5～9岁儿童在不同复杂性任务上类比推理的发展特点

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用经典的A:B:C:D范式,设计两类难度不同的图片任务,依据关系-表征复杂性模型从等级复杂性和水平复杂性角度分析任务难度.在此基础上,选取5～9岁115名儿童探讨两类任务上类比推理的特点和发展趋势.表明:(1)儿童类比推理呈现多样化特点,主要有:充分意义上掌握了类比推理、部分完成了类比推理、位置关系类比推理、不能类比推理和不确定情况类比推理,其中部分完成了类比推理是复杂任务上所特有的.(2)简单、复杂两类任务上,随着年龄增长,5-9岁儿童充分意义上掌握类比推理的人次比例不断上升,不能类比推理的人次比例不断下降.此外,复杂任务上,随年龄增长,部分完成类比任务的人次比例降低.结果表明,在简单任务上,前运算阶段儿童已具备了类比推理能力;但在复杂任务上,儿童到了具体运算阶段才具备类比推理能力.

关键词: 类比推理, 发展特点, 任务复杂性, 关系-表征复杂性模型

Abstract: According to the Relational-Representational Complexity Model,this present study depicted the complexity of analogical tasking from the aspects of hierarchical complexity and horizontal complexity.Based on this model,the developmental trends and characteristics of analogical problem-solving in tasks on varied complexity were investigated with classical A:B:C:D paradigm.A sample of 115 children aged 5 to 9 participated the study,and their performances on analogical tasks with varied complexity were explored.Results indicated that:(1) the children's analogical reasoning showed diversified characteristics.There were mainly five kinds of patterns,including mastering analogical reasoning adequately,completing analogical reasoning from partial relation or location,unable to finish analogical reasoning and uncertain about the analogical reasoning.Thereinto,analogical reasoning from partial relation was peculiar to complex tasks.(2) In both the simple and complex tasks,with age increased,the proportion of children who had mastered the analogical reasoning increased gradually,while the proportion of those who were unable to complete analogical reasoning declined from age 5 to 9.Moreover,the proportion of children who completed analogical reasoning from partial relation declined in complex tasks.In conclusion,when performed simple tasks,the children within preoperational stage showed analogical reasoning ability.However,in complex tasks,only those who had developed into concrete operational stage demonstrated such ability.

Key words: analogical reasoning, developmental characteristics, relational complexity, relational-representational complexity model

中图分类号:

B844.1

张莉, 辛自强, 古丽扎伯克力. 5～9岁儿童在不同复杂性任务上类比推理的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(6): 584-591.

ZHANG Li, XIN Zi-qiang, Gulizha, Bokeli. The Developmental Characteristics of Analogical Reasoning on Tasks with Different Complexity in 5～9 Years Old Children[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2010, 26(6): 584-591.

