心理发展与教育 ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 312-319.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2019.03.08

• 教与学心理 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同词长中文句子阅读知觉广度的年老化:眼动证据

张骏1, 仝文1, 刘志方2   

  1. 1. 山西师范大学教育科学学院, 临汾 041000;
    2. 杭州师范大学教育学院, 杭州 310000
  • 发布日期:2019-06-19
  • 通讯作者: 仝文,E-mail:twaaa@126.com;刘志方,E-mail:lzhf2008@163.com E-mail:twaaa@126.com;lzhf2008@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金青年项目(17CYY059)。

The Aging of Perceptual Span in Different Word Length Sentences: Evidences from Eye Movement

ZHANG Jun1, TONG Wen1, LIU Zhifang2   

  1. 1. College of Educational Sciences, Shanxi Normal University, Linfen 041000;
    2. College of Education, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 310000
  • Published:2019-06-19

摘要: 采用移动窗口范式分别探测单字词句、双字词句和混合句子阅读知觉广度的年老化模式。单字词句是完全由单字词组成的句子,双字词句是完全由双字词组成的句子,混合句的所有词由1~4个汉字组成,这些词汇的平均词长为1.5个字。结果发现:(1)老年读者在各种词长句子上的阅读知觉广度范围均是从注视字至其右侧2个汉字;(2)青年读者在各种词长句子上的阅读知觉广度为注视点左侧1个汉字到右侧3个汉字空间。由此可见,年老化促使中文读者的阅读知觉广度变小,变得更加不对称;且句子构成词汇的词长并不调节中文阅读知觉广度的年老化。

关键词: 词长, 老年, 青年, 阅读知觉广度, 眼动

Abstract: The moving window paradigm was used to explore the aging patterns of perceptual span of three types of sentences——1-character-word sentence(consisted entirely by single-character word), 2-character-word sentence(consisted entirely by two-character word) and mixed sentences(the average word length was 1.5 characters). The results were as follows:(1) The perceptual span of older adults in Chinese reading was extended from fixated character to two characters to its right on all kinds of sentences; (2) The younger adults' perceptual span was extended from one character to left and three characters to right in all conditions, which was larger than older adults'. This study revealed that aging would result in Chinese readers' perceptual span being smaller and more asymmetric, and the word length of sentence did not modulate the aging pattern of perceptual span in Chinese.

Key words: word length, older adults, younger adults, perceptual span, eye movement

中图分类号: 

