.Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 12, 181-201.
Casper, C., Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2011). The activation of specific facets of age stereotypes depends on individuating information.Social Cognition, 29(4), 393-414.
Cornish, M. A., Guyll, M., Wade, N. G., Lannin, D. G., Madon, S., & Chason, K. C. (2018). Does Empathy Promotion Necessarily Lead to Greater Forgiveness? An Experimental Examination.Current Psychology, 39, 1001-1011.
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring Individual Differences in Empathy:Evidence for a Multi-Dimensional Approach.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 44(1), 113-126.
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behaviorand employee voice:Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 869-884.
Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and Prejudice:Their Automatic and Controlled Components.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 56(1), 5-18.
Eaton, J., Struthers, C. W., & Santelli, A. G. (2006). The mediating role of perceptual validation in the repentance-forgiveness process.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(10), 1389-1401.
Elekes, F., Varga, M., & Király, I. (2016). Evidence for spontaneous level-2 perspective taking in adults.Consciousness and Cognition, 41, 93-103.
Exline, J. J., Baumeister, R. F., Zell, A. L., Kraft, A. J., & Witvliet, C. V. (2008). Not so innocent:Does seeing one's own capacity for wrongdoing predict forgiveness? Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 94(3), 495-515.
Farrow, T. F. D., Zheng, Y., Wilkinson, I. D., Spence, S. A., Deakin, J. F. W., Tarrier, N., … Woodruff, P. W. R. (2001). Investigating the functional anatomy of empathy and forgiveness. Neuroreport, 12(11), 2433-2438.
Fatfouta, R., Schroder-Abe, M., & Merkl, A. (2014). Forgiving, fast and slow:Validity of the implicit association test for predicting differential responselatencies in a transgression-recall paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 728.
Fincham, F. D., Hall, J. H., & Beach, S. R. H. (2005). "'Til lack of forgiveness doth us part":Forgiveness and marriage. In E. L. Worthington, Jr. (Ed.),Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 207-225). New York:Brunner-Routledge.
Fincham, F. D., Paleari, F. G., & Regaliab, C. (2010). Forgiveness in marriage:The role of relationship quality, attributions, and empathy.Personal Relationships, 9(1), 27-37.
Flavell, J. H., Everett, B. A., Croft, K., & Flavell, E. R. (1981). Young children's knowledge about visual perception:Further evidence for the Level 1Level 2 distinction.Developmental Psychology, 17(1), 99-103.、
Galinsky, A. D., Maddux, W. W., Gilin, D., & White, J. B. (2008). Why it pays to get inside the head of your opponent:The differential effects of perspective taking and empathy in negotiations.Psychological Science, 19(4), 378-384.
Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking:decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 708-724.
Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(12), 493-501.
Gardner, M. R., Hull, Z., Taylor, D., & Edmonds, C. J. (2017). ‘Spontaneous’ visual perspective-taking mediated by attention orienting that is voluntary and not reflexive.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(4), 1020-1029.
Gilin, D., Maddux, W. W., Carpenter, J., & Galinsky, A. D. (2013). When to use your head and when to use your heart:The differential value of perspective-taking versus empathy in competitive interactions.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(1), 3-16.
Goldring, J., & Strelan, P. (2017). The Forgiveness Implicit Association Test.Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 69-78.
Gopnik, A., & Wellman, H. M. (1994). The theory theory. In L. A. Hirschfeid & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind:Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp.257-293). Cambridge University Press.
Gordon, R. M. (1986). Folk psychology as simulation.Mind & Language, 1(2), 158-171.
Gray, K., Schein, C., & Ward, A. F. (2014). The myth ofharmless wrongs in moral cognition:Automatic dyadiccompletion from sin tosuffering.Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 143(4), 1600-1615.
Harvey, N., & Fischer, I. (1997). Taking advice:Accepting help, improving judgment and sharing responsibility.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(2), 117-133.
Hourigan, K. L. (2018). Forgiving the Unforgivable:An exploration of contradictions between forgivess-related feeling rules and lived and experience of extreme harm. Humanity & Society, 43(2), 016059761880104.http://doi.org/10.1177/016059761880104
Leslie, A. M., Friedman, O., & German, T. P. (2005). Core mechanisms in ‘theory of mind’.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(12), 528-533.
Mccullough, M. E., Bellah, C. G., Kilpatrick, S. D., & Johnson, J. L. (2001). Vengefulness:Relationships with forgiveness, rumination, well-being, and the Big Five.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(5), 601-610.
Mccullough, M. E., Fincham, F. D., & Tsang, J. A. (2003). Forgiveness, forbearance, and time:The temporal unfolding of transgression-related interpersonal motivations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 540-557.
Mccullough, M. E., Rachal, K. C., Sandage, S. J., Worthington, E. L., Brown, S. W., & Hight, T. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships:II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75(6), 1586-1603.
Mccullough, M. E., Worthington, E. L., & Rachal, K. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 73(2), 321-336.
Myers, M. W., Laurent, S. M., & Hodges, S. D. (2014). Perspective taking instructions and self-other overlap:Different motives for helping.Motivation and Emotion, 38(2), 224-234.
Nier, J. A. (2016). How dissociated are implicit and explicit racial attitudes? A bogus pipeline approach.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 8(1), 39-52.
Payne, B. K., Burkley, M. A., & Stokes, M. B. (2008). Why do implicit and explicit attitude tests diverge? The role of structural fit.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 94(1), 16-31.
Schul, Y., Mayo, R., & Burnstein, E. (2004). Encoding under trust and distrust:the spontaneous activation of incongruent cognitions.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5), 668-679.