参考文献

[1] Chen,Z.(1996).Children's analogical problem solving:The effects of superficial,structural,and procedural similarity.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,62(3),410-431.
[2] Diamond,A.,& Taylor,C.(1996).Development of an aspect of executive control:Development of the abilities to remember what is said and to "do as I say,not as I do".Development psychobiology,29(4),315-334.
[3] Gentner,D.(1988).Metaphor as structure mapping:The relational shift.Child Development,59(1),47-59.
[4] Goswami,U.(1991).Analogical reasoning:What developments? A review of research and theory.Child Development,62(1),1-22.
[5] Goswami,U.,Leevers,H.,Pressley,S.,& Wheelwright,S.(1998).Causal reasoning about pairs of relations and analogical reasoning in young children.British Journal of Developmental Psychology,16,553-569.
[6] Halford,G.S.,Wilson,W.H.,& Phillips,S.(1998).Processing capacity defined by relational complexity:Implications for comparaTive,developmental,and cognitive psychology.Behavioral and Brain Sciences,21(6),803-831.
[7] Halford,G.S.,Andrews,G.,Dalton,C.,Boag,C.,& Zielinski,T.(2002).Young children's performance on the balance scale:The influence of relational complexity.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,81(4),383-416.
[8] Pascual-Leone,J.(1998).To appraise developmental difficulty or mental demand,relational complexity is not enough.Behavioral and Brain Sciences.21,843-844.
[9] Richland,L.E.,Morrison,R.G.,& Holyoak,K.J.(2006).Children's development of analogical reasoning:Insights from scene analogy problems.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,94(3),249-273.
[10] Xin,Z.Q.(2008).Fourth through sixth graders' representations of area-of-rectangle problems:Influences of relational complexity and cognitive holding power.The Journal of Psychology:Interdisciplinary and
[11] Applied,142(4),581-600.
[12] 窦东徽,金萍,蔡亮.(2007).基于线索的顿悟问题解决:图式和表征操作的影响.心理发展与教育,23(4),9-14.
[13] 冯廷勇,李红.(2002).类比推理发展理论述评.西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),28(4),44-47.
[14] 李红,冯廷勇.(2002).4～5岁儿童单双维类比推理能力的发展水平和特点.心理学报,34,395-399.
[15] 马晓清,冯廷勇,李宇,李红.(2008).从知觉分心任务看儿童类比推理能力的发展.心理学报,40,987-993.
[16] 唐慧琳,刘昌.(2006).工作记忆对类比推理的影响.心理学探新,26(4),26-31.
[17] 王泉泉,胡清芬.(2009).旋转任务中3～5岁儿童空间物体位置编码的研究.心理发展与教育,25(1),1-6.
[18] 王亚同.(1999).类比推理.保定:河北大学出版社.
[19] 辛自强.(2003).关系-表征复杂性模型的检验.心理学报,35,504-513.
[20] 辛自强.(2005).问题解决与知识建构.北京:教育科学出版社.
[21] 辛自强.(2007).关系-表征复杂性模型.心理发展与教育,23(3),134-141.
[22] 辛自强,张莉.(2009).基于关系-表征复杂性模型的数学应用题表征能力测验.心理发展与教育,25(1),34-41.
[23] 张丽,辛自强.(2008).平衡秤任务复杂性的事前与事后分析.心理发展与教育,24(2),46-53.
[24] 张夏雨,喻平(2009).基于关系-表征复杂性模型的问题图式等级性研究.数学教育学报,18(4),46-49.
[25] 张向葵,王金凤(1999).西方儿童类比推理研究的回眸与展望.教育实践与研究,5,14-15.

相关文章 15

[1]	彭越, 张和颐, 陈英和, 雷秀雅, 戚玥, 于晓, 乔学文, 刘沫漩, 颜露懿. 类比推理策略与工作记忆、抑制控制关系的年龄差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 761-771.
[2]	于晓, 张涵, 陈英和, 戚玥, 刘爱芳, 刘丽丽. 类比推理的眼动研究:揭示个体类比推理策略发展的有效手段[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 897-903.
[3]	于晓, 王红梅, 陈英和, 刘瑞曙, 韩瑽瑽, 韩敏, 张涵, 刘静. 分心抑制和关系整合对学前儿童类比推理的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 385-393.
[4]	费广洪, 王淑娟, 秦梅梅. 提示对3~11岁儿童解决类比推理问题的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(5): 578-585.
[5]	陈英和. 儿童数量表征与数概念的发展特点及机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(1): 21-28.
[6]	顾本柏, 冯廷勇, 袁文萍, 马晓清. 3～5岁幼儿在主题-规则冲突条件下的类比推理[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(2): 126-132.
[7]	王树芳, 莫雷, 金花. 任务难度和反馈学习对儿童类比推理能力的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(1): 24-30.
[8]	辛自强, 张莉. 基于关系-表征复杂性模型的数学应用题表征能力测验[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(1): 34-40,53.
[9]	张丽, 辛自强. 平衡秤任务复杂性的事前与事后分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(2): 46-53.
[10]	杨阿丽, 方晓义, 李辉, 蔺秀云, 刘倩倩. 云南省中小学生师生关系发展特点及对学校适应的预测[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(2): 49-56.
[11]	陈尚宝, 沃建中, 罗良. 8～11岁儿童解决加法等值问题的策略发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2005, 21(2): 17-23.
[12]	陈英和, 耿柳娜. 小学一～三年级儿童加减法策略选择的发展特点研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2005, 21(2): 11-16.
[13]	沃建中, 李峰, 陈尚宝. 5—7岁儿童加法策略的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2002, 18(4): 26-30.
[14]	沃建中, 林崇德, 马红中, 李峰. 中学生人际关系发展特点的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2001, 17(3): 9-15.
[15]	曾琦. 小学生课堂参与的类型研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2001, 17(2): 41-44,49.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed