流动儿童的亲子依恋与其城市适应的关系:心理韧性的中介作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.03.04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究旨在探讨流动儿童的亲子依恋与城市适应的关系，并探讨心理韧性在其中是否起到了中介作用。采用城市适应问卷、亲子依恋问卷、心理韧性量表，对北京市3所小学三到六年级的665名流动儿童进行了调查。经分析发现：（1）女生、低年级、父母教育水平高、公立学校、未转学的流动儿童能更好地城市适应；（2）亲子依恋、城市适应和心理韧性各维度两两相关；（3）亲子依恋中的自我模型和父母模型对城市适应均有直接预测效应。亲子依恋中的自我模型通过心理韧性进而间接影响城市适应；亲子依恋中的父母模型通过心理韧性进而间接影响城市适应；亲子依恋中的自我模型和父母模型可以共同通过心理韧性进而间接影响城市适应；心理韧性在其中均起到显著的部分中介作用。总的来说，亲子依恋可以直接影响城市适应，也可以通过心理韧性的中介作用间接影响城市适应。

关键词: 流动儿童, 亲子依恋, 城市适应, 心理韧性

Abstract: The purpose of current study was to investigate the relationship among parent-child attachment, resilience and urban adaptation of migrant children. Totally, 665 migrant children in grades 3~6 in Beijing participated the study and completed the questionnaires containing scales of parent-child attachment, resilience and urban adaptation of migrant children. Data analysis revealed that:(1) Migrant children who were female, unchanging school, studying in public primary school, parents with higher education scored significantly higher urban adaptation than who were male, changing school few times, studying in private school and lower parents education. (2) Migrant children's parent-child attachment was positively associated with their urban adaptation, also self-model and parent model of migrant children's parent-child attachment. (3) Self-model and parent model of migrant children's parent-child attachment has positively predicted resilience of migrant children, also total migrant children's parent-child attachment. Resilience mediated the relationship between self-model of migrant children's parent-child attachment and urban adaptation. Resilience mediated the relationship between parent model of migrant children's parent-child attachment and urban adaptation. Resilience mediated the relationship between self-model and parent model of migrant children's parent-child attachment and urban adaptation. Self-model and parent model of migrant children's parent-child attachment and resilience could prevent migrant children developing into poor urban adaptation.

Key words: migrant children, parent-child attachment, urban adaptation, resilience

王中会, 蔺秀云. 流动儿童的亲子依恋与其城市适应的关系:心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(3): 284-293.

WANG Zhonghui, LIN Xiuyun. The Relationship between Parent-child Attachment and Urban Adaptation among Migrant Children: The Mediating Role of Resilience[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(3): 284-293.

参考文献

Anthony, E. J. (1987a). Risk, vulnerability, and resilience:An overview. In Anthony, E. J. & Cohler, B. J. (Eds.), The invulnerable child (pp. 3-48). New York:The Guilford Press.

Anthony, E. J. (1987b). Children at high risk for psychosis growing up successfully. In Anthony, E. J. & Cohler, B. J. (Eds.), The invulnerable child (pp. 147-184). New York:The Guilford Press.

Aulakh, P. S., & Gencturk, E. F. (2000). International principal-agent relationships:Control, governance and performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(6), 521-538.

Blair, C. (2001). The early identification of risk for grade retention among African American children at risk for school difficulty. Applied Developmental Science, (5), 37-50.

Bonanno, G. A., Westphal, M., & Mancini, A. D. (2011). Academic resilience in mathematics among poor and minority students. The Elementary School Journal, 104(3), 177-195.

Bub, J. B. (2007). Behavior problems trajectories and first-grade cognitive ability and achievement skills:A latent growth curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 31(2), 175-185.

Fuller, T. L., & Fincham, F. D. (1995). Attachment style in married couples:Relation to current marital functioning, stability over time, and method of assessment. Personal Relationships, (2), 17-34.

Howard, S., Dryden, J., & Johnson, B. (1999). Childhood resilience:Review and critique of literature. Oxford Review of Education, 25(3), 307-323.

Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Hazan, C. (1994). Attachment styles and close relationships:A four-year prospective study. Personal Relationships, (1), 123-142.