Sniezek, J. A., & Buckley, T. (1995). Cueing and cognitive conflict in judge-advisor decision making.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 62(2), 159-174.
Sparks, J. R., & Areni, C. S. (2008). Style versus substance:Multiple roles of language power in persuasion.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(1), 37-60.
Stark, J. H., & Frenkel, D. N. (2013). Changing minds:The work of mediators and empirical studies of persuasion. The Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 28(2), 263-352.
Struthers, C. W., Eaton, J., Santelli, A. G., Uchiyama, M., & Shirvani, N. (2008). The effects of attributions of intent and apology on forgiveness:When saying sorry may not help the story. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 983-992.
Surtees, A., Samson, D., & Apperly, I. (2016). Unintentional perspective-taking calculates whether something is seen, but not how it is seen.Cognition, 148, 97-105.
Takaku, S. (2001). The effects of apology and perspective taking on interpersonal forgiveness:A dissonance-attribution model of interpersonal forgiveness.The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(4), 494-508.
Takaku, S., Weiner, B., & Ohbuchi, K. I. (2001). A cross-cultural examination of the effects of apology and perspective taking on forgiveness.Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 20(1-2), 144-166.
Tinti, C., Chiesa, S., Cavaglià, R., Dalmasso, S., Pia, L., & Schmidt, S. (2018). On my right or on your left? Spontaneous spatial perspective taking in blind people.Consciousness & Cognition, 62, 1-8.
Todd, A. R., Bodenhausen, G. V., Richeson, J. A., & Galinsky, A. D. (2011). Perspective taking combats automatic expressions of racial bias.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6), 1027-1042.
Tuller, H. M., Bryan, C. J., Heyman, G. D., & Christenfeld, N. J. S. (2015). Seeing the other side:Perspective taking and the moderation of extremity.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 18-23.
Tynan, R. (2010). The effects of threat sensitivity and face giving on dyadic psychological safety and upward communication1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(2), 223-247.
Wallace, H. M., Exline, J. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2008). Interpersonal consequences of forgiveness:Does forgiveness deter or encourage repeat offenses? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(2), 453-460.
Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes.Psychological Review, 107(1), 101-126.
Zechmeister, J. S., & Catherine, R. (2002). Victim and offender accounts of interpersonal conflict:Autobiographical narratives of forgiveness and unforgiveness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 675-686.
任娜, 佐斌, 侯飞翔, 汪国驹. (2012). 情境效应或自动化加工:大学生对老年人的内隐态度. 心理学报, 44(6), 777-788.
汝涛涛, 王婷婷, 朱莹莹, 钟罗金, 周国富, 莫雷. (2015). 道德推断中的面孔刻板效应:性别的调节作用. 心理学探新, 35(4), 337-343.
闫国利, 张兰兰, 孙莎莎, 白学军. (2013). 汉语"主观词"的表征及其加工. 心理学报, 45(4), 379-390.
钟毅平, 杨子鹿, 范伟. (2015). 自我-他人重叠对助人行为的影响:观点采择的调节作用. 心理学报, 47(8), 1050-1057.
詹泽, 吴宝沛. (2019). 无处不在的伤害:二元论视角下的道德判断. 心理科学进展, 27(01), 132-144.
[1] 关文军, 胡梦娟, 刘晨. 自闭症儿童父母歧视知觉对群际关系的影响:一个有调节的中介作用模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 854-863.
[2] 李维佳, 胡清芬. 空间再定向任务中心理表征的多样性——来自虚拟现实实验的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 385-394.
[3] 向玲, 范淑娴, 陈家利, 王宝玺. 学习困难青少年认知控制特点研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 410-416.
[4] 侯芬, 伍新春, 邹盛奇, 刘畅, 黄彬彬. 父母教养投入对青少年亲社会行为的影响:亲子依恋的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 417-425.
[5] 阚佳琦, 刘斯漫, 时嘉惠, 闫琦, 郭俊斌, 王争艳. 祖辈共同看护背景下母亲和祖辈将心比心、母子依恋与婴幼儿认知的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 395-402.
[6] 田云龙, 喻承甫, 林霜, 叶诗敏, 张晓琳, 刘毅, 路红, 张卫. 父母体罚、学校参与与青少年网络游戏成瘾:亲子关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 461-471.
[7] 李若璇, 朱文龙, 刘红瑞, 姚梅林. 家长教育期望对学业倦怠的影响:家长投入的中介及家庭功能的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 489-496.
[8] 彭源, 朱蕾, 王振宏. 父母情绪表达与青少年问题行为:亲子依恋、孤独感的多重中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 504-512.
[9] 江永强, 邵云天, 蔺秀云, 何先友. 初中生班级团体依恋、自悯与学习倦怠的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 472-480.
[10] 范航, 朱转, 苗灵童, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突对青少年抑郁情绪的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 481-488.
[11] 叶宝娟, 朱黎君, 方小婷, 刘明矾, 王凯凯, 杨强. 压力知觉对大学生抑郁的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 497-503.
[12] 陈庆秋, 徐华, 吴南. 助人情境中幼儿知恩图报意识的发展[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 403-409.
[13] 徐璐璐, 吴佩佩, 贺雯. 贫困大学生元刻板印象威胁对群际关系的影响:群际焦虑的中介和自尊的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 426-433.
[14] 丁子恩, 王笑涵, 刘勤学. 大学生自尊与网络过激行为的关系:社交焦虑和双自我意识的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 171-180.
[15] 刘雪萍, 陈子卓, 黄文, 彭华茂. 成功老化内涵及影响因素分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 249-256.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!