  • G442
Bai, X., Yan, G., Zang, C., Liversedge, S. P., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text:Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 34(5), 1277-1287.
Bates, D., Mäechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Statistics & Computing, arxiv:1406(1), 133-199.
Choi, W., Lowder, M. W., Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (2015). Individual differences in the perceptual span during reading:Evidence from the moving window technique. Attention Perception & Psychophyics, 77(7), 2463-2475.
Hoosain, R. (1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity:A case study of Chinese. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 8(2), 157-161.
Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading:Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 16(3), 417-429.
Inhoff, A. W., & Liu. W. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 24(1), 20-34.
Inhoff, A. W., & Wu, C. (2005). Eye movements and the identification of spatially ambiguous words during Chinese sentence reading. Memory & Cognition, 33(8), 1345-1356.
Kliegl, R., Grabner, E., Rolfs, M., & Engbert, R. (2004). Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movement in reading. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 16(1-2), 262-284.
Kliegl, R., Richter, E. M. (2010). A linear mixed model analysis of masked repetition priming. Visual Cognition, 18(5), 655-681.
Kemper, S., Crow, A., & Kemtes, K. (2004). Eye fixation patterns of high and low span young and older adults:Down the garden path and back again. Psychology and Aging, 19(1), 157-170.
Kemper, S., & McDowd, J. (2006). Eye movements of young and older adults while reading with distraction. Psychology and Aging, 21(1), 32-39.
Kemper, S., & Liu, C. J. (2007). Eye movements of young and older adults during reading. Psychology and Aging, 22(1), 84-94.
Laubrock, J., Kliegl, R., & Engbert, R. (2006). SWIFT exlorations of age differences in eye movements during reading. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(6), 872-884.
Li, X., & Logan. G. D. (2008). Object-based attention in Chinese readers of Chinese words beyound gestalt principles. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 945-949.
Li, X., Rayner. K., & Cave. K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58(4), 525-552.
McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17(6), 578-586.
Pan, J., Yan, M., & Laubrock, J. (2017). Perceptual span in oral reading:The case of Chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(21), 1-10.
Rayner, K., & Bertera, J. H. (1979). Reading without a fovea. Science, 206(4417), 468-469.
Rayner, K., Reichle, E. D., Stroud, M. J., Williams, C. C., & Pollatsek, A. (2006). The effect of word frequency, word predictability, and font difficulty on eye movements of young and older readers. Psychology and Aging, 21(3), 448-465.
Rayner, K., Castelhano, M. S., & Yang, J. M. (2009). Movements and the perceptual span in older and younger readers. Psychology and Aging, 24(3), 755-760.
Rayner, K., Castelhano, M.S., & Yang, J.M.(2010). Preview benefit during eye fixations in reading for older and yonnger readers. Psychology and Agihy,25(3),714-718.
Risse, S., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Adult age differences in the perceptual span during reading. Psychology and Aging, 26(2), 451-460.
Shu, H., Zhou, W., Yan, M., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Font size modulates saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(2), 482-490.
Whitford, V., & Titone. D. (2016). Eye movements and the perceptual span during first-and second-language sentence reading in bilingual older adults. Psychology and Aging, 31(1), 58-70.
Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Richter, E. M., Nuthmann, A., & Shu, H. (2010). Flexible saccade-target selection in chinese reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(4), 705-725.
Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2015). Perceptual span depends on font size during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 41(1), 209-219.
Zang, C., Meng, H., Liang, F., Bai, X., & Yan, G. (2013). Is there a vertical component to saccade targeting in Chinese reading? Journal of Research in Reading, 36(Supplement S1), S78-S93.
伏干, 闫国利. (2008). 高中二年级学生双字词阅读知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理与行为研究, 6(4), 285-290.
郭惠兰,宋子明,张煜婧,闫国利. (2017). 新闻广播背景音对大学生阅读效率影响的眼动研究. 心理研究, 10(4), 15-21.
刘志方, 闫国利, 张智君, 潘运, 杨桂芳. (2013). 中文阅读中的预视效应与词切分. 心理学报, 45(6), 614-625.
仝文, 刘妮娜, 伏干, 闫国利. (2014). 中文单字词句的阅读知觉广度. 心理与行为研究, 12(3), 298-303.
王丽红, 白学军, 闫国利. (2014). 汉语阅读知觉广度的老化:一项眼动研究. 心理与行为研究, 12(6), 763-768.
闫国利, 白学军. (2007). 汉语阅读的眼动研究. 心理与行为研究, 5(3), 229-234.
闫国利, 巫金根, 臧传丽, 白学军. (2010). 阅读知觉广度眼动研究述评.心理学探新, 30(2), 23-28.
张兰兰, 闫国利, 王丽红.(2011). 老年人汉语阅读中预视效益的眼动研究.应用心理学, 17(4), 318-324.
张智君, 刘志方, 赵亚军, 季靖. (2012). 汉语阅读过程中词切分的位置:一项基于眼动随动显示技术的研究. 心理学报, 44(1), 51-62.
[1] 李金凤, 詹洁辰, 王大华. 情绪唤醒度对老年人健康谣言转发意愿的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 202-211.
[2] 金梦菡, 徐慧, 龚先旻, 彭华茂. 主播情绪唤醒度对中老年人直播购物的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 50-59.
[3] 曹贤才, 张浩, 周博霖, 陈宪涛, 崔晨虹, 吴捷. 影响老年人技术接受的因素——基于技术接受模型的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 799-816.
[4] 赵沐恩, 韩布新, 王大华. 老年人身体健康与依恋长期性变化的联系:六年的追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 663-674.
[5] 牛更枫, 金斯妤, 史晓涵, 杨文城, 周宗奎. 跨越年龄数字鸿沟:老年人互联网使用行为及其促进和阻碍因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 740-749.
[6] 王薇, 程奕芸, 吴洋, 薛立成, 李永鑫, 赵静. 5~7岁孤独症谱系障碍儿童情绪主题绘本阅读的注意偏向[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 163-172.
[7] 周海淳, 陈英和, 戚玥, 陈悦, 杜星雨, 于玲珺, 于晓. 注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的类比能力缺陷: 执行功能还是类比策略?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 1-11.
[8] 艾美杉, 刘玺, 王大华. 失独父母的社区支持现状及其与心理健康的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 720-728.
[9] 刘啸莳, 曹中平, 俞俊杰, 莫碧波, 吴芸. 受教育水平能促进农村中老年人的身体健康吗?——安全感和年龄的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 729-736.
[10] 余林伟, 李爽, 刘燊, 潘文沛, 徐强, 张林. 老年人模糊表情识别的积极效应及其机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 196-206.
[11] 王敬欣, 赵赛男, 徐倩倩. 字间空格与词频对青年人和老年人阅读的影响:眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 781-787.
[12] 高子惠, 焦雨, 王曦, 刘肖岑. 电子绘本文字的动静态呈现方式对幼儿阅读体验和学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 817-824.
[13] 张弘弛, 毛伟宾, 崔慧园, 安姝, 李庆元. 价值对老年人项目记忆和联结记忆的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 625-634.
[14] 林瑶, 张宝山, 徐冉, 张何雅婷. 老年人睡眠质量与家人沟通质量的关系及其影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 200-209.
[15] 刘钰, 苏彦捷, 曹春梅, 丁宇, 樊煜. 社区老年人执行功能和加工速度与运动能力的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 769-777.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!