Luthar, S. S. (2006). Resilience in Development:A synthesis of research across five decades//Incicchetti D. Cohen D (JEds). Developmental psychopathology:Risk disorder and adaptation (pp. 740-795). New York:Wiley.

Masten, A. S., Monn, A., R., & Supkoff, L. M. (2011). Resilience in children and adolescents. In S. M. Southwick, Litz, B. T., Charney, D. & Friedman, M. J. (Eds.), Resilience and mental health:Challenges across the lifespan (pp. 103-120). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Nicole, L., & Anne, T. (2011). The association between paternal sensitivity and infant-father attachment security:a meta-analysis of three decades of research. Journal of family psychology, 25(6), 986-992.

Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior research methods, 40(3), 897-891.

Rutter, M. (2000). Resiliene Reconsidered:Concoptual con-sideration,empiricl findings,and policy implications.In:Shonroff, J. P., Meisels, S. J. (Eds.). Handbook of Early Childhood Intervention (pp. 651-682), Cambridge University Press.

Ungar, M. (2001). The social construction of resilience among problem youth in out-of-home placement:A study of health-enhancing deviance. Child & Youth Care Forum, 30(3), 137-154.

Verschueren, k., & Marcoen, A. (1990). Representation of self and socio emotional competence in kindergartners:differential and combined effects of attachment to mother and to father. Child Development, 70, 183-201.

Werner, E. E. (2005). What can we learn about resilience from large-scale longitudinal studies? In Goldstein, S. & Brooks, R. B. (Eds.), Handbook of Resilience in Children (pp. 91-105). New York:Academic/Plenum Publishers.

Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. S. (2001). Journeys from childhood to midlife:Risk, resilience, and recovery. Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.

Wright, M. O., & Masten, A. S. (2005). Resilience processes in development:Fostering positive adaptation in the context of adversity. In Goldstein, S. & Brooks, R. B. (Eds.), Handbook of resilience in children (pp. 17-37). New York:Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

陈新,刘杨.(2010). 我国流动儿童城市适应研究述评.社会心理科学, 25, 62-67.

段成荣, 梁宏. (2004). 我国流动儿童状况.人口研究, (1), 53-59.

国家统计局.(2012).第六次全国人口普查主要数据公报(第一号).中华人民共和国国家统计局, 4-28.

郭良春,姚远,杨变云.(2005). 公立学校流动儿童少年城市适应性研究——北京市JF中学的个案调查.中国青年研究,(9), 28-30.

韩嘉玲.(2001).北京市流动儿童义务教育状况调查报告.青年研究, (9),10-18.

韩秋念, 廖全明. (2015). 流动儿童心理韧性及其心理社会影响因素研究. 成都师范学院学报, 31(12), 73-76.

胡月琴,甘怡群.(2008). 青少年心理韧性量表的编制和效度验证. 心理学报, 40(08), 902-912.

琚晓燕. (2005). 青少年依恋的测量及其与自尊、社会适应性关系研究(硕士学位论文), 浙江师范大学,金华.

李淑梅.(2009).大学生成人依恋与人际问题的关系研究(硕士学位论文),复旦大学,上海。

刘维涛.(2013). 流动儿童难融城市, 留守儿童渴望团聚. 人民日报, 5月11日.

刘霞,申继亮.(2010). 流动儿童的歧视知觉及与自尊的关系.心理科学, 33(3), 695-697.

刘杨,方晓义,蔡蓉,吴杨,张耀方.(2008). 流动儿童城市适应状况及过程——一项质性研究的结果.北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),(3),9-20.

毛向军, 王中会. (2013). 流动儿童亲子依恋及对其心理韧性的影响.中国特殊教育, 153(3), 50-53.

尚秀华,崔爽.(2013). 论亲子依恋与大学生学校适应的关系.辽宁行政学院学报, 15(2), 126-128.

唐玲.(2009). 青少年依恋量表的编制及留守初中生依恋发展特点研究(硕士学位论文),西南大学,重庆.

陶丽娜.(2011). 高中生依恋与心理弹性的关系研究(硕士学位论文),陕西师范大学,西安.

王慧娟.(2012). 城市流动儿童的社会融合.重庆理工大学学报(社会科学版), 26(6), 61-67.

王琳娜.(2011). 冲突与融合:文化冲突背景下的农民工子女心理问题探析.淮海工学院学报(社会科学版), 9(5), 127-129.

王孟成.(2014). 潜变量建模与 Mplus 应用.重庆:重庆大学出版社.

王天琪.(2013). 从需要理论解析流动儿童的城市适应问题(硕士学位论文),首都经济贸易大学,北京.

王玉花.(2010). 早期亲子依恋对儿童心理弹性发展的影响.教育学刊, 10(2), 23-26.

王中会.(2015). 流动儿童的社会认同与融合:现状、成因及干预策略. 北京:中国社会科学出版社.

王中会.(2016). 流动儿童亲子依恋对城市适应影响的内在机制:社会认同的中介作用.中国特殊教育, 188(2), 56-61.

王中会, 蔺秀云. (2012). 流动儿童心理韧性及对城市适应的影响. 中国特殊教育, (12), 12-18.

王中会,蔺秀云,方晓义.(2010). 公办学校和打工子弟学校中流动儿童城市适应过程对比研究.中国特殊教育, (12), 21-26.

吴丹丹.(2015). 流动青少年家庭环境、亲子依恋与学习适应的关系研究(硕士学位论文),华中师范大学,武汉.

吴新慧.(2004). 关注流动人口子女的社会融入状况——"社会排斥"的视角. 社会, (9), 10-12.

许庆豫,柴江.(2014). 流动儿童社会适应能力研究. 教育评论. (5), 39-41.

赵永婧,范红霞,刘丽.(2014). 亲子依恋与初中留守儿童心理韧性的关系.中国特殊教育, (7),59-64.

相关文章 15

[1]	邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[2]	唐莹莹, 蔺秀云, 殷锦绣, 何婷, 周少嘉, 曹志涛. 亲子依恋和祖孙依恋的一致与不一致和儿童主观幸福感的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 859-868.
[3]	楚啸原, 楚子强, 王琦, 吉舒天, 雷雳. 农村初中学生亲子依恋回避与智能手机依赖:社交焦虑的中介作用和家庭经济困难的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 192-199.
[4]	陈传锋, 葛国宏, 卢丹凤, 岳慧兰. 祖辈协同教养与幼儿错误信念理解能力的关系:亲子依恋与祖辈同住的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 21-30.
[5]	刘晓洁, 李燕. 母亲感知的共同教养对幼儿行为问题的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 626-634.
[6]	张春阳, 徐慰. 儿童期创伤与有留守经历大学生负性情绪：心理韧性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 584-591.
[7]	王颖, 朱海东, 张馨艺, 肖沿. 学龄前留守儿童亲子依恋对执行功能的影响:祖孙依恋的调节作用和中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 195-206.
[8]	赵凤青, 程贝贝, 李奕萱, 刘志斌, 刘兵, 张宝山. 核心家庭父亲协同教养对青少年抑郁的影响:父子依恋和母子依恋的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 109-117.
[9]	袁柯曼, 李白璐, 梁丽婵, 边玉芳. 累积情境风险与流动儿童主观幸福感的关系:个体保护因子的补偿效应和保护效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 546-557.
[10]	潘彦谷, 张大均, 李知洋. 亲子和同伴依恋对初中生心理素质发展的影响:个人中心分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 558-567.
[11]	韩黎, 袁纪玮, 龙艳. 苔花盛开如牡丹？农村留守儿童负性生活事件与心理健康的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 266-274.
[12]	王艳红, 叶丽媛, 李府桂, 周明洁. D型人格对大学新生心理健康的影响:基于三个时间点调查数据的有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 120-127.
[13]	王江洋, 李昂扬, 聂家昕. 依恋与孤儿初中生心理健康的关系:自我污名和心理韧性的并行中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 228-239.
[14]	马茜芝, 张志杰. 高中生亲子依恋与生命意义感的关系:同伴依恋和时间洞察力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 168-174.
[15]	高雯, 王玉红, 方臻, 刘明艳. 亲子三角关系和心理韧性在父母冲突与青少年问题行为之间的作用:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(6): 729-739.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed